[1]HOU Rui,LI Hongbo,GAO Yanli.Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use in Jiangxia District of Wuhan Based on Landscape Pattern[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(01):323-330.
Copy
Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use in Jiangxia District of Wuhan Based on Landscape Pattern
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
28
Number of periods:
2021 01
Page number:
323-330
Column:
Public date:
2021-01-10
- Title:
- Ecological Risk Assessment of Land Use in Jiangxia District of Wuhan Based on Landscape Pattern
- CLC:
- F301.2
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Ecological risk assessment of land use is a basis for the systematic management of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes and grasslands, and is of great significance for optimizing the regional ecological security pattern. Based on the interpretation data of remote sensing images from 2000 to 2015, we analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns of land-use dynamic changes in Jiangxia District of Wuhan, and then used the spatial grid to construct land-use ecological risk index in Jiangxia, which based on landscape pattern, in order to explore the spatial distribution and variation characteristics of ecological risks. Next, we explored the evolution process of ecological risk under different land use types and its response elasticity mechanism. The results are shown as follows.(1)The main land types in Jiangxia District were cultivated land and waters. During the study period, 8.41% of the cultivated land was changed into construction land, which concentrated in the northern part of Jiangxia and gradually expanded to the surroundings.(2)The spatial distribution of land-use ecological risks were obviously different, and showed the agglomeration effect. In addition, the local spatial difference was also increasing.(3)In the past 15 years, the overall ecological risk of the study area had increased. The average value of the ecological risk index had increased from 0.117 4 to 0.190 8. The area ratio of low-level ecological risk zone had decreased from 49.81% to 0.01%. The area of other-levels ecological risk zone had increased in different extent.(4)Arable land, construction land, and water area were less threatened by ecological risks, and the ecological risk of unused land was the highest. In addition, the impact of land use change on ecological risk continued to weaken, and the impact factors of ecological risk were more diversified.
- References:
-
[1] 王夏晖,何军,饶胜,等.山水林田湖草生态保护修复思路与实践[J].环境保护,2018,46(3):17-20.
[2] 成金华,尤喆.“山水林田湖草是生命共同体”原则的科学内涵与实践路径[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):1-6.
[3] 曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等.景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架: ESRISK[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):843-855.
[4] 刘迪,陈海,梁小英,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区生态风险动态变化及其地形梯度分析:以陕西省米脂县为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(23):8584-8592.
[5] 张思锋,刘晗梦.生态风险评价方法述评[J].生态学报,2010,30(10):2735-2744.
[6] 刘永强,廖柳文,龙花楼,等.土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析:以湖南省为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(4):691-700.
[7] 巩杰,谢余初,赵彩霞,等.甘肃白龙江流域景观生态风险评价及其时空分异[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(8):2153-2160.
[8] 奚世军,安裕伦,李阳兵,等.基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估:以贵州省乌江流域为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):712-721.
[9] 余敦,梁珍宝,肖志娟,等.基于景观生态思维的南昌市土地生态风险时空特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):213-220.
[10] Turner B L, Janetos A C, Verburg P H, et al. Land system architecture: Using land systems to adapt and mitigate global environmental change[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(2):395-397.
[11] 李月月,黄义雄,杨阳,等.基于景观结构的福建省沿海生态风险时空特征[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):241-246.
[12] 彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.
[13] Paukert C P, Pitts K L, Whittier J B, et al. Development and assessment of a landscape-scale ecological threat index for the Lower Colorado River Basin[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2011,11(2):304-310.
[14] Ayre K K, Landis W G. A Bayesian approach to landscape ecological risk assessment applied to the upper Grande Ronde watershed, Oregon[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2012,18(5):946-970.
[15] 刘世梁,刘琦,张兆苓,等.云南省红河流域景观生态风险及驱动力分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(13):3728-3734.
[16] 吕乐婷,张杰,孙才志,等.基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估[J].生态学报,2018,38(16):5952-5960.
[17] 石玉琼,王宁练,李团胜,等.榆林市景观生态风险及其时空分异[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(2):494-504.
[18] 李青圃,张正栋,万露文,等.基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J].地理学报,2019,74(7):1420-1437.
[19] 王涛,张超,于晓童,等.洱海流域土地利用变化及其对景观生态风险的影响[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(7):2003-2009.
[20] 肖琳,田光进.天津市土地利用生态风险评价[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(2):469-476.
[21] 田鹏,李加林,史小丽,等.浙江省土地利用格局时空变化及生态风险评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(12):2697-2706.
[22] 吴莉,侯西勇,邸向红.山东省沿海区域景观生态风险评价[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(1):214-220.
[23] 李加林,徐谅慧,杨磊,等.浙江省海岸带景观生态风险格局演变研究[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(1):293-299,314.
[24] 徐兰,罗维,周宝同.基于土地利用变化的农牧交错带典型流域生态风险评价:以洋河为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(4):580-590.
[25] 谢刚,谢元贵,廖小锋,等.基于水土流失敏感性的岩溶地区景观生态风险评价:以黔南州为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):298-304.
[26] 卢江林,李阳兵.基于土地利用/覆被变化的贵阳市红枫湖水源保护区生态风险演变[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):229-233,239.
[27] 陈丹,蒋贵国,张妍,等.基于生态服务价值的沱江流域土地景观生态风险时空分异研究[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(3):223-230,2,313.
[28] 王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):83-89.
[29] 刘春艳,张科,刘吉平.1976—2013年三江平原景观生态风险变化及驱动力[J].生态学报,2018,38(11):3729-3740.
[30] Jin X, Jin Y X, Mao X F. Ecological risk assessment of cities on the Tibetan Plateau based on land use/land cover changes:Case study of Delingha City [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,101(7):185-191.
[31] 魏伟,石培基,雷莉,等.基于景观结构和空间统计方法的绿洲区生态风险分析:以石羊河武威、民勤绿洲为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(12):2023-2035.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2021-01-15