WU Xu,NIU Yaobin,GAO Zhaoliang,et al.Variation Characteristics of Soil Aggregates Under the Treatment Measures on the Expressway Engineering Accumulation Slope[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(03):71-77.
不同治理措施下高速公路堆积体土壤团聚体变化特征
- Title:
- Variation Characteristics of Soil Aggregates Under the Treatment Measures on the Expressway Engineering Accumulation Slope
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2022)03-0071-07
- Keywords:
- soil aggregate; measure regulation; vegetation restoration; engineering accumulation; fractal dimension
- 分类号:
- S157.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为定量评价坡面治理措施(植被恢复模式、恢复年限、削坡分级)对高速公路堆积体土壤团聚体的调控作用,以陕西省不同区域高速公路堆积体为对象,用干筛法和湿筛法测定其土壤团聚体组成。同时选取>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量(R0.25)、土壤团聚体平均质量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径(GMD)、分形维数(D)和破坏率(PAD)等指标进行土壤团聚体稳定性分析。结果表明:与冰草相比,坡面自然植被恢复为小冠花和白三叶时对应的R0.25,MWD和GMD均显著增加,增幅分别介于12%～15%,38%～40%,38%～41%,表明堆积体坡面恢复为豆科草本植物有利于提高土壤团聚体的稳定性; 与未复垦相比,坡面人为复垦种植玉米和黄豆时对应的MWD和GMD均显著降低,降幅分别为13%和12%,表明堆积体坡面(36°)不宜复垦种植农作物; 与恢复1 a相比,恢复2 a和5 a堆积体所对应的R0.25和GMD均显著增加,增幅分别为13%和18%,29%和24%,但恢复5 a所对应的MWD,GMD和D与2 a均无显著差异,表明侧柏人工林短期恢复土壤团聚体稳定性持续提高; 短坡长(<60 m)堆积体坡面土壤团聚体稳定性空间分布相对均匀; 相比未治理全坡面,削坡分级治理后平台和坡面所对应的R0.25显著增加,增幅分别介于57%～95%和38%～44%,表明工程措施可提高土壤团聚体稳定性,且平台稳定性高于坡面; D与根重密度存在极显著负相关。研究结果不仅可为工程堆积体土壤团聚体稳定性评价提供参考,也可为其治理措施配置提供指导。
- Abstract:
- In order to quantitatively evaluate the regulating effect of the slope treatment measures, including vegetation restoration patterns, years of recovery, and the slope cutting and grading control on the soil aggregates of expressway engineering accumulation, the composition of soil aggregates of expressway engineering accumulations in different regions of Shaanxi Province was determined by dry and wet sieving methods. Meanwhile, >0.25 mm water-stable aggregate content(R0.25), soil aggregate mean weight diameter(MWD), geometric mean diameter(GMD), fractal dimension(D), and percentage of aggregate destruction(PAD)were selected to analyze the stability of soil aggregates. The results showed that compared with Agropyron cristatum, the natural restoration species of Coronilla varia and Trifolium repens significantly increased R0.25, MWD, and GMD, the increasing ranges were 12%～15%, 38%～40%, and 38%～41%, respectively, indicating that the restoration of legume herbaceous plants was beneficial to improve the soil aggregate stability. Compared with no-reclamation, the artificial reclamation species of soybean and maize significantly decreased MWD and GMD, the decrement were 13% and 12%, respectively. It showed that the slope(36°)was not suitable for reclamation to plant crops. Compared with recovery for 1 year, recovery for 2 and 5 years significantly increased R0.25 and GMD, the increment were 13% and 18%, 29% and 24%, respectively. However, there were no significant differences between recovery 2 and 5 years for the indictors of MWD, GMD, and D, indicating that the short-term restoration of Platycladus orientalis plantation was helpful to improve the soil aggregates stability. The stability of soil aggregates on the slope of short slope length(<60 m)engineering accumulation was relatively uniform in spatial distribution. Compared with ungoverned slope, the R0.25 corresponding to the platform and the slope surface increased significantly after the slope cutting and grading control, and the increasing ranges were 57%～95% and 38%～44%, respectively, which indicated that the stability of soil aggregates could be improved by engineering measures, and stability of soil aggregates on the platform was higher than that of the slope. There was a negatively correlated relationship between D and root weight density. These research results can not only provide reference for the evaluation of the soil aggregate stability of engineering accumulations, but also provide guidance for its treatment measure configuration.
参考文献/References:
[1] Zhang L T, Gao Z L, Li Z B, et al. Downslope runoff and erosion response of typical engineered landform to variable inflow rate patterns from upslope[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016,80(2):775-796.
[2] Niu Y B, Gao Z L, Li Y H, et al. Characteristics of rill erosion in spoil heaps under simulated inflow:a field runoff plots experiment [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020,202:104655.
[3] 张乐涛,董俊武,袁琳,等.黄土区工程堆积体陡坡坡面径流调控工程措施的减沙效应[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(15):101-109.
[4] 牛耀彬,高照良,刘子壮,等.工程措施条件下堆积体坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学特性[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(6):105-111.
[5] 娄永才,高照良,李永红,等.不同上方来水模式下工程堆积体坡面的植被调控[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(24):144-153.
[6] 侯晓静,杨劲松,王相平,等.不同施肥方式下滩涂围垦农田土壤有机碳及团聚体有机碳的分布[J].土壤学报,2015,52(4):818-827.
[7] Barthès B, Roose E. Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion:validation at several levels[J]. Catena, 2002,47(2):133-149.
[8] Six J, Elliott E T, Paustian K. Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation:A mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000,32(14):2099-2103.
[9] Ding W F, Zhang X C. An evaluation on using soil aggregate stability as the indicator of interrill erodibility[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2016,13(5):831-843.
