[1]MOU Xuejie,WANG Xiahui,ZHANG Xiao,et al.Accounting and Mapping of Gross Ecosystem Product in Yanqing District, Beijing[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(01):265-274.
Copy
Accounting and Mapping of Gross Ecosystem Product in Yanqing District, Beijing
Research of Soil and Water Conservation[ISSN 1005-3409/CN 61-1272/P] Volume:
27
Number of periods:
2020 01
Page number:
265-274
Column:
Public date:
2020-02-20
- Title:
- Accounting and Mapping of Gross Ecosystem Product in Yanqing District, Beijing
- Keywords:
- gross ecosystem product; ecosystem services; mapping.
- CLC:
- X196
- DOI:
- -
- Abstract:
- Yanqing District is one of the ecological conservation areas in Beijing, and provids ecosystem goods and services for Beijing and surrounding areas continuously, which has important ecological value. In this paper, multiple methods such as market value, shadow engineering, replacement cost, travel cost, willingness to pay were used to value the ecosystem product supplies, regulating and cultural services of Yanqing District in 2016, which includes 17 services. And value mapping was conducted based on the value per unit area of different towns and villages and different types of ecosystem. The results showed that:(1)gross ecosystem product(GEP)of Yanqing District in 2016 was 33.563 billion Yuan, among which the regulating service value was the highest, accounting for 91.4% of the GEP; value of product supplies and cultural service were relatively low, accounting for 3.8%, 4.8% respectively;(2)from the aspect of different ecosystem services, value of life maintenance and habitat protection was the highest, which was 14.6 billion Yuan, accounting for 43.5% of the GEP, followed by climate regulation, soil conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, water conservation, accounting for 15.8%, 12.1%, 10.0%,5.4%, respectively; the sum of four service values mentioned above accounted for 81.4% of the GEP in Yanqing;(3)from the aspect of different ecosystem types, GEP decreased in the order: forest>wetland>farmland>grassland>city> bare land; the value of forest ecosystem was the highest, which was 26.879 billion Yuan, accounting for 80.1% of the GEP; wetland and farmland accounted for 10.9% and 7.8%, respectively;(4)value per unit area decreased in the sequence: wetland>forest>farmland>grassland>bare land>city, the value of wetland per unit area was the highest, which was 118 million Yuan/km2, and was 5.9 times of that of forest and 16.8 times of that of farmland;(5)the supply and demand of GEP did not match in space, which means that plain areas with relatively concentrated population were the main demand areas for ecosystem services, while the mountainous areas were main supply areas of GEP.
- References:
-
[1] 欧阳志云,郑华.生态系统服务的生态学机制研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(11):6183-6188.
[2] 欧阳志云,朱春全,杨广斌,等.生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究[J].生态学报,2013,33(21):6747-6761.
[3] Watson R. Living beyond our means:Natural assets and human well-being[R]. Statement from the Board, 2005.
[4] Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[5] Postel S, Bawa K, Kaufman L, et al. Nature’s services:Societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington Dc:Island Press, 2012.
[6] 马国霞,赵学涛,吴琼,等.生态系统生产总值核算概念界定和体系构建[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1709-1715.
[7] 马国霞,於方,王金南,等.中国2015年陆地生态系统生产总值核算研究[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(4):1474-1482.
[8] 王莉雁,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究:以阿尔山市为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(3):146-154.
[9] 徐新良.中国人口空间分布km网格数据集[EB/OL].中国科学院资源环境科学数据中心数据注册与出版系统(http:∥www. resdc. cn/DOI),2017, DOI:10.12078/2017121101.
[10] 欧阳志云,赵同谦,赵景柱,等.海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(8):1395-1402.
[11] 国家林业局.中华人民共和国林业行业标准:森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S]. LY/T1721-2008,2008.
[12] 中国化肥网.全国化肥平均价格[EB/OL]. http:∥www. fert. cn/,2016-11-16/2018-11-19.
[13] 江凌,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.基于RWEQ模型的青海省土壤风蚀模数估算[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):21-25,32,2.
[14] 王晓学,沈会涛,李叙勇,等.森林水源涵养功能的多尺度内涵、过程及计量方法[J].生态学报,2013,33(4):1019-1030.
[15] 贺淑霞,李叙勇,莫菲,等.中国东部森林样带典型森林水源涵养功能[J].生态学报,2011,31(12):3285-3295.
[16] 吴迪,辛学兵,裴顺祥,等.北京九龙山8种林分的枯落物及土壤水源涵养功能[J].中国水土保持科学,2014,12(3):78-86.
[17] 吴丹,邵全琴,刘纪远,等.中国草地生态系统水源涵养服务时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(5):256-260.
[18] 李晶,张微微.关中—天水经济区农田生态系统涵养水源价值量时空变化[J].华南农业大学学报,2014,35(3):52-57.
[19] 黄晓强,赵云杰,信忠保,等.北京山区典型土地利用方式对土壤理化性质及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):5-10.
[20] 饶恩明,肖燚,欧阳志云.中国湖库洪水调蓄功能评价[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(8):1356-1365.
[21] 於方,王金南,曹东,等.中国环境经济核算技术指南[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009.
[22] 国家发展计划委员会,财政部,国家环境保护总局,等.排污费征收标准管理办法[J].环境工作通讯,2003(5):5-9.
[23] 杨佳,王会霞,谢滨泽,等.北京9个树种叶片滞尘量及叶面微形态解释[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(3):384-392.
[24] 肖红叶,张曼胤,崔丽娟,等.北京汉石桥湿地水质分析与净化价值评价[J].防护林科技,2016(9):4-7.
[25] 张彪,高吉喜,谢高地,等.北京城市绿地的蒸腾降温功能及其经济价值评估[J].生态学报,2012,32(24):7698-7705.
[26] Council D P. Technical support document:Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866[R]. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013.
[27] 国家林业局.中华人民共和国林业行业标准:自然资源(森林)资产评价技术规范[S]. LY/T2735-2016,2017.
[28] 曹先磊,刘高慧,张颖,等.城市生态系统休闲娱乐服务支付意愿及价值评估:以成都市温江区为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(9):2970-2981.
[29] 孙宝娣,崔丽娟,李伟,等.基于费用区间法的辽宁省滨海湿地休闲旅游价值评估[J].资源科学,2017,39(6):1160-1170.
[30] Haines-Young R, Potschin M. Proposal for a common international classification of ecosystem goods and services(CICES)for integrated environmental and economic accounting[R]. European Environment Agency, 2010.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2020-02-25