PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]YANG Hua,WANG Zhaolin,SUN Sirui,et al.Coupling Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value and Economic Gravity Evolution in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):242-250.

Copy

Coupling Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value and Economic Gravity Evolution in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 06 Page number: 242-250 Column: Public date: 2021-10-10

Title:: Coupling Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value and Economic Gravity Evolution in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Author(s):: YANG Hua¹，WANG Zhaolin²，SUN Sirui¹，E Shixuan²，WANG Na³; (1.Upper Yangtze River Economic Research Center，Chongqing Technology and Business University，Chongqing，400067，China; 2.School of Public Management，Chongqing Technology and Business University，Chongqing，400067，China; 3.School of Applied Economics，Renmin University of China，Beijing 100872，China)

Keywords:: Three Gorges Reservoir area; ecosystem service value; evolution of the center of gravity; coupling

CLC:: F062.2; F127

DOI:: -

Abstract:: To expplore the coordinated development of ecology and economy in the Three Gorges Reservoir area in the new era，based on relevant theories such as the change of center of gravity and the method of intermediate material conversion，we calculated the value of various ecological services and the position of center of gravity of GDP growth rate，urbanization rate，secondary industry added value and per capita fiscal budget expenditure in the Three Gorges reservoir area by each prefecture city in 2005，2010 and 2015. The dynamic changes and coupling relationships of the position of center of gravity were discussed. The results show that in the early five years，the center of supply and cultural service value were shifted to the southwest，the adjustment service value center was shifted to the northwest，the support service value center was shifted to the southeast，and the total ecological service value was shifted to the northeast; except for cultural service value，the offset distance of other service value center was relatively small; in the last five years，the five service value centers had been shifted to the northeast; except for the value of cultural services，the offset distance of other service value center was relatively large; during the study period，the offset direction of the center of gravity of the regional GDP growth rate were changed，and that of center of gravity of the rest of the socio-economic remained unchanged; the offset distance of the center of gravity of regional GDP growth rate and urbanization rate increased first and then decreased，that of per capita budget fiscal expenditure first decreased and then increased，and that of the added value of the secondary industry was almost unchanged; the overlap between the center of gravity of regional GDP growth rate and the total ecological service value first increased and then weakened，and the overlap between that of the remaining economic variables and the total ecological service value had increased year by year. The analysis showed that changes in forest area，water area，and construction land area are the main reasons for the changes in the value of ecological services in the early stage. At that time，the coupling between ecological environment and economy was weak，and human activities had the inverse effect on the environment; in the later stage，population concentration and industrial agglomeration were also influencing factors，and coupling was enhanced.

