[1]王一鸣,高鹏,穆兴民,等.南方红壤丘陵区小流域水土保持综合效益评价——以江西阳坑小流域为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(05):6-13.
　WANG Yiming,GAO Peng,MU Xingmin,et al.Assessment on Comprehensive Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation in the Small Watershed of the Southern Red Soil Hilly Region—A Case Study in Yangkeng Small Watershed in Jingxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):6-13.
点击复制

南方红壤丘陵区小流域水土保持综合效益评价——以江西阳坑小流域为例

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年05期 页码: 6-13 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-10-28
Title:
Assessment on Comprehensive Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation in the Small Watershed of the Southern Red Soil Hilly Region—A Case Study in Yangkeng Small Watershed in Jingxi Province
作者:
王一鸣1,2, 高鹏1,3, 穆兴民1,3, 赵建民4, 罗煜全5
1. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持保持研究所 土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
3. 西北农林科技大学 土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
4. 南昌工程学院, 南昌 330099
Author(s):
WANG Yiming1,2, GAO Peng1,3, MU Xingmin1,3, ZHAO Jianmin4, LUO Yuquan5
1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. University of China Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
水土保持; 效益评价; 红壤丘陵区
Keywords:
soil and water conservation; benefit evaluation; hilly red soil region
分类号:
S157
摘要:
随着国家对水土保持工作的不断重视，越来越多的水土保持措施开始实施，为评定水土保持工作开展情况，水土保持综合效益评价工作显得尤为重要。因此，选取南方红壤丘陵区水土流失严重的江西阳坑小流域为例，以2005年为基准年，通过层次分析法选择涉及生态效益、经济效益、社会效益的13个评价指标，从单项效益入手，运用市场价值法、替代市场法、对比分析法等方法直接计算水土保持各单项效益价值，从而得到三大效益及综合效益价值。结果表明：江西阳坑小流域经过水土保持治理之后，2005年水土保持综合效益总价值为12 445.42万元。其中生态效益价值为10 240.65万元，占82.29%；单项效益价值大小排序依次为：保水效益 > 净化大气效益 > 保肥效益 > 保土效益。经济效益价值为894.13万元，占7.18%；单项效益价值排序为：粮食增产效益 > 经果林效益 > 水保林效益。社会效益价值为1 310.64万元，占10.53%；单项效益价值排序依次为：改善群众经济效益 > 提高土地生产率效益 > 增加耕地效益 > 减少泥沙淤积效益。评价结果表明水土保持生态效益在水土保持工作中占有决定性地位，这将为今后水土保持工作提供重要的理论依据，同时也将提升人们对水土保持工作的了解与认识。
Abstract:
With more attention paid to the soil and water conservation in China, more and more soil and water conservation measures have been implemented. In order to evaluate the soil and water conservation work situation, soil and water conservation comprehensive benefits evaluation has become particularly important. We set 2005 as the base year and take Yangkeng small watershed, where the water loss and soil erosion are serious, in southern China’s hilly red soil region as an example. We chose 13 evaluation indexes involving the ecological benefits, economic benefits and social benefits to analyze and evaluate the value of each single benefit, the three benefits and comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation by market valuation method, alternative market price method, method of comparative analysis and so on. After soil and water conservation management in Yangkeng small watershed of Jiangxi Province, soil and water conservation comprehensive benefit values totaled about 124.454 2 million yuan in 2005. The ecological value was about 102.406 5 million yuan, accounting for 82.29%; single benefit value decreased in the order: the water conservation benefit > the purifying atmosphere benefit > the protecting fertilizer benefit > the soil conservation benefit. Economic value was about 8.941 3 million yuan, accounting for 7.18%; single benefit value decreased in the sequence: grain production efficiency benefit > the economic fruit forest benefit > the soil and water conservation forest benefit. Social benefit value was about 13.106 4 million yuan, accounting for 10.53%; single benefit value decreased in the order: benefit of improving the economic > benefit of improve land productivity > the benefit of add farmland > benefit of reducing sediment deposition efficiency. We analyzed the single benefit ratio and the soil and water conservation of the three big benefits, and indicated that ecological benefit occupied the decisive position in the soil and water conservation work, which will provide theoretical basis for the work of soil and water conservation in the future, and at the same time, promote people to understand and pay more attention to soil and water conservation work.

参考文献/References:

