Dong Tianfu,Deng Zhihao,Yang Jing,et al.Characteristics of Stability of Soil Aggregates at Different Vegetation Restoration Stages in Karst Reclaimed Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):33-42.
喀斯特退耕地不同植被恢复阶段土壤团聚体稳定性特征
- Title:
- Characteristics of Stability of Soil Aggregates at Different Vegetation Restoration Stages in Karst Reclaimed Land
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2024)02-0033-10
- Keywords:
- karst; yellow soil; calcareous soil; different vegetation for returning farmland; aggregate stability
- 分类号:
- S152.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]探究黔中喀斯特地区黄壤和石灰土发育区耕地退耕对土壤结构和稳定性的影响,为喀斯特区水土流失防治和退耕地恢复植被效益评价提供理论依据。[方法]基于干湿筛法,对耕地(YM)和退耕后不同植被恢复阶段草地(CD)、灌丛(GC)、林地(LD)浅层(0—30 cm)土壤团聚体组成和稳定性差异特征进行了研究。[结果]两种土壤类型发育区土壤机械团聚体含量随粒径减小而降低,水稳性团聚体含量随粒径减小先降低后上升,且土壤机械团聚体均以>1 mm为主,黄壤和石灰土占比分别为82.45%,84.01%; 水稳性团聚体以>2 mm为主,占比分别为53.53%,54.61%。黄壤团聚体平均重量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径(GMD)随土层深度增加而降低,石灰土则相反; 黄壤退耕地的团聚体稳定性相对于石灰土更好; 两种土壤MWD,GMD总体上均为YM最低,土壤结构破坏率(PAD)最高,即YM土壤团聚体稳定性最低,不同退耕植被恢复阶段土壤团聚体稳定性相对于YM皆有所提高。黄壤土壤MWD与有机质含量(SOM)、全氮(TN)显著正相关,GMD与SOM显著正相关,PAD则是与粉粒显著正相关(p<0.05); 石灰土MWD,GMD与砂粒、全钾(TK)显著正相关(p<0.05),和全磷(TP)极显著负相关,PAD与砂粒、TK极显著负相关,与TP极显著正相关(p<0.01),与黏粒显著正相关(p<0.05)。多因素方差分析结果表明:植被类型、土层深度和土壤类型均对土壤团聚体稳定性有显著(p<0.05)影响。[结论]在两种土壤发育区,退耕后不同植被恢复阶段土壤团聚体稳定性指标均高于耕地,可见退耕还林还草有效提高了土壤团聚体稳定性,增强了土壤抵抗侵蚀的能力,研究结果能为喀斯特区水土保持措施布设和退耕地效益评价提供理论依据。
- Abstract:
- [Objective] The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of cropland fallowing on soil structure and stability in the development areas of yellow and calcareous soils in Qianzhong Karst Region, and to provide theoretical basis for the prevention and control of soil erosion and evaluation of the benefits of revegetation of fallowed cropland in karst region. [Methods] Differential characteristics of soil aggregate composition and stability in shallow(0—30 cm)soil layers of cropland(YM)and different stages of vegetation restoration after fallow 〔grassland(CD), scrubland(GC), and woodland(LD)〕 were investigated based on the wet-dry sieve method. [Results] The contents of soil mechanical aggregates in the two types of soil development areas decreased with the decrease of particle size, and the content of water stable aggregates decreased at first and then increased with the decrease of particle size, and the main content of soil mechanical aggregates was >1 mm aggregate, and the proportions of yellow loam and lime soil were 82.45% and 84.01%, respectively. The water stable aggregates were mainly >2 mm aggregate, accounting for 53.53% and 54.61%, respectively. The mean weight diameter(MWD)and geometric mean diameter(GMD)of aggregates in yellow soil decreased with the increase of soil depth, while the opposite trend in calcareous soil to that in yellow soil was found. Cluster stability of yellow soil fallow land was better compared to calcareous soils. In general, the MWD and GMD of the two soils were the lowest in YM, and the soil structure damage rate(PAD)was the highest, the stability of soil aggregates in YM was the lowest, and the stability of soil aggregates in different stages of vegetation restoration was improved compared with that in YM. MWD of yellow soil was significantly positively correlated with organic matter content(SOM)and total nitrogen(TN), GMD was significantly positively correlated with SOM, and PAD was significantly positively correlated with silt(p<0.05). MWD and GMD of calcareous soil were significantly positively correlated with sand and total potassium(TK)(p<0.05), and negatively correlated with total phosphorus(TP). PAD was significantly negatively correlated with sand and TK, positively correlated with TP(p<0.01), and positively correlated with clay(p<0.05). The results of multivariate analysis of variance showed that vegetation type, soil depth and soil type had significant effects on soil aggregate stability(p<0.05). [Conclusion] In the two soil development areas, the soil aggregate stability indexes of different vegetation recovery stages after fallow are higher than those of cultivated land, which shows that fallow returning forest to grass effectively improves the stability of soil aggregate and strengthens the ability of soil to resist erosion, and the results of this study can provide theoretical basis for the deployment of soil and water conservation measures and the evaluation of the benefits of fallow land in the karst area.
