JIN Zhangli,LIU Gaopeng,ZHOU Mingtao,et al.Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Carbon Metabolism Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Grasslands of Karst Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):37-44.
喀斯特山地草地土壤酶活性及土壤微生物碳代谢活性研究
- Title:
- Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Carbon Metabolism Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Grasslands of Karst Mountain
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)03-0037-08
- Keywords:
- karst mountain grassland; soil enzyme activity; soil microbial carbon metabolism; altitudinal gradient
- 分类号:
- Q154
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了明确喀斯特山地草地土壤微生物碳代谢功能,研究采用经典统计分析与排序分析,连续3年研究了桂西北喀斯特山地草地不同海拔土壤酶活性和土壤微生物碳代谢活性,并探讨了二者的相关关系。结果表明:(1)不同海拔喀斯特山地草地土壤养分含量(全氮、全碳、全钾、速效磷、碱解氮)呈一致的变化趋势,表现为中海拔>高海拔>低海拔,并且在不同海拔差异均显著(p<0.05); 而土壤pH值表现为中海拔<高海拔<低海拔。(2)不同海拔喀斯特山地草地土壤微生物碳源利用差异较大,其中羧酸类和碳水化合物是主要的碳源类物质,其次为氨基酸类、酚酸类和聚合物类,胺类碳源的利用率最小。(3)不同海拔喀斯特山地草地土壤微生物群落多样性指数随年份的增加而增加(2015—2017年),平均碳源利用丰富度指数(S)、均匀度指数(E)和物种丰富度指数(H)均表现为低海拔>中海拔>高海拔。(4)不同海拔喀斯特山地草地土壤酶活性(几丁质酶、糖苷酶、碱性磷酸酶、亮氨酸氨基肽酶、过氧化物酶δ和酚氧化酶δ)随年份的增加而增加,平均酶活性均表现为低海拔>中海拔>高海拔。(5)土壤微生物量碳、微生物呼吸和土壤微生物代谢熵从2015—2017年均呈增加趋势,3年内土壤微生物呼吸平均值基本表现为中海拔>高海拔>低海拔。(6)RDA排序分析表明:土壤微生物群落多样性与土壤酶活性呈显著或极显著的相关关系,其中土壤微生物代谢熵和微生物呼吸是土壤微生物多样性分布的主要影响因子,而土壤全碳和全氮与土壤微生物群落功能多样性呈显著的正相关,由此表明土壤全碳和全氮是造成不同海拔喀斯特山地草地土壤微生物群落多样性差异的重要原因。
- Abstract:
- In order to clarify soil microbial carbon metabolism and enzyme activity along an altitudinal gradient in grasslands of karst mountain, we used classical statistical analysis and sequencing analysis to study soil microbial carbon metabolism and enzyme activity in the karst mountains for three consecutive years(from 2015 to 2017), and discussed the relationship between microbial community diversity and soil nutrient. The results are as follows.(1)The contents of total carbon, total nitrogen, total potassium, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus in the soils of grasslands at different elevations decrease in the order: medium elevation>low elevation>high elevation, and the contents of total carbon, total nitrogen, total potassium, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus in the soils at different elevations are significantly different (p<0.05). The pH values of soils show an opposite trend, while the difference of total phosphorus in soils is not significant at different elevations (p>0.05).(2)There are significant differences in functional diversity of microbial communities along the altitudinal gradient. The carbon sources mostly used by soil microbes are carbohydrates and carboxylic acids, followed by amino acids, phenolic acids and polymers, the lowest is amines.(3)The Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, richness index and McIntosh index gradually increased in the period from 2015 to 2017, following the order: intermediate altitude>high altitude>low altitude.(4)Soil microbiomass carbon, microbial respiration, microbial metabolic entropy, soil glycosidase, chitinase, leucine aminopeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, phenol oxidase and peroxidase assay gradually increased during the period from 2015 to 2017, following the order: intermediate altitude>high altitude>low altitude.(5)Soil microbial biomass carbon, microbial respiration and soil microbial metabolic entropy gradually increased in the period from 2015 to 2017, following the order: intermediate altitude>high altitude>low altitude.(6)Redundancy analysis indicates that the soil microbial carbon metabolism and enzyme activity are different along an altitudinal gradient, and microbial respiration, microbial metabolic entropy have the more positive contribution to soil microbial carbon metabolism, which are the main driving factors on soil microbial carbon metabolism. Soil total carbon and soil total nitrogen are the reasons for variation of soil microbial communities along an altitudinal gradient.
参考文献/References:
[1] Geyer K M, Kyker-Snowman E, Grandy A S, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency:accounting for population, community, and ecosystem-scale controls over the fate of metabolized organic matter[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2016,127(2/3):173-188.
[2] Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra C A, et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage[J]. Nature Communications, 2015,6:6707. DOI:10.1038/ncomms7707.
[3] Keiluweit M, Bougoure J J, Nico P S, et al. Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015,5(6):588-592.
[4] Spohn M, Klaus K, Wanek W, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover times depending on soil depth-Implications for carbon cycling[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016,96:74-81.
[5] Liang C, Schimel J P, Jastrow J D. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage[J]. Nature Microbiology, 2017,2(8):17105. DOI:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105
[6] Spohn M, Pötsch E M, Eichorst S A, et al. Soil microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover in a long-term fertilization experiment in a temperate grassland[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016,97:168-175.
[7] Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Hämmerle I, et al. Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon:nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling[J]. Nature Communications, 2014,5:3694. DIO:10.1038/ncomms4694.
[8] Doran J W, Elliott ET, Paustian K. Soil microbial activity, nitrogen cycling, and long-term changes in organic carbon pools as related to fallow tillage management[J]. Soil & Till. Res., 1998,49(1/2):3-18.
