SHI Chuan,LIANG Shen,LIU Yabin,et al.Research on Tensile Resistance Characteristics of Single Root of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in Loess Region of Northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):184-192.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.042.]
青藏高原东北部黄土区灌木柠条锦鸡儿单根抗拉力学特性研究
- Title:
- Research on Tensile Resistance Characteristics of Single Root of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in Loess Region of Northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)05-0184-09
- Keywords:
- northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; Caragana korshinkii Kom.; tensile test of single root; mechanical properties; failure mode; stress-strain characteristics
- 分类号:
- S157.9
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]柠条锦鸡儿(Caragana korshinskii Kom.)是青藏高原东北部和黄土高原地区最为广泛的护坡和水土保持灌木之一,开展该种植物单根抗拉力学特性试验研究,为定量评价该种植物固土护坡效果提供理论依据。[方法]以根径为2.33～9.16 mm的中龄期柠条锦鸡儿根系为研究对象,通过单根拉伸试验对比分析了不同断裂模式和不同根径级别条件下,柠条锦鸡儿单根抗拉力学特性的差异性及其与根径之间的关系,并进一步探讨了单根断裂破坏模式及其应力—应变特征。[结果]柠条锦鸡儿单根存在周皮断裂和整体断裂2种断裂模式,2种断裂模式单根抗拉力和单根抗拉强度分别在(2,4],(4,6]和(6,8] mm以及(6,8] mm根径级别条件下存在显著性差异; 相同断裂模式不同根径级别之间,4个单根抗拉力学特性指标差异程度各不相同。周皮断裂和整体断裂模式条件下,单根抗拉力随着根径的增大分别呈指数函数和幂函数增长趋势; 单根抗拉强度、弹性模量和极限延伸率随着根径增大而降低。2种断裂模式的产生取决于单根受拉伸作用时,周皮、中柱鞘薄壁组织和次生维管组织的应力状态; 对应的单根应力—应变曲线表现为弹性变形、弹塑性变形、应变硬化及周皮(断裂)破坏4个阶段。[结论]在采用单根拉伸试验来获取木本植物根系单根抗拉力学特性指标时,有必要考虑根径和断裂模式对单根抗拉力学特性的影响。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]Caragana korshinskii Kom. is one of the most widely used shrubs for slope protection and soil and water conservation in the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Loess Plateau. The experimental study on the tensile mechanical properties of a single root of C. korshinskii was carried out to provide a theoretical basis for quantitative evaluation of soil fixation and slope protection of this plant. [Methods] Single root of C. korshinskii with root diameters of 2.33～9.16 mm at middle age was taken as the research object. The differences of tensile resistance characteristics of single root of C. korshinskii under different failure modes and different root diameter grades and their relationship with root diameter were compared and analyzed via single root tensile test, and the failure mode of single root and its stress-strain characteristics were further discussed. [Results] Two modes of failure of a single root, the periderm preferential breakage mode and the synchronous breakage mode, occurred when the roots were subjected to single root tensile test. The single root tensile force and single root tensile strength of the two failure modes were significantly different under the conditions of(2,4],(4,6],(6,8] mm and(6,8] mm root diameter grades, respectively(p<0.05). The difference degree of four single root tensile resistance characteristics indexes was different between different root diameter grades with the same failure mode. Under the periderm preferential breakage mode and the synchronous breakage mode, the single root tensile force of C. korshinskii increased with the increase of root diameter, there existed exponential and power relationship between single root tensile force and root diameter, respectively. In addition, the single root tensile strength, single root elastic modulus and single root limit extensile rate of C. korshinskii decreased with the increase of root diameter. The occurrence of these two failure modes of roots depends on the stress state of the periderm, thin wall tissue of middle column sheath, and the secondary vascular tissue when a single root is under tension. The stress-strain curves for the two failure modes can be divided into four stages: elastic deformation, elastic-plastic deformation, strain hardening and fracture failure. [Conclusion] It is necessary to consider the influence of root diameter and failure mode on single root tensile properties when single root tensile test is used to obtain single root tensile properties indexes of woody plant species.
参考文献/References:
[1] 魏刚,殷志强,史立群,等.西宁市北山地区林家崖滑坡发育特征及稳定性分析[J].地质与资源,2015,24(2):146-151.
[2] 秦大河.中国西部环境演变评估综合报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:4-6.
[3] 周云艳,陈建平,王晓梅.植物根系固土护坡机理的研究进展及展望[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(6):1171-1177.
[4] Roering J J, Schmidk K M, Stock J D, et al. Shallow landsliding, root reinforcement, and the spatial distribution of trees in the Oregon Coast Range[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003,40:237-253.