参考文献/References:
[1] 杨青,杨广斌,戴丽,等.喀斯特地区石漠化与土壤类型的空间相关分析:以贵州省为例[J].中国岩溶,2019,38(1):80-87.
Yang Q, Yang G B, Dai L, et al. Spatial correlation analysis of rocky desertification and soil types in karst area: A case study of Guizhou Province[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2019,38(1):80-87.
[2] 李阳兵,侯建筠,谢德体.中国西南岩溶生态研究进展[J].地理科学,2002,22(3):365-370.
Li Y B, Hou J J, Xie D T. The recent development of research on karst ecology in southwest China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2002,22(3):365-370.
[3] Jiang Z C, Lian Y Q, Qin X Q. Rocky desertification in Southwest China: Impacts, causes, and restoration[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014,132:1-12.
[4] 陈洪松,冯腾,李成志,等.西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀特征研究现状与展望[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):10-16.
Chen H S, Feng T, Li C Z, et al. Characteristics of soil erosion in the karst regions of southwest China: Research advance and prospective[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,32(1):10-16.
[5] 蒋忠诚,罗为群,童立强,等.21世纪西南岩溶石漠化演变特点及影响因素[J].中国岩溶,2016,35(5):461-468.
Jiang Z C, Luo W Q, Tong L Q, et al. Evolution features of rocky desertification and influence factors in karst areas of southwest China in the 21st century[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2016,35(5):461-468.
[6] Yuan Y S, Zhao W Q, Zhang Z L, et al. Impacts of oxalic acid and glucose additions on N transformation in microcosms via artificial roots[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018,121(121):16-23.
[7] 韦许梅.桂西北退耕还林不同植被恢复模式的植被效益调查研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2008.
Wei X M. Investigation and Study on Vegetation-Effect in Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns of Returning Land for Farming to Forestry in Guangxi[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2008.
[8] 卢金伟,李占斌.土壤团聚体研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(1):81-85.
Lu J W, Li Z B. Advance in soil aggregate study[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002,9(1):81-85.
[9] 韩贞贵,毛天旭,屠丹,等.长江源区草地覆盖变化对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].草地学报,2020,28(3):801-807.
Han Z G, Mao T X, Tu D, et al. Effects of vegetation change on the distribution and stability of soil aggregate in the source of the Yangtze River[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020,28(3):801-807.
[10] Goh K M. Carbon sequestration and stabilization in soils: Implications for soil productivity and climate change[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2004,50(4):467-476.
[11] 袁瀛,肖列.退耕植被演替过程中土壤团聚体与胶结物质的协同响应[J].西南林业大学学报:自然科学,2018,38(3):116-122.
Yuan Y, Xiao L. Synergetic response of soil aggregates and binding agents in the process of vegetation restoration succession[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University: Natural Sciences,2018,38(3):116-122.
[12] 由政,姚旭,景航,等.不同演替阶段群落根系分布与土壤团聚体特征的协同变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(6):20-25,31.
You Z, Yao X, Jing H, et al. Coordinated variation between root distributions and soil aggregate characteristics at different successional stages[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,23(6):20-25,31.
