Rui Maogang,Zhou Yanchen.Study on the Dynamic Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Runoff on the Slope of Red Soil Engineering Accumulation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):143-152,159.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.043]
红壤工程堆积体坡面径流水动力特性研究
- Title:
- Study on the Dynamic Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Runoff on the Slope of Red Soil Engineering Accumulation
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)03-0143-10
- Keywords:
- soil and water conservation; red soil accumulation; rainfall test; dynamic hydrodynamic; erosion
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]揭示裸坡和土石混合2种典型人为扰动工程堆积体在降雨条件下的坡面径流水动力参数特征,量化堆积体侵蚀动力临界条件,进而为阐明堆积体侵蚀动力机制奠定基础。[方法]以红壤工程堆积体为研究对象,通过模拟降雨试验,开展裸坡和土石混合(20%砾石含量)堆积体在不同降雨强度条件下的径流水动力特性分析,进一步量化不同堆积体侵蚀临界动力条件,开展堆积体侵蚀内在机制研究。[结果]随降雨强度1.0 mm/min递增至2.0 mm/min,堆积体的径流由层流缓流过渡为层流急流,砾石使平均阻力系数增大1.40～3.54倍。径流剪切力和径流功率随降雨强度增大呈递增趋势,1.0 mm/min雨强时砾石作用使径流剪切力均值较裸坡下降44.99%,但≥1.5 mm/min时增大2.90%～18.50%,然而3种降雨强度下砾石均使径流功率均值较裸坡减少10.38%～68.13%,同时单位径流功率及过水断面单位能分别减少20.11%～40.45%和21.06%～37.57%。径流功率是表征堆积体侵蚀动态变化的最优参数,≤1.5 mm/min雨强时砾石抑制堆积体侵蚀,临界径流功率提高19.38%～138.12%,土体可蚀性降低79.87%～83.51%,雨强达到2.0 mm/min时,临界径流功率减小97.87%,土体可蚀性增大347.43%。[结论]降雨强度对裸坡和土石混合堆积体水动力参数均有显著影响,但随降雨强度增大砾石对堆积体侵蚀调控作用会发生改变,存在临界降雨强度。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aim of this study are to explore the characteristics of hydrodynamic parameters on the slope runoff of two typical artificial disturbance engineering accumulations, bare slope and soil rock mixture under rainfall conditions, to quantify the critical conditions for erosion dynamics of accumulations, and to lie the foundation for elucidating the erosion dynamics mechanism of accumulations. [Methods] This study focused on the loose red soil engineering accumulation as the research object. The runoff dynamic hydrodynamic characteristics of bare slope and mixed soil and rock accumulation(20% gravel content)under different rainfall intensity conditions through simulated rainfall experiments were analyzed. The critical dynamic conditions for erosion of different accumulations were quantified. The research on the internal mechanisms of accumulation erosion was conducted. [Results] The runoff of accumulations changed from laminar slow flow to laminar jet flow, and Darcy-Weisbach increased by 1.40～3.54 times, with the increase of rainfall intensity from 1.0 mm/min to 2.0 mm/min. The runoff shear stress and runoff power of the accumulation showed an overall increasing trend with the increase of rainfall intensity. When the rainfall intensity was 1.0 mm/min, the average runoff shear stress of the soil rock mixed accumulation decreased by 44.99% compared to the bare slope. However, when the rainfall intensity was more than 1.5 mm/min, it increased by 2.90%～18.50%. The gravel action reduced the average runoff power by 10.38%～68.13% compared to bare slopes under three rainfall intensities. The gravel action also reduced the unit runoff power and the unit energy of the water flow section by 20.11%～40.45% and 21.06%～37.57%, respectively. The runoff power parameter was used to characterize the dynamic changes of slope erosion in accumulations. When the rainfall intensity was less than 1.5 mm/min, gravel could inhibit accumulation erosion, and the critical runoff power increased by 19.38%～138.12%, resulting in a decrease of 79.87%～83.51% in soil erodibility. When the rainfall intensity reached up to 2.0 mm/min, the critical runoff power decreased by 97.87%, and the soil erodibility increased by 347.43%. [Conclusion] Rainfall intensity has a significant impact on the hydrodynamic parameters of both bare slopes and mixed soil and rock accumulations. However, as rainfall intensity increases, the role of gravel in regulating erosion of the accumulations will change, a critical rainfall intensity can be indentified.
参考文献/References:
[1] 高儒学,戴全厚,甘艺贤,等.土石混合堆积体坡面土壤侵蚀研究进展[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):1-8,39.
Gao R X, Dai Q H, Gan Y X, et al. Research progress on soil erosion on the slope surface of soil-rock mixed engineering accumulation[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,32(6):1-8,39.
[2] 王一峰,屈丽琴,李建明,等.基于近二十年中国水土保持公报的水土流失治理分析[J].长江科学院院报,2023,40(7):59-65.
