PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]ZHOU Hanbing,WANG Zhitai,WANG Zhijie,et al.Response of Ecosystem Service Value of Karst Mountainous City to Terrain Gradient[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):337-347.

Copy

Response of Ecosystem Service Value of Karst Mountainous City to Terrain Gradient

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 06 Page number: 337-347 Column: Public date: 2021-10-10

Title:: Response of Ecosystem Service Value of Karst Mountainous City to Terrain Gradient

Author(s):: ZHOU Hanbing¹，WANG Zhitai^1,2，WANG Zhijie³，BAO Yu^1,2; (1.College of Forestry，Guizhou University，Guiyang 550025，China; 2.Landscape Architecture Planning and Design Center，Guizhou University，Guiyang 550025，China; 3.College of Life Science，Guizhou University，Guiyang 550025，China)

Keywords:: karst area; mountainous city; ecosystem service value; terrain gradient; Guiyang

CLC:: X171.1

DOI:: -

Abstract:: Karst area has its special geographical and geomorphological properties. In order to explore the influence of ‘City mountain mosaic' special mountain city terrain factors on urban ecosystem service value，we took Guiyang City，a typical karst mountainous city，as the research area，and used terrain potential index，terrain distribution index combined with the modified ‘equivalent factor method'and Landsat TM remoted sensing image map in the downtown of Guiyang City in 2018 to evaluate the ecosystem service value of downtown of Guiyang City. The results showed that:(1)the land use types distributed in three sections in space，water land，cropland，grassland and built land had obvious advantages in the low-terrain area(1～10); bare land and cropland had certain advantages in the middle-terrain area(10～20); forest land had an absolute advantage in the high-terrain area(20～50); with the increase of terrain gradient，the dominant terrain area of wetland，water area，cultivated land，grassland and built land gradually changed to the dominant terrain area dominated by forest land;(2)the total ecosystem service value in central district of Guiyang in 2018 was 723 million yuan; on the whole，the terrain gradient showed a trend of first rising and then descending; the service value of ecosystem per unit area increased first，then decreased and finally raised;(3)there were significant differences in the topographic gradient in the exponential advantages of service value and size distribution of individual ecosystems; terrain gradients responded significantly(R²>0.75，and the maximum is 0.96)to individual ecosystem services; the advantages of topographic gradient were hydrological regulation and climate regulation. In general，the terrain and land use type area had the significant impact on the ecosystem service value in the central urban area of Guiyang.

