[1]高延超,李明辉,王东辉,等.植被对不同类型泥石流的抑制作用初探[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):291-295,299.
　GAO Yan-chao,LI Ming-hui,WANG Dong-hui,et al.Effect of Different Types of Vegetation on the Debris Flow Control[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):291-295,299.
点击复制

植被对不同类型泥石流的抑制作用初探

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 20 期数: 2013年05期 页码: 291-295,299 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-10-28
Title:
Effect of Different Types of Vegetation on the Debris Flow Control
作者:
高延超1,2,3, 李明辉1, 王东辉1, 白永建1
1. 中国地质调查局 成都地质调查中心, 成都 610081;
2. 中国科学院 水利部 成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 成都 610041;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
Author(s):
GAO Yan-chao1,2,3, LI Ming-hui1, WANG Dong-hui1, BAI Yong-jian1
1. Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China;
2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Chengdu 610041, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
关键词:
植被; 泥石流; 物源; 四川省巴塘县
Keywords:
vegetation; debris flow; material source; Batang County of Sichuan Province
分类号:
P642.23
摘要:
通过对比四川省巴塘县的118处沟谷泥石流及33处坡面泥石流的植被覆盖率，发现植被对于坡面泥石流具有较好的抑制作用，但对沟谷泥石流作用则不明显。造成这种差别的原因在于坡面泥石流的物源主要是坡体表面侵蚀，植被根系组成的网状锚固层可以减缓乃至消除这种侵蚀效应；沟谷泥石流的物源主要来自沟岸崩塌，但植被对于中厚层的崩滑体锚固能力差，当降雨超过一定阈值后即可暴发泥石流。基于这种特点，建议将生物工程作为坡面泥石流的主要治理手段；对于沟谷泥石流而言，既不能将植被覆盖率作为易发程度的判别标准，也不宜作为综合治理中的主要环节。
Abstract:
There are 118 valley debris flows and 33 slope debris flows in Batang County, Sichuan Province, China. All the vegetation coverage of these hazards has been verified through remote sensing and field investigation. It was found that the vegetation had an effect on the slope debris flow, while there was no correlation between the vegetation and valley debris flows. This difference exists because of the material source in different types of debris flows. The main material source of the slope debris flow results from surface erosion. Vegetation roots can restrain the erosion effect. But, the main sources of valley debris flow are collapses and landslides in the valley. In this case, vegetation does not work because of the deep slip surface in most collapses and landslides. So we suggest that bioengineering should be use for mitigating the slope debris flow. For valley debris flows, the vegetation is neither an active standard nor an approach to mitigation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李朝安,胡卸文,李冠奇,等.四川省"8·13"特大泥石流灾害成生机理与防治原则[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):257-263.
[2] 陈金日.森林植被与泥石流活动[C]//中国科学院成都地理研究所.泥石流论文集.重庆:科学技术文献出版社重庆分社,1981.
[3] 柳素清.四川喜德东沟流域植被对泥石流形成的抑制作用[C]//中国科学院成都地理研究所.泥石流论文集.重庆:科学技术文献出版社重庆分社,1981.
[4] 罗德富,李木咸.泥石流与自然保护[C]//中国科学院成都地理研究所.泥石流论文集.重庆:科学技术文献出版社重庆分社,1981.
[5] 林明安,王士革,范晓岭,等.川西地区低频率泥石流的特征[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(1):227-23.
[6] 柳素清,唐邦兴,刘世建.攀西地区人为泥石流和防治对策[J].水土保持通报,1987,7(1):27-32.
[7] 房明烈.应用MSS图像对成昆铁路北段水系、植被与泥石流分布规律的判释[J].西南交通大学学报,1988(4):115-120.
[8] 李树德,岳升阳,徐海鹏.森林植被与泥石流活动[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(2):30-31.
[9] 田昭一,徐海鹏.森林破坏和泥石流形成关系的探讨[C]//中国科学院兰州冰川冻土研究所.泥石流学术讨论会兰州会议文集.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1986.
[10] 魏东岚,李永化.青藏高原东缘第四纪泥石流沉积物地球化学分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):292-298.
[11] 李德基,吕儒仁,唐邦型,等.四川甘洛利子依达沟泥石流及其防治[C]//全国泥石流防治经验交流会文集编审组.全国泥石流防治经验交流会论文集.重庆:科学技术文献出版社重庆分社,1982.
[12] 高克昌,孟国才,韦方强,等.德宏"7·5"特大滑坡泥石流灾害分析及其对策[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2005,25(3):251-257.
[13] 施蕾蕾,陈宁生,杨成林,等.娃娃沟流域泥石流活动与植被关系探讨[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(3):96-99.
[14] 李德基.泥石流减灾理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,1997.
[15] 陈晓清,崔棚,韦方强.良好植被区泥石流防治初探[J].山地学报,2006,24(3):333-339.
[16] 田连权.亚热带山区泥石流源地的片流与泥沙[J].铁道工程学报,1986,12(4):115-119.
[17] 吴积善,康志成,田连权,等.云南蒋家沟泥石流观测研究[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.

