PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]ZHAO Haonan,ZHAO Yinghui,NING Jing,et al.Evaluation of Land Use Benefit of Urban Agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta Based on TOPSIS Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(05):355-361.

Copy

Evaluation of Land Use Benefit of Urban Agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta Based on TOPSIS Method

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 05 Page number: 355-361 Column: Public date: 2021-08-20

Title:: Evaluation of Land Use Benefit of Urban Agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta Based on TOPSIS Method

Author(s):: ZHAO Haonan¹,ZHAO Yinghui²,NING Jing²,GONG Tiantian³,SUN Zixiang¹; (1.College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China; 2.School of Public Administration and Law,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,China; 3.College of Urban & Environmental Science,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)

Keywords:: Yangtze River Delta city group; land use benefit; TOPSIS method; coefficient of variation method

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: The evaluation of land use benefit is of great significance to promote the intensive use of land resources and ultimately realize the sustainable development of the region. We took 26 prefecture-level cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration as the research samples,used the coefficient of variation method to measure the weights of 15 indicators such as per capita gross national product,and then used the TOPSIS method to determine the relative proximity of each benefit,and explored spatiotemporal changes of land use benefits before and after after 2012. The results show that:(1)the weight index of each land use benefit in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration follows the order of economic benefit>ecological benefit>social benefit; economic benefit is the aspect that has the greatest impact on the comprehensive benefits of land use.(2)the comprehensive land benefits of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations are low and the land use benefits of cities at different levels differ significantly;(3)from the perspective of different provinces,Shanghai's economic,social,and comprehensive benefits are far ahead,while Anhui Province's comprehensive land benefits are low; from the perspective of different city levels,the higher the city level scale,the higher the land economic and comprehensive benefits,but the ecological benefits lower:(4)after 2012 of the Communist Party of China,except for the ecological benefits,the land use benefits showed a continuous improvement trend. The spatial distribution of comprehensive benefits showed the characteristics of ‘high in the east and low in the west,high in the south and low in the north'. The gap is gradually narrowing. Finally,it is proposed to strengthen cooperation between the four provinces and 26 prefecture-level cities,and the government should introduce the reasonable policies and measures.

References:: [1] 杨清可,段学军,叶磊,等.基于SBM-Undesirable模型的城市土地利用效率评价:以长三角地区16城市为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(4):712-721.
[2] 丁成日,高卫星.中国“土地”城市化和土地问题[J].城市发展研究,2018,25(1):29-36.
[3] 马立军.郭凤玉.我国城镇化进程中土地利用问题及对策[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(18):7855-7858.
[4] 陈明星,梁龙武,王振波,等.美丽中国与国土空间规划关系的地理学思考[J].地理学报,2019,74(12):2467-2481.
[5] 张晓玲,吕晓.国土空间用途管制的改革逻辑及其规划响应路径[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1261-1272.
[6] Shinde A S,Muluk A D. Agriculture transformation of land use efficiency in Solapur District of Maharashtra: A geographical analysis[J]. Review of Research Journal,2014,3(6):ROR-677.
[7] Peters C J,Picardy J A,Darrouzet-Nardi A,et al. Feed conversions,ration compositions,and land use efficiencies of major livestock products in U. S. agricultural systems-ScienceDirect[J]. Agricultural Systems,2014,130(3):35-43.
[8] Zitti M,Ferrara C,Perini L,et al. Long-term urban growth and land use efficiency in Southern Europe: Implications for sustainable land management[J]. Sustainability,2015,7(3):3359-3385.
[9] Du J,Thill J C,Peiser R B. Land pricing and its impact on land use efficiency in post-land-reform China:A case study of Beijing[J]. Cities,2016,50:68-74.
[10] Kotowska M M,Leuschner C,Triadiati T,et al. Conversion of tropical lowland forest reduces nutrient return through litterfall,and alters nutrient use efficiency and seasonality of netprimary production[J]. Oecologia,2016,180(2):601-618.
[11] 金贵,邓祥征,赵晓东,等.2005—2014年长江经济带城市土地利用效率时空格局特征[J].地理学报,2018,73(7):1242-1252.
[12] 黄奕龙,王仰麟,卜心国,等.城市土地利用综合效益评价:城际比较[J].热带地理,2006,26(2):145-150.
[13] 王国刚,刘彦随,方方.环渤海地区土地利用效益综合测度及空间分异[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(4):649-656.
[14] Fetzel T,Niedertscheider M,Haberl H,et al. Patterns and changes of land use and land-useefficiency in Africa 1980-2005:an analysis based on the human appropriation of net primary production framework[J]. Regional Environmental Change,2016,16(5):1507-1520.
[15] 李养兵,王丽,李伟涛.快速城市化地区城市用地扩展的效益评价:以安徽省滁州市为例[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(4):2336-2338.
[16] 王筱明.基于熵权法的济南市土地利用效益评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(2):96-98.
[17] 闫岩,雷国平,谢英楠.基于AHP和熵权法的土地利用生态效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(6):134-139.
[18] 柳锦森,葛霖.基于因子分析的荣昌县土地利用经济效益评价[J].农业工程,2014,4(1):81-86.
[19] 李娜,郝继坤.基于因子分析法的衡水市土地利用总体规划实施效果评价[J].安徽农业科学,2011,39(13):7872-7874.
[20] 吴一凡,雷国平,路昌,等.基于改进TOPSIS模型的大庆市城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍度诊断[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(4):85-90.
[21] 赵浩楠,赵映慧,宫田田,等.我国主要城市国际机场土地利用效益评价[J].国土与自然资源研究,2018(1):20-24.
[22] 吴熙铭.基于DEA方法的土地利用经济效益评价研究[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2012.
[23] 宋戈,高楠.基于DEA方法的城市土地利用经济效益分析:以哈尔滨市为例[J].地理科学,2008,28(2):185-188.
[24] 史进,黄志基,贺灿飞,等.中国城市群土地利用效益综合评价研究[J].经济地理,2013,33(2):76-81.
[25] 彭震伟,唐伟成,张立,等.长江三角洲城市群发展演变及其总体发展思路[J].上海城市规划,2014(1):7-12.
[26] 杨凤华.长江三角洲城市群发展的阶段判定与路径优化[J].南通大学学报:社会科学版,2018,34(2):1-8.
[27] 张荣天,焦华富.长江经济带城市土地利用效率格局演变及驱动机制研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2015,24(3):387-394.
[28] 麦建开,康昕怡,朱紫阳,等.基于地理国情监测改进熵权TOPSIS规划评价[J].测绘通报,2019(12):122-127.
[29] 周磊,黄秋昊.基于灰色关联TOPSIS的城市土地效益评价及障碍因子诊断[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):39-44.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-08-20