GAO Hongjuan,HAN Huiqing,YU Hongyan,et al.Spatial Correlation of Socioeconomic Factors and Ecosystem Service Values in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):262-266.
贵州省生态系统服务价值与社会经济空间相关性分析
- Title:
- Spatial Correlation of Socioeconomic Factors and Ecosystem Service Values in Guizhou Province
- Keywords:
- socioeconomic factors; ESV; spatial correlation; Guizhou Province
- 分类号:
- F301.2
- 摘要:
- 基于2000年，2010年土地利用与社会经济数据，利用GeoDA模型分析了贵州省生态系统服务价值（ESV）与城镇化率、人均GDP、人口密度之间空间相关性。结果表明：2000年和2010年ESV与城镇化率、人均GDP、人口密度呈负相关；10 a间，ESV变化与城镇化率变化、人均GDP变化呈正相关，与人口密度变化呈负相关。ESV与城镇化率、人均GDP、人口密度之间高—低相关多分布中部，低—高相关多分布东南部和西北部，低—低和高—高相关分布较少且分散。ESV变化与城镇化率、人均GDP变化之间低—高相关和高—高相关分布北部和西北部，低—低相关分布中部。ESV变化与人口密度变化之间高—低相关分布中部，低—高相关和高—高相关分布北部和西北部。
- Abstract:
- Based on the data of land use, social economy for 2000 and 2010, we explored the spatial correlation of urbanization rate, GDP per person, population density and ecosystem service value (ESV) in Guizhou Province using the GeoDA model. The results showed that there was a negative correlation between urbanization rate, GDP per person, population density and ESV. A positive correlation between urbanization rate change, GDP per person change and ESV change could be observed, while a negative correlation between ESV change and population density change could be found. The high—low correlation and low—high correlation mainly occurred in central part, southeast and northwest parts, while there were little high—high correlation and low—low correlation in spatial correlation types of urbanization rate, GDP per person, population density and ESV. The low—high correlation and high—high correlation were situated in north and northwest parts, while low—low correlation was observed in central part between urbanization rate change, GDP per person change and ESV change. The high—low correlation lied in central part, while high—low correlation and low—high correlation mainly presented in north and northwest parts between population density change and ESV change.
参考文献/References:
[1] 赵志刚,王凯荣,谢小立,等.丘陵县域生态系统服务价值研究:以湖南省桃源县为例[J].湖北农业科学,2014,53(6):1474-1482.
[2] 叶延琼,章家恩,李韵,等.基于农用地变化的社会经济驱动因子对广东省农业生态系统服务价值的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2011,32(6):740-741.
[3] 叶延琼,章家恩,陈丽丽.佛山市顺德区土地利用变化及社会经济发展对生态系统服务的影响[J].生态科学,2014,33(5):872-878.
[4] 吴沛瑶,陈龙乾,张宇,等.社会经济发展对土地生态服务价值的影响:以江苏省徐州市为例[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(4):435-438.
[5] 赵丽,张蓬涛,朱永明.退耕还林对河北顺平县土地利用变化及生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(6):74-77.
[6] 马骏,马朋,李昌晓,等.基于土地利用的三峡库区(重庆段)生态系统服务价值时空变化[J].林业科学,2014,50(5):17-26.
[7] 姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
[8] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
[9] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[10] Geneletti D. Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013,40:25-35.
[11] 陈阳,张建军,杜国明,等.三江平原北部生态系统服务价值的时空演变研究[J].生态学报,2015,35(18):1-12.
[12] 姚远,丁建丽,张芳,等.土地利用变化的人文驱动因子对新疆生态系统服务价值的影响[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):298-304.
[13] 蔡邦成,陆根法,宋莉娟,等.土地利用变化对昆山生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):3005-3010.
相似文献/References:
[1]郜红娟,蔡广鹏,韩会庆,等.贵州省贫困发生率与生态系统服务价值相关性分析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):274.
GAO Hongjuan,CAI Guangpeng,HAN Huiqing,et al.Correlation Analysis Between Poverty Incidence and Ecosystem Service Value in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):274.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2015-08-03;改回日期:2015-08-23。
基金项目:贵州师范学院2015年度校级自然科学研究资助项目（2015YB021）；贵州省环境科学教学团队项目（黔教高[2012]426号）；贵州师范学院环境科学教学团队项目（贵师院[2012]47号）
作者简介:郜红娟(1981-),女,山东菏泽人,硕士,讲师,从事自然资源开发与区域规划研究。E-mail:cgp1963@126.com
通讯作者:韩会庆(1983-),男,山东济南人,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事土地利用开发与保护。E-mail:hhuiqing2006@126.com