[1] 余新晓,毕华兴.水土保持学[M].3版.北京:中国林业出版社,2013:435-440.
[2] 刘震.我国水土保持小流域综合治理的回顾与展望[J].中国水利,2005(22):17-18.
[3] 孙昕.南方红壤区典型小流域水土保持综合效益评价[D].南京:南京林业大学,2009.
[4] 何圣嘉,谢锦升,杨智杰,等.南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失现状、成因及防治[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):65-70.
[5] 聂碧娟,林敬兰,赵会贞.水土保持综合治理效益评价研究进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2009(12):50-53.
[6] 陈渠昌,张如生.水土保持综合效益定分析方法及指标体系研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2007,5(2):95-104.
[7] 康玲玲,王云璋,王砚.小流域水土保持综合治理效益指标体系及其应用[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(3),271-278.
[8] 孙昕,李德成,梁音.南方红壤区小流域水土保持综合效益定量评价方法探讨[J].土壤学报,2009,46(3):374-380.
[9] 钟源,陈菊红,马安妮,等.南水北调陕西水源区水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):119-124.
[10] 赵建民.基于生态系统服务的水土保持综合效益评价研究:以黄土高原中部丘陵为例[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010.
[11] 车克钧,傅辉恩,等.祁连山水源涵养林综合效能的计量研究[J].林业科学,1992，28(4):290-296.
[12] 沈慧,姜凤岐.水土保持林效益评价研究综述[J].林业科学,1998,10(4):492-496.
[13] 林积泉,王伯铎,马俊杰,等.小流域治理环境质量综合评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(1):68-71.
[14] 王建民,王如松.中国生态资产概论[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,2001:89-93.
[15] 国家林业局.森林生态系统服务功能评估规范(LY/T1721—2008)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008:4-6,12.
[16] (美)雷蒙德. M.布鲁克斯著.财务管理[M]. 2版.路蒙佳,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014.
[17] 杨文利,罗煜全,赵建民.赣江中游阳坑小流域水土保持生态承载力估算[J].南昌工程学院学报,2015,34(3),67-70.
[18] 李高飞,任海.中国不同气候带各类型森林的生物量和净第一生产力[J].热带地理,2004,24(4):306-310.
[19] 许信旺,潘根兴,孙秀丽,等.安徽省贵池区农田土壤有机碳分布变化及固碳意义[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(12):2551-2558.
[20] 王兵,魏江生,胡文.中国灌木林-经济林-竹林的生态系统服务功能评估[J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1936-1945.
[21] 《中国生物多样性国情研究报告》编写组.中国生物多样性国情研究报告[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998.
[22] 张颖.我国林木核算模型及其最优核算价格计算[J].林业经济,2009(12):49-52.

相似文献/References:

[1]王星,李占斌,李鹏.陕西省丹汉江流域水土保持工程投资情况分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):43.
　WANG Xing,LI Zhan-bin,LI Peng.Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Project Investment Status of Dan-Han River Watershed in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):43.
[2]宋凤军,穆兴民,白桦.嘉陵江流域输沙量演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):65.
　SONG Feng-jun,MU Xing-min,BAI Hua.Variation of Sediment Discharge in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):65.
[3]高照良,吴晹,郭亚军.新疆维吾尔自治区水土保持补偿费收费方法和标准[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):275.
　GAO Zhao-liang,WU Yi,GUO Ya-jun.Soil and Water Conservation Methods and Standards of Compensation Charge in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):275.
[4]朱青,陈正刚,李剑,等.贵州坡耕地三种种植模式的水土保持效果对比研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):21.
　ZHU Qing,CHEN Zheng-gang,LI Jian,et al.Comparative Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effect of the Three Cropping Patterns on Slope Land in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):21.
[5]贺振伟,郭东罡,白中科,等.两种水土生态恢复模式下刺槐种群数量特征与空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):48.
　HE Zhen-wei,GUO Dong-gang,BAI Zhong-ke,et al.Numeric Character and Spatial Pattern of Robinia pseudoacacia L. Population at Two Kinds of Recovery Modes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):48.
[6]吴启蒙,朱志玲,吴咏梅,等.宁夏水土保持的产业结构影响评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):116.
　WU Qi-meng,ZHU Zhi-ling,WU Yong-mei,et al.Impact Evaluation on Industrial Structure of Soil and Water Conservation in Ningxia Hui Automonous Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):116.
[7]康万利,揭雨成,邢虎成.南方坡耕地种植苎麻水土保持效果和经济效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):86.
　KANG Wan-li,JIE Yu-cheng,XING Hu-cheng.Study of Soil-Water Conservation Effects and Economic Benefit of Ramie in South Slope Crop Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):86.
[8]刘琳,余莉,李正,等.基于改进模糊层次模型的土地整理效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):204.
　LIU Lin,YU Li,LI Zheng,et al.Study on the Evaluation of Integrated Benefit of Land Consolidation Based on Ameliorate Fuzzy AHP[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):204.
[9]汤崇军,郑海金,谢颂华.不同土壤抗蚀性指标对侵蚀泥沙影响的灰色关联度分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):1.
　TANG Chong-jun,ZHENG Hai-jin,XIE Song-hua.Effects of Different Anti-erodibility Parameters on Soil Erosion Based on Grey Correlation Degree Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):1.
[10]郭兰勤,杨勤科.藉河流域水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):139.
　GUO Lan-qin,YANG Qin-ke.Evaluation on the Benefit of the Soil and Water Conservation in Jihe Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):139.
[11]熊康宁,王恒松,刘云.毕节石桥小流域水土保持综合治理生态监测与效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):10.
　XIONG Kang-ning,WANG Heng-song,LIU Yun.Ecological Monitoring and the Evaluation on the Benefits of Comprehensive Management for Soil and Water Conservation in Shiqiao Watershed of Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):10.
[12]张霞,刘晓清,王亚萍,等.秦岭生态功能区水土保持治理效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):86.
　ZHANG Xia,LIU Xiao-qing,WANG Ya-ping,et al.Evaluation on Benefits of Soil and Water Conversation in Ecological Function Region of Qinling Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):86.
[13]钟原,陈菊红,马安妮,等.南水北调陕西水源区水土保持效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(03):119.
　ZHONG Yuan,CHEN Juhong,MA Anni,et al.Evaluation of Benefit of Soil and Water Conservation in Water Source Area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in Shaanxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):119.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-10-17;改回日期:2016-11-08。
基金项目:国家重点研发计划专题计划（2016YFC0501707）；中国科学院西部之光项目；中国科学院青年创新促进会（2011289）
作者简介:王一鸣(1993-),男,江西吉安人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与水文生态效益评价研究。E-mail:wangyiming315@mails.ucas.ac.cn
通讯作者:高鹏(1976-),男,陕西扶风人,博士,副研究员,主要从事水土保持和流域生态水文研究。E-mail:gaopeng@ms.iswc.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01