[1]胡梦雅,孙 彦,曹天庆,等.耕地面源污染治理农户参与意愿研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(04):397-403.
　HU Mengya,SUN Yan,CAO Tianqing,et al.Research on Farmers' Willingness to Participate in Non-Point Source Pollution Control of Cultivated Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(04):397-403.
点击复制

耕地面源污染治理农户参与意愿研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年04期 页码: 397-403 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-08-10
Title:
Research on Farmers' Willingness to Participate in Non-Point Source Pollution Control of Cultivated Land
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)04-0397-07
作者:
胡梦雅1, 孙 彦1, 曹天庆1, 邓滢莹1, 文高辉1,2
(1.湖南师范大学 地理科学学院, 长沙 410081; 2.地理空间大数据挖掘与应用湖南省重点实验室, 长沙 410081)
Author(s):
HU Mengya1, SUN Yan1, CAO Tianqing1, DENG Yingying1, WEN Gaohui1,2
(1.College of Geographic Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China; 2.Hunan Key Laboratory of Geospatial Big Data Mining and Application, Changsha 410081, China)
关键词:
土地生态;  耕地面源污染;  参与意愿;  农户;  计划行为理论;  结构方程模型
Keywords:
land ecology;  non-point source pollution of cultivated land;  willingness to participate;  farmers;  theory of planned behavior;  structural equation model
分类号:
F323.22
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了分析农户参与耕地面源污染治理的意愿及其影响因素,首先采用计划行为理论从理论上分析了农户参与耕地面源污染治理的行为机理,然后利用洞庭湖平原农户调查数据,运用结构方程模型进行实证检验。结果表明:(1)农户对耕地面源污染治理的参与意愿不高;(2)行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制对农户参与耕地面源污染治理的意愿均有正向影响;(3)农户对化肥危害、农药危害、有机肥改善环境的认知程度对其行为态度有显著正向影响;(4)邻居、媒体、村委会影响程度对农户主观规范有显著正向影响;(5)农户的经济实力、行为能力和专业素质对其知觉行为控制有显著正向影响。因此,应切实增强农户治理耕地面源污染的主体意识,充分发挥基层村民自治组织在耕地面源污染治理中的作用,同时采用经济手段引导和激励农户参与耕地面源污染治理。
Abstract:
In order to analyze farmers' willingness to participate in non-point source pollution control of cultivated land and its influencing factors, we first analyzed the behavioral mechanism of farmers' participation in controlling the non-point source pollution of cultivated land based on the theory of planned behavior; and empirically analyzed farmers' willingness to participate in non-point source pollution control of cultivated land based on structural equation model and survey data collected from farmers in Dongting Lake Plain. The results indicated that:(1)the farmers' willingness to participate in non-point source pollution control of cultivated land was not strong;(2)the behavioral attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control had significant positive effects on the farmers' willingness to participate;(3)the farmers' recognition of the harm of chemical fertilizer, pesticide, and of the positive effect of organic fertilizer had a significant impact on the farmers' behavioral attitudes;(4)the influences of neighbors, media and village committees had a significant positive impact on the subjective norms of the farmers;(5)farmers' economic backgrounds, behavioral capabilities and professional qualities had significant positive impacts on their perceived behavior control. In conclusion, it is necessary to strengthen the farmers' subjective consciousness, promote the roles of grassroots villagers' autonomous organizations in non-point pollution control of cultivated land, meanwhile, economic means should be adopted to guide and encourage farmers to participate in the non-point pollution control of cultivated land.

参考文献/References:

[1] 李秀芬,朱金兆,顾晓君,等.农业面源污染现状与防治进展[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(4):81-84.
[2] Ongley E D, Zhang X L, Yu T. Current status of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution assessment in China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2010,158(5):1159-1168.
[3] 宋家永,李英涛,宋宇,等.农业面源污染的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(11):362-365.
[4] 刘钦普.中国化肥面源污染环境风险时空变化[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(7):1247-1253.
[5] 薛蕾,廖祖君,王理.城镇化与农业面源污染改善:基于农民收入结构调节作用的空间异质性分析[J].农村经济,2019(7):55-63.
[6] 杜江,罗珺.我国农业面源污染的经济成因透析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(4):22-27,42.
[7] 耿飙,罗良国.农户减少化肥用量和采用有机肥的意愿研究:基于洱海流域上游面源污染防控的视角[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(4):74-82.
[8] 黄炎忠,罗小锋,刘迪,等.农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素:对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):632-641.
[9] 谢文宝,刘国勇,陈彤.耕地面源污染与农户经营行为典型关系的实证研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2018,48(17):52-59.
[10] 吕晓,屈毅,彭文龙.农户化肥施用认知、减施意愿及其影响因素:基于山东省754份农户调查问卷的实证[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(4):46-51.
[11] 刘可,齐振宏,黄炜虹,等.资本禀赋异质性对农户生态生产行为的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):87-96.
[12] 侯俊东,吕军,尹伟峰.农户经营行为对农村生态环境影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(3):26-31.
[13] 肖新成,何丙辉,倪九派,等.三峡生态屏障区农户参与农业面源污染调控的意愿和行为分析[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,37(5):136-145.
[14] Harring N. Understanding the effects of corruption and political trust on willingness to make economic sacrifices for environmental protection in a cross-national perspective[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2013,94(3):660-671.
[15] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991,50(2):179-211.
[16] 俞振宁,谭永忠,练款,等.基于计划行为理论分析农户参与重金属污染耕地休耕治理行为[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(24):266-273.
[17] 焦辛妮,汪东伟,王长义,等.结构方程模型GLS与WLS性能比较[J].中国公共卫生,2015,31(9):1225-1229.

