[1]万利,孙丽慧,谭靖,等.北京郊区土地利用变化及其生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):92-99.
　WAN Li,SUN Lihui,TAN Jing,et al.Land Use Change and Its Ecological Effects in the Suburbs of Beijing City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):92-99.
点击复制

北京郊区土地利用变化及其生态效应研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 22 期数: 2015年05期 页码: 92-99 栏目: 出版日期: 2015-10-28
Title:
Land Use Change and Its Ecological Effects in the Suburbs of Beijing City
作者:
万利1,2, 孙丽慧2, 谭靖3, 田自强2
1. 农业部 资源遥感与数字农业重点开放实验室, 北京 100081;
2. 中国环境科学研究院 流域水生态保护技术研究室, 北京 100012;
3. 北京东方泰坦科技股份有限公司, 北京 100083
Author(s):
WAN Li1,2, SUN Lihui2, TAN Jing3, TIAN Ziqiang2
1. Key Laboratory of Resources Remote Sensing & Digital Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Laboratory of Riverine Ecological Conservation and Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;
3. Beijing Oriental TITAN Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
土地利用; 生态效应; 北京市; GIS
Keywords:
land use; ecological effects; Beijing City; geographic information system
分类号:
F301.24
摘要:
以京郊3个具有不同功能的区（县）为例，利用从1996年、2005年TM影像中获取的土地利用数据，在分析研究区近10年的土地利用变化的基础上，通过构建生态价值指数（EVI）和土地利用变化的生态价值转移率（TREV），从土地利用变化所引起的各类型间生态价值转移的方向、幅度等方面对北京郊区土地利用变化的生态效应进行定量研究。结果表明：1996—2005年研究区的林地、草地、建设用地增加，而耕地、水域和未利用地减少，各土地利用类型的变化速度依次为建设用地 > 水域 > 耕地 > 草地 > 林地 > 未利用地；从区域看，土地利用相对变化速率从快到慢依次是城市功能拓展区（朝阳区）、城市发展新区（顺义区）、生态涵养发展区（密云县）；从类型变化看，以耕地、水域的转出和建设用地的转入为主。研究时段内研究区的生态价值指数总体呈下降的趋势，各区县的区域生态价值指数差异较大，且相对差异还在扩大，其指数下降速度从快到慢依次是朝阳区、顺义区、密云县；同时从分布变化看，EVI中值波动区减少，EVI较低区和EVI低值区增加，导致了研究区总生态价值指数有所下降。
Abstract:
Using the data of land-use change produced from the integrating Landsat TM images of Beijing City in 1996 and 2005, we quantified the characteristics of LUCC and its ecological effects through developing regional ecological value index and transfer rate of the ecological value. The results showed that, from 1996 to 2005, the area of forestland, grassland, construction land increased while the area of cropland, water body and unused land decreased. The speed of individual land use change is in the order: construction land > water > cropland > grassland > forest > unused land. The order of land use relative change rate from big to small value is the Chaoyang District, Shunyi District, Miyun County. With the speedup of the economic development and the urbanization, the transition among the land use types in suburbs of Beijing became dramatic, among which the transition from cropland, water body to other types and from other types to construction land are the most important land use change. From 1996 to 2005, the ecological value index (EVI) in suburbs of Beijing City showed the downward trend, the improvement and degradation of ecological environment coexisted. The change of cropland, water body and construction land affected ecological environment negatively, while the increase of forestland and grassland improved the ecological environment and its ecological value index. The disparity of the regional ecological value index is still expanding in suburbs of Beijing City and the order of the regional ecological value index from big to small value is the Chaoyang District, Shunyi District, Miyun County. The area of high-EVI land decreased and the area of low-EVI land increased, which resulted in the downward trend of EVI in the study area.

