[1]彭春花,周启刚,孟浩斌,等.基于LECI的三峡库区重庆段景观生态敏感性分析及关键修复区识别[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):325-330.
　PENG Chunhua,ZHOU Qigang,MENG Haobin,et al.Identification of Key Ecological Restoration Areas of Landscape Based on Positive and Negative Sensitivity Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):325-330.
点击复制

基于LECI的三峡库区重庆段景观生态敏感性分析及关键修复区识别

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年03期 页码: 325-330 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-04-20
Title:
Identification of Key Ecological Restoration Areas of Landscape Based on Positive and Negative Sensitivity Analysis
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)03-0325-06
作者:
彭春花1,3, 周启刚1,2,3, 孟浩斌1,3, 李明慧1,3, 周 浪1,3, 刘栩位1,3
(1.重庆工商大学 环境与资源学院, 重庆 400067; 2.重庆工商大学 旅游与国土资源学院, 重庆 400067; 3.生态环境空间信息数据挖掘与大数据集成重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401320)
Author(s):
PENG Chunhua1,3, ZHOU Qigang,1,2,3, MENG Haobin1,3, LI Minghui1,3, ZHOU Lang1,3, LIU Xuwei1,3
(1.College of Environment and Resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China;2.School of Tourism and Land Resources,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China;3.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Spatial Data Mining and Big Data Integration for Ecology and Environment,Chongqing 401320,China)
关键词:
三峡库区重庆段;  景观生态状况指数;  景观生态;  敏感性
Keywords:
Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area;  landscape ecological condition index;  landscape ecology;  sensitivity
分类号:
X321
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
景观生态环境状况好坏是景观生态系统对自然环境变化和人类活动干扰程度及生态环境问题发生可能性大小的一种反映。基于景观功能和景观格局组成要素,构建了包含11个指标的景观生态状况评价模型,采用景观生态状况指数(LECI)及景观生态敏感性指数(LESI),揭示了2002—2017年三峡库区重庆段景观生态状况时空变化特征,识别了景观生态关键修复区。结果表明:(1)2002—2017年,研究区景观生态状况空间分布具有较好的一致性,等级值呈现从东到西逐渐减小趋势。2012年是三峡库区重庆段景观生态环境状况变化的转折点,此后景观生态环境状况逐渐变好;(2)2002—2007年景观生态敏感性以微负敏感为主,占研究区的49.843%。2007—2012年和2012—2017年景观生态敏感性以中性敏感为主,分别占研究区的47.426%,98.208%。研究年限内区域整体生态在向好的方向转变;(3)近15年,研究区东部景观生态敏感性等级波动变化主要为波动增强型,南部主要为持续稳定型,西部主要为持续弱化型,北部主要为波动弱化型。研究区整体景观生态稳定性较低,西部及北部区域需警惕景观生态退化风险;(4)识别研究区生态修复关键区域面积共999.83 km2,占研究区总面积的2.17%,同时提出了生态修复策略以治理区域环境及保护景观生态。本研究丰富了区域景观生态评价方法,也对生态敏感区和修复区的评估具有一定的借鉴意义。
Abstract:
The status of the landscape ecological environment is a reflection of the degree of interference of the landscape ecosystem to the changes in the natural environment and human activities, as well as the possibility of ecological environmental problems. Based on landscape functions and landscape pattern components, we constructed a landscape ecological status evaluation model with 11 indicators. Using the Landscape Ecological Status Index(LECI)and the Landscape Ecological Sensitivity Index(LESI), we revealed the characteristics of temporal and spatial changes of landscape ecological conditions in Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir from 2002 to 2017, and identified key restoration areas of landscape ecology. The results show that:(1)from 2002 to 2017, the spatial distribution of landscape ecological conditions in the study area had a good consistency, and the grade value showed a gradually decreasing trend from east to west; a turning point for the changes in the landscape ecological environment in the Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area was found in 2012; since then, the landscape ecological environment had gradually improved;(2)from 2002 to 2007, the landscape ecological sensitivity was dominated by slight negative sensitivity, accounting for 49.843% of the study area; in the periods of 2007—2012 and 2012—2017, the landscape ecological sensitivity was mainly neutral sensitivity, accounting for 47.426% and 98.208% of the study area, respectively; during the study period, the overall ecology of the region was changing into the better condition;(3)in the past 15 years, the changes in the landscape ecological sensitivity level in the eastern part of the study area were mainly volatility enhancement, the southern part was mainly continuous and stable, the west was mainly continuously weakened, and the north was mainly volatile; the overall landscape ecological stability of the study area was low, and the western and northern regions need to be alerted to the risk of landscape ecological degradation;(4)the key area of ecological restoration in the study area was 999.83 km2, accounting for 2.17% of the total area of the study area, and ecological restoration was proposed; the strategies to manage the regional environment and protect the landscape ecology were put forward. This study can enrich the regional landscape ecological evaluation methods, and also provide certain reference significance for the evaluation of ecologically sensitive areas and restoration areas.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张行,陈海,史琴琴,等.陕西省景观生态脆弱性时空演变及其影响因素[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(2):496-505.