相似文献/References:

[1]袁磊,雷国平,张小虎.大庆油田区土地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):216.
　YUAN Lei,LEI Guo-ping,ZHANG Xiao-hu.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security of the Daqing Oil Field Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(04):216.
[2]余敦,陈文波.鄱阳湖生态经济区土地生态安全研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(04):107.
　YU Dun,CHEN Wen-bo.Research for Land Ecological Security in Poyang Lake Ecological Economic Zone[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):107.
[3]张茹,戴文婷,刘兆顺,等.我国北方农牧交错区土地生态安全评价——以白城市为例[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(02):259.
　ZHANG Ru,DAI Wenting,LIU Zhaoshun,et al.Evaluation of Land Ecological Security in Agro-Pastoral Zone of Northern China—A Case Study of Baicheng City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):259.
[4]毕海洋,李波,南箔,等.土地功能调控与生态政绩考核研究——以华阳河湖群地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(02):171.
　BI Haiyang,LI Bo,NAN Bo,et al.Study on Land Function Regulation and Ecological Performance Evaluation System of Huayang Lake Group[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):171.
[5]秦伟霞,王新闯,马守臣,等.基于功能分区的土地生态质量障碍因子诊断——以新乡市为例[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(04):148.
　QIN Weixia,WANG Xinchuang,MA Shouchen,et al.Obstacle Factors Diagnosis of Land Ecological Quality Based on Functional Partition—A Case Study of Xinxiang City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(04):148.
[6]方相林,冯凤英,于斌,等.河南省东北部农用地肥力分析[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(04):49.
　FANG Xiang-lin,FENG Feng-ying,YU Bin,et al.Soil Fertility Analysis of Agricultural Land in the Northeast of He’nan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(04):49.
[7]刘凌冰,李世平.西北荒漠化地区土地生态安全评价——以酒泉市为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(04):190.
　LIU Ling-bing,LI Shi-ping.Evaluation on Land Ecological Security in Desertification Areas of Northwest China—A Case Study of Jiuquan City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(04):190.
[8]葛亮,高扬,陆春锋,等.京杭大运河江苏段沿线土地生态空间差异及响应[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(01):330.
　GE Liang,GAO Yang,LU Chunfeng,et al.The Spatial Difference and Response of the Land Ecological Space Along Jiangsu Section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,26(04):330.
[9]张驭航,李 玲,王秀丽,等.基于模糊伽马模型的河南省生态空间辨识与格局优化[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(06):211.
　ZHANG Yuhang,LI Ling,WANG Xiuli,et al.Ecological Spatial Identification and Pattern Optimization in Henan Province Based on Fuzzy Gamma Model[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):211.
[10]余 敦,梁珍宝,肖志娟,等.基于景观生态思维的南昌市土地生态风险时空特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(01):213.
　YU Dun,LIANG Zhenbao,XIAO Zhijuan,et al.Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Land Ecological Risk in Nanchang City Based on Landscape Ecology[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(04):213.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-08-28 修回日期:2020-09-22
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(41801190); 湖南省哲学社会科学基金(18YBQ097); 湖南省自然科学基金(2019JJ50390); 湖南省教育厅创新平台开放资助项目(19K062); 湖南省大学生研究性学习和创新性试验计划项目(201910542009); 湖南师范大学本科生创新创业计划项目(2019009)
第一作者:胡梦雅(1999—),女,湖南常德人,本科,研究方向为土地经济与管理。E-mail:1757743792@qq.com
通信作者:文高辉(1990—),男,江西萍乡人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,主要从事土地经济与管理、农村土地利用研究。E-mail:wengaohui360101@sina.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-20