PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]DU Jiaojiao,ZHOU Yunchao,BAI Yunxing,et al.Research of Soil Hydrophysical Properties of Pinus Massoniana Plantation After the Introduction of Broad-Leaved Tree Species[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):105-112.

Copy

Research of Soil Hydrophysical Properties of Pinus Massoniana Plantation After the Introduction of Broad-Leaved Tree Species

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 28 Number of periods: 2021 04 Page number: 105-112 Column: Public date: 2021-08-10

Title:: Research of Soil Hydrophysical Properties of Pinus Massoniana Plantation After the Introduction of Broad-Leaved Tree Species

Author(s):: DU Jiaojiao, ZHOU Yunchao, BAI Yunxing, ZHANG Xunyuan; (Guizhou Key Laboratory of Plateau Mountain Forest Cultivation, Guizhou Provincial Forest Resources and Environment Research Center/College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)

Keywords:: Pinus massoniana; broadleaf tree; soil hydro-physics; coordinate comprehensive evaluation

CLC:: S714.2

DOI:: -

Abstract:: In order to explore the soil hydrophysical properties of Pinus massoniana plantation after the introduction of broad-leaved tree species, the Pinus massoniana pure forest and the mixed forest stands of Pinus massoniana after the introduction of broad-leaved tree species(Bretschneidera sinensis, Manglietia guinanensis, Cercidiphyllum japonicum, Michelia maudiae, Camellia oleifera)in Longli Forest Farm of Guizhou Province were selected as the research objects, and the forest soils characteristics and hydrological characteristics of the different stand types were studied quantitatively through by ring knife method, drying method and indoor soaking method. The results showed that:(1)the soil bulk density of different forest types increased with the depth of soil layer; the soil bulk density of Pinus massoniana and Michelia maudiae(1.29 g/cm³)mixed forest was the smallest, and that of Pinus massoniana and Cercidiphyllum japonicum(1.54 g/cm³)mixed forest was the largest;(2)soil total porosity, capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity, soil maximum water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity and field water holding capacity all decreased with the increase of soil layer, which was consistent with soil porosity and water holding capacity;(3)compared with the Pinus massoniana pure forest, the introduction of deep-rooted tree species had the positive influence on soil bulk density, porosity and water holding capacity; for example, Pinus massoniana and Michelia maudiae was the best, followed by Pinus massoniana and Camellia oleifera mixed forest, and the worst was Pinus massoniana and Cercidiphyllum japonicum mixed forest. From the perspective of soil hydrophysical characteristics, in the course of the future construction of Pinus massoniana soil and water conservation forest, the introduction of deep root tree species with easy decomposition of litter can be preferred, which is helpful for the improvement of soil structure and the forest to better play its ability of soil hydrologic regulation, meanwhile, the introduction of shallow root tree species can be avoided as far as possible.

