[1]朱锐鹏,刘殿君,张世豪,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用类型水土流失效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(04):10-17.
　ZHU Ruipeng,LIU Dianjun,ZHANG Shihao,et al.Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Different Land Use Types in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(04):10-17.
点击复制

黄土丘陵沟壑区不同土地利用类型水土流失效应

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 29 期数: 2022年04期 页码: 10-17 栏目: 出版日期: 2022-06-20
Title:
Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield in Different Land Use Types in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau
文章编号:
1005-3409(2022)04-0010-08
作者:
朱锐鹏1,2, 刘殿君3, 张世豪1,2, 高志强4,左启林1,2, 赵炯昌1,2, 王百群5, 于 洋1,2
(1.北京林业大学 水土保持学院, 北京 100083; 2.山西吉县森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 北京 100083; 3.内蒙古自治区水利科学研究院, 呼和浩特 010051; 4.准格尔旗水务局, 内蒙古 准格尔旗 017100; 5.中国科学院 水利部所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100)
Author(s):
ZHU Ruipeng1,2, LIU Dianjun3, ZHANG Shihao1,2,GAO Zhiqiang4, ZUO Qilin1,2, ZHAO Jiongchang1,2, WANG Baiqun5, YU Yang1,2
(1.School of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing100083,China; 2.Jixian National Forest Ecosystem Research Network Station,CNERN,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing100083,China; 3.Water Conservancy Research Institute Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,Hohhot010051,China; 4.Water Resources Bureau of Jungar Banner,Jungar Banner,Inner Mongolia017100,China; 5.State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau,Institute of Soil and Water......)
关键词:
坡面径流;  黄土高原;  植被类型;  减流效益;  减沙效益
Keywords:
soil and water conservation;  slope runoff;  Loess Plateau;  vegetation restoration;  runoff reduction benefit;  sediment reduction benefit
分类号:
S157.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探究黄土丘陵沟壑小流域不同类型植被措施的水土保持效益,以地处黄河中游内蒙古段的圪坨店小流域为研究区,建立6个投影面积为5 m×20 m的径流监测小区,基于野外径流小区定位监测和降雨监测数据,分析不同年份降水特征和坡面不同土地利用类型(油松、沙棘、人工草地、天然草地、农田)对产流产沙的影响,并设置裸地径流小区作为对照,采用不同土地利用类型径流系数和单位面积侵蚀量与裸地的比值表征减流减沙效益。结果表明:研究时段(2014—2017年)内,降水集中分布在6—9月。不同土地利用类型的径流量和泥沙量差异显著(p<0.05),径流量最小的是油松林地,为(4.55±3.25)L; 径流量最大的是裸地,为(412.73±97.09)L。不同土地利用类型径流量具体表现为:裸地>农田(玉米)>天然草地(针茅)>人工草地(苜蓿)>沙棘>油松林。泥沙量观测结果与径流量类似,最小的是油松林,为(0.8±0.38)g/L; 最大的是裸地,为(87.36±15.37)g/L。不同土地利用类型径流系数和侵蚀模数差异显著(p<0.05),其中,农田径流系数最高,为12.26%±1.27%,油松林径流系数最低,为0.09%±0.06%,不同土地利用类型径流系数具体表现为:农田>天然草地>人工草地>沙棘>油松林地。同样的,油松侵蚀模数最低,是(0.002±0.001)kg/(m2·a),农田侵蚀模数最高,为(1.49±0.71)kg/(m2·a)。观测时段内,不同土地利用类型侵蚀模数与径流系数表现一致。综上所述,植被恢复能有效控制水土流失,不同植被措施的减流减沙效益有显著差异,具体表现为:油松>沙棘>人工草地>天然草地>农田。研究结果可为黄河中游内蒙古段植被恢复流域综合治理提供依据。
Abstract:
In order to study the different soil and water conservation benefits of different land use types in the Loess hilly watershed, Getuodian watershed which is located in the Inner Mongolia section of the middle reaches of the Yellow River was used as study site. Soil erosion characteristics of six land use types, including forestland(pinus tabuliformis), sea-buckthorn(Hippophae rhamnoides), artificial grassland(Medicago arabica), natural grassland(Stipa capillata)and farmland(Zea mays)were analyzed based on long term in-situ field monitoring. Meanwhile, the bare land was used as control, the runoff coefficient and the ratio of erosion modulus to bare land were calculated as the benefits of runoff and sediment reduction of different land use types. Based on the long-term monitoring data, the results showed that the precipitation during the study period(2014—2017)concentrated from June to September; runoff volume and sediment amount exhibited significant differences among different land use types(p<0.05); forestland had the lowest runoff volume [(4.55±3.25)L] whereas bare land had the highest [(412.73±97.09)L]; the results of sediment amount are consistent with runoff, bare land generated the highest sediment amount with(87.36±15.37)g/L, and forestland yielded the lowest sediment amount with(0.8±0.38)g/L; the runoff coefficient and erosion modulus of different land use types showed significantly different; the highest and lowest runoff coefficients were observed in farmland and forest forestland, which were 12.26%±1.27% and 0.09%±0.06%, respectively; the runoff coefficients of different land use types decreased in the order: farmland>natural grassland>artificial grassland>sea-buckthorn>forestland; similarly, the erosion modulus of forestland showed the lowest [(0.002±0.001)kg/(m2·a)] whereas farmland had the highest [(1.49±0.71)kg/(m2·a)]; the erosion modulus was consistent with the runoff coefficient. These results show that vegetation restoration can prevent soil erosion and the different land use types have different soil and water conservation benefits. The benefits of different land use types increased in the order: natural grassland<artificial grassland<sea-buckthorn<forestland. These results can provide the basis for the vegetation restoration and comprehensive watershed management in the Inner Mongolia section of the middle reaches of the Yellow River.

