LIU Yuanyuan,SUN Benhua,PI Xiaomin,et al.Post-Effects of Organic Material Input on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen on Anthropogenic Loess Soil in Guanzhong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(04):71-76.
有机物料输入对关中土碳氮影响的后效作用
- Title:
- Post-Effects of Organic Material Input on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen on Anthropogenic Loess Soil in Guanzhong Area
- Keywords:
- organic materials; soil organic carbon; dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen; nitrate nitrogen; anthropogenic loess soil
- 分类号:
- S153.6;S152.7
- 摘要:
- 土壤有机碳氮是土壤肥力的关键因素，有机物料施用是提高土壤有机碳氮的有效措施。研究和比较了不同有机物料输入对土耕层（0—20 cm）土壤有机碳、全氮、可溶性有碳氮及0—200 cm剖面土壤硝态氮和含水量分布变化的后效作用。结果表明，停止施入有机物料两年后，与对照（CK）相比，秸秆与氮磷肥配施（SNP）和生物炭与氮磷肥配施（BNP）的表层（0—20 cm）土壤有机碳（SOC）分别提高了29.5%和29.8%（p<0.05）；氮磷肥（NP）、有机肥与氮磷肥配施（MNP）、秸秆与氮磷肥配施（SNP）和生物炭与氮磷肥配施（BNP）的表层土壤全氮含量较CK分别提高了22.0%，14.3%，24.2%和26.4%（p<0.05）。BNP处理的土壤可溶性有机碳（DOC）显著高于其他处理（p<0.05），分别比CK，NP，MNP和SNP提高了23.4%，10.9%，21.3%，20.5%；所有施肥处理的土壤可溶性有机氮（DON）均显著高于CK（p<0.05），分别提高了39.3%，29.3%，34.5%和52.3%。与CK相比，各施肥处理显著提高了表层土壤硝态氮含量（p<0.05），增加了0—100 cm土层的硝态氮累积量。与NP处理相比，MNP和SNP显著提高了0—200 cm土层的硝态氮累积量（p<0.05），而BNP则差异不显著。相比CK，施肥处理（NP，MNP，SNP，BNP）可显著提高0—20 cm土层的含水量，增加0—40 cm土层的储水量，且BNP处理显著高于SNP和MNP。总体而言，生物炭在提高和维持表层土壤肥力以及降低剖面硝态氮淋溶风险等方面的后效作用显著优于秸秆和有机肥，是陕西关中地区旱地土上一种较好的有机物料施用方式。
- Abstract:
- Soil organic carbon and nitrogen are the key factors of soil fertility, and organic material application is an effective measure to improve soil organic carbon and nitrogen. We studied and compared the post-effects of inputs of different organic materials on soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in the top layer (0—20 cm) and the distribution of soil nitrate and water in 0—200 cm depth. The results showed that compared with CK (p<0.05), the soil organic carbon (SOC) under the treatments of straw together with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (SNP), and biochar together with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers (BNP) increased by 29.5% and 29.8%, respectively after 2 years of the application of organic materials. The soil total nitrogen contents under the treatments of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer(NP), Organic fertilizer together with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (MNP), straw together with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers(SNP) and biochar together with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers(BNP) increased by 22.0%, 14.3%, 24.2% and 26.4%, respectively (p<0.05). The soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC) of BNP was 23.4%, 10.9%, 21.3% and 20.5% higher than that of other treatments (CK, NP, MNP and SNP), respectively (p<0.05). The soil dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) of all fertilization treatments were 39.3%, 29.3%, 34.5% and 52.3% higher than that of CK, respectively (p<0.05). Compared with CK, the fertilization treatment significantly improved the nitrate content in the surface soil and increased the nitrate accumulation in the 0—100 cm soil layer (p<0.05). Compared with NP treatment, MNP and SNP significantly increased nitrate accumulation in 0—200 cm soil layer (p<0.05), while it was not significantly different from BNP. Compared with CK, NP, MNP, SNP and BNP could significantly increase the soil water content in 0—20 cm soil layer and the water storage in 0—40 cm soil layer and BNP treatment was Significantly higher than treatments of SNP and MNP (p<0.05). In general, the post-effects of biochar on the improvement and maintenance of the soil fertility and the reduction of the risk of nitrate leaching in the profile were more significant than that of straw and organic fertilizer. Therefore, application biochar was a much better way to apply organic material to the anthropogenic soil of dry land area in Guanzhong Area of Shaanxi.
