[1]孙欧文,蔡建国,吴家森,等.浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(01):118-123.
　SUN Ouwen,CAI Jianguo,WU Jiasen,et al.Hydrological Characteristics of Litter and Forest Soil of Typical Forest Types in Zhejiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(01):118-123.
点击复制

浙江省典型森林类型枯落物及林下土壤水文特性

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 26 期数: 2019年01期 页码: 118-123 栏目: 出版日期: 2019-02-28
Title:
Hydrological Characteristics of Litter and Forest Soil of Typical Forest Types in Zhejiang Province
作者:
孙欧文1, 蔡建国1, 吴家森2, 葛宏立2
1. 浙江农林大学 风景园林与建筑学院, 浙江 临安 311300;
2. 浙江农林大学 浙江省森林生态系统碳循环与固碳减排重点实验室, 浙江 临安 311300
Author(s):
SUN Ouwen1, CAI Jianguo1, WU Jiasen2, GE Hongli2
1. School of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang Agricultural & Forestry University, Lin’an, Zhejiang 311300, China;
2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration, Zhejiang Agricultural & Forestry University, Lin’an, Zhejiang 311300, China
关键词:
蓄积量; 枯落物; 水文特性; 浙江省
Keywords:
storage; litter; hydrological characteristics; Zhejiang Province
分类号:
S715.3
摘要:
选择浙江省5种典型林型（杉木林、毛竹林、阔叶林、针阔混交林、马尾松林）枯落物及林下土壤作为研究对象，布设30 m×30 m标准样地，枯落物水文效应测定采用浸泡法，土壤层水文效应测定采用环刀法。结果表明：不同林分类型枯落物蓄积量大小介于10.14~25.07 t/hm2，排列顺序分别为针阔混交林 > 阔叶林 > 马尾松林 > 杉木林 > 毛竹林；最大持水量大小介于21.82~33.64 t/hm2，排列顺序为针阔混交林 > 阔叶林 > 杉木林 > 马尾松林 > 毛竹林；有效拦蓄量大小介于16.8~24.84 t/hm2，其排序为针阔混交林 > 杉木林 > 阔叶林 > 马尾松林 > 毛竹林；5种森林类型枯落物的持水量均随浸水时间而增大并逐步趋于稳定，其关系符合对数函数；前0.5 h内枯落物吸水速率最大，1 h之后吸水速率急剧降低，而后随着时间的推移，枯落物的吸水速率趋于统一，其关系呈幂函数关系；5种森林类型林下土壤容重、非毛管孔隙度、孔隙度、持水能力等指标差异并不显著，土壤持水力均值介于201.86~296.63 t/hm2。综合来看，阔叶林及含有阔叶树种的林分持水能力相对高于针叶林。
Abstract:
Selecting litter and soil of five typical forest types (Chinese fir forest, moso bamboo forest, broad-leaved forest, mixed broadleaf-conifer forest, and masson pine forest) in Zhejiang Province as the research object, we set up sample plots with 30 m×30 m in which hydrological effects of litter of plots was examined by soaking method, and hydrological effects of soil layer was investigated by cutting ring method. The results are as follows. The litter amounts of different forest types greatly varied from 10.14 t/hm2 to 25.07 t/hm2, and the litter amount decreased in the order:mixed broadleaf-conifer forest > broad-leaved forest > masson pine forest > Chinese fir forest > moso bamboo forest; the maximum water-holding capacity of litter ranged from 21.82 t/hm2 to 33.64 t/hm2, the maximum water-holding capacity decreased in the order:mixed broadleaf-conifer forest > broad-leaved forest > Chinese fir forest > masson pine forest > moso bamboo forest;the effective impoundment amount was between 16.8 t/hm2 and 24.84 t/hm2, and the effective impoundment amount decreased in the order:mixed broadleaf-conifer forest > Chinese fir forest > broad-leaved forest > masson pine forest > moso bamboo forest. The water-holding capacities of litter of the five types of forest increased and stabilized gradually with the increase of immersion time, which could be described by logarithmic function. Forest litter had the largest water absorption rate within the initial half hour, and water absorption rate declined sharply after 1 hour; with the increase of immersion time, the water absorption rate of litter tended to be consistent, and they presented the power function relationship; there were no significant differences in the soils of the 5 forest types in terms of soil bulk density, noncapillary porosity, porosity, and water-holding capacity, and the average soil water-holding capacity varied from 201.86 t/hm2 to 296.63 t/hm2. In short, water-holding capacities of the broad-leaved forest and forest containing broad-leaved tree species were higher than those of the coniferous forest.

