[1]刘洁,刘小林,张兴昌,等.水蚀风蚀交错区不同类型植被对土壤碳氮影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):53-56.
　LIU Jie,LIU Xiao-lin,ZHANG Xing-Chang,et al.Influence of the Different Typical Vegetation on the Soil Total Nitrogen and Organic Matter in the Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):53-56.
点击复制

水蚀风蚀交错区不同类型植被对土壤碳氮影响的研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 15 期数: 2008年06期 页码: 53-56 栏目: 出版日期: 2008-12-20
Title:
Influence of the Different Typical Vegetation on the Soil Total Nitrogen and Organic Matter in the Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region, China
作者:
刘洁1, 刘小林2, 张兴昌1, 杨宏平3, 王少国3
1. 西北农林科技大学, 资源与环境学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 陕西榆林市农业科学研究所, 陕西 榆林 719000;
3. 西北农林科技大学, 理学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
LIU Jie1, LIU Xiao-lin2, ZHANG Xing-Chang1, YANG Hong-Ping3, WANG Shao-Guo3
1. College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Yulin Agricultural Science Research Istitute, Yulin, Shaanxi 719000, China;
3. College of Sciences, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
水蚀风蚀交错区; 植被类型; 全氮; 有机质
Keywords:
wind-water erosion crisscross region; vegetation types; total nitrogen(TN); organic matter(OM)
分类号:
S153.61
摘要:
植被类型对土壤养分及其物质循环具有重要作用。通过典型采样与室内分析相结合，系统研究了水蚀风蚀交错区不同典型植被对200cm土层内土壤全氮、有机质和C/N比值的影响，结果表明：（1）0-40cm内土壤全氮和有机质含量随深度增加而逐渐下降，40cm以下基本不随深度变化而变化。不同植被类型的土壤C/N比值基本不随深度变化而变化，其中裸地农田的200cm剖面土壤C/N均值最高，剖面平均为9.5，其他植被类型基本相似为6.7～7.7。0-20cm油松土壤C/N比值最高，为10.3，榆树最低，为5.99；（2）0-20cm土层内沙蒿全氮含量最高，约为油松、榆树、黑豆农田的1.5倍。20-40cm土层内，沙打旺最高，黑豆农田与农田裸地基本相似。总体而言，沙打旺和沙蒿200cm剖面全氮含量均高于其他植被类型，油松和榆树土壤全氮含量最低；（3）0-20cm内有机质含量沙蒿最高，榆树最低，20-40cm层次内，沙蒿的有机质含量显著降低，最高者为农田裸地，沙打旺和黑豆农田次高，油松略高于沙蒿，榆树仍为最低。从整个0-200cm土壤剖面看，裸地农田有机质含量最高，沙打旺次之。榆树在各层次有机质含量均低于其他植被类型。但油松0-20cm表层有机质含量较高说明油松可以提高表层土壤有机质含量，但对深层土壤有机质没有明显作用。
Abstract:
This paper systematically studied the influences of the different vegetation on the soil total nitrogen (TN) and organic matter (OM) in the wind-water erosion crisscross region in China.The results show that (1) The content of TN and OM decline with the increase of the soil depth within the 0-40cm,and become steady under the depth of 40cm.Under the different conditon of vagetation,the value of soil C/N changes few with the depth,within the 0-200cm depth,the averaged value of soil C/N in deserted aricultural land is the largest,and the averaged values of soil C/N fluctuate with range of 6.7～7.7.Within 0-20cm,the value of C/N in Pinus Tabulaeformis land become the summit with 10.3,and the value is the smallest with 5.99 in the elm land.(2) The value of TN under the vegetati on of Artemisa arenaria and Astragalus adsurgens land is distinctly larger than the other vegetation,the Pinus Tabulaeformis and the elm have the smallest TN.(3) Within 0-20cm,the soil OM in the Artemisa arenaria is the largest,and the smallest in the elm land.Within 20-40cm,the content of OM in Artemisa arenaria land decrease greatly,however the OM in the deserted agricultural land become the peak,and then the Astragalus adsurgens,the black bean land,still the elm land has the smallest value of soil OM.Generally,within 0-200cm,the deserted agricultural land has the largest content of soil OM,and the elm land has the smallest one.The Pinus Tabulaeformis can improve the OM at the shallow soil layer.

