CHEN An,LI Jingji,WANG Maosheng,et al.Research for Change of Ecosystem Service and the Tradeoff-Synergy Relation of the YLN Basin in the Tibet Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):313-319+329.
西藏“一江两河”流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系研究
- Title:
- Research for Change of Ecosystem Service and the Tradeoff-Synergy Relation of the YLN Basin in the Tibet Autonomous Region
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)02-0313-07
- 分类号:
- X171.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为使环境资源得到高效配置,明晰生态系统服务间权衡关系是重要前提。以一江两河流域为对象,基于InVEST模型对该区1990—2018年的土壤保持、水源涵养和固碳服务进行动态评估,并采用相关分析法探讨了流域、县域尺度下各服务间的权衡关系。结果表明:(1)1990—2018年,土壤保持量和碳储量呈波动增加趋势,产水量呈减少趋势。单位面积土壤保持量、产水量和碳储量的高值区均分布在流域东部的拉萨河河谷地区。(2)流域尺度下,2010年水源涵养服务与固碳服务间表现出权衡关系,其余年份各服务间均呈现出协同关系; 县域尺度下,各服务间关系也多为协同关系,但具有较强的空间异质性。(3)热点制图显示,1990—2018年1类区占比最大且呈增加趋势,主要地类为低植被覆盖草地; 0类和2类区占比增加,主要地类分别为沙地和高植被覆盖草地; 3类区占比有所减少,主要地类为高植被覆盖草地和灌木林。由此可得,研究区3种生态系统服务具有较强的时空异质性,各服务间以协同关系为主,且随时空变化而发生着强弱变化。
- Abstract:
- For the effective allocation of environmental resources, clarifying the tradeoff relations among the ecosystem services is the important premise. The YLN Basin(the Basin of Yarlung Tsangpo River, Lhasa River, and Nianchu River)is the research case. Based on InVest model, this regional soil conservation, water conservation, and carbon storage between 1990 and 2018 were evaluated dynamically. This paper also adopted the other related analysis to discuss the tradeoff relations among the different services on the scales of basin and county respectively. The results show that:(1)from 1990 to 2018, the soil conservation and the carbon storage showed a fluctuating increasing trend, water production reduced; the high values of soil conservation, water production and carbon storage in per unit area all distributed in the Lhasa River valley in the eastern basin;(2)on scale of basin, there was a trade-off nexus between water conservation service and carbon storage service in 2010, and the other services all manifested synergistic nexus in the other years; on the scale of county, the relations of services mainly were occupied by synergistic nexus, nonetheless it possessed relatively intensive spatial heterogeneity;(3)the hotspot map illustrated that category 1 had largest proportion and it was increasing between 1990 and 2018, the main land type was low vegetation covered meadow; the proportions of the categories of 0 and 2 increased, the main land types were sandy land and high vegetation covered meadow; the proportion of category 3 reduced, the main land types were high vegetation covered meadow and shrubbery. Therefore, the 3 kinds of ecosystematic services have the relatively intensive spatial heterogeneity, and the synergistic nexus is the major one among the services that is alterable following the spatiotemporal change showing different degrees.
参考文献/References:
[1] Raymond C M, Singh G G, Benessaiah K, et al. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships[J]. Bioscience, 2013,63(7):536-546.
[2] 傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576.
[3] Yang G, Ge Y, Xue H, et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015,136:110-121.
[4] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1005-1016.
[5] 包蕊,刘峰,张建平,等.基于多目标线性规划的甲积峪小流域生态系统服务权衡优化[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):812-828.
[6] 陈登帅,李晶,杨晓楠,等.渭河流域生态系统服务权衡优化研究[J].生态学报,2018,38(9):3260-3271.
[7] 尹礼唱,王晓峰,张琨,等.国家屏障区生态系统服务权衡与协同[J].地理研究,2019,38(9):2162-2172.
[8] Schrobback P, Adamson D, Quiggin J. Turning water into carbon: Carbon sequestration and water flow in the Murray-Darling Basin[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2010,49(1):23-45.
[9] Dymond J R, Ausseil A G, Djanibekov N, et al. How attractive are short-term CDM forestations in arid regions: The case of irrigated cropland in Uzbekistan[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2012,21:108-117.
[10] Zhou Z X, Li Jing, Guo Z Z, et al. Trade-offs between carbon, water, soil and food in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region from remotely sensed data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2017,58:145-156.
[11] Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, et al. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world[J]. Global Environment Change, 2014,28:263-275.
[12] 杜军,胡军,尼玛吉,等.1981—2017年西藏“一江两河”流域5 cm地温及其界限温度时空变化特征[J].地理学报,2019,74(9):1821-1834.
[13] 郑德凤,郝帅,吕乐婷,等.三江源国家公园生态系统服务时空变化及权衡-协同关系[J].地理研究,2020,39(1):64-78.
[14] 连喜红,祁元,王宏伟,等.人类活动影响下的青海湖流域生态系统服务空间格局[J].冰川冻土,2019,41(5):1254-1263.
[15] 卢慧婷,黄琼中,朱捷缘,等.拉萨河流域生态系统类型和质量变化及其对生态系统服务的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8911-8918.
[16] 张戈丽,欧阳华,周才平,等.近50年来气候变化对西藏“一江两河”地区农业气候热量资源的影响[J].资源科学,2010,32(10):1943-1954.
[17] 王聪,伍星,傅伯杰,等.重点脆弱生态区生态恢复模式现状与发展方向[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7333-7343.
[18] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss[J]. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1958,39(2):285-291.
[19] Williams J R, Renard K G, Dyke P T. EPIC: A new method for assessing erosion's effect on soil productivity[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1983,38(5): 381-383.