相似文献/References:

[1]肖培青,姚文艺,张海峰.黄土高原植被固土减蚀作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):282.
　XIAO Pei-qing,YAO Wen-yi,ZHANG Hai-feng.Research Progress of the Role of Vegetation in Soil Conservtion and Soil Erosion Reduction on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):282.
[2]王高峰,唐川,王洪德,等.初咱磨子沟泥石流特征及危险性评价研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):234.
　WANG Gao-feng,TANG Chuan,WANG Hong-de,et al.Characteristics and Hazard Assessment of Debris Flows in Chuzanmozigou Catchment[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):234.
[3]田冰,王裕宜.基于功率谱分析的蒋家沟泥石流侵蚀输沙量准周期的探讨[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):244.
　TIAN Bing,WANG Yu-yi.Power Spectral Analysis on Periodicity of Sediment Transport in Debris Flow in Jiangjiagou Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):244.
[4]胡桂胜,陈宁生,邓虎.基于GIS的西藏林芝地区泥石流易发与危险区分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):195.
　HU Gui-sheng,CHEN Ning-sheng,DENG Hu.Analysis of Debris Flow-prone and Dangerous Area in Nyingchi of Tibet Based on GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):195.
[5]李朝安,胡卸文,李冠奇,等.四川省“8·13”特大泥石流灾害成生机理与防治原则[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):257.
　LI Chao-an,HU Xie-wen,LI Guan-qi,et al.Formation Mechanism of the ’8·13’ Catastrophic Debris Flow in Sichuan and the Principles of Controlling[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):257.
[6]汪有科,吴钦孝,韩冰.黄土高原植被建造优化模式[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(03):87.
　Wang Youke,Wu Qinxiao,Han Bin.Optimum Patterns to Building Vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1994,1(05):87.
[7]张黎勇.皖南山区山体滑坡、泥石流的成因及其防治[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):171.
　Zhang Liyong.The Cause and Prevention of Slideslope, Debris Flow in the Hilly Areas of Southern Anhui Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):171.
[8]李树德.中国滑坡、泥石流灾害的时空分布特点[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(04):33.
　Li Shude.The Temporal and Spacial Distribution of Landslide and Debris Flow Disasters in China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1999,6(05):33.
[9]王礼先.植被生态建设与生态用水——以西北地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2000,7(03):5.
　WANG Li-xian.Vegetative Eco-environment Construction and Water Use of Eco-environment——Taking Northwestern Area for An Example[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2000,7(05):5.
[10]吴正华.北京泥石流灾害及其降水触发条件[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(01):67.
　WU Zhenghua.The Mud-rock Flow Disaster and Their Touch off Condition by Rainfall in Beijing Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):67.
[11]李树德,岳升阳,徐海鹏.森林植被与泥石流活动[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(02):30.
　LI Shu-de,YUE Sheng-yang,XU Hai-peng.Forest Vegetation and Debris Flow Activities[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(05):30.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2013-05-08;改回日期:2013-06-15。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（41102226）；科技基础性工作专项（2011FY110101）
作者简介:高延超(1981-),男,河北保定人,在职博士,工程师,主要从事滑坡泥石流防治工作研究和工程勘查设计。E-mail:gaoyc@imde.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01