MEI Jiaming,LIU Yang,YUE Pengyun,et al.Effects of Landscape Pattern Change on Sediment Tranport in the Xunhe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):45-50，56.
旬河流域景观格局变化对泥沙输出的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Landscape Pattern Change on Sediment Tranport in the Xunhe River Basin
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)03-0045-06
- 分类号:
- P333; S157
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为探究河流输沙量对景观格局变化的响应,以旬河流域为研究区,选取旬河上、中、下游12个典型流域,借助SWAT模型对各支流泥沙进行了模拟分析; 在此基础上,通过1995年和2015年遥感影像解译及景观指数分析,探究流域内部景观格局变化及其与河流输沙量的关系。结果表明:SWAT在径流、泥沙模拟过程中,率定期和验证期的决定系数(R2)均大于0.75,Nash-Sutteliffe系数(Ens)为0.74～0.85,模型的适用性良好。通过遥感影像解译,旬河流域土地利用类型主要以林地和农用地为主。受“退耕还林还草”和“植树造林”等植被恢复措施的影响,2015年流域景观的优势化程度比1995年显著加深,景观类型之间的连通性趋于优良,斑块分布更加集中,景观格局朝着单一化方向发展,导致河流输沙量显著降低。其中,景观水平上的景观分离度指数(DIVISION)和类型水平上水体的斑块密度指数(PD5)对输沙量解释度最大。此外,相较于景观水平,以类型水平指数表征对输沙量的解释度,拟合效果优良。该研究可为旬河流域水土流失治理及减缓土壤侵蚀等方面提供一定的科学依据。
- Abstract:
- Landscape pattern change in a watershed is an important factor controlling sediment transportation of a river system. The Xunhe River, a major tributary of the Han River, was chosen as the study site. 12 typical watersheds in the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Xunhe River were selected to simulate and analyze the sediment transportation in each tributary using SWAT model. We interpreted remote sensing images from 1995 and 2015 to obtain land cover and calculate the landscape indices. The relationship between landscape pattern change and sediment transportation was examined. SWAT model performed well in simulating sediment transportation. The coefficients of determination(R2)in calibration and validation periods were both greater than 0.75. The Nash-Sutteliffe indices(Ens)were between 0.74 and 0.85. Forest and agricultural land were the two major land cover types in the Xunhe River watershed. Due to forestation and the conversion of agricultural lands into forests and grasslands, the landscape in 2015 had a significantly higher dominant degree, connection among landscape classes was stronger, distribution of patches was more concentrated than that in 1995. The landscape pattern was evolved to be more simplified, resulting in the significant reduction in river sediment transportation. The DIVISION of the landscape level and the PD5 of the class level for water were the two indices that contributed the most to sediment transportation. In addition, the class level indices performed better in explaining sediment transportation than the landscape level indices. This study can provide the scientific basis for soil erosion control and mitigation in the Xunhe River area.
参考文献/References:
[1] Buttafuoco G, Conforti M, Aucelli C, et al. Assessing spatial uncertainty in mapping soil erodibility factor using geostatistical stochastic simulation[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012,66(4):1111-1125.
[2] 王甜,黄志霖,曾立雄.三峡库区退耕还林土壤侵蚀及养分流失控制:以兰陵溪小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(5):83-88.
[3] Leh M, Bajwa S, Chaubey I. Impact of land use change on erosion risk:an integrated remote sensing, geographic information system and modeling methodology[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2013,24(5):409-421.
[4] 康磊,刘世荣,刘宪钊.岷江上游景观格局与土壤侵蚀变化:以杂古脑流域为例[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):23-28,3.
[5] 潘竟虎,文岩.基于RUSLE-SMA的黄土丘陵沟壑区土壤侵蚀评价及景观格局分析:以庆城县蔡家庙流域为例[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(2):436-444.
[6] 王计平,杨磊,卫伟,等.黄土丘陵区景观格局对水土流失过程的影响:景观水平与多尺度比较[J].生态学报,2011,31(19):5531-5541.
[7] 刘宇.景观指数耦合景观格局与土壤侵蚀的有效性[J].生态学报,2017,37(15):4923-4935.
[8] 廖凯涛,胡建民,宋月君,等.南方红壤丘陵区流域植被景观格局变化及水沙响应关系[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(3):36-42,50.
[9] 李晶,周自翔.延河流域景观格局与生态水文过程分析[J].地理学报,2014,69(7):933-944.
[10] 秦伟,曹文洪,郭乾坤.植被格局对侵蚀产沙影响的研究评述[J].生态学报,2017,37(14):4905-4912.
[11] Mukundan R, Pierson D C, Schneiderman E M, et al. Using detailed monitoring data to simulate spatial sediment loading in a watershed[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015,187(8):1-10.
[12] 马芊红,张科利.西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2018,33(11):1130-1141.
[13] Ferreira V, Panagopoulos T, Andrade R, et al. Spatial variability of soil properties and soil erodibility in the Alqueva reservoir watershed[J]. Solid Earth, 2015,6(2):383-392.
