Zhang Xianlin,Feng Mengdie,He Binghui,et al.Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Suitable Models Under Different Land Use Types in Karst Trough-Valley Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):34-41.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.021]
喀斯特槽谷区不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及适宜模型
- Title:
- Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Suitable Models Under Different Land Use Types in Karst Trough-Valley Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)04-0034-08
- Keywords:
- karst; land-use type; soil physical and chemical properties; infiltration characteristics; regression model
- 分类号:
- S152.7
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究喀斯特槽谷区不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗规律,提出适合喀斯特槽谷区的土壤入渗模型。[方法]以喀斯特槽谷区4种典型土地利用类型(林地、草地、耕地、园地)为研究对象,分析不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征差异及影响因素,评价了Horton,Kostiakov和Philip这3种常见入渗模型在该区的适应性。[结果](1)不同土地利用类型土壤容重、含水率和电导率存在显著差异(p<0.05),耕地土壤容重(1.1 g/cm3)、含水率(26.9%)以及电导率(75.43 mS/cm)低于其他土地利用类型,园地土壤容重(1.32 g/cm3)、林地含水率(35.02%)以及草地电导率(164.6 mS/cm)分别高于其他土地利用类型。(2)不同土地利用类型土壤入渗过程均表现为迅速下降、缓慢下降以及趋于稳定。(3)Horton模型、Kostiakov模型和Philip模型对喀斯特槽谷区不同土地利用方式拟合结果存在差异,其中,Horton模型结果最优,拟合度R2达到0.922～0.951,Philip模型拟合结果最差,拟合度R2为0.754～0.908。(4)pH值与初始入渗速率和平均入渗速率呈极显著正相关关系(p<0.01),与稳定入渗速率呈显著正相关关系(p<0.05); 0.05～0.25 mm和<0.05 mm微团聚体分别与稳定入渗率和平均入渗率呈显著正相关和负相关(p<0.05)。多元线性回归模型表明,容重、含水率以及<0.05 mm微团聚体是主要影响入渗速率的因子,且与入渗性能指标存在负相关关系。[结论]不同土地利用方式下耕地具有更好的渗透性能,Horton模型更适合模拟喀斯特槽谷区土壤入渗,研究结果可为喀斯特槽谷区土壤入渗性能评估及植被配置等提供科学依据。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]The aims of this study are to investigate the soil infiltration patterns under different land uses in karst trough valley and to propose a suitable soil infiltration model for karst trough valley. [Methods]Four typical land uses(forest, grassland, cropland and orchard)in the karst trough valley were taken as the research objects to determine the differences in soil infiltration characteristics and influencing factors as affected by different land uses, and to evaluate the adaptability of three common infiltration models:Horton, Kostiakov and Philip, the in this area. [Results](1)Soil bulk density, water content and electrical conductivity were markedly different among different land uses(p<0.05). Soil bulk density(1.1 g/cm3), water content(26.9%)and electrical conductivity(75.43 mS/cm)in cropland were lower than those in other land uses. Soil bulk density(1.32 g/cm3)in orchard, water content in forest(35.02%)and electrical conductivity in grassland(164.6 mS/cm)were higher than those in other land uses, respectively.(2)The infiltration process of different land use types showed rapid decline, slow decline and stabilization.(3)There were differences in the fitting results of Horton model, Kostiakov model and Philip model for different land use modes in karst trough valley. Horton model had the best results, with the fit R2 reaching 0.922～0.951, and Philip model had the worst results, with the fit R2 ranging from 0.754 to 0.908.(4)The pH value was highly significantly positively correlated with initial infiltration rate and average infiltration rate(p<0.01)and significantly positively correlated with stable infiltration rate(p<0.05); 0.05～0.25 mm and <0.05 mm fractions of micro-aggregates were significantly positively and negatively correlated with stable infiltration rate and average infiltration rate, respectively(p<0.05). The multiple linear regression model showed that soil bulk density, water content and <0.05 mm fraction of micro-aggregates were the main factors influencing infiltration rate, which had an inhibitory effect on infiltration. [Conclusion]Cropland has better infiltration performance among different land uses, and the Horton model is more suitable for modeling soil infiltration in karstic troughs and valleys. The results of the study can provide a scientific basis for the assessment of soil infiltration performance and vegetation allocation in karst trough valley areas.
参考文献/References:
[1]赵西宁,吴发启.土壤水分入渗的研究进展和评述[J].西北林学院学报,2004,19(1):42-45.
Zhao X N, Wu F Q. Developments and reviews of soil infiltration research[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2004,19(1):42-45.
[2]何苗苗,刘芝芹,王克勤,等.滇池流域不同植被覆盖土壤的入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(3):181-187.
He M M, Liu Z Q, Wang K Q, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics and influencing factors under different vegetation cover types in Dianchi Lake basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(3):181-187.
[3]李平,王冬梅,丁聪,等.黄土高寒区典型植被类型土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(5):1610-1620.
Li P, Wang D M, Ding C, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics and its influencing factors of typical vegetation type in Loess Alpine region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(5):1610-1620.