参考文献/References:

[1] Feng X, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Modeling soil erosion and its response to land-use change in hilly catchments of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 118(3/4):239-248.
[2] Wang S Y. Temporal change in the landscape erosion pattern in the Yellow River Basin, China [J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2007,21(10):1077-1092.
[3] Hany E K, Zhang H F, Zhang P C, et al. Soil erosion and surface runoff on different vegetation covers and slope gradients:A field experiment in Southern Shaanxi Province, China [J]. Catena, 2013,105:1-10.
[4] Tang B Z, Jiao J Y, Yan F C, et al. Variations in soil infiltration capacity after vegetation restoration in the hilly and gully regions of the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018,19(3):1456-1466.
[5] Wang S, Fu B, Piao S, et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2016, 9(1): 38-41.
[6] 王升,王全九,董文财,等.黄土坡面不同植被覆盖度下产流产沙与养分流失规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(4):23-27.
[7] 吴蕾,穆兴民,高鹏,等.黄土高原地区植被盖度对产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):133-138,144.
[8] Rebeca V M, Eusebio V R, Klaudiaet O, et al. Soil erosion and runoff in different vegetation patches from semiarid Central Mexico [J]. Catena, 2010,80(3):162-169.
[9] Mongil-Manso J, Navarro-Hevia J, San Martín R. Does forest restoration influence soil infiltrability? A case study in the restored woodland of Sierra de Ávila(Central Spain)[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2021,18(7):1778-1793.
[10] 李海防,卫伟,陈利顶,等.黄土高原林草地覆盖土壤水量平衡研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(1):287-293.
[11] Xiao P Q, Yao W Y, Shen Z Z, et al. Effects of shrub on runoff and soil loss at loess slopes under simulated rainfall [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2017,27(4):589-599.
[12] 申震洲,姚文艺,肖培青,等.黄河流域砒砂岩区地貌-植被-侵蚀耦合研究进展[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2020(4): 64-71.
[13] 张攀,姚文艺,肖培青,等.黄河流域砒砂岩区多动力侵蚀交互叠加效应研究[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(1): 109-116.
[14] Xie F, Zhao G, Mu X, et al. Sediment Yield in Dam-Controlled Watersheds in the Pisha Sandstone Region on the Northern Loess Plateau, China[J]. Land, 2021,10(11):1264.
[15] Ma W M, Zhang X C. Effect of Pisha sandstone on water infiltration of different soils on the Chinese Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2016,8(3):331-340.
[16] Zhou J, Fu B J, Yan D C, et al. Assessing the integrity of soil erosion in different patch covers in semi-arid environment [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019,571:71-86.
[17] 姚文艺,吴智仁,刘慧,等.黄河流域砒砂岩区抗蚀促生技术试验研究[J].人民黄河,2015,37(1):6-10.
[18] Shen Z, Yao W, Xiao P, et al. Research progress of soil and water conservation in Pisha stone area of Yellow River[C]∥Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2020, 1637(1): 012085.
[19] Meng X, Zhu Y, Yin M, et al. The impact of land use and rainfall patterns on the soil loss of the hillslope[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 1-10.
[20] Wu L, Liu X, Ma X. Spatiotemporal distribution of rainfall erosivity in the Yanhe River watershed of hilly and gully region, Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(4): 1-13.
[21] Xin Z B, Yu X X, Li Q Y, et al. Spatiotemporal variation in rainfall erosivity on the Chinese Loess Plateau during the period 1956—2008 [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2011,11(1):149-159.
[22] 王玲莉,张富,胡彦婷,等.侵蚀性降雨分类及植被类型对产流产沙的影响[J].人民黄河,2021,43(10):1-5.
[23] Wei W, Chen L, Fu B, et al. The effect of land uses and rainfall regimes on runoff and soil erosion in the semi-arid loess hilly area, China[J]. Journal of hydrology, 2007, 335(3-4): 247-258.
