[1]李华林,高华端,胡勤,等.喀斯特地区坡面径流对产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):26-30.
　LI Hualin,GAO Huaduan,HU Qin,et al.Influence of Runoff on Sediment Yield on Slope in Karst Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):26-30.
点击复制

喀斯特地区坡面径流对产沙的影响

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年02期 页码: 26-30 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-04-28
Title:
Influence of Runoff on Sediment Yield on Slope in Karst Area
作者:
李华林1, 高华端1, 胡勤1, 高儒学1, 孙泉忠2
1. 贵州大学 林学院, 贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州省水土保持技术咨询研究中心, 贵阳 550002
Author(s):
LI Hualin1, GAO Huaduan1, HU Qin1, GAO Ruxue1, SUN Quanzhong2
1. Forestry college of Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Soil and Water Conservation Technical Consulting and Research Center of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550002, China
关键词:
喀斯特; 植被类型; 坡面径流; 产沙量
Keywords:
karst area; vegetation types; slope runoff; sediment yield
分类号:
S157.1
摘要:
贵州省关岭县蚂蝗田小流域属典型喀斯特流域，根据小流域2009—2012年6个坡面径流小区的定位观测资料，研究了乔木林（黄花梨）、灌木林（女贞）、撂荒草地三种不同植被类型下坡面径流对产沙的影响。结果表明：三种植被类型的产流次数相同，但产沙次数存在较大差异，表现为荒草地 > 乔木林 > 灌木林；灌木林与乔木林的年均径流量相差不大，荒草地的年均径流量是它们总和的2倍；荒草地的年均产沙量最大，为55.17 t/km2，是灌木林的11倍，乔木林的6倍；乔木林的产流量与产沙量无明显相关关系；灌木林表现出线性关系，拟合方程为y=0.1707x+0.2526，R2值为0.48；荒草地表现为幂函数关系，拟合方程为y=0.3246x1.2965，R2值为0.64。
Abstract:
Mahuangtian watershed is a typical karst basin in Guanling County of Guizhou Province. According to the observation data of six slope runoff plots from 2009 to 2012 in the small watershed, we’ve studied the effect of runoff on sediment in three different vegetation types, which are arbor forest, shrub forest and abandoned grassland. The main results are as followings. Three vegetation types had the same effect in times of runoff, but sediment yield events were different, the yield of sediment decreased in the order:grassland > arbor land > shrub forest; annual runoff in shrub land and arbor forest land was similar but the annual runoff of grassland was double as the total of former two types. Annual sediment yield of grassland was 55.17 t/km2 which is 11 times of sediment yield in the shrub forest, and 6 times of sediment yield in arbor; the runoff and sediment yield showed no significant connection in arbor forest but the linear relationship between runoff and sediment yield was found in shrub forest, the fitting equation is y=0.1707x+0.2526, R2 values is 0.48, and power function relationship was found in grassland, the fitting equation is y=0.3246x1.2965, R2 values is 0.64.

参考文献/References:

[1] 高祥涛,李士进,陶剑.基于相关反馈的土壤侵蚀遥感图像检索技术研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2009(3):56-60.
[2] 姚云.不同坡长条件下扰动地表对紫色土坡面土壤可蚀性的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.
[3] Cerda A. Soil Erosion after Land Abandonment in a Semiarid Environment of Southern Spain[J]. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 1997,11:163-176.
[4] Carroll C, Hal pin M, Burger P, et al. The Effect of Crop Type, Crop Rotation, and Tillage Practice on Runoff and Soil Loss on a Vertisol in Central Queensland[J]. Geomorphology, 2000,32:385-415.
[5] 艾宁,魏天兴,朱清科,陕北黄土高原不同植被类型下降雨对坡面径流侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):26-30.
[6] 杨春霞,肖培青,甄斌,等.野外不同被覆坡面产流产沙特征[J].水上保持学报,2012,26(4):28-36.
[7] 余新晓,张学霞,李建牢,等.黄上地区小流域植被覆盖和降水对侵蚀产沙过程的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):1-8.
[8] 刘栋,刘普灵,邓瑞芬,等.不同卜垫面径流小区次降雨侵蚀特征相关分析[J].水上保持通报,2011,31(2):99-102.
[9] 胡顺光.贵州喀斯特区小流域尺度生态治理的水土流失机制研究[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2008.
[10] 蒋荣,张兴奇,张科利,等.喀斯特地区不同林草植被的减流减沙作用[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):18-22.
[11] 纪启芳.贵州喀斯特地区坡面不同植被的减流减沙作用[D].南京:南京大学,2013.
[12] 周素萍,张兴奇,张科利,等.贵州喀斯特地区不同生物措施的水土保持效果[J].贵州农业科学,2011,39(4):117-120.
[13] 刘凤仙.贵州喀斯特地区林草措施对水土流失的影响[J].中国水土保持,2007(12):38-39.
[14] 刘凤仙,覃莉,顾再柯.贵州省水土保持监测点观测数据整编的做法及存在问题[J].中国水土保持,2014(3):59-61.
[15] 李瑞,刘瑞禄,吕涛,等.贵州省喀斯特地区典型小流域不同种植模式坡面径流产沙研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(5):132-135.
[16] 纪启芳,张兴奇,张科利,等.贵州省喀斯特地区坡面产沙产流特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):1-5.
[17] 刘艳,刘学全,崔鸿侠,等.长江中游低丘黄壤坡面地表径流产沙规律初探[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):149-153.
[18] 陈奇伯,寸玉康,刘芝芹,等.滇西高原不同地类坡面产流产沙规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(2):71-73.
[19] 张旭东,周金星,黄玲玲.中亚热带黄壤丘陵区不同植被恢复模式产流产沙特征[R].海峡两岸环境与资源学术研讨会学术论文集,2007.