[4]杨振奇,秦富仓,李旻宇,等.砒砂岩区不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(4):733-739.
Yang Z Q, Qin F C, Li M Y, et al. Soil infiltration capacity and its influencing factors of different land use types in feldspathic sandstone region[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020,29(4):733-739.
[5]李松阳,刘康妮,余杭,等.云南省蒋家沟不同植被类型土壤物理性质对水分入渗特征的影响[J].山地学报,2021,39(6):867-878.
Li S Y, Liu K N, Yu H, et al. The influence of soil physical properties on the infiltration of soil covered by different vegetation types in the Jiangjia Gully, Yunnan Province, China[J]. Mountain Research, 2021,39(6):867-878.
[6]马雪燕,穆兴民,王双银,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复对土壤入渗影响及适宜模型研究[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):67-75.
Ma X Y, Mu X M, Wang S Y, et al. Study on the effects of different vegetation restoration on soil infiltration and suitable models in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(2):67-75.
[7]吴佩瑶,秦富仓,董晓宇,等.坡度影响下的砒砂岩区裸露坡面水分入渗特征及模拟[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):64-69.
Wu P Y, Qin F C, Dong X Y, et al. Water infiltration characteristics and simulation on exposed slope in Pisha rock area under the influence of slope[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(2):64-69.
[8]Wang S, Fu Z Y, Chen H S, et al. Mechanisms of surface and subsurface runoff generation in subtropical soil-epikarst systems:Implications of rainfall simulation experiments on Karst slope[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020,580:124370.
[9]郭海云,王根绪,孙守琴.氮添加对亚高山针叶林土壤结构及水分入渗性能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(1):238-245.
Guo H Y, Wang G X, Sun S Q. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil structure and water infiltration of subalpine coniferous forest[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(1):238-245.
[10]蔡雅梅,冯民权.汾河河岸带土壤氮、磷的时空分布规律及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):222-229,236.
Cai Y M, Feng M Q. Study on the spatial and temporal distribution and influencing factors of soil nitrogen and phosphorus in riparian zones of Fenhe River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(4):222-229,236.
[11]冯璐,刘京涛,韩广轩,等.黄河三角洲滨海湿地地下水位变化对土壤种子库特征的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):3826-3835.
Feng L, Liu J T, Han G X, et al. Effects of groundwater level fluctuation on characteristics of soil seed banks in coastal wetlands of the Yellow River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(10):3826-3835.
[12]董远鹏,刘喜娟,董梦阳,等.腐殖质和硝酸钙对赤泥团聚体形成的促进作用[J].环境污染与防治,2020,42(10):1205-1210.
Dong Y P, Liu X J, Dong M Y, et al. Improvement effect of calcium nitrate and humus on the aggregate formation in bauxite residue[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2020,42(10):1205-1210.
[13]曾江敏,何丙辉,李天阳,等.喀斯特槽谷区不同林草恢复模式下土壤入渗特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):58-64.
Zeng J M, He B H, Li T Y, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics under different forest and grass restoration models in Karst trough-valley region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(4):58-64.
[14]de Almeida W S, Panachuki E, de Oliveira P T S, et al. Effect of soil tillage and vegetal cover on soil water infiltration[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018,175:130-138.
[15]岳海晶,樊贵盛.土壤入渗模型参数的多元线性预测模型精度的对比分析[J].灌溉排水学报,2016,35(10):73-77,96.
Yue H J, Fan G S. Comparison of multivariate linear prediction model precision of soil infiltration model parameters[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2016,35(10):73-77,96.
[16]邓子正,黄明镜,张吴平,等.旱作条件下保护性耕作对土壤结构和容重影响试验研究[J].土壤通报,2023,54(1):46-55.
Deng Z Z, Huang M J, Zhang W P, et al. Effects of conservation tillage on soil structure and bulk density under dryland[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2023,54(1):46-55.
[17]洪艳华.长期耕作对黑土理化性质及微生物群落结构的影响[D].黑龙江大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2021.
Hong Y H. Effects of Long-Term Tillage on Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Community Structure in Black Soil[D].Daqing, Heilongjiang:Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2021.
[18]王欢,付威,胡锦昇,等.渭北旱塬管理措施对冬小麦地土壤剖面物理性状的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(7):1097-1106.
Wang H, Fu W, Hu J S, et al. Effects of agricultural measures on soil profile physical properties of winter wheat field in Weibei highland, China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019,25(7):1097-1106.
[19]张一清,王文娥,胡明宇,等.容重及含水率对土壤电导率的影响研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2022,40(3):162-169.
Zhang Y Q, Wang W E, Hu M Y, et al. Influence of bulk density and water content on soil electrical conductivity[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2022,40(3):162-169.
[20]Bai Y X, Zhou Y C, Du J J, et al. Effects of a broadleaf-oriented transformation of coniferous plantations on the hydrological characteristics of litter layers in subtropical China[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2021,25:e01400.