[13] 王妙倩,许小明,王浩嘉,等.黄土高原次生林植被演替过程中土壤团聚体动态特征分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2023,51(10):107-117.
Wang M Q, Xu X M, Wang H J, et al. Dynamic characterization of soil aggregates during secondary forest vegetation succession in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Natural Science Edition,2023,51(10):107-117.
[14] 董亚辉,戴全厚,邓伊晗,等.喀斯特山区退耕地水稳性团聚体演变特征及土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):138-141.
Dong Y H, Dai Q H, Deng Y H, et al. Dynamics of soil water stable aggregates and their relationship with soil nutrients on converted land in karst areas[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,30(2):138-141.
[15] 林立文.喀斯特区植被恢复对土壤有机质组分及团聚体稳定性的影响[D].南宁:广西大学,2021.
Lin L W. Effects of Karst Vegetation Restoration on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Matter Composition[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2021.
[16] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
Bao S D. Soil Agrochemical Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008.
[17] 邓志豪,杨静,戴全厚,等.喀斯特区土地利用方式对石灰土团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):114-121.
Deng Z H, Yang J, Dai Q H, et al. Effects of land use patterns on aggregate stability and organic carbon of calcareous soil in karst area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(5):114-121.
[18] 韦慧,邓羽松,林立文,等.喀斯特生态脆弱区典型小生境土壤团聚体稳定性比较研究[J].生态学报,2022,42(7):2751-2762.
Wei H, Deng Y S, Lin L W, et al. Comparative study on the stability of soil aggregates in typical microhabitats in karst ecologically fragile areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(7):2751-2762.
[19] Tang F K, Cui M, Lu Q, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on the aggregate stability and distribution of aggregate-associated organic carbon in a typical karst gorge region[J]. Solid Earth, 2016,7(1):141-151.
[20] 白怡婧,刘彦伶,李渝,等.长期不同施肥和耕作对坡耕地黄壤团聚体组成及有机碳的影响[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(2):52-60.
Bai Y J, Liu Y L, Li Y, et al. Effect of long-term different tillage and fertilization measures on aggregates composition and organic carbon in yellow soil slope cultivated land[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,19(2):52-60.
[21] 俞月凤,卢凌霄,杜虎,等.不同类型森林石灰土的团聚体组成及其有机碳分布特征[J].西北植物学报,2013,33(5):1011-1019.
Yu Y F, Lu L X, Du H, et al. Distribution of organic carbon and aggregation of calcareous soil in different forest types[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013,33(5):1011-1019.
[22] 冷暖.南亚热带赤红壤团聚体稳定性及其降雨溅蚀响应[D].南宁:广西大学,2022.
Leng N. Aggregate Stability of Lateritic Red Soil and Its Response to Rainfall Splash Erosion in South Subtropical Zone[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2022.
[23] 王彬.土壤可蚀性动态变化机制与土壤可蚀性估算模型[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
Wang B. Dynamic Mechanism of Soil Erodibility and Soil Erodibility Calculation Model[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University, 2013.
[24] Nguetnkam J P, Dultz S. Soil degradation in Central North Cameroon: Water-dispersible clay in relation to surface charge in Oxisol A and B horizons[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011,113(1):38-47.
[25] Tombcz E, Szekeres M. Colloidal behavior of aqueous montmorillonite suspensions: The specific role of pH in the presence of indifferent electrolytes[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2004,27(1/2):75-94.
[26] Weng L P, Van Riemsdijk W H, Hiemstra T. Humic nanoparticles at the oxide-water interface: Interactions with phosphate ion adsorption[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008,42(23):8747-8752.
[27] 杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899.
Yang P L, Luo Y P, Shi Y C. Soil fractal characteristics characterized by weight distribution of particle size[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1993,38(20):1896-1899.
[28] 林立文,邓羽松,王金悦,等.南亚热带人工林种植对赤红壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(11):3647-3656.
Lin L W, Deng Y S, Wang J Y, et al. Effects of plantation on aggregate distribution and stability of lateritic red soil in south subtropical China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(11):3647-3656.
[29] 赵国政.典型喀斯特地区小流域石灰土与黄壤理化特征及其水分调节技术研究[D].贵阳:贵州民族大学,2021.