相似文献/References:

[1]邹永偲,兰安军,范泽孟,等.“三生空间”视角下贵州省景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(03):432.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.045]
　Zou Yongcai,Lan Anjun,Fan Zemeng,et al.Evaluation of Landscape Ecological Security and Its Coupling Characteristics Analysis in Guizhou Province from the Perspective of Production-Living-Ecology Space[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):432.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.03.045]
[2]张贤林,冯梦蝶,何丙辉,等.喀斯特槽谷区不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及适宜模型[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):34.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.021]
　Zhang Xianlin,Feng Mengdie,He Binghui,et al.Soil Infiltration Characteristics and Suitable Models Under Different Land Use Types in Karst Trough-Valley Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):34.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.021]
[3]何钢,蔡运龙,万军.生态重建模式的尺度视角—以我国西南喀斯特地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):83.
　HE Gang,CAI Yun-long,WAN Jun.Scale Perspective on Ecological Rehabilitation Model—Case Study in Karst Area of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(02):83.
[4]宋先花,蔡运龙.西南喀斯特石漠化地区生态建设产业化初探[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(03):87.
　SONG Xian-hua,CAI Yun-long.Industrialization of Ecological Construction in Karst Areas of Southwest China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(02):87.
[5]樊云龙,熊康宁,陈浒.贵州喀斯特山区大型土壤动物多样性研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(06):92.
　FAN Yun-long,XIONG Kang-ning,CHEN Hu.Study on the Diversity of Soil Macrofauna in Karst Mountainous Area in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(02):92.
[6]李瑞,王霖娇,盛茂银,等.喀斯特石漠化演替中植物多样性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):111.
　LI Rui,WANG Linjiao,SHENG Maoyin,et al.Plant Species Diversity and Its Relationship with Soil Properties in Karst Rocky Desertification Succession[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):111.
[7]梁超,郝文芳,袁丁.黄土丘陵区不同植被群落土壤水分研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):103.
　LIANG Chao,HAO Wen-fang,YUAN Ding.Study on the Soil Water of Different Vegetation Communities in the Loess Hilly-Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):103.
[8]邵技新,张凤太,苏维词,等.基于集对分析的喀斯特生态景观退化诊断研究——以毕节地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):11.
　SHAO Ji-xin,ZHANG Feng-tai,SU Wei-ci,et al.Diagnosis of Karst Ecological Landscape Degradation Based on Set of Analysis——A Case Study in Bijie[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(02):11.
[9]刘洁,刘小林,张兴昌,等.水蚀风蚀交错区不同类型植被对土壤碳氮影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):53.
　LIU Jie,LIU Xiao-lin,ZHANG Xing-Chang,et al.Influence of the Different Typical Vegetation on the Soil Total Nitrogen and Organic Matter in the Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):53.
[10]杨涛,王得祥,刘雅娟,等.黄土丘陵区不同植被类型土壤贮水动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(06):81.
　YANG Tao,WANG De-xiang,LIU Ya-juan,et al.The Dynamical Changes of Soil Water Holding Capacity of Different Vegetation Types in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(02):81.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-06-15;改回日期:2016-07-19。
基金项目:贵州省专业学位研究生工作站项目”贵州省喀斯特生态与环境研究”（黔教研合JYSZ字[2014]003）；贵州省水利厅水利科技专项经费项目”草海流域坡耕地综合治理技术与示范”（KT201311）
作者简介:李华林(1992-),男,贵州铜仁印江县人,在读硕士,从事区域水土保持研究。E-mail:664380773@qq.com
通讯作者:高华端(1965-),男,贵州贵阳人,教授,博士,硕士生导师、主要研究方向:区域水土保持与环境。E-mail:gdghd110@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01