GAO Yuan,SHI Haijing,DING Chengqin,et al.Buffering Effect of Artificial Robinia pseudoacacia Forest on Temperature and Humidity in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(05):175-183.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.025.]
黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林温湿度缓冲效应
- Title:
- Buffering Effect of Artificial Robinia pseudoacacia Forest on Temperature and Humidity in Loess Hilly Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)05-0175-09
- Keywords:
- temperature; humidity; artificial R. pseudoacacia forest; buffering effect on temperature and humidity
- 分类号:
- S716
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]研究黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林对环境温湿度的缓冲效应,探究不同时间尺度林带对环境气候的缓冲特点以及森林小气候效应与环境因素之间的关系,为黄土丘陵区的群落构建和植被恢复提供参考依据。[方法]选取该区域同年建立的人工刺槐林和林外空旷地为研究对象,对气温、地表温度、土壤温度和空气相对湿度进行为期一年的连续监测,量化不同时间尺度人工刺槐林的温湿度缓冲效应。[结果]林内气温、地表温度、土壤温度和相对湿度年均值分别低于林外0.13℃,0.99℃,0.92℃和0.16%。在一天中的14:00—16:00时段,林内气温、地表温度和土壤温度分别低于林外1.08℃,4.17℃和1.88℃,相对湿度高于林外2.72%; 在5:00—7:00时段,林内气温和地表温度分别高于林外0.45℃和0.58℃,相对湿度低于林外1.80%。最热月(7月)林内气温、地表温度和土壤温度分别低于林外0.76℃,2.17℃和3.29℃,相对湿度高于林外1.67%; 最冷月(1月)林内气温和土壤温度分别高于林外0.28℃和0.87℃,地表温度低于林外0.20℃,相对湿度低于林外1.16%。人工刺槐林的缓冲效应随环境气候变化表现不同,当林外气温、地表温度、土壤温度分别高于16.70℃,9.89℃和1.43℃时,人工刺槐林表现为降温作用,低于该温度则表现为升温作用; 温度和缓冲值之间为一元三次方程关系,随着温度升高或降低,缓冲值的绝对值增大速率加快。[结论]在人工刺槐林温湿度缓冲效应影响下,林内温湿度比林外更加稳定,形成了优于林外环境气候的独特小气候。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The buffering effect of artificial R. pseudoacacia forest on environmental temperature and humidity in the loess hilly area was studied, and the buffering characteristics of forest belts on environmental climate at different time scales and the relationship between forest microclimate effect and environmental factors were explored, so as to provide reference for community construction and vegetation restoration in the loess hilly area. [Methods] The artificial R. pseudoacacia forest planted in the same year in this area was taken as an example, and air temperature(Ta), near surface temperature(Tns), soil temperature(Ts)and air relative humidity(RH)inside and outside of the forest continuously for a whole year were measured. The climate buffering effects of artificial R. pseudoacacia forests at different time scales were quantified. [Results] The annual average Ta, Tns, Ts and RH in the forest were lower by 0.13℃, 0.99℃, 0.92℃ and 0.16%, respectively, than those outside of the forest. During 14:00 to 16:00 of a day, the Ta, Tns and Ts inside of the forest were 1.08℃, 4.17℃ and 1.88℃ lower, respectively, than those outside of the forest, while the RH of air was 2.72% higher. During 5:00 to 7:00, the Ta and Tns inside of forest were 0.45℃ and 0.58℃ higher than those outside of forest, respectively, and the RH was 1.80% lower than that outside of forest. The Ta, Tns and Ts inside of forest were lower by 0.76℃, 2.17℃ and 3.29℃ than those outside of the forest in July, respectively, and the RH was higher by 1.67%, than that outside of the forest in July. In January, when extreme low temperature occurred, the Ta and Ts in the forest were 0.28℃ and 0.87℃ higher, Tns was 0.20℃ lower than those outside the forest, respectively, and RH was 1.16% lower than that outside the forest. The buffering effect of artificial R. pseudoacacia forest varied with change of environmental climate. When the Ta, Tns and Ts outside the forest were higher than 16.70℃, 9.89℃ and 1.43℃ respectively, the buffering value was positive(inside the forest was warmer than outside), while they were lower than those, the buffering value was negative. The relationship between temperature and buffering value was cubic. With the increase or decrease of temperature, the absolute value of buffering value increased at a faster rate. [Conclusion] The temperature and humidity in the forest were more stable than that those outside the forest with the buffering effect of artificial R. pseudoacacia forest, forming a unique microclimate superior to the environmental climate outside the forest.