References:: [1] Andréassian V. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004,291(1/2):1-27.
[2] Jin M, Zhang R, Sun L, et al. Temporal and spatial soil water management: a case study in the Heilonggang region, PR China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1999,42(2):173-187.
[3] 陈东立,余新晓,廖邦洪.中国森林生态系统水源涵养功能分析[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(1):49-54.
[4] 王晓学,沈会涛,李叙勇,等.森林水源涵养功能的多尺度内涵、过程及计量方法[J].生态学报,2013,33(4):1019-1030.
[5] Poirier V, Coyea M R, Angers D A, et al. Silvicultural treatments and subsequent vegetation impact long-term mineral soil biogeochemistry in mixedwood plantations[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016,368,140-150.
[6] 田大伦,陈书军.樟树人工林土壤水文—物理性质特征分析[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(2):1-6.
[7] Jia Y H, Shao M A. Temporal stability of soil water storage under four types of revegetation on the northern Loess Plateau of China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013,117,33-42.
[8] Mina M, Huber M O, Forrester D I, et al. Multiple factors modulate tree growth complementarity in central European mixed forests[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2018,106(3):1106-1119.
[9] 李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,等.珠江源头区几种主要林分类型下土壤的水分涵养功能研究[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(6):34-36.
[10] 公博,师忱,何会宾,等.冀北山区6种人工林的林地水源涵养能力[J].干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(3):167-172.
[11] Rivero R G, Grunwald S, Osborne T Z, et al. Characterization of the spatial distribution of soil properties in water conservation area 2A, everglades, florida[J]. Soil Science, 2007,172(2),149-166.
[12] Alanís N, Hernández-Madrigal V M, Cerda A, et al. Spatial gradients of intensity and persistence of soil water repellency under different forest types in central Mexico[J]. Land Degrad, 2016,28(1):317-327.
[13] 杨良辰,张春茹.沿坝地区3种典型林分类型枯落物层与土壤层水源涵养能力综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):177-182.
[14] Dietz J, Hlscher D, Leuschner C, et al. Rainfall partitioning in relation to forest structure in differently managed montane forest stands in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,237(1):170-178.
[15] 刘凯,贺康宁,田赟,等.青海高寒山区5种林分的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):141-146.
[16] 陈文静,祁凯斌,黄俊胜,等.川西不同树种人工林对土壤涵水能力的影响[J].生态学报,2017,37(15):4998-5006.
[17] 倪晓薇,宁晨,闫文德,等.贵州龙里林场马尾松湿地松人工林土壤养分分布特征[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2017,37(9):49-56.
[18] 颜耀.套种阔叶树种对红壤侵蚀区马尾松林生态功能的提升效果[D].福州:福建农林大学,2017.
[19] Chen F, Zheng H, Zhang K, et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure and metabolic activity following conversion from native Pinus massoniana plantations to exotic Eucalyptus plantations[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2013,291:65-72.
[20] Wang H, Liu S, Wang J, et al. Effects of tree species mixture on soil organic carbon stocks and greenhouse gas fluxes in subtropical plantations in China[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2013,300:4-13.
[21] 罗达,唐敬超,刘世荣,等.南亚热带乡土树种人工纯林及混交林土壤微生物群落结构[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(9):2543-2550.
[22] 中国林业科学研究院.森林土壤水分—物理性质的测定LY/T1215—1999[S].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[23] 王正安,邸利,王彦辉,等.六盘山叠叠沟小流域4种植被土壤层水文调节功能的综合评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(11):184-190.
[24] 朱万泽,盛哲良,舒树淼.川西亚高山次生林恢复过程中土壤物理性质及水源涵养效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):205-212.
[25] 韩路,王海珍,于军.塔里木河上游不同植被类型土壤水文特性研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(6):124-129.
[26] 孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
[27] 鲁绍伟,毛富玲,靳芳,等.中国森林生态系统水源涵养功能[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(4):223-226.
[28] 何帆,王得祥,雷瑞德,等.秦岭林区主要树种叶片凋落物性质的研究[J].西北林学院学报,2008,23(4):35-38.
[29] 庞学勇,刘世全,刘庆,等.川西亚高山人工云杉林地有机物和养分库的退化与调控[J].土壤学报,2004,41(1):126-133.
[30] 程欢,程一伦,宫渊波,等.川西北高山/亚高山区6种典型土壤类型水文效应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(2):225-231.
[31] 杨曾奖,曾杰,徐大平,等.森林枯枝落叶分解及其影响因素[J].生态环境学报,2007,16(2):649-654.
[32] 袁军,谭晓风,袁德义,等.油茶根系分布规律调查研究[J].浙江林业科技,2009,29(4):33-35.
[33] 乔琦,秦新生,邢福武,等.珍稀植物伯乐树一年生更新幼苗的死亡原因和保育策略[J].生态学报,2011,31(16):224-231.
[34] 廖乐平.亚热带木兰科、樟科10个树种细根形态与功能特性研究及其亲缘关系分析[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2016.
[35] 周东雄.杉木深山含笑混交林土壤肥力的研究[J].福建林学院学报,1994,14(3):220-224.
[36] 王大力,尹澄清.植物根孔在土壤生态系统中的功能[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):869-874.
[37] 王小平,肖肖,王新悦,等.连香树人工林细根生物量分布及根系分泌速率季节变化研究[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(12):152-156.
[38] 邢会文.4种植物根—土界面摩阻特性研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2009.
[39] 白云星,周运超.马尾松人工林根系对近自然经营措施的响应[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2019,39(11):1-6.
[40] 张希彪,上官周平.人为干扰对黄土高原子午岭油松人工林土壤物理性质的影响[J].生态学报,2005,26(11):3685-3695.
[41] 何圣嘉,谢锦升,杨智杰,等.南方红壤丘陵区马尾松林下水土流失现状、成因及防治[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(6):65-70.
[42] 莫江明,彭少麟, Brown S,等.鼎湖山马尾松林群落生物量生产对人为干扰的响应[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):193-200.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2021-08-20