参考文献/References:

[1] TurnerⅡB L, Skole D, Sanderson S, et al. Land use and land cover change:Science/research plan[R]. Stockholm:IGBP,1995.
[2] Lambin E F, Baulies X, Bockstael N, et al. Land-use and land-cover change:Implementation strategy[R].Stockholm:IGBP,1999.
[3] 傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明.黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响:以延安市羊圈沟流域为例[J].地理学报,1999,54(3):241-246.
[4] 李秀彬.全球环境变化研究的核心领域:土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报,1996,51(6):553-558.
[5] ⅡASA. Modeling land use and land cover changes in Europe and Northern Asia[R]. Research Plan,1998.
[6] Kruska R L, Reid R S. Land-use and land-cover dynamics in response to changes in climatic, biological and socio-political forces:the case of southwestern Ethiopia[J]. Landscape Ecology,2000,15(4):339-355.
[7] Pielke R A, Avissar R. Influence of landscape structure on local and regional climate[J]. Landscape Ecology,1990,4(2/3):133-155.
[8] Houghton R A, Skole D L, Lefkowitz D S. Changes in the landscape of Latin America between 1850 and 1985Ⅱ. Net release of CO2 to the atmosphere[J]. Forest Ecology & Management,1991,38(91):173-199.
[9] 李青丰.西北地区的土地利用格局与生态环境保护[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(3):22-23.
[10] Olson T C, Wischmeier W H. Soil-erodibility evaluations for soils on the runoff and erosion stations[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1963,27(5):590-592.
[11] Rasmussen P E, Goulding K W T. Long-term agroecosystem experiments:Assessing agricultural sustainability and global change[J]. Science,1998,282(5390):893-896.
[12] 罗为检,王克林,刘明.土地利用及其格局变化的环境生态效应研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2003,11(2):150-152.
[13] 彭建,王仰麟,张源,等.滇西北生态脆弱区土地利用变化及其生态效应:以云南省永胜县为例[J].地理学报,2004,59(4):629-638.
[14] 史永亮,王如松,周海波,等.南疆生态脆弱区土地利用变化及其生态影响评价:以新疆阿克苏市为例[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(7):753-758.
[15] 于兴修,杨桂山,李恒鹏.典型流域土地利用/覆被变化及其景观生态效应:以浙江省西苕溪流域为例[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(1):13-19.
[16] 蒙吉军,吴秀芹,李正国.河西走廊土地利用/覆盖变化的景观生态效应:以肃州绿洲为例[J].生态学报,2004,24(11):2535-2541.
[17] 邹秀萍,齐清文,徐增让,等.怒江流域土地利用/覆被变化及其景观生态效应分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(5):147-151.
[18] Carlson T N, Traci Arthur S. The impact of land use-land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology:A satellite perspective[J]. Global & Planetary Change,2000,25(1):49-65.
[19] 万利,陈佑启,谭靖,等.土地利用变化对区域生态系统服务价值的影响:以北京市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2009,28(4):94-99.
[20] 胡和兵,刘红玉,郝敬锋,等.城市化流域生态系统服务价值时空分异特征及其对土地利用程度的响应[J].生态学报,2013,33(8):2565-2576.
[21] 张蓉珍,魏志超,陈西蕊.西安市土地利用变化及其生态系统服务价值研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(3):254-256.
[22] 程琳,李锋,邓华锋.中国超大城市土地利用状况及其生态系统服务动态演变[J].生态学报,2011,31(20):6194-6203.
[23] 彭文甫,周介铭,罗怀良,等.城市土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值损益估算:以成都市为例[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):43-51.
[24] 谭敏,褚克坚,华祖林,等.基于LUCC的生态服务价值动态分析及预测:以徐州市区为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(2):297-301.
[25] 茆长宝,陈勇.土地利用及其生态服务价值演变的驱动力与预测研究:以江苏省为例[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(4):269-275.
[26] 王思远,刘纪远,张增祥,等.近10年中国土地利用格局及其演变[J].地理学报,2002,57(5):523-530.
[27] Costanza R. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387(6630):3-15.
[28] 王成,魏朝富,邵景安,等.区域生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应:以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(8):1485-1489.
[29] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[30] 彭建,蔡运龙,王秀春.基于景观生态学的喀斯特生态脆弱区土地利用/覆被变化评价:以贵州猫跳河流域为例[J].中国岩溶,2007,26(2):137-143.