参考文献/References:
[1] Hardwick S R, Toumi R, Pfeifer M, et al. The relationship between leaf area index and microclimate in tropical forest and oil palm plantation:Forest disturbance drives changes in microclimate[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2015,201:187-195.
[2] 董金伟,白世红,马风云,等.山东泰山3种人工林小气候对比分析[J].山东林业科技,2017,47(5):56-59.
[3] 陈宏志,胡庭兴,龚伟,等.我国森林小气候的研究现状[J].四川林业科技,2007,28(2):29-32.
[4] Kovács B, Tinya F,Ódor P. Stand structural drivers of microclimate in mature temperate mixed forests[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017,234-235:11-21.
[5] 彭巍,李明文,王慧,等.森林小气候国内外研究进展[J].防护林科技,2020(7):45-03.
[6] 孙金伟,吴家兵,关德新,等.森林与空旷地空气温湿度及土壤温度的长期对比研究[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(12):2685-2691.
[7] 徐明洁,张涛,孙怡,等.千烟洲人工针叶林对温湿环境的调节作用[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(11):3245-3254.
[8] 张一平,刘玉洪,马友鑫,等.热带森林不同生长时期的小气候特征[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2002,45(1):83.
[9] 王珮环,陈智,于贵瑞,等.长白山温带阔叶红松林对温湿环境的调节效应[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(5):1521-1528.
[10] 王兵,崔向慧,杨锋伟.中国森林生态系统定位研究网络的建设与发展[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(4):84-91.
[11] Ashton P. Some measurements of the microclimate within a Sri Lankan tropical rainforest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1992,59:217-235.
[12] 林永标,申卫军,彭少麟,等.南亚热带鹤山3种人工林小气候效应对比[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1657-1666.
[13] Li Y, Zhao M S, Motesharrei S, et al. Local cooling and warming effects of forests based on satellite observations[J]. Nature Communications, 2015,6(1):6603.
[14] 杨铭伦,张文革,张旭,等.西天山森林小气候梯度特征[J].林业科技通讯,2021,579(3):14-18.
[15] 霍艾迪,王国梁,李倩,等.基于MODIS影像数据的陕北黄土高原植被区划研究[J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(4):32-36.
[16] 邹厚远.陕北黄土高原植被区划及与林草建设的关系[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(2):96-101.
[17] 张社奇,王国栋,田鹏,等.黄土高原刺槐林地土壤微生物的分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):128-131.
[18] Ashcroft M B, Ramp D, Warton D I, et al. A novel approach to quantify and locate potential microrefugia using topoclimate, climate stability, and isolation from the matrix[J]. Global Change Biology, 2012,18(6):1866-1879.
[19] Shi H J, David P, Wen Z M, et al. Thermal buffering effect of alpine boulder field microhabitats in Australia:Implications for habitat management and conservation[J]. Biological Conservation, 2014,180:278-287.
[20] Zhang Y, Wei L Y, Wei X R, et al. Long-term afforestation significantly improves the fertility of abandoned farmland along a soil clay gradient on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018,29(10):3521-3534.
[21] 徐丽萍,杨改河,姜艳,等.黄土高原人工植被小气候生态效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):163-173.
[22] 徐丽萍,杨改河,冯永忠,等.黄土高原人工植被对局地小气候影响的效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):170-175.
[23] 肖玉,谢高地,甄霖,等.三北工程黄土高原丘陵沟壑区森林降温增湿效果研究[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):5836-5846.
[24] 王欢欢,赵杰,岳超,等.黄土高原植被恢复对地表的冷却作用及变化规律[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):214-220.
