FAN Xinyi,HU Zuolong,ZHAO Guangju,et al.Characteristics and Dynamic Mechanism of River Channel Souring and Silting in the Fugu-Longmen Section During 2007-2017[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):211-216.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.03.028]
2007—2017年府谷—龙门段河道冲淤特征及其动力机制
- Title:
- Characteristics and Dynamic Mechanism of River Channel Souring and Silting in the Fugu-Longmen Section During 2007-2017
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2023)03-0211-06
- Keywords:
- middle reaches of the Yellow River; river channel souring and silting; water-sediment variations; median particle size; sediment rating curve
- 分类号:
- TV147
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- [目的]河道演变是水流、泥沙与河床边界相互作用的结果,对水利工程的安全、洪涝灾害的防控有显著的影响。黄河中游府谷—龙门段位于晋陕峡谷地带,以黄土高原沟壑侵蚀地貌为主,流经的黄土高原地区是黄河泥沙的主要来源,因此研究该河段的河道冲淤特征及影响因素对控制黄河中游水土流失有重要意义。[方法]基于府谷、吴堡、龙门3个典型水文站径流泥沙及河道断面数据,分析了2007—2017年府谷—龙门段河道冲淤特征及相关影响因素。[结果](1)近11年来府谷—龙门段河道整体表现为冲刷,其中府谷—吴堡段表现为河道冲刷量逐渐减小,吴堡—龙门段表现为河道冲刷逐年加剧。(2)府谷—吴堡段呈水减沙增的趋势,吴堡—龙门段整体表现为水多沙少,两河段河道冲淤量与水流含沙量变化同步。(3)府谷—吴堡段悬移质泥沙中值粒径呈增加趋势,河道冲刷变缓; 吴堡—龙门段悬移质泥沙中值粒径呈减小趋势,加剧河道侵蚀。(4)府谷站入黄泥沙量增加,河道侵蚀力降低,河道冲刷变缓; 吴堡站入黄泥沙量减少,河道侵蚀力增强,河道处于冲刷的状态。[结论]径流泥沙的变化在很大程度上影响了府谷—龙门段河道冲淤。在生态环境有所改善的背景下,研究该河段河道冲淤特征及动力机制对进一步减少中游地区水土流失、预防中下游洪涝灾害具有重要的意义。
- Abstract:
- [Objective]River evolution is the result of the interaction between river flow and riverbed boundaries, and has a significant impact on the safety of water projects and the prevention and control of flooding. The Fugu-Longmen section of the middle reaches of the Yellow River is located in the Jin-Shan canyon, and is dominated by gully erosion landform of the Loess Plateau. Riverbank erosion is the main source of sediment in this area. So it is important to study the characteristics and influencing factors of river channel souring and silting in this section to control soil erosion in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. [Methods] Based on data of runoff, sediment and river cross-section in three typical hydrological stations, Fugu, Wubu and Longmen, the characteristics of channel erosion and siltation, and the related influencing factors in Fugu-Longmen section from 2007 to 2017 were analysed. [Results](1)The channel exhibited erosion in Fugu-Longmen section in the past 11 years, with the channel in Fugu-Wubu section exhibiting a gradual decrease and the channel exhibiting an increase in Wubu-Longmen section.(2)The Fugu-Wubu section showed a trend of decreasing water and increasing sediment, while the Wubu-Longmen section showed an overall trend of more water and less sediment. The amount of channel erosion and siltation in the two sections was synchronized with the change of sediment content in the water flow.(3)The median size of suspended sediment in the Fugu-Wubu section increased, then river scour became slower. The median size of suspended sediment in the Wubu-Longmen section tended to decrease, exacerbating river erosion.(4)The amount of incoming yellow sediment in the Fugu-Wubu section increased, the erosive force of the river weakened, and river scouring became slower. The Wubao-Longmen section was in a state of scouring due to human intervention, which reduced the amount of sediment entering the Yellow River and increased the erosive force of the river. These results are consistent with the pattern of channel evolution in both river sections. [Conclusion] The change of runoff and sediment have greatly affected the siltation of the Fugu-Longmen section. Under the background of improved ecological environment, it is significance to study the characteristics and dynamic mechanism of river channel dredging in this section of the river to further reduce soil erosion in the middle reaches of the river and prevent flood disasters in the middle and lower reaches of the river.
参考文献/References:
[1] 许炯心,蔡强国,李炳元,等.中国河流地貌研究进展:纪念沈玉昌先生100年诞辰[J].地理学报,2016,71(11):2020-2036.
[2] Das A K, Sah R K, Hazarika N. Bankline change and the facets of riverine hazards in the floodplain of Subansiri-Ranganadi Doab, Brahmaputra Valley, India[J]. Natural Hazards, 2012,64(2):1015-1028.
[3] 赵占超,侯素珍,赖瑞勋,等.黄河内蒙古河段水沙及河床演变特性变化分析[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2022,53(2):109-120.
[4] 曹绮欣,关凯,张冰洁,等.1960—2017年北洛河下游冲淤变化特征及其成因分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2020,31(2):74-80.
