[1]陈安强,马文贵,高福军,等.土石山区径流小区坡长对径流量和侵蚀量影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(04):190-193,196.
　CHEN An-qiang,MA Wen-gui,GAO Fu-jun,et al.Effects of Slope Length on Runoff and Soil Erosion in Rocky Mountain Runoff Plots[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(04):190-193,196.
点击复制

土石山区径流小区坡长对径流量和侵蚀量影响的研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 14 期数: 2007年04期 页码: 190-193,196 栏目: 出版日期: 1900-01-01
Title:
Effects of Slope Length on Runoff and Soil Erosion in Rocky Mountain Runoff Plots
作者:
陈安强1, 马文贵2, 高福军2, 杨吉华1, 刘培娟1
1. 山东农业大学林学院水土保持系, 山东, 泰安, 271018;
2. 临朐县水土保持生态建设局, 山东, 临朐, 262600
Author(s):
CHEN An-qiang1, MA Wen-gui2, GAO Fu-jun2, YANG Ji-hua1, LIU Pei-juan1
1. Soil and Water Conservation Department of Forest College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, 271018, China;
2. Soil Water Conservation and Zoology Constructive Office of Linqu, Linqu, Shandong, 262600, China
关键词:
坡长; 径流; 侵蚀; 降雨量; 降雨强度
Keywords:
slope length; runoff; soil erosion; rainfall; rainfall intensity
分类号:
S157
摘要:
以土石山区径流小区所产生的径流量和侵蚀量为研究对象,对在山东省临朐县辛庄试验站径流小区坡长为10m,20m和40m多年的观测资料,分析了坡长与径流和侵蚀的关系.研究表明:不同坡长条件下降雨量与径流量和侵蚀量呈线性关系,同一坡长条件下,径流量和侵蚀量随降雨量的增加而增加,不同坡长条件下,随坡长的增加,径流量逐渐增加,在P<10mm时20m坡长的侵蚀量大于40m坡长的侵蚀量,在P>10mm时呈相反变化.不同坡长条件下I30与径流量和侵蚀量呈幂函数关系,同一坡长条件下,径流量和侵蚀量随I30的增加而增加,不同坡长条件下,随坡长的增加,侵蚀量逐渐增加,在I30<20mm时20m坡长的径流量大于40m坡长的径流量,在I30>20mm时呈相反变化.
Abstract:
The relationship between slope length and runoff with soil erosion is analyzed using years of observation data in Linqu county,Shandong province Daxinzhuang station runoff plots.The results show that rainfall and runoff with erosion is linear under different slope length,however,the runoff and soil erosion increase with the rainfall increasing on the same slope length,the runoff increases with the slope length increasing.Soil erosion of 20m-long plot is less than 40m-long plot’s as P<10mm,but on the contrary as P>10mm.There is significant linear relationship between every rainfall and runoff or soil erosion.There is significant power function between the biggest of I30 rainfall intensity and runoff or soil erosion.the runoff and soil erosion increase with I30 increasing on the same slope length,soil erosion increases with the slope length increasing,and 20m-long plot of runoff is more than 40 m-long plots as I30<20mm,it has contray chang as I30>20mm.

参考文献/References:

[1] 黎四龙,蔡强国,吴淑安,等.坡长对径流及侵蚀的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,1988,12(1):29-35.
[2] 姚治君,廖俊国,陈传友.云南玉龙山东南坡降雨因子与土壤流失关系的研究[J],自然资源学报,1991,(6):45-53.
[3] 蔡强国.坡长在坡面侵蚀产沙过程中的作用[J].泥沙研究,1989,12(4):84-91.
[4] 万朝廷.黄丘五副区降雨和地形因素与坡面水土流失关系研究[J].中国水土保持,1996,(12):26-29.
[5] 吴发启,赵晓光,刘秉正,等.黄土高原南部缓坡耕地降雨与侵蚀的关系[J].水土保持研究,1999,(2):53-60.

相似文献/References:

[1]王程,陈正江,杨勤科,等.流域分布式坡长不确定性的初步分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):15.
　WANG Cheng,CHEN Zheng-jiang,YANG Qing-ke,et al.Analysis on Uncertainty of DEM Derived Watershed Distributed Slope Length[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):15.
[2]杨巍,汤洁,李昭阳,等.基于SWAT模型的大伙房水库汇水区径流与泥沙模拟[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):77.
　YANG Wei,TANG Jie,LI Zhao-yang,et al.Streamflow and Sediment Simulation Based on SWAT Model in Dahuofang Reservoir Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):77.
[3]刘士余,章俊霞,罗志军,等.近50年赣西北大坑小流域径流对降雨的响应[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):19.
　LIU Shi-yu,ZHANG Jun-xia,LUO Zhi-jun,et al.Response of Runoff to Rainfall in Dakeng Small Watershed in Northwestern Jiangxi Province over the Last 50 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):19.
[4]白桦,穆兴民,高鹏,等.嘉陵江流域降水及径流演变规律分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):102.
　BAI Hua,MU Xing-min,GAO Peng,et al.Analysis on Spatio-temporal Variation of Precipitation and Streamflow in the Jialingjiang River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):102.
[5]侯喜禄,梁一民,曹清玉.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要水保林类型及草地水保效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):96.
　Hou Xilu,Liang Yimin,Cao Qingyu.A STUDY ON BENEFITS OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BY MAIN WOODLAND AND GRASSLAND TYPES IN LOESS HILLY REGION[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(04):96.
[6]吴钦孝,刘向东,赵鸿雁,等.宜川县油松人工林集水区水文状况分析[J].水土保持研究,1991,(02):116.
　Wu Qinxiao,Liu Xiangdong,Zhao Hongyan,et al.AN ANALYSIS ON HYDROSTATUS OF CATCHMENT IN ARTIFICIAL CHINESE PINE FOREST IN YICHUAN COUNTY[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(04):116.
[7]汪有科,李立,傅左,等.薪炭林水土保持效益的研究[J].水土保持研究,1992,(01):70.
　Wang Yuke,Li Li,Fu Zuo,et al.A STUDY ON THE BENEFIT OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR ENERGY FOREST[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(04):70.
[8]石生新,蒋定生.几种水土保持措施对强化降水入渗和减沙的影响试验研究[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(01):82.
　Shi Shengxin,Jiang Dingsheng.Impacts of Several Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Strengthening Rainfall infiltration and Reducing Sediment Yield[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(04):82.
[9]赵鸿雁,吴钦孝,韩冰,等.影响水土流失主要因子间相互关系研究[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(01):103.
　Zhao Hongyan,Wu Qinxiao,Han Bing,et al.Study on the Relation among Factors Affecting of Soil and Water Loss[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1995,2(04):103.
[10]曹全意.黄土高原地区提高山坡地径流利用率的有效途径[J].水土保持研究,1998,5(04):31.
　Cao Quanyi.The Effective Way to Raise the Runoff Use Ratein Slope Land of Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(04):31.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2007-4-11。
基金项目:山东省水利厅资助项目“山东典型侵蚀区水土流失机理与综合治理效益研究”
作者简介:陈安强(1981- ),男,硕士研究生,主要从事流域综合治理方面的研究.
通讯作者:杨吉华

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01