参考文献/References:

[1] 曹恒.青海高寒区不同人工林地土壤和枯落物的水文功能研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2014.
[2] 景贯阳.陇东黄土高原人工刺槐林枯落物层和土壤层生态水文功能研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2017.
[3] 刘斌,鲁绍伟,李少宁,等.北京西山6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2015,49(4):73-78.
[4] 吴四平.三峡山地不同类型林地的生态水文功能研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2017.
[5] 刘艳,孙向阳,范俊岗,等.辽宁省森林枯落物现存量及其持水性能[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2017,25(4):689-699.
[6] 张甜,董希斌,唐国华,等.大兴安岭不同类型低质林土壤和枯落物的水文性能[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(10):1-5.
[7] 夏玲摇,刘美华,叶晨,等.浙江省典型森林群落对大气环境的改善效应[J].江西农业大学学报,2017,39(2):357-365.
[8] 齐瑞,杨永红,陈宁,等.白龙江上游5种典型灌木林枯落物蓄积量及持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):123-127.
[9] 叶晶,吴家森,张金池,等.不同经营年限山核桃林地枯落物和土壤的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(3):87-91.
[10] 于晓文,宋小帅,康峰峰,等.辽河源典型森林群落下枯落物的水文特性[J].水土保持通报,2014,34(4):65-69.
[11] 胡晓聪,黄乾亮,金亮.西双版纳热带山地雨林枯落物及其土壤水文功能[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(1):55-63.
[12] 王谦,孙保平,丁国栋,等.陕西榆林樟子松人工林土壤及枯落物水文效应[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2015,43(8):123-132.
[13] 胡静霞,杨新兵,朱辰光,等.冀西北地区4种纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):304-310.
[14] 许景伟,李传荣,夏江宝,等.黄河三角洲滩地不同林分类型的土壤水文特性[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(1):173-176.
[15] 钟梁,高友英,孙浩,等.抚河上游生态公益林4种森林类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].南方林业科学,2017,45(6):5-8.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪有科,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,等.林地枯落物抗冲试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):57.
　Wang Youke,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan,et al.AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ANTI-SCOURABILITY OF LITTER ON WOODLAND[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(01):57.
[2]汪有科,吴钦孝,韩冰,等.森林植被水土保持功能评价[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):24.
　Wang Youke,Wu Qinxiao,Han Bing,et al.Appraising the Function of Forest Vegetation on Soil and Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(01):24.
[3]鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同海拔人工油松林枯落物及其土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):54.
　LU Shao-wei,CHEN Bo,PAN Qing-hua,et al.Hydrological Effects of Forest Litters and Soil in Pinus Tabuliformis Plantations at the Different Altitudes of Mountains of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):54.
[4]高琛,鲁绍伟,杨新兵,等.北京松山不同密度丁香天然林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):59.
　GAO Chen,LU Shao-wei,YANG Xin-bing,et al.Hydrological Effects of Forest Litters and Soil of Natural Syzygium aromaticum Forests with Different Densities in Songshan Mountain of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):59.
[5]高开通,胡淑萍,刘鹏举,等.北京九龙山自然保护区典型林分枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):160.
　GAO Kai-tong,HU Shu-ping,LIU Peng-ju,et al.Hydrological Effects of Typical Forest Litters in Beijing Jiulongshan Nature Reserve[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(01):160.
[6]庞梦丽,孙明阳,王明远,等.河北太行山典型水土保持经济林枯落物持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):200.
　PANG Mengli,SUN Mingyang,WANG Mingyuan,et al.Litter Water-Holding Capacity of Economic Forests for Soil and Water Conservation in Taihang Mountain of Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):200.
[7]陈继东,周长亮,李惠丽.接坝地区9种典型林分类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):216.
　CHEN Jidong,ZHOU Changliang,LI Huili.Hydrological Effects of Litter and Soils in Nine Forest Types of the Jieba Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(01):216.
[8]齐记,史宇,余新晓,等.北京山区主要树种枯落物水文功能特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(03):73.
　QI Ji,SHI Yu,YU Xin-xiao,et al.Hydrological Function of Litters of the Main Tree Species in Beijing Mountainous Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(01):73.
[9]刘硕.青海省大通县主要造林树种枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):105.
　LIU Shuo.Hydrological Effects Study of Main Forestation Litters in Datong County, Qinghai Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):105.
[10]王兵,王燕,赵广东.江西大岗山三种主要植被类型枯落物水文性能研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):197.
　WANG Bing,WANG Yan,ZHAO Guang-dong.Studies on Litter Hydrologic Characteristics of Three Main Forest Types in Mountain Dagangshan of Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(01):197.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2018-3-30;改回日期:2018-4-1。
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划团队任务"低效公益林更新改造和健康维持技术研究与示范"（2012BAD22B0503）；天台县生态公益林效益评价及空间布局与生态需求耦合水平研究（ZC2017ZFCG-031）；江山市公益林建设成效评估（ZC2017ZFCG-024）
作者简介:孙欧文(1993-),女,浙江省杭州市人,硕士研究生,研究方向为园林植物应用与效益评估。E-mail:307317657@qq.com
通讯作者:吴家森(1972-),男,浙江省丽水市人,博士,教授级高级工程师,硕士生导师,从事森林土壤与环境研究。E-mail:jswu@zafu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01