[1]GAO Min,WANG Yong,GAO Jie,et al.Analysis on Changes and Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area Under the Project of Returning Farmland to Forest[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(02):276-283.
Copy
Analysis on Changes and Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area Under the Project of Returning Farmland to Forest
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 02
Page number:
276-283
Column:
Public date:
2020-03-30
- Title:
- Analysis on Changes and Relationship of Ecosystem Services in Karst Area Under the Project of Returning Farmland to Forest
- CLC:
- X171.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to provide scientific theoretical basis for the implementation of the project of returning farmland to forest under the new situation, Puding County of Anshun City, Guizhou Province was taken as the research area, four services such as soil conservation, water yield, carbon storage and habitat quality in 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2017 in Puding County were measured by using the value trade-off model of ecosystem services and transactions(InVEST). The results showed that:(1)the ecosystem service change indexes(ESCI)of water yield, carbon storage, soil conservation and habitat quality service in the three periods were different, some indexes remained stable, and the others doubled. The gain and loss ranges were not the same in terms of spatial distribution, and the same kinds of ecosystem services had not the same distributions in different time periods;(2)The distribution patterns of the four dominant ecosystem services also presented the significant spatial heterogeneity; the leading service of water yield mainly distributed in mountainous forestland, construction land and bare land; carbon storage services mainly distributed in forest areas; habitat quality leading services distributed in water body, forestland, grassland and cultivated land;(3)there were obvious synergistic relationships between soil conservation and carbon storage service, soil conservation and habitat quality service, carbon storage and habitat quality in Puding County; there was a good synergistic relationship between soil conservation and water yield;(4)multiple ecosystem service supply of type 4 and type 3 of hot spots in Puding County mainly distributed in the forest and grassland areas, and with the comprehensive development of the policy of returning farmland to forest(grass), type 4 and type 4 of hot spots area increased year by year; Type 0 and type 1 hot spots mainly distributed in the construction land and cultivated land areas of Puding County.
- References:
-
[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis[M]. Washington D C: World Resources Institute, 2005.
[2] 苏维词.贵州喀斯特山区生态环境脆弱性及其生态整治[J].中国环境科学,2000,20(6):547-551.
[3] 张殿发,王世杰,李瑞玲.贵州省喀斯特山区生态环境脆弱性研究[J].地理学与国土研究,2002,18(1):77-79.
[4] Feng X, Fu B, Lu N, et al. How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China's Loess Plateau[J]. Scientific Reports,2013,3.DOI:10.1038/srep02846.
[5] Rodríguez J P, Douglas B T, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services[J/OL]. Ecology and Society,2006,11(1):28.http:∥www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/.
[6] Foley J A. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science,2005,309(5734):570-574.
[7] Leea H, Lautenbacha S. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators,2016,66:340-351.
[8] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].生态学报,2017,37(21):7219-7231.
[9] 王蓓,赵军,胡秀芳.石羊河流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系分析[J].生态学报,2018,38(21):7582-7595.
[10] 武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.
[11] 王壮壮,张立伟,李旭谱,等.流域生态系统服务热点与冷点时空格局特征[J].生态学报,2019,39(3):823-834.
[12] 潘竟虎,李真.干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17):280-289.
[13] Qiao X N, Gu Y Y, Zou C G, et al. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2018,28(1):86-99.
[14] Yang X, Zhou Z, Li J, et al. Trade-offs between carbon sequestration, soil retention and water yield in the Guanzhong—Tianshui Economic Region of China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2016,26(10):1449-1462.
[15] 张婷,侍昊,徐雁南,等.退耕还林对喀斯特地区土地利用景观格局影响的定量化评价[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(3):34-43.
[16] 郜红娟,张朝琼,王后阵,等.岩溶山区生态服务价值对退耕还林(草)工程的响应[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2014,32(6):21-24.
[17] 焦树林,艾其帅.黔中喀斯特地区退耕还林项目的碳汇经济效益分析[J].生态经济,2011,244(10):69-72.
[18] 张博胜.退耕还林工程驱动下的中国西南喀斯特山区土地利用变化及其生态效应研究:以云南省文山县为例[D].昆明:云南财经大学,2010.
[19] Tian Y, Wang S, Bai X, et al. Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2016,566:1297-1308.
[20] Yanqing L,Wei S. Trade-off Analysis of Ecosystem Services in a Mountainous Karst Area, China[J]. Water, 2018,10(3).DOI:10.3390/w10030300.
[21] 陈洪元.贵州喀斯特山区雨洪资源高效利用方法:以普定县陈家寨喀斯特石漠化示范区为例[J].贵州科学,2015,33(5):22-26.
[22] 钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
[23] 章文波,付金生.不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J].资源科学,2003,25(1):37-38.
[24] 李默然,丁贵杰.贵州黔东南主要森林类型碳储量研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2013,33(7):119-124.
[25] 罗怀良,袁道先,陈浩.南川市三泉镇岩溶区农田生态系统有机碳密度[J].生态环境,2008,17(5):2014-2018.
[26] 解宪丽,孙波,周慧珍,等.中国土壤有机碳密度和储量的估算与空间分布分析[J].土壤学报,2004,41(1):35-43.
[27] 褚琳,张欣然,王天巍,等.基于CA-Markov和Invest模型的城市景观格局与生境质量时空演变及预测[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(12):4106-4118.
[28] 李晶,李红艳,张良.关中—天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系[J].生态学报,2016,36(10):3053-3062.
[29] 刘竞妍,张可,王桂华.综合评价中数据标准化方法比较研究[J].数字技术与应用,2018,36(8):84-85.
[30] 武文欢,彭建,刘焱序,等.鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1571-1581.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-02-25