PDF Download HTML

]" id="html" rel="external">HTML

[1]LIANG Liying,LIANG Yanqing,HUANG Zhiying,et al.Coupling Coordination Relationship Between Economic Benefits and Urbanization of China's Provincial Lands[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):263-270.

Copy

Coupling Coordination Relationship Between Economic Benefits and Urbanization of China's Provincial Lands

Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume: 27 Number of periods: 2020 03 Page number: 263-270 Column: 目次 Public date: 2020-04-20

Title:: Coupling Coordination Relationship Between Economic Benefits and Urbanization of China's Provincial Lands

Author(s):: LIANG Liying¹, LIANG Yanqing^1,2, HUANG Zhiying³, SHI Siqi¹; (1.College of Resources and Environmental Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China; 2.Lab of Environment Change and Ecological Construction of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050024, China; 3.College of Land Resources and Urban and Rural Planning, Hebei University of Geosciences, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

Keywords:: land economic benefit; urbanization; nuclear density space estimation method; coupling coordination; spatial autocorrelation; trend surface

CLC:: F301.24

DOI:: -

Abstract:: At present, China is faced with the dual tasks of improving the economic benefits of land and promoting the rational development of urbanization, the coordinated development of the two is of great significance for promoting the sustainable and healthy development of China's economy and society. On the basis of clarifying the principle of coupling and coordination, the entropy method, nuclear density space estimation method, coupling coordination degree model and spatial autocorrelation method are used to analyze the land economic benefits and urbanization's nuclear density distribution, coupling coordination time-space differentiation pattern, spatial agglomeration state and spatial trend surface variation characteristics of 31 provinces and cities in China in the past decade. The results show that:(1)the spatial nuclear density phenomenon of the two is more significant, and gradually spreads around with Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou as the core;(2)the overall level of coupling coordination is low and continues to show spatial agglomeration, the cold hot spot phenomenon and distribution trend are obvious, which presents the overall spatial trend and agglomeration trend of ‘high east and low west, middle high and low north and south', and the aggregate intensity gradually increases with time. In the future, the coordinated development of land economic benefits and urbanization can be promoted by optimizing regional land resource allocation and formulating rationalized policies.

References:: [1] 曹少娇.济南市土地利用效益与城市化耦合协调发展研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2016.
[2] Wheaton W C. Urban residential growth under perfect foresight [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1982,12(1):1-21.
[3] Louw E. Land assembly for urban transformation:The case of s-Hertogenbosch in the Netherlands[J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,25(1):69-80.
[4] Fischer G, Sun L. Model based analysis of future land-use development in China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2001,85(1/3):163-176.
[5] Economides G, Miaouli N. Federal transfers, environmental policy and economic growth[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2006,28(4):680-699.
[6] 夏浩,苑韶峰,杨丽霞.浙江县域土地经济效益空间格局演变及驱动因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(3):341-349.
[7] 王涌涛.乡村旅游对提高土地利用效率及经济效益研究:以常熟市蒋巷村为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(7):159-163.
[8] 武京涛,涂建军,阎晓,等.中国城市土地利用效益与城市化耦合机制研究[J].城市发展研究,2011,18(8):42-45.
[9] Cervero R. Efficient urbanisation:economic performance and the shape of the metropolis[J]. Urban Studies, 2001,38(10):1651-1671.
[10] Quaas M F, Smulders S. Brown growth, green growth, and the efficiency of urbanization[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2018,71(2):529-549.
[11] 陈明星.城市化领域的研究进展和科学问题[J].地理研究,2015,34(4):614-630.
[12] 郑艳婷,马金英,戴荔珠,等.武汉城市群的区域性城市化特征及其动力机制[J].资源科学,2016,38(10):1948-1961.
[13] 董苗,刘普幸,张彦龙,等.1975—2014年河套绿洲城市化遥感监测与区域差异分析[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):1-8,15.
[14] 姜磊,周海峰,何世雄,等.雾霾背景下的城市化与空气质量协调发展的空间分析:以中国283个城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):306-313.
[15] 张明斗,莫冬燕.城市土地利用效益与城市化的耦合协调性分析:以东北三省34个地级市为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(1):8-16.
[16] 杨丽霞,夏浩,苑韶峰.基于耦合协调度的土地利用经济效益空间差异分析:以浙江省为例[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(11):83-88.
[17] 彭漫莉,杨柳,邬东,等.基于投入产出分析的贵州省土地经济效益时空评价[J].贵州农业科学,2015,43(7):233-239.
[18] 张志强.河北省城市土地利用效益研究[D].石家庄:河北经贸大学,2016.
[19] 陈炳,曾刚,曹贤忠,等.长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):530-541.
[20] 赵丹丹,胡业翠.土地集约利用与城市化相互作用的定量研究:以中国三大城市群为例[J].地理研究,2016,35(11):2105-2115.
[21] 李久枫,余华飞,付迎春,等.广东省“人口—经济—土地—社会—生态”城市化协调度时空变化及其聚类模式[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(2):287-298.
[22] 汪德根,孙枫.长江经济带陆路交通可达性与城镇化空间耦合协调度[J].地理科学,2018,38(7):1089-1097.
[23] 王兆峰,霍菲菲,徐赛.湘鄂渝黔旅游产业与旅游环境耦合协调度变化[J].经济地理,2018,38(8):204-213.
[24] 王毅,丁正山,余茂军,等.基于耦合模型的现代服务业与城市化协调关系量化分析:以江苏省常熟市为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(1):97-108.
[25] 徐维祥,刘程军.产业集群创新与县域城镇化耦合协调的空间格局及驱动力:以浙江为实证[J].地理科学,2015,35(11):1347-1356.
[26] 邓楚雄,钟小龙,谢炳庚,等.洞庭湖区土地生态系统的服务价值时空变化[J].地理研究,2019,38(4):844-855.
[27] 张广海,张琳林.我国休闲资源分布特征与影响因素研究[J].资源开发与市场,2018,34(5):720-724.
[28] 张姗姗,张磊,张落成,等.苏南太湖流域污染企业集聚与水环境污染空间耦合关系[J].地理科学,2018,38(6):954-962.
[29] 陈超,马春光.中国大宗商品期货交割库空间布局及影响因素[J].地理科学,2017,37(1):125-129.
[30] 陈小龙,叶持跃,刘文生,等.中国国家生态旅游示范区空间分布特征研究[J].生态科学,2018,37(1):171-177.
[31] 李晓玲,修春亮,ШендрикАлександр,等.中俄滨海大城市人口密度空间格局比较研究:以圣彼得堡和大连市为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(9):78-86.

Similar References:

Memo

Last Update: 2020-04-30