[21]Mitchell E, Scheer C, Rowlings D, et al. Trade-off between ‘new' SOC stabilisation from above-ground inputs and priming of native C as determined by soil type and residue placement[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2020,149(2):221-236.
[22]李学斌,陈林,樊瑞霞,等.围封条件下荒漠草原4种典型植物群落枯落物输入对土壤理化性质的影响[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2015,41(1):101-110.
Li X B, Chen L, Fan R X, et al. Effects of four typical plant community litter input on soil physical and chemical properties under the fenced condition in desert steppe[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2015,41(1):101-110.
[23]Sun D, Yang H, Guan D X, et al. The effects of land use change on soil infiltration capacity in China:A meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,626:1394-1401.
[24]莫斌,陈晓燕,杨以翠,等.不同土地利用类型土壤入渗性能及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):13-17.
Mo B, Chen X Y, Yang Y C, et al. Research on soil infiltration capacity and its influencing factors in different land uses[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,23(1):13-17.
[25]云慧雅,毕华兴,王珊珊,等.不同林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):183-189.
Yun H Y, Bi H X, Wang S S, et al. Soil physical and chemical characteristics of different forest types and their effects on soil infiltration process[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(6):183-189.
[26]丁燕芳,赵凤霞,米琳,等.豫中植烟土壤有效态微量元素与pH和有机质的关系[J].土壤,2022,54(1):88-94.
Ding Y F, Zhao F X, Mi L, et al. Relationship between available trace elements and pH and organic matter in tobacco-planting soil in central Henan Province[J]. Soils, 2022,54(1):88-94.
相似文献/References:
[1]邹永偲,兰安军,范泽孟,等.“三生空间”视角下贵州省景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(03):432.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.045]
Zou Yongcai,Lan Anjun,Fan Zemeng,et al.Evaluation of Landscape Ecological Security and Its Coupling Characteristics Analysis in Guizhou Province from the Perspective of Production-Living-Ecology Space[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):432.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.045]
[2]何钢,蔡运龙,万军.生态重建模式的尺度视角—以我国西南喀斯特地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):83.
HE Gang,CAI Yun-long,WAN Jun.Scale Perspective on Ecological Rehabilitation Model—Case Study in Karst Area of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(04):83.
[3]宋先花,蔡运龙.西南喀斯特石漠化地区生态建设产业化初探[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):87.
SONG Xian-hua,CAI Yun-long.Industrialization of Ecological Construction in Karst Areas of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(04):87.
[4]樊云龙,熊康宁,陈浒.贵州喀斯特山区大型土壤动物多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):92.
FAN Yun-long,XIONG Kang-ning,CHEN Hu.Study on the Diversity of Soil Macrofauna in Karst Mountainous Area in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):92.
[5]李瑞,王霖娇,盛茂银,等.喀斯特石漠化演替中植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):111.
LI Rui,WANG Linjiao,SHENG Maoyin,et al.Plant Species Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Properties in Karst Rocky Desertification Succession[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):111.
[6]邵技新,张凤太,苏维词,等.基于集对分析的喀斯特生态景观退化诊断研究——以毕节地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):11.
SHAO Ji-xin,ZHANG Feng-tai,SU Wei-ci,et al.Diagnosis of Karst Ecological Landscape Degradation Based on Set of Analysis——A Case Study in Bijie[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):11.
[7]杨皓,胡继伟,黄先飞,等.喀斯特地区金刺梨种植基地土壤肥力研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(03):50.
YANG Hao,HU Jiwei,HUANG Xianfei,et al.Study on Soil Fertility of Rosa sterilis S. D. Shi Planting Bases Located in Karst Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):50.
[8]欧芷阳,申文辉,彭玉华,等.广西平果县岩溶山地不同植物群落的土壤酶活性[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):75.
OU Zhiyang,SHEN Wenhui,PENG Yuhua,et al.Soil Enzyme Activities of Different Plant Communities in Karst Mountains of Pinguo County, Guangxi[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):75.
[9]曹明达,周忠发,潘艳喜,等.喀斯特洞穴滴水水文化学过程的时空变化及其环境指示——以贵州织金洞为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):339.
CAO Mingda,ZHOU Zhongfa,PAN Yanxi,et al.Temporal and Spatial Variation of Water Chemistry and Environmental Indication of Drip Water in Karst Cave —A Case Study of Zhijin Cave， Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):339.
[10]李远艳,安裕伦,杨广斌.基于PSR模型的喀斯特地区生态系统健康动态评价——以贵州省为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(06):279.
LI Yuanyan,AN Yulun,YANG Guangbin.Dynamic Evaluation of Ecosystem Health Based on PSR Model in Karst Areas—A Case Study of Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):279.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-05-19 修回日期:2023-09-13
资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目课题(2022YFF1302903); 西南大学先导计划(SWU-XDZD22003)
第一作者:张贤林(2001—),男,四川南充人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤侵蚀与流域治理。E-mail:zxl001208@163.com
通信作者:何丙辉(1966—),男,湖南汨罗人,博士,教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持、森林培育与林业生态工程研究。E-mail:hebinghui@swu.edu.cn