Tian Yuqin,Wang Bing,Wang Jianfang,et al.Influence of Typical Herbaceous Root Characteristics on Soil Shear Properties in Loess Hilly Regions[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):153-159.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.013]
黄土丘陵区典型草本根系特征对土壤抗剪特性的影响
- Title:
- Influence of Typical Herbaceous Root Characteristics on Soil Shear Properties in Loess Hilly Regions
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)03-0153-07
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探讨退耕还林(草)工程实施20年以来,退耕地植物根系特征对土壤抗剪特性的影响,旨在为新时期黄土高原植被恢复和水土保持效益评估提供参考。[方法]选取黄土高原丘陵沟壑区不同演替阶段6个典型草地和2个人工草地,采集土壤表层(0—5 cm)土样120个,测定土壤抗剪特性、土壤性质和根系特征指标。[结果](1)各样地土壤容重无显著的差异(p>0.05),毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度和土壤含水量存在显著差异(p<0.05),其中人工草地毛管孔隙度和总孔隙度相对较小,白羊草样地土壤含水量最低。(2)不同演替阶段须根系植物根长密度和表面积密度较大在不同演替阶段均大于直根系植物,须根系植物根体积密度除演替初期外均小于直根系植物,人工草地沙打旺上述根系特征参数均不同程度小于自然撂荒草地。(3)各样地平均根土复合体抗剪强度相较于素土增加了22.11%～46.22%,但自然撂荒草地平均抗剪强度差异不显著(p>0.05)。人工草地黏聚力整体低于自然撂荒草地,不同演替阶段内摩擦角均表现为须根系植物大于直根系植物(1.07,1.25,1.23倍)。(4)黏聚力随总孔隙度(R2=0.82)或根体积密度(R2=0.47)的增加呈线性增大,内摩擦角随土壤容重的增加呈线性减少(R2=0.39)。[结论]在植被恢复过程中,土壤性状、根系特征及根系构型对土壤抗剪特性有一定影响。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The study aims to explore the impact of plant root characteristics on soil shear characteristics in typical abandoned farmland undergoing the ‘Grain for Green' program over a period of 20 years, and to provide reference for evaluating the soil and water conservation benefits of vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau during the new era. [Methods] Eight typical grasslands including six different successional stages and two artificial grasslands, were selected in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau. Soil samples from the topsoil(0—5 cm)were collected, and measurements on soil shear characteristics, soil properties, and root characteristics were conducted to explore the influence of vegetation restoration on soil shear characteristics. [Results](1)There were no significant differences in soil bulk density among the sites(p>0.05). However, capillary porosity, total porosity, and soil moisture content exhibited significant differences(p<0.05). The artificial grassland had relatively lower capillary porosity and total porosity, and the Bothriochloa ischaemum(Linnaeus)Keng grassland had the lowest soil moisture content.(2)In different successional stages, the root length density and surface area density of fibrous root systems were generally higher than those of taproot systems. However, the root volume density of fibrous root systems was lower than that of taproot systems, except in the early successional stage. The artificial grassland(Astragalus adsurgens Pall.)exhibited lower values for these root characteristics compared to the natural fallow grassland.(3)The average shear strength of the root-soil complex increased by 22.11% to 46.22% compared to the bare soil, but the difference in average shear strength between natural fallow grassland and other grasslands was not significant(p>0.05). The cohesive force of the natural fallow grassland was generally higher than that of the artificial grassland, and the friction angle within different successional stages showed that fibrous root systems had higher values compared to taproot systems(1.07, 1.25, and 1.23 times higher).(4)Cohesive force increased linearly with total porosity(R2=0.84)or root volume density(R2=0.47), while the friction angle decreased linearly with increasing soil bulk density(R2=0.47). [Conclusion] In the process of vegetation restoration, soil properties, root characteristics and root configuration have certain effects on soil shear resistance.
参考文献/References:
[1] 甘凤玲,韦杰,李沙沙.紫色土埂坎典型草本根系摩阻特性对土壤含水率的响应[J].草业学报,2022,31(7):28-37.
Gan F L, Wei J, Li S S. Response of root-soil friction characteristics of three common grasses to soil water content in purple soil bunds[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022,31(7):28-37.
[2] Kok H, McCool D K. Quantifying freeze/thaw-induced variability of soil strength[J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1990,33(2):501-0506.
[3] Moayedi H, Tien B D, Dounis A, et al. Novel nature-inspired hybrids of neural computing for estimating soil shear strength[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019,9(21):4643.
[4] Barbhuiya G H, Hasan S D. Effect of nano-silica on physio-mechanical properties and microstructure of soil:A comprehensive review[J]. Materials Today:Proceedings, 2021,44:217-221.
[5] 张爱国,李锐,杨勤科.中国水蚀土壤抗剪强度研究[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(3):5-9.
Zhang A G, Li R, Yang Q K. Study on soil anti shearing intensity of water erosion in China[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001,21(3):5-9.
[6] 陈红星,李法虎,郝仕玲,等.土壤含水率与土壤碱度对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(2):21-25.
Chen H X, Li F H, Hao S L, et al. Effects of soil water content and soil sodicity on soil shearing strength[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007,23(2):21-25.
[7] 李想,王瑄,盛思远,等.坡面不同土地利用类型土壤抗剪强度影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):80-84.
