[1]SI Runlei,HU Yecui,LI Jun,et al.Comprehensive Utilization Efficiency and Regulation Path of Land and Space of Urban Agglomeration[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):174-180.
Copy
Comprehensive Utilization Efficiency and Regulation Path of Land and Space of Urban Agglomeration
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 03
Page number:
174-180
Column:
目次
Public date:
2020-04-20
- Title:
- Comprehensive Utilization Efficiency and Regulation Path of Land and Space of Urban Agglomeration
- CLC:
- F293.2; F301.24
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Due to the significant differences in the regional development of urban agglomerations in China, the comprehensive improvement of land needs to be carried out in an orderly and classified manner. Based on the theory of regional system, we used entropy method, correlation analysis, radar chart and other methods to construct the index system and measurement model to measure the comprehensive utilization efficiency of urban agglomeration's land space from the dimensions of construction land input, utilization intensity, output level, utilization quality, etc., divide the zones of comprehensive utilization efficiency of land, and define the remediation path from the perspective of comprehensive remediation of land. The results show that there are significant regional differences in the comprehensive development indices of urban agglomerations in China, showing the regional characteristics of high level in the eastern coast and low level in the central and western regions; the comprehensive efficiency of spatial utilization of urban agglomerations in China can be divided into 3 comprehensive index areas and 12 improvement areas; different types of areas have distinct characteristics; the differences of urban agglomerations are the comprehensive reflection of the cross-effects of many factors such as resource endowment, geographical location, policy and system tendency, industrial structure, etc. This study on the characteristics and differentiation mechanism of the land space utilization efficiency of urban agglomeration not only provides the theoretical basis for the comprehensive improvement of land space, but also serves the land space planning.
- References:
-
[1] 孔令苏,李玉芳,荀文会,等.生态文明建设视角下的“十三五”土地整治规划研究:以沈阳市为例[J].国土资源,2017(4):48-49.
[2] 刘华军,贾文星,彭莹.中国城市群发展的空间协同性测度及比较[J].云南财经大学学报,2018,34(5):47-58.
[3] 倪泽晟,沈雨裳,申晨.我国新型城镇化发展水平的综合测度及指标体系构建:基于2005—2016年30个省市自治区的空间差异研究[J].经营与管理,2019(5):64-71.
[4] 齐讴歌,赵勇,白永秀.城市群功能分工,技术进步差异与全要素生产率分化:基于中国城市群面板数据的实证分析[J].宁夏社会科学,2018(5):84-96.
[5] 邓玲,郝庆.国土综合整治及其机制研究[J].科学,2016,68(3):40-44.
[6] 方创琳,王振波,马海涛.中国城市群形成发育规律的理论认知与地理学贡献[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):651-665.
[7] Chen Y, Chen Z, Xu G, et al. Built-up land efficiency in urban China:Insights from the General Land Use Plan(2006—2020)[J]. Habitat International, 2016,51:31-38.
[8] Zhong T, Mitchell B, Huang X. Success or failure:evaluating the implementation of China's national general land use plan(1997—2010)[J]. Habitat International, 2014,44:93-101.
[9] 谭术魁,饶映雪,朱祥波.土地投入对中国经济增长的影响[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2012,22(9):61-67.
[10] 周扬,郭远智,刘彦随.中国乡村地域类型及分区发展途径[J].地理研究,2019,38(3):467-481.
[11] 肖轶,尹珂.综合国土整治规划环境友好型土地利用影响评价:以重庆市璧山县大路镇为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(5):243-247.
[12] 乔伟峰,戈大专,高金龙.江苏省乡村地域功能与振兴路径选择研究[J].地理研究,2019,38(3):522-534.
[13] 李永乐,舒帮荣,吴群.中国城市土地利用效率:时空特征、地区差距与影响因素[J].经济地理,2014,34(1):133-139.
[14] 唐亮,刘军芳,马贤磊.城市建设用地消耗强度与经济社会水平协调发展研究:基于城市发展阶段的分析[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(11):73-82.
[15] 陈伟,吴群.长三角地区城市建设用地经济效率及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2014,34(9):142-149.
[16] 吴得文,毛汉英,张小雷,等.中国城市土地利用效率评价[J].地理学报,2011,66(8):1111-1121.
[17] 马红敏,姜国勇,赵亮,等.城市建设用地节约集约利用评价内涵和发展方向综述[J].国土资源,2015(11):44-46.
[18] 郑新奇,邓红蒂,姚慧,等.中国设区市土地集约利用类型区划分研究[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2010,20(2):6-11.
[19] 梁流涛,赵庆良,陈聪.中国城市土地利用效率空间分异特征及优化路径分析:基于287个地级以上城市的实证研究[J].中国土地科学,2013,27(7):48-54.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-04-30