[2] Polsky C, Neff R, Yarnal B. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments:The vulnerability Sco-ping Diagram[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2007,17(3):472-485.
[3] 李鹤,张平宇.全球变化背景下脆弱性研究进展与应用展望[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(7):920-929.
[4] 孙才志,闫晓露,钟敬秋.下辽河平原景观格局脆弱性及空间关联格局[J].生态学报,2009,34(2):247-257.
[5] 孙鸿超,张正祥.吉林省松花江流域景观格局脆弱性变化及其驱动力[J].干旱区研究,2019,34(7):950-957.
[6] 张玉娟,何鲲,李城林,等.松花江流域(哈尔滨段)景观敏感度时空变化分析[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2019,42(11):5-7,11,16.
[7] 王奇,李伟芳,寇相玮,等.甬台温海岸带景观格局及生态脆弱性时空演变特征[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(1):297-303,325.
[8] 穆荣钦.基于水土保持功能分区的生态脆弱性评价研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州师范大学,2019.
[9] 马文月,杨美玲,周俊俊.西北生态脆弱区生态补偿研究进程与展望[J].宁夏工程技术,2019,18(4):356-362.
[10] 贾晶晶,赵军,王建邦,等.基于SRP模型的石羊河流域生态脆弱性评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(1):34-41.
[11] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
[12] 傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576.
[13] Ortega M, Saura S, Gonzalez-avila S, et al. Landscape vulnerability to wildfires at the forest-agriculture interface:Half-century patterns in Spain assessed through the SISPARES monitoring framework [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2012,85(4):331-349.
[14] Zang Z, Zou X, Zuo P, et al. Impact of landscape patterns on ecological vulnerability and ecosystem service values:An empirical analysis of Yancheng Nature Reserve in China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,72(2017):142-152.
[15] 徐燕,孙小银,张大智,等.1980—2015年南四湖流域景观格局及其脆弱性[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(2):635-642.
[16] Sativ P. Landscape vulnerability and rehabilitation issues: A study of hydropower projects in Garhwal region, Himalaya [J]. Natural Hazards, 2015,75(3):2265-2278.
[17] Yuan C, Zhang Z W, Gao J H, et al. Evaluating landscape ecological sensitivity of an estuarine island based on landscape pattern across temporal and spatial scales[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019,101(6):221-237.
[18] 苏显力.基于移动窗口法的下辽河平原区农田景观异质性研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2018.
[19] 解亚丽,柯小玲,闵园园,等.基于超效率DEA模型的三峡库区生态效率评价及空间演化格局分析[J].中国环境管理,2020,12(1):113-120.
[20] 梅昭容,李云驹,康翔,等.基于移动窗口分析法的矿区景观格局时空演变研究[J].国土资源遥感,2019,31(4):60-68.
[21] 杨青,陆荫,张强.祁连山国家级自然保护区所属县域生态环境评价[J].甘肃科技,2019,35(21):6-7.
[22] 张寒,王浩程,王琳.基于ArcGIS的山东省潍坊市蔡家沟村生态敏感性差异分析[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(5):92-99.
[23] 陶帅,邝婷婷,彭文甫,等.2000—2015年长江上游NDVI时空变化及驱动力分析:以宜宾市为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(14):5029-5043.
[24] 李素萃,赵艳玲,肖武,等.巢湖流域景观生态质量时空分异评价[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(1):203-213.

相似文献/References:

[1]魏兴萍.基于灰色关联分析三峡库区重庆段生态安全[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(04):124.
　WEI Xing-ping.Ecological Security Assessments of Three Gorges Reservoir area in Chongqing Based on Gray Relational Analysis[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):124.
[2]邹欣怡,赵 伟,蒲海霞.三峡库区重庆段土地利用转型及生态服务功能价值时空分异特征[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):267.
　ZOU Xinyi,ZHAO Wei,PU Haixia.Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Land Use Transformation and Ecological Service Function Value in Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):267.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-07-19 修回日期:2020-08-12
资助项目:重庆市技术创新与应用发展重点研发项目(cstc2018jszx-zdyfxmX0021); 重庆市基础研究与前沿探索项目(cstc2018jcyjAX0497); 重庆工商大学创新型科研项目(yjscxx2020-094-74)
第一作者:彭春花(1995—),女,重庆开州人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为环境规划与管理。E-mail:827055619@qq.com
通信作者:周启刚(1976—),男,重庆铜梁人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为环境规划与管理。E-mail:zqg1050@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-20