Wang Y F, Qu L Q, Li J M, et al. Analysis of soil erosion control based on china soil and water conservation bulletin in the past two decades[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute,2023,40(7):59-65.
[3] 李镇,张文博,吕佼容,等.含结构体工程堆积体土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(4):53-62.
Li Z, Zhang W B, Lv J R, et al. Study on soil erosion of engineering accumulation with structure[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,36(4):53-62.
[4] Ramos-Scharrón C E, Alicea-Díaz E E, Figueroa-Sánchez Y A, et al. Road cutslope erosion and control treatments in an actively-cultivated tropical montane setting[J]. Catena, 2022,209(2):105814.
[5] 杨健,高照良,李永红.国内外开展开发建设项目研究进展的初步分析[J].中外企业家,2010(7):6-9.
Yang J, Gao Z L, Li Y H. Preliminary analysis of research progress on development and construction projects at home and abroad[J]. Chinese and Foreign Entrepreneurs,2010(7):6-9.
[6] Gao Y, Yin Y P, Li B, et al. Post-failure behavior analysis of the Shenzhen‘12.20'CDW landfill landslide[J]. Waste Management, 2019,83:171-183.
[7] 许阳光,郭文召,王文龙,等.极端降雨下黄土高原草被沟坡浅层滑坡特征及其对产流产沙的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(19):7898-7909.
Xu Y G, Guo W Z, Wang W L, et al. Characteristics of shallow landslides under extreme rainfall and their effects on runoff and sediment on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(19):7898-7909.
[8] 吕刚,李叶鑫,宁宝宽,等.暴雨作用下排土场平台—边坡系统土壤侵蚀过程模拟研究[J].煤炭学报,2021,46(5):1463-1476.
Lv G, Li Y X, Ning B K, et al. Soil erosion process of platform-slope system of dump under heavy rain[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(5):1463-1476.
[9] 李天阳,何丙辉,雷廷武,等.汶川震区滑坡堆积体土石混合坡面细沟水动力学特征室内试验[J].水利学报,2014,45(8):892-902.
Li T Y, He B H, He T W, et al. Indoor experiments on eroding rills hydrodynamics characteristics of earth-rock mixed landslide slope in Wenchuan Earthquake area[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2014,45(8):892-902.
[10] 李建明,牛俊,孙蓓,等.两种驱动力作用下植被调控堆积体坡面减水减沙效益[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(11):76-84.
Li J M, Niu J, Sun B, et al. Benefits of soil and water reduction on spoil heaps by vegetation under two driving forces[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2021,37(11): 76-84.
[11] 赵暄,谢永生,景民晓,等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体的类型与特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2013,11(1):88-94.
Zhao X, Xie Y S, Jing M X, et al. Types and characteristics of spoilbank in development construction project[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,11(1):88-94.
[12] 马洪超,谢永生,赵暄,等.工程堆积体标准小区界定与可蚀性因子改进[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(3):59-64.
Ma H C, Xie Y S, Zhao X, et al. Defining of engineering accumulations unit plot and improvement of engineering accumulations erodibility factor[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,30(3):59-64.
[13] 赵满,王文龙,郭明明,等.含砾石风沙土堆积体坡面径流产沙特征[J].土壤学报,2019,56(4):847-859.
Zhao M, Wang W L, Guo M M, et al. Runoff and Sediment Yielding Characteristics of Slopes of Stacks of Gravels-Containing Aeolian Sandy Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2019,56(4):847-859.
[14] 李建明,牛俊,王文龙,等.不同土质工程堆积体径流产沙差异[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):187-194.
Li J M, Niu J, Wang W L, et al. Differences in characteristics of runoff and sediment yielding from engineering accumulations with different soil textures[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE),2016,32(14):187-194.
[15] 牛耀彬,高照良,李永红,等.工程堆积体坡面细沟形态发育及其与产流产沙量的关系[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(19):154-161.
Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Rill morphology development of engineering accumulation and its relationship with runoff and sediment[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE),2016,32(19):154-161.
[16] 牛耀彬,高照良,齐星圆,等.不同工程堆积体坡面治理措施对土壤抗冲刷侵蚀能力的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(2):134-143.
Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Qi X Y, et al. Effects of treatment measures on soil anti-scour erodibility in engineering accumulation slope[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2019,35(2):134-143.
[17] 王雪松,谢永生.模拟降雨条件下锥状工程堆积体侵蚀水动力特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(1):117-124.
Wang X S, Xie Y S. Hydrodynamic characteristics of tapered spoilbank under simulated rainfall condition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2015,31(1):117-124.
[18] 丁文斌,李叶鑫,史东梅,等.两种工程堆积体边坡模拟径流侵蚀对比研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):558-569.
Ding W B, Li Y X, Shi D M, et al. Contrast study on simulated runoff erosion of two engineering accumulation slopes[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017,54(3):558-569.
