[1]艾尚进,程 虎,夏 露,等.鄂东南崩壁不同深度土层微形态特征及稳定性评价[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(05):382-390.
　AI Shangjin,CHENG Hu,XIA Lu,et al.Micromorphological Characteristics and Stability of Different Soil Layers of Collapsed Wall in Southeastern Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(05):382-390.
点击复制

鄂东南崩壁不同深度土层微形态特征及稳定性评价

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 29 期数: 2022年05期 页码: 382-390 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-08-20
Title:
Micromorphological Characteristics and Stability of Different Soil Layers of Collapsed Wall in Southeastern Hubei Province
文章编号:
1005-3409(2022)05-0382-09
作者:
艾尚进1,2,3, 程 虎1,2, 夏 露1,2, 马悦阳1,2, 舒 倩1,2, 许文年1,2, 夏 栋1,2,3,4
(1.三峡大学 水泥基生态修复技术湖北省工程研究中心, 湖北 宜昌 443002; 2.三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室, 湖北 宜昌 443002; 3.三峡大学 水利与环境学院, 湖北 宜昌 443002; 4.自然资源部城市国土资源监测与仿真重点实验室, 广东 深圳 518040)
Author(s):
AI Shangjin1,2,3, CHENG Hu1,2, XIA Lu1,2, MA Yueyang1,2, SHU Qian1,2, XU Wennian1,2, XIA Dong1,2,3,4
(1.Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center of Slope Habitat Construction Technique Using Cement-based Materials, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002,China; 3.College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002,China; 4 Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of......)
关键词:
崩岗;  稳定性;  土壤微形态;  主成分分析;  最小数据集
Keywords:
collapsed wall;  stability;  soil micromorphological;  principal component analysis;  minimum dataset(MDS)
分类号:
S152.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了深入认识崩壁不同深度土层微观结构特征和稳定性状况,选取鄂东南通城县一处发育完整的崩壁为研究对象,通过观察土壤薄片,定量和定性分析了崩壁6个不同深度土层的微形态特征,在此基础上,采用主成分分析对崩壁稳定性进行评价,并构建了崩壁稳定性评价体系的微形态指标最小数据集(MDS)。结果表明:(1)崩壁不同深度土层微形态差异显著。表土层土壤基质颜色呈现暗红色,基质比较高(0.91),团聚体和孔隙状况发育成熟,孔隙连通性较好。红土层基质颜色以红色为基调,随深度增加逐渐变浅,基质比为0.69(平均值),土壤团聚体结构弱发育,孔隙类型以囊孔和裂隙为主,连通性较差。砂土层主要以未风化完全的矿物颗粒为主,基质比极低(0.25),孔隙类型以矿物颗粒间隙为主。(2)各土层稳定性微形态评价得分从大到小排序为:表土层(TC1)>红土层(TC2>TC3>TC4)>砂土层(TC5>TC6),与多数土壤微形态指标间呈现显著正相关(p<0.05)。(3)崩壁土体稳定性微形态评价的最小数据集(MDS)由土壤基质颜色、土壤基质类型、土壤基质比、土壤团聚体、土壤微结构、总孔隙百分比和有机质含量7个指标构成。综上,不同深度土层微形态特征差异是崩壁土体稳定性具有层次分异性的重要因素之一。基于土壤微形态分析及建立的最小数据集评价体系,可以对崩壁土体的稳定性进行初步的监测。
Abstract:
In order to gain a deeper understanding of the microstructural characteristics and stability conditions of the soil layers at different depths of the crumbling wall, a well-developed crumbling wall in Tongcheng County in southeast of Hubei was selected as the research object, and the micromorphological characteristics of the soil layers at six different depths of the crumbling wall were quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed by observing the soil thin sections, and on this basis, the stability of the crumbling wall was evaluated by using principal component analysis, and the minimum micromorphological indexes of the crumbling wall stability evaluation system were constructed. The results showed that:(1)the micromorphology of soil layers at different depths of the crumbling wall differs significantly; the soil matrix color of the topsoil layer shows dark red color, high matrix ratio(0.91), mature development of agglomerates and pore condition, and good pore connectivity; the tone of matrix color of the laterite layer is red, and gradually becomes lighter with increasing depth, the red soil layer has a matrix ratio of 0.69(mean), a weakly developed soil aggregate structure, pore type dominated by cystic pores and fissures, and poor connectivity; the sandy soil layer is mainly composed of mineral particles that have not weathered completely, with a very low matrix ratio(0.25), and the pore type is mainly the interstitial space between the mineral particles;(2)the evaluation scores of stability micromorphology of each soil layer decrease in the order: topsoil layer(TC1)>laterite layer(TC2>TC3>TC4)>sandy soil layer(TC5>TC6), which shows the significantly positive correlation with most soil micromorphology indicators(p<0.05);(3)the minimum data set(MDS)for microform evaluation of crumbling wall soil stability consists of seven indicators: soil matrix color, soil matrix type, soil matrix ratio, soil agglomerates, soil structural body, total pore percentage and organic matter content. From what has been discussed above, the difference in micro-morphological characteristics of soil layers at different depths is one of the important factors for the stability of crumbling wall soils with hierarchical differentiation. Based on the soil micromorphology analysis and the established minimum data set evaluation system, the stability of different soil layers of the crumbling wall can be preliminarily monitored.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张婉璐,袁再健,李定强,等.“崩岗”概念及其英文译法探析[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(5):136-143.
