[1]NIU Zihao,ZHOU Zhongfa,ZHU Changli,et al.Rurality Spatial Distribution and Types of Rural Development in Karst Mountains[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):316-324.
Copy
Rurality Spatial Distribution and Types of Rural Development in Karst Mountains
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
28
Number of periods:
2021 03
Page number:
316-324
Column:
Public date:
2021-04-20
- Title:
- Rurality Spatial Distribution and Types of Rural Development in Karst Mountains
- CLC:
- F320.3
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- The karst mountains are typical ecological environment vulnerable area where rural economic development is slow. Evaluating the rurality is helpful to promote the regional economic development. Taking Panzhou City as a case, we constructed an evaluation index system of rurality, conducted a quantitative evaluation on the rurality of 474 rural units in Panzhou City, analyzed its spatial differentiation characteristics, divided rural development types based on ecological and economic conditions, and explored the differences of rurality under different development types. The results show that:(1)the spatial distribution of rurality in Panzhou is obvious, and the overall distribution characteristics in the south is higher than north, and east is higher than west;(2)with respect to the overall aspect, the rurality index shows significant spatial agglomeration; From the local level, the cold spots distribute in the western part of the city, while the hot spots distribute in the southern part, and the sub-cold and sub-hot are distribute around the cold and hot area, respectively;(3)the rural development type is divided into ecological protection priority, economic development priority, ecological protection and economic development common important type I and Ⅱ, each type of rural development account for 34.0%, 18.1%, 17.6% and 30.3% of Panzhou's total area, respectively;(4)there are obvious differences between different types of rural development, the rurality level of both ecological protection priority and common important type Ⅱ are weak, weaker and medium; the rurality level of both economic development priority and common important type I are medium, stronger and strong. This paper analyzes the status and development types of rural differentiation in Panzhou from the micro perspective, and clarifies the potential conditions and development paths of rural development, which can provide the decision-making basis for the regional rural poverty alleviation and rural revitalization.
- References:
- [1] 张小林.乡村概念辨析[J].地理学报,1998,53(4):365-371.[2] 屠爽爽,龙花楼,李婷婷,等.中国村镇建设和农村发展的机理与模式研究[J].经济地理,2015,35(12):141-147,160.[3] 龙花楼,屠爽爽.乡村重构的理论认知[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(5):581-590.[4] 龙花楼,邹健.我国快速城镇化进程中的乡村转型发展[J].苏州大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2011,32(4):97-100.[5] 孙玉,程叶青,张平宇.东北地区乡村性评价及时空分异[J].地理研究,2015,34(10):1864-1874.[6] 李红波,张小林.乡村性研究综述与展望[J].人文地理,2015,30(1):16-20,142.[7] 王慧咏.水生态敏感区乡村性格局与演变研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2017.[8] 龙花楼,张杏娜.新世纪以来乡村地理学国际研究进展及启示[J].经济地理,2012,32(8):1-8.[9] Cloke P. An index of rurality for England and Wales[J]. Regional Studies, 1977,11(1):31-46.[10] Woods M. Performing rurality and practising rural geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010,34(6):835-846.[11] Woods M. Rural Geography:Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring[M]. Landon:Sage, 2005.[12] Harrington V, Dan O'Donoghue. Rurality in England and Wales1991:A replication and extension of the 1981 rurality index[J]. Sociologia Ruralis, 1998,38(2):178-203.[13] 龙花楼,刘彦随,邹健.中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):426-434.[14] 任国平,刘黎明,管青春,等.基于生活质量的大都市郊区乡村性评价及空间自相关类型划分[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(7):264-275.[15] 邵子南,陈江龙,苏勤,等.江苏省乡村性空间格局及影响因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(2):185-193.[16] 周艳兵,郝星耀,刘玉,等.河南省县域乡村发展类型及乡村性空间分异研究[J].农业现代化研究,2014,35(4):447-452.[17] 魏耀华,陈荣蓉,杨朝现,等.丘陵区村域乡村性空间分异及发展类型研究:以重庆市荣昌区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2019,38(3):170-175.[18] 董顺舟,赵宇鸾,李秀彬.基于地形梯度的高原山地区土地利用格局时空特征:以贵州省盘县为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(2):213-222.[19] 周忠发,朱昌丽,谭玮颐,等.基于空间开发适宜性评价的石漠化地区可持续发展研究:以贵州省盘州市为例[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2019,37(1):1-9.[20] 朱彬,张小林.江苏省乡村性的县域差异时空分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(4):539-547.[21] 王勇,周雪,李广斌.苏南不同类型传统村落乡村性评价及特征研究:基于苏州12个传统村落的调查[J].地理研究,2019,38(6):1311-1321.[22] 刘彦随.中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):637-650.[23] 姚龙,刘玉亭.基于聚类分析的城郊地区乡村发展类型:以广州市从化区为例[J].热带地理,2015,35(3):427-436.[24] 段德罡,刘嘉伟.中国乡村类型划分研究综述[J].西部人居环境学刊,2018,33(5):78-83.[25] 马力阳,李同昇,李婷,等.我国北方农牧交错带县域乡村性空间分异及其发展类型[J].经济地理,2015,35(9):126-133.[26] 谢玲,李孝坤,任秋爽,等.西南地区贫困乡村地域类型划分及减贫对策研究[J].农业现代化研究,2017,38(5):818-826.[27] 张利国,王占岐,魏超,等.基于村域多功能视角的乡村振兴策略:以鄂西郧阳山区为例[J].资源科学,2019,41(9):1703-1713.[28] 孟欢欢,李同昇,于正松,等.安徽省乡村发展类型及乡村性空间分异研究[J].经济地理,2013,33(4):144-148,185.[29] 赵涛涛,白建军,尚忠慧.基于BP神经网络的陕西省县域乡村性分异研究[J].浙江大学学报:理学版,2016,43(2):203-210.[30] 高建岗,黄锐.基于耕地质量指数和空间自相关的苏南地区耕地保护分区[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):213-218.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2021-04-20