[1]YU Yuan,HAN Ling,LI Mingyu,et al.Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs/Synergies in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):293-300.
Copy
Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs/Synergies in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
28
Number of periods:
2021 02
Page number:
293-300
Column:
Public date:
2021-02-06
- Title:
- Study on the Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs/Synergies in Ha-Chang Urban Agglomeration
- Keywords:
- Ha-Chang urban agglomeration; ecosystem services; tradeoffs synergies degree; regional differences
- CLC:
- X171.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Ha-Chang urban agglomeration ranks first in the national second-tier city group. Studying the changes of ecosystem services and weighing the synergy between the Ha-Chang urban agglomeration areas is of far-reaching significance to promote the sustainable development of the region. Based on multi-source remote sensing data combined with InVEST model and trade-off synergy model(ESTD), we analyzed the land cover changes in 2000, 2010 and 2015 of Ha-Chang urban agglomeration, the spatial-temporal distribution of three ecosystem services, soil conservation, carbon storage and water production, and their tradeoff synergy relationship. The results show that:(1)from 2000 to 2015, the total construction land in the Ha-Chang urban agglomeration increased by 1 462 km2; among them, the growth rate from 2000 to 2010(958 km2)was higher than that from 2010 to 2015(504 km2); in the past 15 years, the forest land increased by 1 527 km2, and the grassland, cultivated land and bare land decreased by 661 km2,1 611 km2 and 780 km2, respectively;(2)in the past 15 years, the amount of soil conservation continued to decrease, the carbon storage decreased first and then increased, and the water yield increased first and then decreased;(3)among the six types of land cover, the forest land provided the highest soil conservation capacity per unit area, and the wetland provided the highest carbon storage and water yield;(4)synergism was dominant among the three ecosystem services of Ha-Chang urban agglomeration; the soil conservation-carbon storage and soil conservation-water production in the south were mostly synergistic, on the contrary in the North, from the whole area, the correlation between carbon storage-water production was relatively weak. The results can provide the reference for the development of more comprehensive and specific ecological protection strategies in the Ha-Chang urban agglomeration area.
- References:
-
[1] Daily G C. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[2] Costanza R, Darge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[3] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J]. Ecology Letters, 2009,12(12):1394-1404.
[4] 李双成,张才玉,刘金龙,等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1379-1390.
[5] Qiu J, Turner M G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013,110(29):12149-12154.
[6] Rodríguez J, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services [J]. Ecology and Society, 2006,11(1),709-723.
[7] 戴尔阜,王晓莉,朱建佳,等.生态系统服务权衡:方法,模型与研究框架[J].地理研究,2016,35(6):1005-1016.
[8] 李鹏,姜鲁光,封志明,等.生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展[J].生态学报,2012,32(16):5219-5229.
[9] 曹祺文,卫晓梅,吴健生.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(11):3102-3111.
[10] Li Y, Zhang L, Qiu J, et al. Spatially explicit quantification of the interactions among ecosystem services [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2017,32(6):1181-1199.
[11] Vidal-Legaz B, Martínez-Fernández J, Picón A S, et al. Trade-offs between maintenance of ecosystem services and socio-economic development in rural mountainous communities in southern Spain: a dynamic simulation approach[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013,131:280-297.
[12] MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystem and Human Well-Being[J]. Washington D C: Island Press, 2005.
[13] Smith P, Ashmore M R, Black H I J, et al. The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013,50(4):812-829.
[14] 冉凤维,罗志军,吴佳平,等.鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(3):995-1004.
[15] 傅伯杰,于丹丹.生态系统服务权衡与集成方法[J].资源科学,2016,38(1):1-9.
[16] Kragt M E, Robertson M J. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014,102:147-157.
[17] Richards D R, Friess D A. Characterizing coastal ecosystem service trade-offs with future urban development in a tropical city [J]. Environmental Management, 2017,60(5):961-973.
[18] 饶胜,林泉,王夏晖,等.正蓝旗草地生态系统服务权衡研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(3):81-86.
[19] 葛菁,吴楠,高吉喜,等.不同土地覆被格局情景下多种生态系统服务的响应与权衡:以雅砻江二滩水利枢纽为例[J].生态学报,2012,32(9): 2629 -2639.
[20] 李慧颖.基于遥感和InVEST模型的辽宁省退耕还林工程生态效应评估[D].长春:吉林大学,2019.
[21] Wang Z M, Mao D H, Li L, et al. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992—2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China[J]. Science of Total Environment, 2015,514:119-130.
[22] Mao D H, He X Y, Wang Z M, et al. Diverse policies leading to contrasting impacts on land cover and ecosystem services in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Clean Production, 2019,240:117961.
[23] Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning [M]. Washington D C: Agricultural Handbook, 1978.
[24] 章文波,付金生.不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力[J].资源科学,2003,25(1):35-41.
[25] Williams J R. EPIC:the Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator[J]. Technical Bulletin-United States Department of Agriculture, 1990,4(4):206-207.
[26] Zhang L W, Fu B J, LüY H, et al. Balancing multiple ecosystem services in conservation priority setting [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2015,30(3):535-546.
[27] 蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.
[28] 蒋春丽,张丽娟,张宏文,等.基于RUSLE模型的黑龙江省2000—2010年土壤保持量评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(5):642-649.
[29] 袁志芬,黄桂林,莫宏伟,等.四川省宝兴县生态系统生物碳储量动态评估[J].林业资源管理,2014(1):82-88.
[30] 王治良.嫩江流域湿地自然保护区空缺(GAP)分析[D].哈尔滨:中国科学院研究生院(东北地理与农业生态研究所),2016.
[31] Lu N, Sun G, Feng X M, et al. Water yield responses to climate change and variability across the North-South Transect of Eastern China(NSTEC)[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,481:96-105.
[32] 王耕,韩冬雪.基于InVEST模型的大凌河上游汇水区水源涵养功能评估[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(3):206-211.
[33] Donohue R, Roderick M, Mcvicar T. Roots, storms and soil pores: Incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko's hydrological model [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012,436/437:35-50.
[34] Yang H, Yang D, Lei Z, et al. New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation[J]. Water Resources Research, 2008,44(3),893-897.
[35] Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No.56 [M]. Rome,Italy:Fao-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998.
[36] 孟庆林.基于生态系统服务变化的长白山地区土地利用/覆被优化研究[D].吉林延边:延边大学,2019.
[37] 李鸿健,任志远,刘焱序,等.西北河谷盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同分析:以银川盆地为例[J].中国沙漠,2016,36(6):1731-1738.
[38] 潘竟虎,李真.干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17):280-289.
[39] Wang C, Wang S, Fu B J, et al. Precipitation gradient determines the trade off between soil moisture and soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and species richness in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,575:1538-1545.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2021-02-10