[1]ZHU Xiaoqing,HUANG Zhihao,ZHANG Tiancheng,et al.Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics and Driving Factors of Land Development Intensity and Ecological Bearing Capacity in Resource-based Cities—A Case Study of Maanshan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):317-326,335.
Copy
Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics and Driving Factors of Land Development Intensity and Ecological Bearing Capacity in Resource-based Cities—A Case Study of Maanshan City
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 04
Page number:
317-326,335
Column:
目次
Public date:
2020-06-20
- Title:
- Spatiotemporal Coupling Characteristics and Driving Factors of Land Development Intensity and Ecological Bearing Capacity in Resource-based Cities—A Case Study of Maanshan City
- Keywords:
- resource-based city; land development intensity; ecological bearing capacity; coupling coordination; driving factors; Maanshan City
- CLC:
- F301.24; X171
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- In order to clarify the collaborative development relationship and interaction mechanism between resource-based city development intensity and ecological bearing capacity, the spatiotemporal characteristics and driving factors of coupling development intensity and ecological bearing capacity of resource-based cities were revealed by constructing a comprehensive evaluation index system of land development intensity and ecological bearing capacity, and by means of coupling coordination degree model, exploratory spatial data analysis method and geographic weighted regression model. Maanshan City was selected as a typical case study. The results show that:(1)from 2008 to 2018, the intensity of territorial development in the sample area increased rapidly from 0.215 6 to 0.538 6, and the spatial heterogeneity gradually emerged; the ecological bearing capacity increased steadily from 0.420 2 to 0.489 5, with little spatial difference and basic stability;(2)the coupling between territorial development intensity and ecological bearing capacity coordination degree kept a continuous upward trend, and gradually changed from moderate imbalance stage to low coordination stage, showing the overall distribution pattern of high and low sides in the middle; the spatial agglomeration trend was more significant, the distribution of cold and hot spots was more stable;(3)spatial and temporal differences of driving factors for coordinated development of land development intensity and ecological bearing capacity were obvious, the driving role decreased in the order: industrial transformation>economic development>government regulation>resource agglomeration. Based on the above interpretation, some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to promote the coordinated development of land development intensity and ecological bearing capacity.
- References:
-
[1] 陈妍,梅林.东北地区资源型城市转型过程中社会—经济—环境协调演化特征[J].地理研究,2018,37(2):307-318.
[2] 张继飞,邓伟,刘邵权.西南山地资源型城市地域空间发展模式:基于东川区的实证[J].地理科学,2013,33(10):1206-1215.
[3] Beardsley K, Thorne J H, Roth N E, et al. Assessing the influence of rapid urban growth and regional policies on biological resources[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2009,93(3):172-183.
[4] Hasse J E, Lathrop R G. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl[J]. Applied Geography: an International Journal, 2003,23(2/3):159-175.
[5] 刘艳军,刘静,何翠,等.中国区域开发强度与资源环境水平的耦合关系演化[J].地理研究,2013,32(3):507-517.
[6] 李强,高楠.城市蔓延的生态环境效应研究:基于34个大中城市面板数据的分析[J].中国人口科学,2016(6):58-67.
[7] 赵亚莉,刘友兆,龙开胜.城市土地开发强度变化的生态环境效应[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2014,24(7):23-29.
[8] 姚士谋,王辰,张落成,等.我国资源环境对城镇化问题的影响因素[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(3):94-100.
[9] 陈雯,孙伟,段学军,等.以生态—经济为导向的江苏省土地开发适宜性分区[J].地理科学,2007(3):26-31.
[10] 薛曜祖,李佩娟.区域开发强度与环境资源耦合的时空演变分析[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(2):224-230.
[11] 徐磊,董捷,陈恩.基于“三生”功能的长江中游城市群国土空间利用协调特征[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):257-263.
[12] 刘艳军,刘德刚,付占辉,等.哈大巨型城市带空间开发—经济发展—环境演变的耦合分异机制[J].地理科学,2018,38(5):662-671.
[13] 卫思夷,居祥,荀文会.区域国土开发强度与资源环境承载力时空耦合关系研究:以沈阳经济区为例[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(7):58-65.
[14] 孙黄平,黄震方,徐冬冬,等.泛长三角城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合的空间特征与驱动机制[J].经济地理,2017,37(2):163-170,186.
[15] 林坚,唐辉栋.全域意义上的“开发强度”刍议[J].中国土地,2017(6):16-18.
[16] 叶菁,谢巧巧,谭宁焱.基于生态承载力的国土空间开发布局方法研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(11):262-271.
[17] 金悦,陆兆华,檀菲菲,等.典型资源型城市生态承载力评价:以唐山市为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(14):4852-4859.
[18] 段佩利,刘曙光,尹鹏,等.城市群开发强度与资源环境承载力耦合协调的实证[J].统计与决策,2019,35(8):49-52.
[19] 王秀,姚玲玲,李阳,等.新型城镇化与土地集约利用耦合协调性及其时空分异:以黑龙江省12个地级市为例[J].经济地理,2017,37(5):173-180.
[20] 段佩利,刘曙光,尹鹏,等.中国沿海城市开发强度与资源环境承载力时空耦合协调关系[J].经济地理,2018,38(5):60-67.
[21] 盖美,聂晨,柯丽娜.环渤海地区经济—资源—环境系统承载力及协调发展[J].经济地理,2018,38(7):163-172.
[22] 刘娜娜,王效俐,韩海彬.高校科技创新与高技术产业创新耦合协调发展的时空特征及驱动机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):59-70.
[23] 徐佳萍,郑林,廖传清.江西省城镇化效率与经济发展水平的时空耦合关系[J].经济地理,2018,38(5):93-100.
[24] 仇方道,孙莉莉,郭梦梦,等.再生性资源型城市工业化与城镇空间耦合格局及驱动因素:以徐州市为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(10):1670-1680.
[25] 胡艳兴,潘竟虎,陈蜒,等.基于ESDA和GWR的中国地级及以上城市四化协调发展时空分异格局[J].经济地理,2015,35(5):45-54.
[26] 国家发展和改革委员会.全国及各地区主体功能区规划[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-07-09