Zhao G Z. Soil Physical Characteristics of Calcareous Soil and Yellow Soil in a Small Catchment of Typical Karst Area and Their Water Regulation Techniques[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou Minzu University, 2021.
[30] 孙兆地.石灰岩、花岗岩母质发育的土壤-油松林生态系统中有机碳、氮、磷、钾的垂直分布特征:以松山自然保护区为例[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012.
Sun Z D. Vertical Distribution Characters of Organic Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Soil-Chinese Pine Forest Ecosystem Developed from Limestone and Granite Parent Materials: Taking Song Mountain Nature Reserve for Example[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012.
相似文献/References:
[1]李永垚,熊康宁,罗娅.喀斯特石漠化综合治理工程科技贡献率测算研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):259.
LI Yong-yao,XIONG Kang-ning,LUO Ya.Progress of Research on Measurement of Science and Technology Contribution Rate Concerning Karst Rocky Desertification Comprehensive Management Project[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):259.
[2]纪启芳,张兴奇,张科利,等.贵州省喀斯特地区坡面产流产沙特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):1.
JI Qi-fang,ZHANG Xing-qi,ZHANG Ke-li,et al.Runoff and Sediment Characteristics of Slope Land in Karst Areas of Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):1.
[3]王德光,胡宝清,饶映雪,等.基于网格法与ANN的县域喀斯特土地系统功能分区研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):131.
WANG De-guang,HU Bao-qing,RAO Ying-xue,et al.Research on Functional Zoning of Karst Land System at County Regional Scale Based on the Methods of Lattice and ANN[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(02):131.
[4]何钢,蔡运龙,万军.生态重建模式的尺度视角—以我国西南喀斯特地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):83.
HE Gang,CAI Yun-long,WAN Jun.Scale Perspective on Ecological Rehabilitation Model—Case Study in Karst Area of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(02):83.
[5]宋先花,蔡运龙.西南喀斯特石漠化地区生态建设产业化初探[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):87.
SONG Xian-hua,CAI Yun-long.Industrialization of Ecological Construction in Karst Areas of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(02):87.
[6]吴秀芹,蔡运龙,蒙吉军.喀斯特山区土壤侵蚀与土地利用关系研究——以贵州省关岭县石板桥流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(04):46.
WU Xiu-qin,CAI Yun-long,MENG Ji-jun.Impacts of Land Use on Soil Erosion in Karst Mountainous Area——A Case Study in Shibanqiao Catchment in Guanling county, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(02):46.
[7]彭建,蔡运龙,王尚彦,等.喀斯特石林发育的土壤学视角[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(04):49.
PENG Jian,CAI Yun-long,WANG Shang-yan,et al.Study on the Role of Soil in Stone Forest Development[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(02):49.
[8]张冬青,林昌虎,何腾兵.贵州喀斯特环境特征与石漠化的形成[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):220.
ZHANG Dong-qing,LIN Chang-hu,HE Teng-bing.Environmental Characteristic of Karst in Guizhou and Forming of Rock Desertification[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):220.
[9]李宝荣,崔国发,王克勤.玉溪市南盘江流域石灰岩地区景观格局变化研究——以江川县路居片区小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(01):227.
LI Bao-rong,CUI Guo-fa,WANG Ke-qin.Study on the Landscape Change of a Karst Area in the Drainage Area of Nanpanjiang River in Yuxi——A Small Drainage Area of Luju District in Jiangchuan County as an Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):227.
[10]王金乐,林昌虎,何腾兵.贵州喀斯特山区石漠化生态环境背景与生态重建[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):148.
WANG Jin-le,LIN Chang-hu,HE Teng-bing.Ecological Environment of Rocky Desertification and Ecological Rehabilitation Model in Karst Mountainous Area of Guizhou[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(02):148.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-02-25 修回日期:2023-04-19
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(42161009,41807175,31971438); 贵州省科学技术基金(黔科合基础-ZK[2021]一般223)
第一作者:董天富(1998—),男,贵州大方人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态水文。E-mail:395102130@qq.com
通信作者:杨静(1987—),女,重庆合川人,博士,副教授,主要从事生态水文研究。E-mail:kinty920@163.com