参考文献/References:

[1] Post W M,Kwon K C.Soil carbon sequestration crashes and woodland structure in East Africa[J].Journal of Ecology,2000,81:305-314.
[2] Lal R.Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland[J].Environmental Pollution,2002,116,353-362.
[3] Lal R.Soil erosion and the global carbon budget[J].Environmental International,2003,29:437-450.
[4] Lal R.Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems[J].Environmental Management,2004,33(4):528-544.
[5] John B,Yamashita T,Ludwig B,et al.Storageof organic carbon inaggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use[J].Geoderma,2005,128:63-79.
[6] Tan Z X,Lal R.Carbon sequestration potential estimates with changes in land use and tillage practice in Ohio,USA[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2005,111:140-152.
[7] 安韶山,刘梦云,李壁成,等.宁南山区不同植被恢复措施的土壤养分效应研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23 (8):1429-1432.
[8] 巩杰,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵区小流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19 (1):93-96.
[9] 彭文英,张科利,陈瑶,等.黄土坡耕地退耕还林后土壤性质变化研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(2):272-278.
[10] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,邱扬,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区土地利用结构与生态过程[J].北京:商务印书馆,2002.
[11] 张春霞,郝明德.黄土高原地区紫花苜蓿生长过程中土壤养分的变化规律[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(6):1107-1111.
[12] 任书杰,曹明奎,陶波,等.陆地生态系统氮状态对碳循环的限制作用研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(4):58-67.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁超,郝文芳,袁丁.黄土丘陵区不同植被群落土壤水分研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):103.
　LIANG Chao,HAO Wen-fang,YUAN Ding.Study on the Soil Water of Different Vegetation Communities in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(06):103.
[2]杨涛,王得祥,刘雅娟,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型土壤贮水动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):81.
　YANG Tao,WANG De-xiang,LIU Ya-juan,et al.The Dynamical Changes of Soil Water Holding Capacity of Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(06):81.
[3]朱德兰,杨涛,王得祥,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区三种不同植被土壤水分动态及蒸散耗水规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):8.
　ZHU De-lan,YANG Tao,WANG De-xiang,et al.Study on Soil Water Dynamic and the Evapotranspiration of Three Different Vegetation in the Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(06):8.
[4]高传友,赵清贺,刘倩.北江干流河岸带不同植被类型土壤粒径分形特征[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):37.
　GAO Chuanyou,ZHAO Qinghe,LIU Qian.Fractal Characteristic of Soil Particle Size Under Different Vegetation Types in Riparian Zone of the Main Stream of Beijiang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(06):37.
[5]仇宽彪,成军锋.陕西省植被水分利用效率及与气候因素的关系[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):256.
　QIU Kuanbiao,CHENG Junfeng.Vegetation Water Use Efficiency and Its Relationship with Climate in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(06):256.
[6]卢龙彬,付强,黄金柏.黄土高原北部水蚀风蚀交错区产流条件及径流系数[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):17.
　LU Long-bin,FU Qiang,HUANG Jin-bai.Runoff Conditions and Runoff Coefficient of the Wind-water Erosion Crisscross Region on the Northern Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):17.
[7]苗武,史正涛,陈骏,等.松华坝水源地不同植被土壤特性及水源涵养功能[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):131.
　MIAO Wu,SHI Zheng-tao,CHEN Jun,et al.The Soil Properties and Water Conservation Function of Different Vegetations in Songhuaba Water Source[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(06):131.
[8]焦权,戴全厚,聂林红,等.贵州茅台水源功能区不同植被类型的蓄水效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):199.
　JIAO Quan,DAI Quanhou,NIE Linhong,et al.Effect of Different Vegetation Types on Water Storage in the Source Functional Area of Maotai Town, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):199.
[9]居萍,李良俊,李丽.不同植被类型土壤氮素对侵蚀环境的响应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):1.
　JU Ping,LI Liangjun,LI Li.Response of Soil Nitrogen to Erosion Environment in Different Vegetation Types[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(06):1.
[10]罗明达,杨吉华,房用,等.沂源石灰岩山地不同植被类型土壤颗粒分形特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):17.
　LUO Ming-da,YANG Ji-hua,FANG Yong,et al.Characteristics of Soil Particles Fractal Dimension under Different Vegetation Types in Yiyuan Limestone Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(06):17.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2008-10-23;
基金项目:西部之光（2006YB04）；“十一五”国家科技支撑项目（2006BAD09B06）；中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所领域前沿项目（SW05501）
作者简介:刘洁（1971- ），陕西西安人，在读硕士，主要从事植被建设与生态环境效益方面的研究，E-mail：liujie@ms.xab.ac.cn
通讯作者:张兴昌（1965- ），男，陕西武功人，博士，研究员，主要从事环境科学、土壤化学方面研究。E-mail：zhangxc@ms.iswc.ac

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01