[25] 张静,李鹏展.延河流域退耕还林还草工程后土地质量评估[J].绿色科技,2018(20):32-35.
[26] Shi H J, Wen Z M, David P, et al. A framework for quantifying the thermal buffering effect of microhabitats[J]. Biological Conservation, 2016,204:175-180.
[27] 刘文杰,张克映,李红梅,等.西双版纳热带雨林干季林冠层雾露形成的小气候特征研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(3):486-491.
[28] Chen J M, Black T A. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1992,15(4):421-429.
[29] 刘学全,史玉虎,蔡晟,等.三峡库区防护林不同林分结构森林小气候研究[J].湖北林业科技,1998(1):1-5.
[30] 胡顺军,郭谨,王举林,等.应用常规气象观测资料估算塔里木盆地水面蒸发量[J].干旱区地理,2004,27(2):212-215.
[31] 王今殊,王进欣.热带次生林、季雨林林窗温度特征对比分析[J].徐州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2004,22(3):59-64.
[32] Peng S S, Piao S L, Zeng Z Z, et al. Afforestation in China cools local land surface temperature[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014,111:2915-2919.
[33] 罗茜.长沙市城市森林的温湿效应[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2013.
相似文献/References:
[1]董晓华,姚着喜,彭涛,等.温度对砂型土壤和石英砂水分特征曲线的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):64.
DONG Xiaohua,YAO Zhuoxi,PENG Tao,et al.Effects of Temperature on Comparative Study of the Water Characteristic Curve of Soil and Quartz Sand[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):64.
[2]卢晓杰,张克斌,李瑞.我国北方农牧交错带气候对植被的影响——以宁夏盐池为例[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):188.
LU Xiao-jie,ZHANG Ke-bin,LI Rui.Impact of Climate on Vegetation in Northern Agriculture and Animal Husbandry of Our Country Interlocks—Take Yanchi of Ningxia as an example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):188.
[3]刘瑛,高甲荣,陈子珊,等.北京郊区两种生态护岸方式温湿度效应对比[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):227.
LIU Ying,GAO Jia-rong,CHEN Zi-shan,et al.Comparison of Temperature and Relative Humidity Effects of Two Ecological Embankments in Beijing Suburb[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):227.
[4]吕晶,高甲荣,王颖,等.不同护坡植物对岸坡土壤性质的影响及效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):101.
LV Jing,GAO Jia-rong,WANG Ying,et al.Effects of Different Plant Revetments on the Soil Physical Feature[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):101.
[5]刘敏,方江平.西藏川滇高山栎净光合速率对环境因子的响应[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(03):263.
LIU Min,FANG Jiang-ping.Response of Quercus aquifoliodes Net Photosynthetic Rate to Environmental Factors in Tibet[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):263.
[6]霍文,杨青,李杨,等.阿克苏流域可能蒸发量的计算[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):137.
HUO Wen,YANG Qing,LI Yang,et al.Calculation of Potential Evaporation at Akesu River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(05):137.
[7]孟好军,赵维俊,雷军,等.黑河流域高山草甸湿地土壤CO2通量日变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(02):189.
MENG Haojun,ZHAO Weijun,LEI Jun,et al.Daily Variation Process of Soil CO2 Flux of Alpine Meadow Wetland in Heihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):189.
[8]马海鸽,蒋齐,王占军,等.温度和光照对不同预处理野生甘草种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(05):225.
MA Hai-ge,JIANG Qi,WANG Zhan-jun,et al.Effects of Light and Temperature on Seed Germination of Glycyrrhiza uralensis under Different Pretreatment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):225.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-04-18 修回日期:2022-06-08
资助项目:西部青年学者项目(XAB2020YN04); 中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA20040202); 国家自然科学基金项目(41501055); 国家科技基础条件平台建设项目(2005DKA32300)
第一作者:高原(1997—),男,山东济南人,硕士生,主要从事水土保持监测和植被恢复的研究。E-mail:gaoyuan201@mails.ucas.ac.cn
通信作者:史海静(1983—),女,陕西扶风人,博士,副研究员,主要从事水土保持与科研信息化的研究。E-mail:shihaijingcn@nwafu.edu.cn