[14] 刘宇,吴炳方,曾源,等.耦合过程和景观格局的土壤侵蚀水环境影响评价[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(9):2581-2589.
[15] 黄婷,于德永,乔建民,等.内蒙古锡林郭勒盟景观格局变化对土壤保持能力的影响[J].资源科学,2018,40(6):1256-1266.
[16] 郭思琪,韩磊,赵永华,等.秦岭地区土壤侵蚀时空变化及景观格局[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(7):2167-2176.
[17] 赵亮,刘宇.耦合景观破碎化和土壤侵蚀的“源”“汇”边界指数[J].地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(1):98-104.
[18] 王金花,李占斌,张荣刚,等.水蚀风蚀交错区流域景观格局变化及水沙响应关系[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(3):68-75.
[19] Ouyang W, Hao F, Skidmore K, et al. Soil erosion and sediment yield and their relationships with vegetation cover in upper stream of the yellow river[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010,409(2):396-403.
[20] Xu Y, Tang H, Wang B, et al. Effects of landscape patterns on soil erosion processes in a mountain-basin system in the north china[J]. Natural Hazards, 2017,87(3):1567-1585.
[21] 姚雄,余坤勇,刘健,等.南方水土流失严重区的生态脆弱性时空演变[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(3):735-745.
[22] 闫玮明,孙冰,裴男才,等.粤北阔叶人工林和次生林植物多样性与土壤理化性质相关性研究[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(5):898-907.
相似文献/References:
[1]宋玥,张忠学.不同耕作措施对黑土坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(02):14.
SONG Yue,ZHANG Zhong-xue.The Effect of Different Tillage Measures on Soil Erosion in Slope Farmland in Black Soil Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(03):14.
[2]裴会敏,许明祥,李强,等.侵蚀条件下土壤有机碳流失研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):269.
PEI Hui-min,XU Ming-xiang,LI Qiang,et al.Advances in Soil Organic Carbon Losses under Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):269.
[3]赵玉明,刘宝元,姜洪涛.东北黑土区垄向的分布及其对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):1.
ZHAO Yu-ming,LIU Bao-yuan,JIANG Hong-tao.Distribution of Tillage-induced Direction and Its Effect on Soil Erosion in Black Soil Area of Northeast China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):1.
[4]袁靓,高华端,张旭贤,等.基于土壤侵蚀的贵阳市喀斯特地区基岩层间节理研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):167.
YUAN Jing,GAO Hua-duan,ZHANG Xu-xian,et al.Research on the Interlayer Joints of Bedrock in the Karst Region of Guiyang City Based on Soil Erosion[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):167.
[5]泮雪芹,刘占仁,孟晓云,等.云蒙湖流域不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):6.
PAN Xue-qin,LIU Zhan-ren,MENG Xiao-yun,et al.Analysis on Features of Soil Erosion with Different Land Uses in the Yunmeng Lake Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):6.
[6]朱志玲,吴咏梅,张敏.基于GIS的宁夏生态环境敏感性综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):101.
ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,ZHANG Min.Comprehensive Evaluation on Eco-environment Sensibility of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):101.
[7]李瑞,李勇,刘云芳.贵州喀斯特地区降雨与坡面土壤侵蚀关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):7.
LI Rui,LI Yong,LIU Yun-fang.Study of Rainfall and Soil Erosion on Slope in Karst Region of Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):7.
[8]程峥,姚志宏,张婧,等.南方红壤农作区数字流域建立和应用[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):12.
CHENG Zheng,YAO Zhi-hong,ZHANG Jing,et al.Establishment and Application of Digital Watershed in the Red Earth Areas, Southern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):12.
[9]董磊,彭明春,王崇云,等.基于USLE和GIS/RS的滇池流域土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):11.
DONG Lei,PENG Ming-chun,WANG Chong-yun,et al.Research on Soil Erosion Based on the USLE Model and RS/GIS in the Dianchi Lake Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):11.
[10]陈宇,焦菊英,王宁,等.黄土丘陵区撂荒地不同侵蚀带土壤种子库特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):1.
CHEN Yu,JIAO Ju-ying,WANG Ning,et al.Characteristics of Soil Seed Banks under Different Erosion Zones on Abandoned Land in the Hilly-gullied Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):1.
[11]邹琴英,师学义,张 臻.汾河上游土壤侵蚀时空变化及景观格局的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):15.
ZOU Qinying,SHI Xueyi,ZHANG Zhen.Effects of Temporal and Spatial Changes of Soil Erosion and Landscape Pattern in the Upper Reaches of the Fenhe River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):15.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-07-20 修回日期:2019-08-20资助项目:国家自然科学基金(31600377,31700462); 科技基础性工作专项“南水北调(中线)水源地生物群落环境调查”(2015FY110400)第一作者:梅嘉洺(1994—),男,山东烟台人,硕士研究生,主要从事土地利用、土壤侵蚀方面研究。E-mail:mjmdct94@163.com通信作者:刘峰(1975—),男,山东临沂人,研究员,博士,主要从事全球变化生态学、景观生态学、生态系统生态学及生态模拟等领域的研究。E-mail:liufeng@wbgcas.cn