[5] 林秀芝,董晨燕,苏林山,等.黄河小北干流冲淤与水沙响应关系分析[J].人民黄河,2019,41(5):5-8.
[6] 李鹏,陈沈良,刘清兰,等.黄河尾闾沙洲及河口形态对水沙变化的响应[J].泥沙研究,2022,47(2):57-64. DOI:10,16239/j. cnki.0468-155 x.2022.02.009.
[7] 韩香举,陈沈良,付作民,等.现行黄河口滨海区冲淤时空演变及其影响因素[J].海洋通报,2020,39(5):567-580.
[8] 冀鸿兰,樊宇,翟涌光,等.1988—2018年黄河内蒙古段河道边界演变特征及影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(5):242-249,267.
[9] Yao Z, Ta W, Jia X, et al. Bank erosion and accretion along the Ningxia-Inner Mongolia reaches of the Yellow River from 1958 to 2008[J]. Geomorphology, 2011,127(1/2):99-106.
[10] 刘晓芳,王党伟,吉祖稳,等.黄河口尾闾河道冲淤及其影响因素分析[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(5):42-47.
[11] 穆兴民,巴桑赤烈, ZHANG Lu,等.黄河河口镇至龙门区间来水来沙变化及其对水利水保措施的响应[J].泥沙研究,2007(2):36-41.
[12] Yue X, Mu X, Zhao G, et al. Dynamic changes of sediment load in the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin, China and implications for eco-restoration[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2014,73:64-72.
[13] 蒋观滔,高鹏,穆兴民,等.退耕还林(草)对北洛河上游水沙变化的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(6):1-6.
[14] 侯珺,戴巧玉.河道冲淤量不同计算方法的结果与分析[J].陕西水利,2021(9):83-85.
[15] Syvitski J P, Morehead M D, Bahr D B, et al. Estimating fluvial sediment transport:the rating parameters[J]. Water Resources Research, 2000,36(9):2747-2760.
[16] 夏绍钦,张会兰,郝佳欣,等.长江涪江小河坝站水沙关系特性及其驱动因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(7):1603-1613.
[17] Yang G, Chen Z, Yu F, et al. Sediment rating parameters and their implications: Yangtze River, China[J]. Geomorphology, 2007,85(3/4):166-175.
[18] 王延贵,胡春宏,刘茜,等.长江上游水沙特性变化与人类活动的影响[J].泥沙研究,2016(1):1-8.
[19] 黎铭,张会兰,孟铖铖.黄河皇甫川流域水沙关系特性及关键驱动因素[J].水利水电科技进展,2019,39(5):27-35.
[20] 谢炎,刘亚,范北林.冲积河流河道演变的水沙因子指标研究进展[J].人民长江,2019,50(10):32-36.
[21] 许炯心,胡春宏,陈建国.不同粒径组泥沙对黄河下游沉积的影响及其在黄河治理中的意义[J].中国科学(E辑:技术科学),2009,39(2):310-317.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈浩,陆中臣.黄河中游流域系统水沙过程变异研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(04):46.
CHEN Hao,LU Zhong-chen.Study on Runoff and Sediment Process Variation in the Basins System of the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):46.
[2]陈浩,蔡强国,周金星,等.黄河中游侵蚀产沙环境要素临界与交互作用研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):54.
CHEN Hao,CAI Qiang-guo,ZHOU Jin-xing,et al.Research Progress of Interactive Influence and Thresholds of Geographic Environmental Elements on Sediment Yield of Drainage Basins in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(03):54.
[3]高亚军,王玉明,赫晓慧.黄河中游严重水土流失区土壤粒径分布规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):27.
GAO Ya-jun,WANG Yu-ming,HE Xiao-hui.Study of Distribution Law of Soil Particle Diameter in Serious Soil and Water Loss Zone of the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(03):27.
[4]王宏,冉大川,白志刚,等.人类活动对黄河中游水沙影响的分析计算[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(05):168.
WANG Hong,RAN Da-chuan,BAI Zhi-gang,et al.Analysis and Calculation of Effect of Human Activities on Water and Sediment in Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):168.
[5]马丽梅,王万忠,焦菊英,等.黄河中游输沙与减沙的时空分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):67.
MA Li-mei,WANG Wan-zhong,JIAO Ju-ying,et al.Spatial-temporal Characteristics of Sediment Discharge and Sediment Reduction in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):67.
[6]刘 强,尉飞鸿,夏 雪,等.1980—2020年窟野河流域土地利用景观格局演变及其驱动力[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(05):335.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.029.]
LIU Qiang,WEI Feihong,XIA Xue,et al.Landscape Pattern Evolution and Driving Forces of Land Use in Kuye River Basin from 1980 to 2020[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):335.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.05.029.]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-04-07 修回日期:2022-05-10
资助项目:国家自然科学基金项目“黄土高原水土保持措施潜力及其对河流水沙的调控机制”(U2243211)
第一作者:范馨逸(1999—),女,宁夏固原人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事生态水文及水土保持研究。E-mail:fanxinyi26@icloud.com
通信作者:高鹏(1976—),男,陕西扶风人,研究员,博士,博士生导师,主要从事生态水文及水土保持研究。E-mail:gaopeng@ms.iswc.ac.cn