References:: [1] King R T. Wildlife and man[J]. NY Conservationist，1966，20(6):8-11.
[2] 李丽，王心源，骆磊，等.生态系统服务价值评估方法综述[J].生态学杂志，2018，37(4):1233-1245.
[3] Costanza R，D'Arge R，de Groot R，et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature，1997，387(6630):253-260.
[4] James B，Spencer B. What are ecosystem services: The need for standardized environmental accounting units[J]. Ecological Economics，2007，62(2/3):616-626.
[5] 欧阳志云，王如松，赵景柱.生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].应用生态学报，1999，10(5):635-640.
[6] 欧阳志云，王如松.生态系统服务功能、生态价值与可持续发展[J].世界科技研究与发展，2000，22(5):45-50.
[7] 谢高地，鲁春霞，成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].资源科学，2001，23(6):5-9.
[8] Benjamin B. Ecosystem services-Bridging ecology，economy and social sciences[J]. Ecological Complexity，2010，7(3):257-259.
[9] Sandhu H，Crossman N，Smith F P. Ecosystem services and Australian agricultural enterprises[J]. Ecological Economics，2012，74:19-26.
[10] Olalekan A，Gordon M，Alan G. Inequality and ecosystem services: The value and social distribution of Niger Delta wetland services[J]. Ecosystem Services，2015，12:42-54.
[9] 宋振威，孙美莹，杨荣金，等.宁夏贺兰山东麓葡萄产业生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].应用生态学报，2019，30(3):979-985.
[10] 赵苗苗，赵海凤，李仁强，等.青海省1998—2012年草地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].自然资源学报，2017，32(3):418-433.
[11] 张艳军，官冬杰，翟俊，等.重庆市生态系统服务功能价值时空变化研究[J].环境科学学报，2017，37(3):1169-1177.
[12] 江波，陈媛媛，肖洋，等.白洋淀湿地生态系统最终服务价值评估[J].生态学报，2017，37(8):2497-2505.
[13] 张丽云，江波，肖洋，等.洞庭湖生态系统最终服务价值评估[J].湿地科学与管理，2016，12(1):21-25.
[14] 赵晟，李梦娜，吴常文.舟山海域生态系统服务能值价值评估[J].生态学报，2015，35(3):678-685.
[15] 谢高地，张彩霞，张雷明，等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报，2015，30(8):1243-1254.
[16] 王玲，何青.基于能值理论的生态系统价值研究综述[J].生态经济，2015，31(4):133-136.
[17] 许旭，郜昂，朱萍萍，等.基于多源遥感数据的生态系统服务价值评估:以河北省为例[J].国土资源遥感，2013，25(4):180-186.
[18] Klein L R. Measurement of a shift in the world's center of economic gravity[J]. Journal of Policy Modeling，2009，31(4):489-492.
[19] Grether J M，Mathys N A. Is the world's economic centre of gravity already in Asia[J]. General & Introductory Geography，2010，42(1):47-50.
[20] 涂建军，刘莉，张跃，等.1996—2015年我国经济重心的时空演变轨迹:基于291个地级市数据[J].经济地理，2018，38(2):18-26.
[21] 陆保一，明庆忠，郭向阳，等.中国旅游业—科技创新—区域经济的耦合态势及其预测分析[J].地理与地理信息科学，2020，36(2):126-134.
[22] 于小娟，张红日，李哲.基于GIS的人口与经济的时空耦合研究[J].测绘与空间地理信息，2019，42(8):66-68.
[23] 李豫新，赵东栋.人口重心与经济重心演变路径及耦合性分析[J].统计与决策，2016(4):139-143.
[24] 钟业喜，陆玉麒.鄱阳湖生态经济区人口与经济空间耦合研究[J].经济地理，2011，31(2):195-200.
[25] 高军波，谢文全，韩勇，等.1990—2013年河南省县域人口、经济和粮食生产重心的迁移轨迹与耦合特征:兼议与社会剥夺的关系[J].地理科学，2018，38(6):919-926.
[26] 仲俊涛，米文宝，候景伟，等.改革开放以来宁夏区域差异与空间格局研究:基于人口、经济和粮食重心的演变特征及耦合关系[J].经济地理，2014，34(5):14-20，47.
[27] 陈莹，胡梦可，方勇.武汉市土地利用程度和经济发展的重心迁移及耦合协调性研究[J].长江流域资源与环境，2017，26(8):1131-1140.
[28] 周艳，黄贤金，徐国良，等.长三角城市土地扩张与人口增长耦合态势及其驱动机制[J].地理研究，2016，35(2):313-324.
[29] 淳阳，朱晚秋，潘洪义，等.重心转移视角下新型城镇化与生态足迹时空差异及其耦合关系研究:以四川省为例[J].长江流域资源与环境，2018，27(2):306-317.
[30] 胡晨沛，李辉尚.1978—2015年中国农业经济重心和禀赋结构重心时空轨迹及其耦合趋势研究[J].华中农业大学学报:社会科学版，2019(2):91-99，167.
[31] 国洪磊，周启刚.三峡库区蓄水前后土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究，2016，23(5):222-228.
[32] 庞敏，周启刚，马泽忠，等.三峡库区蓄水前后土地利用与经济发展协调度[J].水土保持研究，2020，27(1):66-72，80.
[33] 黄磊，吴传清，文传浩.三峡库区环境—经济—社会复合生态系统耦合协调发展研究[J].西部论坛，2017，27(4):83-92.
[34] 贺嘉，许芯萍，张雅文，等.流域“环境—经济—社会”复合系统耦合协调时空分异研究:以金沙江为例[J].生态经济，2019，35(6):131-138.
[35] 张艳军，官冬杰，翟俊，等.重庆市生态系统服务功能价值时空变化研究[J].环境科学学报，2017，37(3):1169-1177.
[36] 吴娇，李月臣.三峡库区(重庆段)景观格局变化及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报，2018，34(4):308-317.
[37] 张杨，马泽忠，陈丹.基于生态格局视角的三峡库区土地生态系统服务价值[J].水土保持研究，2019，26(5):321-327.
[38] 马骏，马朋，李昌晓，等.基于土地利用的三峡库区(重庆段)生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].林业科学，2014，50(5):17-26.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-10-10