[2] 廖义善,唐常源,袁再健,等.南方红壤区崩岗侵蚀及其防治研究进展[J].土壤学报,2018,55(6):1297-1312.
[3] Wei Y, Liu Z, Wu X, et al. Can Benggang be regarded as gully erosion[J]. Catena, 2021,207:105648.
[4] 梁双双,林金石,黄炎和,等.模拟雨滴条件下崩壁不同土层的溅蚀特征[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(1):43-48.
[5] 周红艺,李辉霞.华南活动型崩岗崩壁土体的崩解特性及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):74-79.
[6] 冯延云,张晓明,丁树文,等.干湿循环作用下崩岗土体抗拉强度的衰减性分析[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):168-174.
[7] 冯舒悦,王军光,文慧,等.赣南崩岗侵蚀区不同部位土壤抗剪强度及影响因素研究[J].土壤学报,2020,57(1):71-83.
[8] 辜婧瑶,阳邦戈,魏玉杰,等.崩岗不同土层土壤水力学特性差异性分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):61-67.
[9] Tao Y, Zou Z, Guo L, et al. Linking soil macropores, subsurface flow and its hydrodynamic characteristics to the development of Benggang erosion[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020,586:124829.
[10] Alvarez M F, Poch R M, Osterrieth M. Bioporosity in thin sections of luvic phaeozems of southeast of buenos aires, argentina, and its possible role as an indicator of soil quality:An micromorphological approach[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2021,54(6):918-926.
[11] Gerasimova M I, Savitskaya N V. Micromorphological interpretation of natural and anthropogenic evolution of soils in bykovo lacustrine-alluvial section of the moskva river floodplain[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2020,53(7):950-959.
[12] 张蕾,张凤荣,靳东升,等.黄土高原淋溶土黏粒、氧化铁与颜色的关系及发生学解释:以山西土系调查的31个黏化层为例[J].土壤学报,2021,58(4):876-886.
[13] 庞奖励,淮态,邱海燕,等.土壤微形态研究进展综述及前瞻[J].土壤,2008,40(5):685-690.
[14] 廖凯涛,刘艳,刘荃,等.赣州市崩岗侵蚀分布特征与影响因子分析[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(6):126-130.
[15] 冯春杰,邓羽松,何溢钧,等.基于主成分—聚类分析的崩岗侵蚀强度评价[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):41-46.
[16] 赵冰琴,夏栋,夏露,等.向家坝工程扰动区植被恢复土壤质量评价[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(3):1224-1234.
[17] 刘颖,王数,张凤荣,等.不同改良措施下砂质土壤肥力的微形态评价:以内蒙古科尔沁沙地为例[J].土壤,2017,49(5):1023-1031.
[18] Gerasimova M I, Kovda I V, Lebedeva M P, et al. Micromorphological terms: the state of the art in soil microfabric research[J]. Eurasian Soil Science, 2011,44(7):739-752.
[19] 刘颖,王数,张凤荣,等.北京妙峰山优质玫瑰生产基地的土壤微形态特征[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):636-645.
[20] 李珍珍,王数,张宏飞,等.黏土对沙地土壤改良效果的微形态研究:以内蒙古科尔沁沙地为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(11):115-123.
[21] 张相,李肖,林杰,等.南方红壤丘陵区侵蚀沟道内土壤团聚体及有机碳特征[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):115-123.
[22] 林敬兰,黄炎和,蒋芳市,等.崩岗土体的渗透性能机理研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(2):53-56.
[23] 赵玥,韩巧玲,赵燕东.基于CT扫描技术的土壤孔隙定量表达优化[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(10):252-259.
[24] 赵冬,许明祥,刘国彬,等.用显微CT研究不同植被恢复模式的土壤团聚体微结构特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(9):123-129.
[25] 王佳妮,马戌,张晓明.干湿循环下崩岗土体裂隙发育对其渗透性能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):90-95.
[26] 周红艺,李辉霞,叶奇,等.华南活动崩岗崩壁土体裂隙发育规律试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(1):338-342.
[27] Mierzwa-Hersztek M, Gondek K, Lahori A H, et al. Soil micromorphological and physical properties after application of composts with polyethylene and biocomponent-derived polymers added during composting[J]. Pedosphere, 2021,31(4):560-571.
[28] 张晓娜,王数,王秀丽,等.北京地区不同土纲典型剖面的土壤微形态特征[J].土壤,2016,48(3):565-573.