[20] Teng H F, Liang Z Z, Chen S C, et al. Current and future assessments of soil erosion by water on the Tibetan Plateau based on RUSLE and CMIP5 climate models[J]. the Science of the Total Environment, 2018,635:673-686.
[21] Lu Q S, Xu B, Liang F Y, et al. Influences of the Grain-for-Green project on grain security in southern China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013,34(11):616-622.
[22] 欧阳志云,王如松.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(5):635-640.
[23] 杨蕾.基于In VEST模型的三江源主要生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2020.
[24] 李屹峰,罗跃初,刘纲,等.土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响:以密云水库流域为例[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):726-736.
[25] 周文佐,刘高焕,潘剑君.土壤有效含水量的经验估算研究:以东北黑土为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(4):88-95.
[26] Li J, Gong J, Guldmann J M, et al. Carbon dynamics in the Northeastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from 1990 to 2030 using landsat land use/cover change data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020,12(3):528-528
[27] Zhao S, Zhu C, Zhou D, et al. Organic carbon storage in China's urban areas[J]. PLoS One, 2013,8(8).DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0071975.
[28] 范宇.西藏土壤有机碳库及其空间分布特征研究[D].成都:四川农业大学,2006.
[29] 赵忠贺,徐增让,成升魁,等.西藏生态系统碳蓄积动态的土地利用/覆被变化归因分析[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(5):755-766.
[30] Wang C, Wang S, Fu B J, et al. Precipitation gradient determines the tradeoff between soil moisture and soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and species richness in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,575:1538-1545.
[31] 黄麟,曹巍,吴丹,等.西藏高原生态系统服务时空格局及其变化特征[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(4):543-555.
[32] 张华国.试论新时期西藏“一江两河”农业生态流域资源开发和经济发展的生态环境问题及对策[J].西藏农业科技,2017,39(2):40-44.
[33] Niu Q, Liu L, Heng J, et al. A multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin of Tibetan Plateau, Southwest China[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2020,8.DOI:10.3389/feart.2020.00213.
[34] 拉珍,拉巴,陈涛,等.基于TVDI的西藏“一江两河”地区干旱监测研究[J].高原山地气象研究,2015,35(4):48-52.
相似文献/References:
[1]付梦娣,肖能文,赵志平,等.北京城市化进程对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):235.
FU Mengdi,XIAO Nengwen,ZHAO Zhiping,et al.Effects of Urbanization on Ecosystem Services in Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):235.
[2]荣月静,张慧,王岩松.基于Logistic-CA-Markov与InVEST模型对南京市土地利用与生物多样性功能模拟评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):82.
RONG Yuejing,ZHANG Hui,WANG Yansong.Assessment on Land Use and Biodiversity in Nanjing City Based on Logistic-CA-Markov and InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):82.
[3]张云倩,张晓祥,陈振杰,等.基于InVEST模型的江苏海岸带生态系统碳储量时空变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):100.
ZHANG Yunqian,ZHANG Xiaoxiang,CHEN Zhenjie,et al.Research on the Spatiotemporal Variation of Carbon Storage in Coastal Zone Ecosystem of Jiangsu Based on InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):100.
[4]巩杰,马学成,张玲玲,等.基于InVEST模型的甘肃白龙江流域生境质量时空分异[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):191.
GONG Jie,MA Xuecheng,ZHANG Lingling,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation of Habitat Quality in Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu Based on InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):191.
[5]虎帅,张学儒,官冬杰.基于InVEST模型重庆市建设用地扩张的碳储量变化分析[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):323.
HU Shuai,ZHANG Xueru,GUAN Dongjie.Analysis on Carbon Storage Change of Construction Land Expansion in Chongqing Based on InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):323.
[6]柯新利,普鹍鹏,杨柏寒,等.耕地保护对生态系统水源涵养功能的影响——以武汉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(01):391.
KE Xinli,PU Kunpeng,YANG Bohan,et al.Impacts of Cultivated Land Protection on Water Retention Function of Ecosystem—A Case Study in Wuhan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):391.
[7]柳冬青,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统土壤保持功能时空变异及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(04):98.
LIU Dongqing,GONG Jie,ZHANG Jinxi,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation of Soil Conservation Function and Its Influencing Factors in Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):98.
[8]刘晓娜,裴厦,陈龙,等.基于InVEST模型的门头沟区生态系统土壤保持功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(06):168.
LIU Xiaona,PEI Sha,CHEN Long,et al.Study on Soil Conservation Service of Ecosystem Based on InVEST Model in Mentougou District of Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(02):168.
[9]卢周扬帆,许端阳,张绪教,等.阿拉善干旱荒漠区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(06):296.
LU Zhouyangfan,XU Duanyang,ZHANG Xujiao,et al.Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services in Arid Desert Region of Alxa[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(02):296.
[10]王秀明,刘谞承,龙颖贤,等.基于改进的InVEST模型的韶关市生态系统服务功能时空变化特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):381.
WANG Xiuming,LIU Xucheng,LONG Yingxian,et al.Spatial-Temporal Changes and Influencing Factors of Ecosystem Services in Shaoguan City Based on Improved InVEST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):381.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-01-19 修回日期:2021-02-19
资助项目:国家重点研发项目“第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究”(2019QZKK0307)
第一作者:陈安(1995—),男,河北沧州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为生态环境监测与评价。E-mail:350583076@qq.com
通信作者:李景吉(1983—),男,江苏徐州人,博士,讲师,主要从事植物多样性与生态保护研究。E-mail:lijingji2014@cdut.edu.cn