CHEN Jidong,ZHOU Changliang,LI Huili.Hydrological Effects of Litter and Soils in Nine Forest Types of the Jieba Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(06):216-221,226.
接坝地区9种典型林分类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应
- Title:
- Hydrological Effects of Litter and Soils in Nine Forest Types of the Jieba Region
- Keywords:
- Jieba region; forest types; litter; soil; hydrological effect
- 分类号:
- S715.7
- 摘要:
- 以八英庄林场9种典型林分类型为研究对象，对其枯落物层、土壤层水文效应进行研究，结果表明：（1）9种典型林分类型枯落物蓄积量在5.79~24.97 t/hm2的范围内，排序为白桦纯林 > 白桦山杨混交林 > 油松纯林 > 山杨纯林 > 蒙古栎纯林 > 落叶松油松混交林 > 白桦黑桦混交林 > 落叶松纯林 > 落叶松白桦混交林。（2）9种典型林分类型枯落物持水能力有一定差异，排序为白桦山杨混交林 > 山杨纯林 > 油松纯林 > 白桦纯林 > 白桦黑桦混交林 > 落叶松油松混交林 > 蒙古栎纯林 > 落叶松白桦混交林 > 落叶松纯林。（3）枯落物持水量与浸水时间呈较好的指数关系，相关系数在0.95以上，吸水速率与浸水时间呈较好的幂函数关系，相关系数大于0.9。（4）白桦山杨混交林枯落物有效拦蓄量最大为52.63 t/hm2，落叶松白桦混交林枯落物有效拦蓄量最小为14 t/hm2。（5）蒙古栎纯林土壤持水能力最强为117.42 t/hm2，其次是白桦山杨混交林为104.75 t/hm2，白桦纯林土壤持水能力最差为37.80 t/hm2。（6）土壤初渗速率在2.3~56.8 mm/min范围内，土壤入渗速率与入渗时间呈较好的幂函数关系，相关系数大于0.95。
- Abstract:
- A pilot study of hydrological effects of litter and soil layer was carried out in nine forest types in Bayingzhuang forest farm. The results showed:(1) the total storage capacity of litter was about 5.79~24.97 t/hm2, which decreased in the order:Betula platyphylla Suk. pure forest > Betula platyphylla Suk.-Populus davidiana mixed forest > Pinus tabuliformis pure forest > Populus davidiana pure forest > Quercus mongolica pure forest > Larix principis rupprechti-Pinus tabuliformis mixed forest > Betula platyphylla Suk.-Betula davurica mixed forest > Larix principis rupprechti pure forest > Larix principis rupprechti-Betula platyphylla Suk. mixed forest; (2) there were some differences in water holding capacities of litter in 9 forest types, which decreased in the order of Betula platyphylla Suk.-Populus davidiana mixed forest > Populus davidiana pure forest > Pinus tabuliformis pure fores > Betula platyphylla Suk. pure forest > Betula platyphylla Suk.-Betula davurica mixed forest > Larix principis rupprechti-Pinus tabuliformis mixed fores > Quercus mongolica pure forest > Larix principis rupprechti-Betula platyphylla Suk. mixed forest > Larix principis rupprechti pure forest; (3) water holding capacity and soaking time had the significant logarithmic relationship, the correlation coefficient was above 0.95; the relationship between absorption rate and soaking time could be described by power function, the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.90; (4) the modified interception amount of Quercus mongolica pure forest was the strongest, which was 52.63 t/hm2; the modified interception amount of Larix principis rupprechti-Betula platyphylla Suk. mixed forest was the least, which was 14 t/hm2; (5) water holding capacity of soil in Quercus mongolica pure forest was strongest, which was 117.42 t/hm2, water holding capacity of soil in Betula platyphylla Suk.-Populus davidiana mixed forest came the next, which was 104.75 t/hm2, water holding capacity of soil in Betula platyphylla Suk. pure forest was the least, which was 37.80 t/hm2; (6) the soil initial infiltration rate was about 2.3~56.8 mm/min; The relationship between the infiltration rate and infiltration time could be fitted by power function, the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.95.
参考文献/References:
[1] 马雪华.森林水文学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1993.
[2] 赵鸿雁,吴钦孝,刘国彬.黄土高原人工油松林枯枝落叶层的水土保持功能研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(1):168-172.
[3] 赵鸿雁,吴钦孝,刘国彬.黄土高原人工油松林水文生态效应[J].生态学报,2003,23(2):376-379.
[4] 冯楷斌,张暘暘,郭敬丽.冀北山地不同类型白桦林枯落物及土壤持水性能研究[J].林业资源管理,2016,4(2):74-80.
[5] 田超,杨新兵,李军,等.冀北山地不同海拔蒙古栎林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):221-226.
[6] 张祎,李鹏,刘晓君,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型枯落物持水效能研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):100-105.
[7] 鲁绍伟,陈波,潘青华,等.北京山地不同密度侧柏人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):224-229.
[8] 张宁,郭宾良,张楠,等.滦河典型林分枯落物层与土壤层的水文效应[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):43-48.
[9] 陈波,杨新兵,赵心苗,等.冀北山地6种天然纯林枯落物及土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):196-202.
[10] 徐娟,余新晓,席彩云.北京十三陵不同林分枯落物层和土壤层水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(3):189-193.
[11] 王海东,李明桂,张丽玮,等.冀北山地油松林枯落物的持水特性研究[J].河北林果研究,2014,29(3):263-266.
[12] 常月梅,王春风,启东,等.滦河上游水源涵养林枯落物层水文效应研究[J].河北林果研究,2014,29(4):359-363.
[13] 郭成久,孙景刚,苏芳莉,等.土壤容重对草甸土坡面养分流失特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(6),27-30.
[14] 田大伦,陈书军.樟树人工林土壤水文-物理性质特征分析[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(4):1-6.
[15] 郭泺,夏北成,倪国祥.不同森林类型的土壤持水能力及其环境效应研究[J].中山大学学报:自然科学版,2005,44(S):327-330.
[16] 吴强,楚聪颖,张鹏,等.滦河上游7种典型林分类型水土保持功能[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):40-44.
[17] 张社奇,王国栋,时新玲,等.黄土高原油松人工林地土壤水分物理性质研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2005,23(1):60-64.
相似文献/References:
[1]郑淼.冀北山地4种典型林分固碳释氧效益估算[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(03):154.
ZHENG Miao.Estimating the Benefits of Carbon Sequestration and Oxygen Release from Four Typical Stands in the Mountainous Region of North Hebei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(06):154.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-01-09;改回日期:2017-01-20。
基金项目:河北省林业科技指导项目“木兰林区森林流域经营关键技术研究”（1305448）
作者简介:陈继东(1980-),男,河北涿鹿人,在读硕士,林业高级工程师,从事森林资源管理与经营方面工作。E-mail:20132638@qq.com
通讯作者:李惠丽(1992-),女,河北藁城人,硕士,从事森林经营方面工作。E-mail:245539483@qq.com