References:: [1] Dally G C，Power M. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[J]. Nature，1997，388(6642):529-530.
[2] Costanza R，d'Arge R，De Groot R，et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. nature，1997，387(6630):253-260.
[3] 郑德凤，王燕燕，曹永强，等.基于生态系统服务的生态福祉分类与时空格局:以中国地级及以上城市为例[J].资源科学，2020，42(6):1110-1122.
[4] 毛齐正，黄甘霖，邬建国.城市生态系统服务研究综述[J].应用生态学报，2015，26(4):1023-1033.
[5] McKenzie E，Posner S，Tillmann P，et al. Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making:lesson from international experiences of spatial planning[J]. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy，2014，32(2):320-340.
[6] Soga M，Gaston K J. Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment，2016，14(2):94-101.
[7] 巩杰，徐彩仙，燕玲玲，等.1997—2018年生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向[J].应用生态学报，2019，30(10):3265-3276.
[8] 王志芳，彭瑶瑶，徐传语.生态系统服务权衡研究的实践应用进展及趋势[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版，2019，55(4):773-781.
[9] 傅伯杰，于丹丹.生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J].资源科学，2016，38(1):1-9.
[10] 王晓峰，薛亚永，张园.基于地形梯度的陕西省生态系统服务价值评估[J].冰川冻土，2016，38(5):1432-1439.
[11] 徐煖银，孙思琦，薛达元，等.基于地形梯度的赣南地区生态系统服务价值对人为干扰的空间响应[J].生态学报，2019，39(1):97-107.
[12] 赵艳霞，武爱彬，刘欣，等.浅山丘陵区土地利用地形梯度特征与生态系统服务价值响应[J].水土保持研究，2014，21(3):141-145.
[13] 陈奕竹，肖轶，孙思琦，等.基于地形梯度的湘西地区生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].中国生态农业学报，2019，27(4):623-631.
[14] 杨锁华，胡守庚，瞿诗进.长江中游地区生态系统服务价值的地形梯度效应[J].应用生态学报，2018，29(3):976-986.
[15] 戴云哲，李江风.洞庭湖区生态用地生态服务价值时空演化的地形梯度效应[J].水土保持研究，2018，25(3):197-204.
[16] 石垚，袁大鹏，赵雪杉，等.基于地形梯度的冀西北间山盆地生态系统服务价值评估:以河北省怀来县为例[J].水土保持研究，2018，25(3):184-190.
[17] 任梅，王志杰，王志泰，等.黔中喀斯特山地城市景观格局指数粒度效应:以安顺市为例[J].生态学杂志，2018，37(10):3137-3145.
[18] 王绍博，罗小龙，顾宗倪，等.精明增长背景下上海城市空间扩展演变特征与驱动机制[J].经济地理，2019，39(6):58-65.
[19] 陈娟，王龙，赵欣运，等.贵阳市城镇化进程与土地利用转变关系[J].地球科学，2019，44(9):2944-2954.
[20] 刘玺，何守阳，刘贝贝.岩溶山区城镇化进程的土地利用景观格局演变特征:以贵阳市为例[J].地球与环境，2019，47(4):527-536.
[21] 喻红，曾辉，江子瀛.快速城市化地区景观组分在地形梯度上的分布特征研究[J].地理科学，2001，21(1):64-69.
[22] 郭洪峰，许月卿，吴艳芳.基于地形梯度的土地利用格局与时空变化分析:以北京市平谷区为例[J].经济地理，2013，33(1):160-166，186.
[23] 谢高地，鲁春霞，冷允法，等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报，2003，18(2):189-196.
[24] 谢高地，甄霖，鲁春霞，等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报，2008，23(5):911-919.
[25] 谢高地，张彩霞，张雷明，等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报，2015，30(8):1243-1254.
[26] Kreuter U P，Harris H G，Matlock M D，et al. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area，Texas[J]. Ecological Economics，2001，39(3): 333-346.
[27] Curtis I A. Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes[J]. Ecological Economics，2004，50(3/4): 163-194.
[28] 唐启琳，刘方，刘秀明，等.基于LUCC的喀斯特山区生态系统服务价值评价[J].环境科学与技术，2019，42(1):170-177.
[29] 徐彩仙，巩杰，李焱，等.基于地形梯度的甘肃白龙江流域典型生态系统服务分布特征[J].生态学报，2020，40(13):4291-4301.
[30] 栾崧，曹建文，赵良杰，等.地球上奇特地貌的形成过程[J].中国矿业，2019，28(S1):366-367，370.
[31] 高红艳，刁承泰.试论喀斯特地貌对城市发展建设的影响:以喀斯特山区城市贵阳为例[J].中国岩溶，2010，29(1):81-86.
[32] 周晓芳，周永章，欧阳军.贵州喀斯特地貌区聚落的垂直分异探讨[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2011，21(12):158-162.
[33] 张明阳，王克林，刘会玉，等.桂西北典型喀斯特区生态服务价值的环境响应及其空间尺度特征[J].生态学报，2011，31(14):3947-3955.
[34] 刘世梁，董玉红，孙永秀，等.基于生态系统服务提升的山水林田湖草优先区分析:以贵州省为例[J].生态学报，2019，39(23):8957-8965.
[35] 谢高地，张彩霞，张昌顺，等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学，2015，37(9):1740-1746.
[36] 唐秀美，郝星耀，刘玉，等.生态系统服务价值驱动因素与空间异质性分析[J].农业机械学报，2016，47(5):336-342.
[37] Brandt S，Maennig W. Perceived externalities of cell phone base stations:the case of property prices in Hamburg，Germany[J]. Environment and Planning，2012，44(2):396-410.
[38] Palmquist R B. Welfare measurement for environmental improvements using the hedonic model: the case of nonparametric marginal prices[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，1988，15(3): 297-312.
[39] Liebelt V，Bartke S，Schwarz N. Urban green spaces and housing prices: an alternative perspective[J]. Sustainability，2019，11(13). DOI:10.3390/su11133707.
[40] 柳冬青，张金茜，巩杰，等.陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度—生态系统服务—人类福祉时空关系研究:以安定区为例[J].生态学报，2019，39(2):637-648.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-10-10