参考文献/References:
[1] 陈安强,付斌,鲁耀,等.有机物料输入稻田提高土壤微生物炭氮及可溶性有机碳氮[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(21):160-167.
[2] 张刚,王德建,王灿.不同农田施肥方式下土壤碳氮变化特征及其环境意义[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(32):303-308.
[3] Karlen D L, Mausbach M J, Doran J W, et al. Soil quality:A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation (a guest editorial)[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1997,61(1):4-10.
[4] 陈裴裴,吴家森,郑小龙,等.不同施肥对雷竹林渗漏水中可溶性有机碳、氮流失的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(5):1303-1310.
[5] 汤宏,沈健林,张杨珠,等.秸秆还田与水分管理对稻田土壤微生物量碳、氮及溶解性有机碳、氮的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(1):240-246.
[6] 张宏威,康凌云,梁斌,等.长期大量施肥增加设施菜田土壤可溶性有机氮淋溶风险[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(21):99-107.
[7] 宋震震,李絮花,李娟,等.有机肥和化肥长期施用对土壤活性有机氮组分及酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):525-533.
[8] Lazcano C, Gómez-Brandón M, Revilla P, et al. Short-term effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microbial community structure and function[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2013,49(6):723-733.
[9] 潘剑玲,代万安,尚占环,等.秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):526-535.
[10] 黄剑.生物炭对土壤微生物量及土壤酶的影响研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2012.
[11] 崔全红,孙本华,吴得峰,等.有机无机肥配施对旱地土碳氮的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(2):289-294.
[12] 魏孝荣,郝明德,张春霞.旱地长期施肥对土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(1):95-97.
[13] 王志勇,红梅,杨殿林,等.供氮水平和有机无机配施对夏玉米产量及土壤硝态氮的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2008,26(6):11-14.
[14] 樊羿.有机肥资源利用现状调查与施用有机肥对土壤环境的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2006.
[15] 徐虎,张敬业,蔡岸冬,等.外源有机物料碳氮在红壤团聚体中的残留特征[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4660-4668.
[16] 李文军,彭保发,杨奇勇.长期施肥对洞庭湖双季稻区水稻土有机碳、氮积累及其活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(3):488-500.
[17] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[18] Ge S, Xu H, Ji M, et al. Characteristics of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and C/N ratio in Chinese apple orchards[J]. Open Journal of Soil Science, 2013,3(5):213-217.
[19] Gao W, Yang J, Ren S R, et al. The trend of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and wheat and maize productivity under different long-term fertilizations in the upland fluvo-aquic soil of North China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2015,103(1):61-73.
[20] 梁斌,李俊良,杨学云,等.施肥对麦田土壤可溶性有机氮的影响[J].生态学报,2016,6(14):4430-4437.
[21] Khalili B, Nourbakhsh F. Vertical distribution of soluble organic nitrogen, nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and amidohydrolase activities in a manure-treated soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2012,175(2):265-272.
[22] 段鹏鹏,丛耀辉,徐文静,等.氮肥与有机肥配施对设施土壤可溶性氮动态变化的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4717-4727.
[23] 丁婷婷,王百群,何瑞清,等.施用秸秆对土壤可溶性有机碳氮及矿质氮的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):72-77.
[24] Clough T, Condron L, Kammann C, et al. A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics[J]. Agronomy,2013,3(2):275-293.
[25] 刘方春,聂俊华,刘春生,等.不同施肥措施对土壤硝态氮垂直分布的特征影响[J].土壤通报,2005,36(1):50-53.
[26] 南镇武,刘树堂,袁铭章,等.长期定位施肥土壤硝态氮和铵态氮积累特征及其与玉米产量的关系[J].华北农学报,2016,31(2):176-181.