[24] 吴光艳,成婧,祝振华,等.黄土高原南部人工林林冠对降雨特征的影响分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):32-35,42.
[25] 孙佳美,余新晓,梁洪儒,等.模拟降雨条件下不同覆被减流减沙效益与侵蚀影响因子[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):46-51.
[26] Zhang X P, Zhang L, McVicar T R, et al. Modelling the impact of afforestation on average annual streamflow in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 2008, 22(12): 1996-2004.
[27] 肖培青,姚文艺,王昌高.灌木减流减沙效应及其水力学机理试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2012(5):33-37.
[28] 肖培青,姚文艺,刘慧.砒砂岩地区水土流失研究进展与治理途径[J].人民黄河,2014,36(10):92-94.
[29] Liang Z, Wu Z, Yao W, et al. Pisha sandstone: Causes, processes and erosion options for its control and prospects[J]. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2019,7(1):1-8.
[30] 张琪琳,王占礼,王栋栋,等.黄土高原草地植被对土壤侵蚀影响研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(10):1093.
[31] 何有华.紫花苜蓿在陇中地区生态环境建设中的作用分析[J].草业科学,2002,19(10):17-18.
[32] 王恒星,张建军,孙若修,等.晋西黄土区不同植被格局坡面产流产沙特征[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(3):85-95.
[33] 张霞,李鹏,李占斌,等.坡面草带分布对坡沟水土流失的防控作用及其优化配置[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(7):122-128.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈奇伯,寸玉康,刘芝芹,等.滇西高原不同地类坡面产流产沙规律研究[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(02):71.
　CHEN Qi-bo,CUN Yu-kang,LIU Zhi-qin,et al.Study on Runoff and Sediment Production on Slope Land of Western Plateau of Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(04):71.
[2]郭雨华,赵廷宁,孙保平,等.草地坡面水动力学特性及其阻延地表径流机制研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(04):264.
　GUO Yu-hua,ZHAO Ting-ning,SUN Bao-ping,et al.Study on the Dynamic Characteristics of Overland Flow and Resistance to Overland Flow of Grass Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):264.
[3]金雁海,柴建华,朱智红,等.内蒙古黄土丘陵区坡面径流及其影响因素研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(05):292.
　JIN Yan-hai,CHAI Jian-hua,ZHU Zhi-hong,et al.Researches of the Effects of Influence Factors on Surface Flow in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,13(04):292.
[4]唐小娟,郭雪莲.几种坡面径流调控措施的筛选试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(05):125.
　TANG Xiao-juan,GUO Xue-lian.Selection Experiment of Different Slope Runoff Adjustment Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,15(04):125.
[5]李华林,高华端,胡勤,等.喀斯特地区坡面径流对产沙的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):26.
　LI Hualin,GAO Huaduan,HU Qin,et al.Influence of Runoff on Sediment Yield on Slope in Karst Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):26.
[6]刘 迪,邓 强,时新荣,等.黄土高原刺槐人工林根际和非根际土壤磷酸酶活性对模拟降水变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):95.
　LIU Di,Dengqiang,SHI Xinrong,et al.Responses of Phosphatase Activity in Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere Soils to Simulated Precipitation Changes in Planted Robinia pseudoacacia Forest on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):95.
[7]孙从建,侯慧新,陈 伟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型农作物产流产沙效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(02):99.
　SUN Congjian,HOU Huixin,CHEN Wei,et al.Research on Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield of Typical Crop Field in the Hilly-Gully Region of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):99.
[8]张永旺,万珊珊,王 俊,等.黄土高原植被演替过程中土壤水分亏缺[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(05):120.
　ZHANG Yongwang,WAN Shanshan,WANG Jun,et al.Soil Water Deficit During Vegetation Succession on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):120.
[9]邓 强,刘 迪,时新荣,等.黄土高原刺槐人工林林下植物多样性对模拟降水变化的响应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(01):1.
　DENG Qiang,LIU Di,SHI Xinrong,et al.Effects of Manipulative Precipitation on Plant Species Diversity in the Understory of Planted Robinia pseudoacacia Forest on the Loess Plateau, China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):1.
[10]陈文广,孔祥斌,廖宇波,等.黄土高原区耕地质量评价——以陕西省延川县为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):375.
　A Case Study of Yanchuan County,Shaanxi Province.Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality in the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):375.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2021-11-10 修回日期:2021-12-23
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(42177310); 内蒙古自治区水利科技重大专项(213-03-10-303002-NSK2017-M2)
第一作者:朱锐鹏(1998—),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,硕士研究生,主要从事植被恢复的生态效应研究。E-mail:zrp13325573156@163.com
通信作者:于洋(1985—),男,河北承德人,博士,副教授,主要从事植被恢复与流域治理研究。E-mail:theodoreyy@gmail.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-20