[1]HUO Yizhen,WANG Wenda,HAN Cuilian,et al.Effects of Irrigation Quota on Maize Yield Traits and Water Use Efficiency Under Mulched Drip Irrigation in Hetao Irrigation Distract[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):182-187.
Copy
Effects of Irrigation Quota on Maize Yield Traits and Water Use Efficiency Under Mulched Drip Irrigation in Hetao Irrigation Distract
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 05
Page number:
182-187
Column:
目次
Public date:
2020-08-20
- Title:
- Effects of Irrigation Quota on Maize Yield Traits and Water Use Efficiency Under Mulched Drip Irrigation in Hetao Irrigation Distract
- Keywords:
- mulched drip irrigation; plant height; leaf area index; aboveground biomass accumulation; SPAD; yield; water use efficiency
- CLC:
- S274.1
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to evaluate the suitability of mulched drip irrigation for maize planting in Hetao Irrigation Distract, and screen suitable irrigation quota, five treatments of different drip irrigation quotas including DP1(180 mm), DP2(200 mm), DP3(220 mm), DP4(240 mm)and DP5(260 mm)were set up, and traditional flooding irrigation(358 mm)was set as the control. The effects of different treatments on plant height, leaf area index, aboveground biomass accumulation, leaf SPAD value, yield, and water use efficiency during the whole growth period of maize were systematically measured. The results show that: the yield and water use efficiency of maize treated by drip irrigation were significantly higher than traditional flooding irrigation; with the increase of drip irrigation quota, the plant height, leaf area index, aboveground biomass accumulation and SPAD all show the significant increase, and the overall performance decreases in the order: DP5>DP4>DP3>DP2>DP1; however, the difference between DP4 and DP5 is not significant, indicating that when the irrigation amount reaches a certain value, the effect of continuous increase of irrigation water on maize growth index greatly weakens; mulched drip irrigation significantly increases maize yield and water use efficiency, and DP4 increases these indeices most significantly, the yields are 56.06%, 40.37%, 33.67%, 6.50% and 5.48% higher than those of CK, DP1, DP2, DP3 and DP5, respectively; the water use efficiency increases by 149.05%, 26.56%, 25.22%, 5.82% and 12.44%, respectively. Comprehensive analysis indicates that 240 mm irrigation quota of maize mulched drip irrigation in this area is more suitable.
- References:
-
[1]田德龙.河套灌区盐分胁迫下水肥耦合效应机理及模拟研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011.
[2]范雅君,吕志远,田德龙,等.河套灌区玉米膜下滴灌灌溉制度研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(1):123-129.
[3]田德龙,李熙婷,郭克贞,等.河套灌区地下滴灌对紫花苜蓿生长特性的影响[J].节水灌溉,2015(5):16-19.
[4]张昊,郝春雷,孟繁盛,等.膜下滴灌条件下不同灌水量对玉米产量及土壤水分的影响[J].作物杂志,2018,32(1):105-109.
[5]杨宏羽,李欣,王波,等.膜下滴灌油葵土壤水热高效利用及高产效应[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(8):82-88.
[6]李长照,刘庆华,仲爽.玉米膜下滴灌土层增温效果的研究[J].东北农业大学学报,2009,40(10):49-51.
[7]刘梅先,杨劲松,李晓明,等.膜下滴灌条件下滴水量和滴水频率对棉田土壤水分分布及水分利用效率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3203-3210.
[8]夏桂敏,褚凤英,陈俊秀,等.基于膜下滴灌的不同灌水量对黑花生产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2015,46(1):119-123.
[9]Sezen S M, Yazar A, Eker S. Effect of drip irrigation regimes on yield and quality of field grown bell pepper[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2006,81(1/2):115-131.
[10]葛宇,何新林,王振华,等.滴灌灌水量对复播油葵耗水特性和产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2012,31(3):111-113.
[11]王自奎.小麦/玉米间作复合群体光能和水分传输利用试验与模拟研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015.
[12]郭彦芬,霍轶珍,韩翠莲,等.不同覆盖方式对玉米生长发育及土壤水分动态变化的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(6):72-74.
[13]井涛.膜下滴灌马铃薯生长发育规律及其对水氮的响应[D].内蒙古呼和浩特市:内蒙古农业大学,2014.
[14]赵靖丹,李瑞平,史海滨,等.滴灌条件下地膜覆盖对玉米田间土壤水热效应的影响[J].节水灌溉,2016(1):6-9,15.
[15]康静,黄兴法.膜下滴灌的研究及发展[J].节水灌溉,2013(9):71-74.
[16]李媛媛,杨恒山,张瑞富,等.灌溉定额对浅埋滴灌春玉米生长与产量的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,35(2):315-318.
[17]郑和祥,郭克贞,郝万龙.作物生长指标与土壤水分状况及地温关系研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):210-216.
[18]郭维.黑龙江省西部玉米膜下滴灌试验研究[D].哈尔滨; 东北农业大学,2010.
[19]田育丰.限量灌溉和施氮水平对春玉米生长及生理特性的影响[J].广西农业科学,2010,41(10):1055-1057.
[20]Saeed I A M, EI-Nadi A H. Forage sorghum yield and water use efficiency under variable irrigation[J]. Irrigation Science, 1998,18(2):67-71.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-08-25