[29] Wu Z, Deng Y, Cai C, et al. Multifractal analysis on spatial variability of soil particles and nutrients of Benggang in granite hilly region, China[J]. Catena, 2021,207:105594.
[30] 刘昌鑫,潘健,邓羽松,等.干湿循环对崩岗土体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):253-258.
[31] Jiang F, He K, Huang M, et al. Impacts of near soil surface factors on soil detachment process in benggang alluvial fans[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020,590:125274.
[32] Zhou X, Hu J, Wei Y, et al. Estimation of soil detachment capacity on steep slopes in permanent gullies under wetting-drying cycles[J]. Catena, 2021,206:105450.
[33] 张越,赵冬峰,郑勤敏,等.花岗岩红壤丘陵区崩岗土体界限含水量的温度效应研究[J].土壤学报,2020,59(1):118-128.
[34] 王小红,杨智杰,刘小飞,等.中亚热带山区土壤不同形态铁铝氧化物对团聚体稳定性的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(9):2588-2596.
[35] Pessoa T N, Cooper M, Nunes M R, et al. 2D and 3D techniques to assess the structure and porosity of Oxisols and their correlations with other soil properties[J]. Catena, 2022,210:105899.
[36] Yang Y J, Liu S R, Wang H, et al. Reduction in throughfall reduces soil aggregate stability in two subtropical plantations[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2019,70(2):301-310.

相似文献/References:

[1]李旭义,查轩,陈世发.崩岗侵蚀治理范式结构与功能研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):93.
　LI Xu-yi,ZHA Xuan,CHEN Shi-fa.Research on the Structure and Function of Erosive Control Paradigm of Slump Gully[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):93.
[2]林敬兰,陈志明,黄炎和,等.安溪县崩岗侵蚀空间分布特征探讨[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):63.
　LIN Jing-lan,CHEN Zhi-ming,HUANG Yan-he,et al.Study on the Charactistics of Spatial Distribution of Slope Disintegration Erosion in Anxi County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):63.
[3]林敬兰,黄炎和.崩岗侵蚀的成因机理研究与问题[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):41.
　LIN Jing-lan,HUANG Yan-he.Review of Study on Formation Mechanism of Slope Disintegration Erosion and Its Problems[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(05):41.
[4]周红艺,李辉霞,叶奇,等.华南活动崩岗崩壁土体裂隙发育规律试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(01):338.
　ZHOU Hongyi,LI Huixia,YE Qi,et al.Simulation of Morphological Development of Soil Cracks in the Collapsing Hill Region of Southern China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):338.
[5]朱慧鑫,邓羽松,丁树文.鄂东南花岗岩区节理对崩岗发育的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(03):347.
　ZHU Huixin,DENG Yusong,DING Shu wen.Impact of Joints of Rock on the Development of Collapse Hills in Southeast of Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):347.
[6]邓羽松,丁树文,蒋代华,等.苍梧县崩岗洪积扇不同培肥模式土壤肥力特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(01):56.
　DENG Yusong,DING Shuwen,JIANG Daihua,et al.Soil Fertility Characteristics of Different Fertilization Patterns in Collapsed Gully Alluvial Fan in Cangwu County[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(05):56.
[7]赵淦,黄炎和,林金石,等.流量及坡度对崩岗崩积体侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(02):11.
　ZHAO Gan,HUANG Yan-he,LIN Jin-shi,et al.Effect of Discharge and Slope Gradient on Colluvial Deposits Erosion in Benggang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):11.
[8]张燕,黄炎和,林金石,等.崩岗不同土层渗透差异及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(03):37.
　ZHANG Yan,HUANG Yan-he,LIN Jin-shi,et al.Study on Permeability Discrepance and Influence Factors of Different Soil Layers in Collapsing Hill[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):37.
[9]庄雅婷,黄炎和,林金石,等.崩岗红土层土壤液塑限特性及影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(03):208.
　ZHUANG Ya-ting,HUANG Yan-he,LIN Jin-shi,et al.Study on Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit Characteristics and Factors of Benggang in Red Soil Layer[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):208.
[10]蒋芳市,黄炎和,林金石,等.坡度和雨强对花岗岩崩岗崩积体细沟侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(01):1.
　JIANG Fang-shi,HUANG Yan-he,LIN Jin-shi,et al.Effects of Different Rainfall Intensities and Slope Gradients on Rill Erosion of Coluvial Deposits in Granite Benggang[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(05):1.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2021-11-03 修回日期:2021-12-08
资助项目:自然资源部城市自然资源监测与仿真重点实验室开放基金资助项目(KF-2019-04-071); 宜昌市自然科学研究项目(A20-3-010); 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0504902)
第一作者:艾尚进(1994—),男,湖北省丹江口市人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持研究。E-mail:1051570973@qq.com
通信作者:夏栋(1985—),男,湖北省黄冈罗田县人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土壤侵蚀和边坡生态防护理论与技术研究。E-mail:xiadongsanxia@163.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-08-20