[5] Wang X, Hong M M, Huang Z, et al. Biomechanical properties of plant root systems and their ability to stabilize slopes in geohazard-prone regions[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2019,189:148-157.
[6] 杨路,杜峰,秦晶晶,等.黄土区3种优势灌木根土复合体的抗剪强度研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(1):295-300,310.
[7] Bordoloi S, Ng C W W. The effects of vegetation traits and their stability functions in bio-engineered slopes:A perspective review[J]. Engineering Geology, 2020,275(10):105742.
[8] Stokes A, Atger C, Bengough A G, et al. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides[J]. Plant and Soil, 2009,324(1/2):1-30.
[9] 刘亚斌,余冬梅,祁兆鑫,等.寒旱环境黄土区灌木植物根系拉拔试验及其根系表面微观结构特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(S1):3701-3713.
[10] Baets S D, Poesen J, Reubens B, et al. Root tensile strength and root distribution of typical Mediterranean plant species and their contribution to soil shear strength[J]. Plant and Soil, 2008,305(1/2):207-226.
[11] 朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.青藏高原黄土区护坡灌木植物根系力学特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(S2):3445-3452.
[12] 王萍花,陈丽华,冀晓东,等.4种常见乔木单根拉伸的应力应变曲线分析[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):17-22.
[13] 刘亚斌,李淑霞,余冬梅,等.西宁盆地黄土区典型草本植物单根抗拉力学特性试验[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):157-166.
[14] 赵丽兵,张宝贵.紫花苜蓿和马唐根的生物力学性能及相关因素的试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(9):7-12.
[15] 叶超,郭忠录,蔡崇法,等.5种草本植物根系理化特性及其相关性[J].草业科学,2017,34(3):598-606.
[16] Genet M, Stokes A, Salin F, et al. The influence of cellulose content on tensile strength in tree roots[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005,278:1-9.
[17] Ekeoma E C, Boldrin D, Loades K W, et al. Drying of fibrous roots strengthens the negative power relation between biomechanical properties and diameter[J]. Plant and Soil, 2021,469(1):321-334.
[18] Zhang C B, Xia Z, Jing J, et al. Root moisture content influence on root tensile tests of herbaceous plants[J]. Catena, 2019,172:140-147.
[19] 刘秀萍,陈丽华,宋维峰,等.油松根系抗拉应力与应变全曲线试验研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(2):66-70.
[20] Liu Y B, Shi C, Yu D M, et al. Characteristics of root pullout resistance of Caragana korshinskii Kom. in the loess area of northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2022,14(7):811-823.
[21] 邱权,李吉跃,王军辉,等.西宁南山4种灌木根际和非根际土壤微生物、酶活性和养分特征[J].生态学报,2014,34(24):7411-7420.
[22] 牛西午,丁玉川,张强,等.柠条根系发育特征及有关生理特性研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(5):860-865.
[23] 刘昌义,胡夏嵩,赵玉娇,等.寒旱环境草本与灌木植物单根拉伸试验强度特征研究[J].工程地质学报,2017,25(1):1-10.
[24] 乔娜,余芹芹,卢海静,等.寒旱环境植物护坡力学效应与根系化学成分响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(3):108-113.
[25] 杨东,王慧,程军奇,等.近50年青海省气候变化特征及其与ENSO的关系[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(4):547-553.
[26] 孙毅.西宁市黄土滑坡发育特征及稳定性分析[D].西安:长安大学,2013.
[27] 鹿化煜,王先彦,孙雪峰,等.钻探揭示的青藏高原东北部黄土地层与第四纪气候变化[J].第四纪研究,2007,27(2):230-241.
[28] Zhuang J Q, Peng J B, Wang G H, et al. Prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the Loess Plateau, Yan'an, China, Using the TRIGRS model[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2016,42(6):915-927.
[29] 李京梅,盛嘉誉,唐仲涛.近60年西宁地区气候变化及突变分析[J].青海科技,2021,28(5):100-106.
[30] 全国钢标准化技术委员会. 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2021[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2021.
[31] 及金楠,吴智阳,姚安坤.林木根系单根的生物力学特性[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2012,41(2):140-144.
[32] 李洪成,姜宏华. SPSS数据分析教程[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2012.
[33] 朱海丽,胡夏嵩,毛小青,等.护坡植物根系力学特性与其解剖结构关系[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(5):40-46.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-11-01 修回日期:2022-11-26
资助项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(42002283,42062019); 第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0905)
第一作者:石川(1997—),男,青海西宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向生态工程地质。E-mail:shichuanwj@163.com
通信作者:刘亚斌(1987—),男,青海西宁人,副教授,博士,研究方向生态工程地质。E-mail:liuyabincug@163.com