[1]LUO Zhanfu,LI Lan,GAO Xu,et al.Study on the Coupling and Coordination of High-Quality Development and Ecological Environment of Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration Based on the Concept of Ecological City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):276-284.
Copy
Study on the Coupling and Coordination of High-Quality Development and Ecological Environment of Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration Based on the Concept of Ecological City
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
28
Number of periods:
2021 02
Page number:
276-284
Column:
Public date:
2021-02-06
- Title:
- Study on the Coupling and Coordination of High-Quality Development and Ecological Environment of Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration Based on the Concept of Ecological City
- Keywords:
- ecological city; quality of urban development; ecological sensitivity; coupling coordination degree; Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration
- CLC:
- F299.27; X22
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to explore the relationship between the high-quality development and the regional ecological environment quality of Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration, with respect to high-quality development in terms of the concept of ecological city, Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration was taken as the research sample, multivariate data and GIS spatial analysis method were used to evaluate the urban development quality and regional ecological sensitivity level quantitatively. Moreover, the coupling coordination between urban development quality and regional ecological sensitivity was analyzed. The results show that:(1)the spatial distribution of urban development quality grade in Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration presents the obvious characteristics of center-periphery and dual-core structure, and five major types such as comprehensive development type, social security type, economic development type, environment-friendly type and development lagging type have formed;(2)the regional ecological sensitivity of Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomerations shows two spatial distribution characteristics such as scattered and fragmented patterns and centralized contiguous condition patterns; not only is the scale of ecological sensitive areas of different grades significantly different, but the sensitivity scale of the same level is also significantly different among different areas;(3)the spatial distribution characteristics of coupling coordination degree are significantly different in Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration, showing high degrees in the east and west and scattered patterns in the central south, which is consistent with the spatial distribution of ecological sensitivity. All in all, there are obvious differences in the quality of urban development in Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration, and the ecological environment is complex and diverse, and the degrees of regional coupling and coordinated development are different. Therefore, the correct countermeasures should be implemented to promote regional coordinated development in terms of the major types of regional quality development and the regional ecological environment.
- References:
-
[1] 吴健生,毛家颖,林倩,等.基于生境质量的城市增长边界研究:以长三角地区为例[J].地理科学,2017,37(1):28-36.
[2] 张军扩,侯永志,刘培林,等.高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J].管理世界,2019,35(7):1-7.
[3] 张文忠,许婧雪,马仁锋,等.中国城市高质量发展内涵、现状及发展导向:基于居民调查视角[J].城市规划,2019,43(11):13-19.
[4] 方创琳.中国新型城镇化高质量发展的规律性与重点方向[J].地理研究,2019,38(1):13-22.
[5] 姚罗昕.新时代下的生态城市建设研究:进展、困境及对策[J].中外建筑,2020,16(3):48-50.
[6] 黄肇义,杨东援.国内外生态城市理论研究综述[J].城市规划,2001,25(1):59-67.
[7] 张振刚,张小娟.生态城市的系统框架构建研究:以广州市为例[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(21):245-249.
[8] Register R. Ecocity Berkeley: Building Cities for A Healthy Future[M].Berkeley, USA: North Atlantic Books,1987.
[9] Roseland M. Dimension of the Future: An Eco-City Overview[M]. Vancouver: New Society Publishers,1997.
[10] 理查德·瑞吉斯特.生态城市[M].王如松,胡聃,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.
[11] Yanitsky O. Urbanization in the USSR: theory, tendencies and policy[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1986,10(2):265-287.
[12] 薛梅,董锁成,李宇.国内外生态城市建设模式比较研究[J].城市问题,2009,28(4):71-75.
[13] 吴琼,王如松,李宏卿,等.生态城市指标体系与评价方法[J].生态学报,2005,25(8):2090-2095.
[14] 马世骏,王如松.社会—经济—自然复合生态系统[J].生态学报,1984,4(1):1-9.
[15] 王如松,欧阳志云.天城合一:山水城建设的人类生态学原理[J].现代城市研究,1996,11(1):13-17.
[16] 宋冬梅,肖笃宁,申元村.我国沿海地区生态城市建设评价[J].地理科学进展,2004,23(4):80-86.
[17] 姚士谋,陈爽,房国坤.现代生态城市建设与空间布局的若干思路:以科隆与南京城市比较为例[J]. 规划师,2004,20(1):79-81.
[18] 米凯,彭羽.国外生态城市指标体系及其应用现状分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(S3):129-134.
[19] 蒋艳灵,刘春腊,周长青,等.中国生态城市理论研究现状与实践问题思考[J].地理研究,2015,34(12):2222-2237.
[20] 王发曾.我国生态城市建设的时代意义、科学理念和准则[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(2):17-25.
[21] 王宝钧,宋翠娥,傅桦.城市生态空间与城市生态腹地研究[J].河北师范大学学报,2009,33(6):825-830.
[22] 徐丽婷,姚士谋,陈爽,等.高质量发展下的生态城市评价:以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].地理科学,2019,39(8):1228-1237.
[23] Wang Y, Ding Q, Zhuang D. An eco-city evaluation method based on spatial analysis technology: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015,58:37-46.
[24] 杜婕,韩佩杰.基于ArcGIS区统计的陇南市生态敏感性评价[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2018,41(7):99-102.
[25] 徐辉,师诺,武玲玲,等.黄河流域高质量发展水平测度及其时空演变[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):115-126.
[26] 王莹,王慧敏.基于熵权TOPSIS模型的城市建设用地供应绩效评价及障碍度诊断:以西安市为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(5):110-119.
[27] 赵卫东,章浩南,姜琼,等.室内人工降雨条件下黄土侵蚀坡面的变异特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(4):867-875.
[28] 丁雨賝,冯长春,王利伟.山地区域土地生态红线划定方法与实证研究:以重庆市涪陵区义和镇为例[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(7):851-859.
[29] 李秀霞,倪晋仁.土壤侵蚀及其影响因素空间相关性分析[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(2):161-166.
[30] 姚昆,周兵,李小菊,等.基于AHP-PCA熵权模型的大渡河流域中上游地区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(5):265-271.
[31] 高露雄,王汇.基于多目标决策与层次分析法的最佳路径模型[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2011,34(5):221-224.
[32] 赵建吉,刘岩,朱亚坤,等.黄河流域新型城镇化与生态环境耦合的时空格局及影响因素[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):159-171.
[33] 贾卓,陈兴鹏.中国西部兰州:西宁城市群县域经济集聚格局与空间溢出研究[J].兰州大学学报:社会科学版,2019,47(2):144-151.
[34] 张韦萍,石培基,赵武生,等.西北区域城镇化与资源环境承载力协调发展的时空特征:以兰西城市群为例[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(7):2337-2347.
[35] 张剑,雒占福.兰白西城市群空间集聚与扩散分析[J].现代城市研究,2015,30(3):104-109.
[36] 程钦良,张亚凡,宋彦玲.兰西城市群空间结构演变及优化研究[J].地域研究与开发,2020,39(2):52-57.
[37] 樊杰.“人地关系地域系统”是综合研究地理格局形成与演变规律的理论基石[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):597-607.
[38] 张少兰.兰西地区快速城市化与资源环境的关联耦合分析[D].西安:西北大学,2016.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2021-02-10