Li X, Wang X, Sheng S Y, et al. Analysis of influence factors on soil shear strength in slope under different land use types[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017,31(1):80-84.
[8] 李建兴,何丙辉,谌芸,等.不同护坡草本植物的根系分布特征及其对土壤抗剪强度的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(10):144-152.
Li J X, He B H, Chen Y, et al. Root distribution features of typical herb plants for slope protection and their effects on soil shear strength[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(10):144-152.
[9] 杨亚川,莫永京,王芝芳,等.土壤—草本植被根系复合体抗水蚀强度与抗剪强度的试验研究[J].中国农业大学学报,1996,1(2):31-38.
Yang Y C, Mo Y J, Wang Z F, et al. Experimental study on anti-water erosion and shear strength of soil-root composite[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1996,1(2):31-38.
[10] 郑子成,张锡洲,李廷轩,等.玉米生长期土壤抗剪强度变化特征及其影响因素[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(5):125-130.
Zheng Z C, Zhang X Z, Li T X, et al. Change Characteristics and lnfluencing Factors of Soil Shear Strength during Maize Growing Period[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2014,45(5):125-130.
[11] 陈晓安,杨洁,熊永,等.红壤区崩岗侵蚀的土壤特性与影响因素研究[J].水利学报,2013,44(10):1175-1181.
Chen X A, Yang J, Xiong Y, et al. Research on the soil characteristics and factors of collapsing erosion in the red soil zone[J]. Ournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013,44(10):1175-1181.
[12] 格日乐,张成福,蒙仲举,等.3种植物根—土复合体抗剪特性对比分析[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):85-90.
Ge R L, Zhang C F, Meng Z J, et al. The shear property comparison of three roots-soil composites[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,28(2):85-90.
[13] 邓佳.南方红壤区常见草本根土复合体生物力学抗蚀机理研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2015.
Deng J. The research of biomechanical erosion resistance mechanism forthe common herbal roots-soil composite in southern red soil region[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University, 2015.
[14] 张立芸,段青松,范茂攀,等.玉米和大豆根系对滇中地区坡耕地红黏土抗剪强度的影响[J].土壤学报,2022,59(6):1527-1539.
Zhang L Y, Duan Q S, Fan M P, et al. Effects of maize and soybean roots on topsoil shear strength of red clay on slopingfarmland in central Yunnan[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022,59(6):1527-1539.
[15] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理实验室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.
Institute of Soil Physics, Nanjing Soil Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Physical properties of soil[M]. Beijing:Beijing Science Press, 1978.
[16] Martel S J. Mechanics of landslide initiation as a shear fracture phenomenon[J]. Marine Geology, 2004,203(3):319-339.
[17] Wei J, Shi B, Li J, et al. Shear strength of purple soil bunds under different soil water contents and dry densities: A case study in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China[J]. Catena, 2018,166:124-133.
[18] 唐菡,谌芸,刘枭宏,等.喀斯特坡地拉巴豆地埂篱根及根—土复合体力学特性[J].生态学报,2019,39(16):6114-6125.
Tang H, Chen Y, Liu X H, et al. Study on the mechanic features of root and root-soil matrix of Dolichos lablab L. hedgerows on the slopes of the karst area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(16):6114-6125.
[19] Tsige D, Senadheera S, Talema A. Stability analysis of plant-root-reinforced shallow slopes along mountainous road corridors based on numerical modeling[J]. Geosciences, 2019,10(1):19.
相似文献/References:
[1]韩金发.风沙地引种厚荚相思的生长情况与土壤性状的关系[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):127.
HAN Jin-fa.Relationship of Growing Situation of A.crassicarpa with Physicochemical Properties of Soil in Wind Sandy Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):127.
[2]李灵,张玉,江慧华,等.旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):56.
LI Ling,ZHANG Yu,JIANG Hui-hua,et al.Effects of Tourist Activities on Soil Quality of Wuyishan Scenery District[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):56.
[3]马富亮,符素华,罗广惠.东北典型黑土区坡耕地涝渍地土壤化学性状[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):51.
MA Fuliang,FU Suhua,LUO Guanghui.Soil Chemical Characteristics of the Waterlogged Land on Slope Cropland in Typical Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):51.
[4]邓 超,李永梅,范茂攀,等.大豆单间作对土壤团聚体及固土能力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):77.
DENG Chao,LI Yongmei,FAN Maopan,et al.Effects of Different Planting Patterns of Soybean on Soil Aggregates and Soil Consolidation Ability[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):77.
[5]杨馥羽,陈奇伯,黎建强,等.计划烧除对云南松林土壤抗剪性能的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(06):214.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.028]
Yang Fuyu,Chen Qibo,Li Jianqiang,et al.Effects of Prescribed Burning on Soil Shear Strength in Pinus yunnanensis Forests[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):214.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.028]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-02-10 修回日期:2023-06-15
资助项目:中国科学院“西部之光”西部青年学者项目(XAB2019A04); 国家自然科学基金重点项目(42130717)
第一作者:田愉琴(1996—),女,贵州铜仁人,硕士,主要从事土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:1952862833@qq.com
通信作者:王兵(1982—),男,陕西武功人,博士,研究员,主要从事植被恢复与土壤侵蚀研究。E-mail:bwang@ms.iswc.ac.cn