PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]ZHANG Xuesong,XU Zijin.Spatial Temporal Evolution of Functional Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space and Its Relationship with Human Activity Intensity in Ethnic Minority Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(06):268-273.

Copy

Spatial Temporal Evolution of Functional Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space and Its Relationship with Human Activity Intensity in Ethnic Minority Areas

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 06 Page number: 268-273 Column: Public date: 2021-10-10

Title:: Spatial Temporal Evolution of Functional Coupling Coordination Degree of Production-Living-Ecological Space and Its Relationship with Human Activity Intensity in Ethnic Minority Areas

Author(s):: ZHANG Xuesong^1,2，XU Zijin^1,2,3; (1.Key Laboratory of Geographical Process Analysis and Simulation，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079，China; 2.College of Urban and Environmental Sciences，Central China Normal University，Wuhan 430079，China; 3.Guizhou University of Finance and Economics，Guiyang 550025，China)

Keywords:: rural revitalization; production-living-ecological space; spatial coupling coordination; human activities; Guizhou Province; ethnic minority

CLC:: K901

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to further improve the development quality of new urbanization in ethnic minority areas and promote regional coordinated and sustainable development，we constructed the evaluation index system for function system level of production-living-ecological space in Ethnic Minority Autonomous Prefecture of Guizhou. The coupling coordination degree model was used to calculate the spatial development coordination level of the study area. The intensities of human activities in minority areas were calculates，and the relationship between them was analyzed by introducing response index. The results show that:(1)before 2015，the coupling coordination degree of functional system of production-living-ecological space fluctuated，and after 2015，it presented the stable and coordinated development trend;(2)the coupling coordination degree of the function system of production-living-ecological space and the intensity of human activities tended to be stable in the fierce interaction in minority areas of Guizhou Province. The balance between production space function(economic development)and ecological space function(ecological protection)is the difficulty and key to improve regional sustainable development ability. There is a moderate correlation between the coupling coordination degree of function system of production-living-ecological space and the intensity of human activities in the minority areas，indicating that the minority areas have their own characteristics. Formulating development measures in line with the actual situation of minority areas can effectively alleviate the contradiction between people and land in the minority areas.

References:: [1] 张军涛，翟婧彤.我国沿海中心城市“三生空间”耦合一协调度评价及优化策略[J].现代城市研究，2020，34(7):2-8.
[2] 黄金川，林浩曦，漆潇潇.面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J].地理科学进展，2017，36(3):378-391.
[3] 陈钱钱，舒晓波，曾凡彬.江西省三生空间结构时空格局多尺度分析[J].水土保持研究，2020，27(4):385-391.
[4] 高星，刘泽伟，李晨曦，等.基于“三生空间”的雄安新区土地利用功能转型与生态环境效应研究[J].生态学报，2020，40(20):1-10.
[5] 刘鹏飞，孙斌栋.中国城市生产、生活、生态空间质量水平格局与相关因素分析[J].地理研究，2020，39(1):13-24.
[6] 王成，唐宁.重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J].地理研究，2018，37(6):1100-1114.
[7] 王成，周明茗，李颢颖，等.基于耗散结构系统熵模型的乡村生产空间系统有序性研究[J].地理研究，2019，38(3):619-631.
[8] 王成，龙卓奇，樊荣荣.重庆市江津区乡村生产空间系统适应性评价及障碍因素分析[J].地理研究，2020，39(7):1609-1624.
[9] 蔡玉梅，顾林生，李景玉，等.日本六次国土综合开发规划的演变及启示[J].中国土地科学，2008(6):76-80.
[10] 陈仲常，张泽东.基子熵权法的重庆市主体功能区规划[J].重庆理工大学学报:社会科学版，2010，24(11):31-34.
[11] 樊杰，周侃，孙威，等.人文—经济地理学在生态文明建设中的学科价值与学术创新[J].地理科学进展，2013，32(2):147-160.
[12] 魏后凯，高春亮.中国区域协调发展态势与政策调整思路[J].河南社会科学，2012，20(1):107-108.
[13] 贵州省统计局.贵州统计年鉴2019[Z].北京:中国统计出版社，2019.
[14] 贵州省黔东南州统计局.黔东南州统计年鉴2019[Z].北京:中国统计出版社，2019.
[15] 贵州省黔南州统计局.黔南统计年鉴2019[Z].北京:中国统计出版社，2019.
[16] 贵州省黔西南州统计局.黔西南州统计年鉴2019[Z].北京:中国统计出版社，2019.
[17] 王振坡，朱丹，王丽艳.区域协同下京津冀城市群城市综合承载力评价[J].首都经济贸易大学学报，2018，20(6):73-81.
[18] 史丹，白骏骄.产业结构早熟对经济增长的影响及其内生性解释:基于互联网式创新力视角[J].中央财经大学学报，2019(6):105-118.
[19] 欧惠，戴文远，黄万里，等.基于“三生空间”的福建省城市综合承载力研究[J].生态学报，2020，39(3):71-79.
[20] 刘浩，张毅，郑文升.城市土地集约利用与区域城市化的时空耦合协调发展评价:以环渤海地区城市为例[J].地理研究，2011，30(10):1805-1817.
[21] 韦晨，侯国林.基于“三生空间”功能评价的中原城市群国土空间特征及优化研究[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报，2020，43(3):18-26.
[22] 徐勇，孙晓一，汤青.陆地表层人类活动强度:概念、方法及应用[J].地理学报，2015，70(7):1068-1079.
[23] 徐小任，徐勇.黄土高原地区人类活动强度时空变化分析[J].地理研究，2017，3(4):661-672.
[24] 韩美，张翠，路广，等.黄河三角洲人类活动强度的湿地景观格局梯度响应[J].农业工程学报，2017，33(6):265-274.
[25] 彭文君.喀斯特山区土地生态环境对人类活动的响应机制和耐受能力研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学，2018.
[26] 陈钱钱.江西省“三生”空间时空演化及其对人类活动强度的动态响应[D].南昌:江西师范大学，2020.
[27] 刘健，刘银坤.基于Pearson系数对气象因子与污染物的相关性研究[J].华北科技学院学报，2019，16(4):93-97.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-10-10