[27] Jin Z, Chen X, Chen C, et al. Biochar impact on nitrate leaching in upland red soil, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2016,75(14):1109.
[28] 高洪军,朱平,彭畅,等.不同施肥方式对东北春玉米农田土壤水热特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):195-200.
[29] 于昕阳,翟丙年,金忠宇,等.有机无机肥配施对旱地冬小麦产量、水肥利用效率及土壤肥力的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(5):320-324.
相似文献/References:
[1]沈艳,傅瓦利,蓝家程,等.岩溶山地不同土地利用方式土壤颗粒有机碳和矿物结合态有机碳的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):1.
SHEN Yan,FU Wa-li,LAN Jia-cheng,et al.Distribution Characteristics of Soil Particulate Organic Carbon and Mineral-associated Organic Carbon of Different Land Use in Karst Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):1.
[2]陈媛媛,周运超.灰质白云岩土壤有机碳的团聚体保护[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):82.
CHEN Yuan-yuan,ZHOU Yun-chao.Protection of Soil Organic Carbon in the Calcite Dolomite Aggregate[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):82.
[3]裴会敏,许明祥,李强,等.侵蚀条件下土壤有机碳流失研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):269.
PEI Hui-min,XU Ming-xiang,LI Qiang,et al.Advances in Soil Organic Carbon Losses under Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):269.
[4]李玉进,王百群.施用柳枝稷茎和叶对土壤有机碳与微生物量碳的影响及其分解特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):78.
LI Yu-jin,WANG Bai-qun.Effect of Amendment of Leaf and Stem of Switchgrass(Panicum virgatum) on Soil Organic Carbon and Microbial Biomass Carbon as well as the Decomposition Characteristic of the Leaf and Stem[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):78.
[5]赵发珠,韩新辉,杨改河,等.黄土丘陵区不同退耕还林地土壤有机碳、氮密度变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):43.
ZHAO Fa-zhu,HAN Xin-hui,YANG Gai-he,et al.Change Characteristics of Density of Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen under Land Shifted into Forestland in Hilly Loess Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):43.
[6]杨洋,王百群,李玉进.苜蓿对旱地土壤有机碳氮变化的驱动作用[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):78.
YANG Yang,WANG Bai-qun,LI Yu-jin.Driving Effect of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) on Dynamics of Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen in Dryland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):78.
[7]沙晋明,陈鹏程,陈松林.土壤有机质光谱响应特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(02):21.
SHA Jinming,CHEN Pengcheng,CHEN Songlin.Characteristics Analysis of Soil Spectrum Response Resulted From Organic Material[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(04):21.
[8]贾松伟,贺秀斌,陈云明,等.黄土丘陵区土壤侵蚀对土壤有机碳流失的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):88.
JIA Song-wei,HE Xiu-bin,CHEN Yun-ming,et al.Effect of Soil Erosion on Soil Organic Carbon Loss on the Loess Hilly Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(04):88.
[9]徐华君.阿尔泰山区土壤有机碳氧化稳定性的初步比较分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):27.
XU Hua-jun.Comparative Analysis of the Soil Organic Carbon Oxidation Stability in Altai Mountain, Xinjiang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(04):27.
[10]范胜龙,黄炎和,林金石.表征土壤有机碳区域分布的优化空间插值模型研究——以福建省龙海市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(06):1.
FAN Sheng-long,HUANG Yan-he,LIN Jin-shi.The Optimized Interpolation Models and Its Relationship with Soil Sampling Density on Detecting Spatial Variability of Farmland Soil Organic Carbon —A Case Study in Longhai City, Fujian Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):1.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2017-08-15;改回日期:2017-09-14。
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划（2013AA102904）；陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目（2016KTZDNY03-06）；高等学校学科创新引智计划（B12007）
作者简介:柳媛媛(1990-),女,甘肃庆阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农田生态系统土壤碳氮循环。E-mail:891639355@qq.com
通讯作者:孙本华(1972-),男,江苏淮安人,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事土壤化学和土壤生态研究。E-mail:sunbenhua@126.com