[19] 李永红,牛耀彬,王正中,等.工程堆积体坡面径流水动力学参数及其相互关系[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):83-88.
Li Y H, Niu Y B, Wang Z Z, et al. Hydrodynamic parameters and their relationships of runoff over engineering accumulation slope[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2015,31(22):83-88.
[20] 王仁新,何丙辉,李天阳,等.汶川震区滑坡堆积体坡面土壤侵蚀率及水动力学参数研究[J].土壤学报,2016,53(2):375-387.
Wang R X, He B H, Li T Y, et al. Research on soil erosion rate and hydrodynamic parameters of landslide accumulation slope in wenchuan earthquake area[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2016,53(2):375-387.
[21] 陈卓鑫,王文龙,康宏亮,等.砾石对红壤工程堆积体边坡径流产沙的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(17):6545-6556.
Chen Z X, Wang W L, Kang H L, et al. Effects of gravel on runoff and sediment yield of red soil engineering accumulation slopes[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(17):6545-6556.
[22] 何晓玲,郑子成,李廷轩.不同耕作方式对紫色土侵蚀及磷素流失的影响[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(12):2492-2500.
He X L, Zheng Z C, Li T X. Effects of tillage practices on soil erosion and phosphorus loss in sloping cropland of purple soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2013,46(12):2492-2500.
[23] 雷廷武,张晴雯,闫丽娟.细沟侵蚀物理模型[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:117-129.
Lei T W, Zhang Q W, Yan L J. Physical model of rill erosion[M]. Beijing: Science Press,2009:117-129.
[24] 蒲玉宏,王伟.煤矿废弃堆积物坡面侵蚀研究初报[J].中国水土保持,1995(10):11-15.
Pu Y H, Wang W. Preliminary report on slope erosion of coal mine waste deposits[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China,1995(10):11-15.
[25] Lv J R, Luo H, Xie Y S, et al. Effects of rock fragment content, size and cover on soil erosion dynamics of spoil heaps through multiple rainfall events[J]. Catena, 2019,172:179-189.
[26] 聂慧莹,王文龙,郭明明,等.降雨条件下两种土壤类型工程堆积体坡面水沙关系与侵蚀动力特征[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(9):3141-3153.
Nie H Y, Wang W L, Guo M M, et al. Runoff-sediment relationship and erosion dynamic characteristics for two types of engineering deposits under rainfall condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(9):3141-3153.
[27] 戎玉博,王森,白玉洁,等.含砾石锥状工程堆积体侵蚀水动力学特性和细沟形态特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(2):134-141.
Rong Y B, Wang S, Bai Y J, et al. Characteristics of hydrodynamics and rill morphology of tapered engineering piles with gravel[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,32(2):134-141.
[28] 朱元骏,邵明安.不同碎石含量的土壤降雨入渗和产沙过程初步研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(2):64-67.
Zhu Y J, Shao M A. Processes of rainfall infiltration and sediment yield in soils containing different rock fragment contents[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2006,22(2):64-67.
相似文献/References:
[1]白桦,穆兴民,王双银.水土保持措施对秃尾河径流的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):40.
BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,WANG Shuang-yin.Impact of Soil and Water Conservation on River Flow of Tuwei River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):40.
[2]王星,李占斌,李鹏.陕西省丹汉江流域水土保持工程投资情况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):43.
WANG Xing,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Project Investment Status of Dan-Han River Watershed in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):43.
[3]宋凤军,穆兴民,白桦.嘉陵江流域输沙量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):65.
SONG Feng-jun,MU Xing-min,BAI Hua.Variation of Sediment Discharge in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):65.
[4]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):10.
[5]贺振伟,郭东罡,白中科,等.两种水土生态恢复模式下刺槐种群数量特征与空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):48.
HE Zhen-wei,GUO Dong-gang,BAI Zhong-ke,et al.Numeric Character and Spatial Pattern of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Population at Two Kinds of Recovery Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):48.
[6]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):116.
[7]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):86.
[8]郭兰勤,杨勤科.藉河流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):139.
GUO Lan-qin,YANG Qin-ke.Evaluation on the Benefit of the Soil and Water Conservation in Jihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):139.
[9]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(03):70.
[10]刘向东,吴钦孝,赵鸿雁.森林植被垂直截留作用与水土保持[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):8.
Liu Xiangdong,Wu Qinxiao,Zhao Hongyan.The Vertical Interception Function of Forest Vegetation and Soil and Water Conservation[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(03):8.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-07-15 修回日期:2023-07-27
资助项目:云南省水利厅科技计划项目“红壤土壤侵蚀规律研究”(YNSL2022-06)
第一作者:芮茂刚(1973—),男,云南丽江人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究。E-mail:13888997248@163.com
通信作者:周彦辰(1988—),男,湖北武汉人,高级工程师,博士,主要研究方向为水资源综合管理。E-mail:zhouyc_omg@126.com