[9] Dorthe Groth Petersen, Steven J. Blazewicz, Mary Firestone,et al. Abundance of microbial genes associated with nitrogen cycling as indices of biogeochemical process rates across a vegetation gradient in Alaska[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2012,14(4):993-1008.
[10] Tang J, Riley W J. Weaker soil carbon-climate feedbacks resulting from microbial and abiotic interactions[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015,5(1):56-63.
[11] Keiluweit M, Nico P S, Kleber M, et al. Are oxygen limitations under recognized regulators of organic carbon turnover in upland soils?[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2016,127(2/3):157-171.
[12] Zhou H, Zhang D, Wang P, et al. Changes in microbial biomass and the metabolic quotient with biochar addition to agricultural soils: A Meta-analysis[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2017,239:80-89.
[13] Tian J, Wang J, Dippold M, et al. Biochar affects soil organic matter cycling and microbial functions but does not alter microbial community structure in a paddy soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 556: 89-97.
[14] 李胜平,王克林.桂西北喀斯特山地草地土壤养分季节变化规律及其对植被多样性的响应[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(4):199-205.
[15] 武德传,王维洁,施寒丰,等.喀斯特山地植烟土壤养分空间变异及分区研究[J].核农学报,2016(8):1625-1632.
[16] 张红旗,尚二萍,于竹筱.基于地形分异指数的黔桂喀斯特山地土地利用垂直分布特征[J].资源科学,2017,39(10):1964-1974.
[17] 许尔琪,张红旗.喀斯特山地土地利用变化的垂直分布特征[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(12):1693-1702.
[18] 余莉,甘淑,袁希平.喀斯特山地流域边界多层次提取的径流树模型[J].山地学报,2016(5):615-622.
[19] 孙嘉曼,卜晓莉,吴永波,等.喀斯特山地石灰土施用生物炭对刺槐幼苗生长和土壤特性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(12):3250-3257.
[20] Watzinger A, Feichtmair S, Kitzler B, et al. Soil microbial communities responded to biochar application in temperate soils and slowly metabolized 13C-labelled biochar as revealed by 13C PLFA analyses:results from a short-term incubation and pot experiment[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2014,65(1):40-51.
[21] Sinsabaugh R L, Shah J J F, Findlay S G, et al. Scaling microbial biomass, metabolism and resource supply[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2015,122(2/3):175-190.
[22] Hu Y, Wang i, Tang Y, et al. Variability in soil microbial community and activity between coastal and riparian wetlands in the Yangtze River estuary-Potential impacts on carbon sequestration[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2014,70:221-228.
[23] Xu X, Schimel J P, Thornton P E, et al. Substrate and environmental controls on microbial assimilation of soil organic carbon: A framework for Earth system models[J]. Ecology Letters, 2014,17(5):547-555.
[24] 王启基,王长庭,史惠兰,等.高寒草甸群落植物多样性和初级生产力沿海拔梯度变化的研究[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(2):240-245.
[25] Zhang X, Guan P, Wang Y, et al. Community composition, diversity and metabolic footprints of soil nematodes in differently-aged temperate forests[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015,80:118-126.
[26] Spohn M, Chodak M. Microbial respiration per unit biomass increases with carbon-to-nutrient ratios in forest soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015,81:128-133.
[27] Singh B P, Cowie A L. Long-term influence of biochar on native organic carbon mineralisation in a low-carbon clayey soil[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014,4:3687. DOI:10.1038/srep03687.
[28] Metcalf J L, Xu Z Z, Weiss S, et al. Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during mammalian corpse decomposition[J]. Science, 2016,351(6269):158-162.
[29] ifˇ/cáková L, Vǔtrovský T, Howe A, et al. Microbial activity in forest soil reflects the changes in ecosystem properties between summer and winter[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2016,18(1):288-301.
[30] Lin X, Tfaily M M, Green S J, et al. Microbial metabolic potential for carbon degradation and nutrient acquisition(N, P)in an ombrotrophic peatland[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014:AEM,00206-14.
相似文献/References:
[1]丁 丽,冀玉良,李 懿.不同林龄油松根际土壤微生物群落多样性及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(04):184.
Ding Li,JI Yuliang,LI Yi.Soil Microbial Diversity and Its Influencing Factors in Rhizosphere and Non-Rhizosphere in the Stands of Pinus tabuliformis with Different Ages in Minjiang River Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):184.
[2]杨嘉仪,赵广举,穆兴民,等.高寒草地鼠兔干扰下不同地表类型的土壤属性特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(03):115.
YANG Jiayi,ZHAO Guangju,MU Xingmin,et al.Soil Properties of Different Surface Types Disturbed by Plateau Pika in Alpine Meadow[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):115.
[3]李 欢,魏雅丽,闫帮国,等.干热河谷土壤酶活性和车轴草生长对氮磷添加的响应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):89.
LI Huan,WEI Yali,YAN Bangguo,et al.Response of Soil Enzyme Activities and Trifolium repens L. Growth to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition in Dry and Hot Valley[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):89.
[4]雷跻初,刘小伟,邓 军,等.渭北旱塬不同年限撂荒地土壤酶活性及其化学计量变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(01):44.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.041]
Lei Jichu,Liu Xiaowei,Deng Jun,et al.Characteristics of Changes in Soil Enzyme Activities and Stoichiometric Under Different Abandoned Years in the Dry Area of Northern Weihe River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(03):44.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.01.041]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-07-11 修回日期:2019-08-02资助项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51678348); 湖北省自然科学基金重点项目(2016CFA085); 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504902); 宜昌市应用基础研究项目(A18-302-b04)第一作者:金章利(1982—),女,湖南南县人,硕士,副教授,主要研究方向:生态环境修复。E-mail:Zhanglijinn@163.com