[10] 李娟,韩霁昌,陈超,等.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区土地利用方式对土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(1):248-253.
[11] 李燕燕,刘亮英,张志坚,等.亚热带红壤区自然恢复草地转换为人工林后对土壤团聚体有机碳周转的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(11):80-85.
[12] 张淑娟,贺秀斌,鲍玉,等.三峡水库消落带不同水位高程土壤团聚体变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(1):25-30.
[13] 张少伟,郭勇,权红花.陕西省地理国(省)情监测中的基本地貌类型及划分指标[J].测绘标准化,2012,28(4):13-16.
[14] 牛耀彬,高照良,齐星圆,等.不同工程堆积体坡面治理措施对土壤抗冲刷侵蚀能力的影响[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(2):134-143.
[15] 张加子琦,贾燕锋,王佳楠,等.东北黑土区长缓复合侵蚀坡面土壤可蚀性参数特征[J].土壤学报,2020,57(3):590-599.
[16] 杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899.
[17] 刘均阳,周正朝,苏雪萌.植物根系对土壤团聚体形成作用机制研究回顾[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(3):267-273.
[18] 祁迎春,王益权,刘军,等.不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体组成及几种团聚体稳定性指标的比较[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):340-347.
[19] 赵冬,许明祥,刘国彬,等.用显微CT研究不同植被恢复模式的土壤团聚体微结构特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(9):123-129.
[20] 王月玲,蔡进军,张源润,等.半干旱退化山区不同生态恢复与重建措施下土壤理化性质的特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):11-14.
[21] 胡尧,李懿,侯雨乐.不同土地利用方式对岷江流域土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):22-29.
[22] 马佳慧,张兴昌,邱莉萍.黑岱沟矿区排土场不同复垦方式下土壤性质的研究[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(1):93-96.
[23] 徐程,谷峰,王瑶,等.土壤团聚体和水分动态在3种植被覆盖下的关系[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):68-74.
[24] 刘国彬.黄土高原草地土壤抗冲性及其机理研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(1):93-96.
[25] 秦瑞杰,郑粉莉,卢嘉.草本植物生长发育对土壤团聚体稳定性影响的试验研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):141-144.
[26] 张赛,王龙昌.保护性耕作对土壤团聚体及其有机碳含量的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(4):264-272.
相似文献/References:
[1]由政,姚旭,景航,等.不同演替阶段群落根系分布与土壤团聚体特征的协同变化[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):20.
YOU Zheng,YAO Xu,JING Hang,et al.Coordinated Variation Between Root Distributions and Soil Aggregate Characteristics at Different Successional Stages[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):20.
[2]林绍霞,张清海,张珍明,等.不同垦植模式茶园土壤性状及团聚体特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):45.
LIN Shao-xia,ZHANG Qing-hai,ZHANG Zhen-ming,et al.Research for Soil Properties and Aggregates in Tea Plantation with Different Planting Patterns[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):45.
[3]韩加强,高晓飞,路炳军,等.水保措施对褐土水稳性大团聚体的影响研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):50.
HAN Jia-qiang,GAO Xiao-fei,LU Bing-jun,et al.Research on the Influence of Measures of Soil and Water Conservation on the Water-stable Macroaggregates in Cinnamon Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):50.
[4]黄安,谢贤健,周贵尧,等.内江市微地形条件影响下土壤团聚体稳定性及分形特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):77.
HUANG An,XIE Xian-jian,ZHOU Gui-yao,et al.The Soil Aggregates Stability and the Fractal Features as Influenced by Tiny Terrain Conditions in Neijiang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):77.
[5]陈媛媛,周运超.灰质白云岩土壤有机碳的团聚体保护[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):82.
CHEN Yuan-yuan,ZHOU Yun-chao.Protection of Soil Organic Carbon in the Calcite Dolomite Aggregate[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):82.
[6]卢金伟,李占斌.土壤团聚体研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(01):81.
LU Jin-wei,LI Zhan-bin.Advance in Soil Aggregate Study[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2002,9(03):81.
[7]吕春花,郑粉莉.冰草根系生长发育对土壤团聚体形成和稳定性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(04):97.
LU Chun-hua,ZHENG Fen-li.Soil Aggregate Formation and Stability as Effected by Root Growth of Ryegrass[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(03):97.
[8]林培松,高全洲.不同土地利用方式下紫色土结构特性变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):134.
LIN Pei-song,GAO Quan-zhou.Study on Changes in Structural Properties of Purple Soils under Different Land Use[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):134.
[9]李娟,韩霁昌,陈超,等.山地丘陵区不同土地利用方式对空心村整治还田土壤团聚体特征的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):174.
LI Juan,HAN Jichang,CHEN Chao,et al.Effects of Different Land Use Patterns on Characteristics of Soil Aggregates Under Vacancy Village Renovation in Hilly Areas[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):174.
[10]谢志强,许建林,朱兆龙,等.一种可用于评估土壤团聚体稳定性的超声能量法[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(04):19.
XIE Zhiqiang,XU Jianlin,ZHU Zhaolong,et al.Application of Ultrasonic Energy for Assessing Aggregate Stability[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):19.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2021-05-06 修回日期:2021-06-07
资助项目:山西省高等学校科技创新项目(2020L0141,2020L0146); 山西农业大学科技创新基金(博士科研启动)项目(2020BQ38,2020BQ44); 山西省优秀博士来晋工作奖励(SXYBKY2019029,SXYBKY2020007)
第一作者:吴旭(1989—),女,陕西渭南人,博士,讲师,主要从事工矿区植被恢复与重建原理研究。E-mail:13572569663@163.com
通信作者:高照良(1969—),男,河南灵宝人,研究员,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:农业水土工程和荒漠化防治。E-mail:gzl@ms.iswc.ac.cn