相似文献/References:

[1]范新军,毕天云.云南边境石漠化地区“三生空间”格局演变及驱动机制[J].水土保持研究,2025,32(06):424.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.06.011]
　Fan Xinjun,Bi Tianyun.Evolution of production-living-ecological space pattern and its driving mechanisms in rocky desertification areas of Yunnan border region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,32(05):424.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2025.06.011]
[2]徐 云,高明坤,张增信.基于InVEST模型的长江中下游地区生境质量变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):355.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.032]
　Xu Yun,Gao Mingkun,Zhang Zengxin.Land Use Change and Its Impact on Habitat Quality in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Based on InVEST Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(05):355.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.032]
[3]孙保平,孙立达.西吉县黄家二岔小流域地表径流和土壤渗透性能的研究[J].水土保持研究,1990,(02):16.
　Sun Baoping,Sun Lida.A Research For Soil Permeability and Surface Runoff in Huangjia-Ercha Small Watershed in Xiji County, Ningxia[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1990,(05):16.
[4]赵昭霞,叶树华.渭南地区土地利用现状简析[J].水土保持研究,1992,(02):35.
　Zhao Zhaoxia,Yie Shuhua.ANALYSIS OF LAND UTILIZATION OF WEINAN PREFECTURE[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1992,(05):35.
[5]杨勤科,郑粉莉,张竹梅.神木试区土地资源与利用[J].水土保持研究,1993,(02):47.
　Yang Qinke,Zheng Fenli,Zhang Zhumei.Land Resources and Its Utilization in the Shenmu Experimental Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(05):47.
[6]张希彪,上官周平.陇东黄土高原土地利用空间格局研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):167.
　ZHANG Xi-biao,SHANGGUAN Zhou-ping.Study on the Spatial Pattern of Land-use in Longdong Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(05):167.
[7]闫岩,雷国平,谢英楠.基于AHP和熵权法的土地利用生态效益研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):134.
　YAN Yan,LEI Guo-ping,XIE Ying-nan.Study on Evaluation of Land Use Ecological Efficiency Based on AHP and Entropy Weight Method[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):134.
[8]付梦娣,妙旭华,全占军,等.庆阳市土地利用变化的景观生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):240.
　FU Meng-di,MIAO Xu-hua,QUAN Zhan-jun,et al.Land Use Change and Its Ecological Effect in Qingyang City of Gansu Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):240.
[9]路昌,雷国平,张慧,等.黑龙江省哈尔滨市不同土地利用类型的碳排放效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):245.
　LU Chang,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Hui,et al.Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Carbon Emission in Harbin City of Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):245.
[10]陈杰,杨太保,何毅.石羊河下游民勤土地利用及景观格局动态分析[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):251.
　CHEN Jie,YANG Tai-bao,HE Yi.Analysis on Dynamic Characteristics of Landscape Patterns in Minqin of Shiyang River Downstream[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):251.
[11]罗彦芳,钱翌,王秀珍.淳安县土地利用景观格局特征及其生态效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(06):371.
　LUO Yang-fang,QIAN Yi,WANG Xiu-zhen.Analysis on the Characteristics of Landscape Pattern of Land Use and Its Ecological Effect in Chun’an County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(05):371.
[12]陈国强,陈鹏.海湾型城市土地利用动态演变及其生态环境效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(03):26.
　CHEN Guo-qiang,CHEN Peng.Analysis on the Dynamic Change and Ecological Effect of Land Use in Bay-type City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(05):26.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2014-09-22;改回日期:2014-10-22。
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项（2012ZX07501002-009）；农业部资源遥感与数字农业重点开放实验室基金（RDA1002）；北京市科技新星计划（Z131101000413086）
作者简介:万利(1980-),女,四川绵阳人,副研究员,博士,主要从事景观生态、3S技术与土地利用研究。E-mail:myra035@163.com
通讯作者:谭靖(1981-),男,湖南株洲人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事地图学与地理信息系统研究。E-mail:tanjing@otitan.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01