[1]张宝成,杨春秀,王 静.两种楤木根际土壤碳特征及酶活性[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):83-87.
　ZHANG Baocheng,YANG Chunxiu,WANG Jing.Characteristics of Carbon and Enzyme Activity of Rhizosphere Soil of Two Aralia Arborescens[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):83-87.
点击复制

两种楤木根际土壤碳特征及酶活性

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 28 期数: 2021年03期 页码: 83-87 栏目: 出版日期: 2021-04-20
Title:
Characteristics of Carbon and Enzyme Activity of Rhizosphere Soil of Two Aralia Arborescens
文章编号:
1005-3409(2021)03-0083-05
作者:
张宝成1,2, 杨春秀3, 王 静4
(1遵义师范学院生物与农业科技学院, 贵州 遵义 563000; 2遵义师范学院山地生态研究所, 贵州 遵义 563000; 3贵州师范大学 生命科学学院, 贵阳 550000; 4江西农业大学 农学院, 南昌330045)
Author(s):
ZHANG Baocheng1,2, YANG Chunxiu3, WANG Jing4
(1.School of Biology &Agricultural Science and Technology,Zunyi Normal College,Zunyi 563000,China;2.Institute of Mountain Ecology,Zunyi Normal College,Zunyi,Guizhou 563000,China;3.College of Life Sciences,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550000,China;4.Agricultural College of Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanchang 330045,China)
关键词:
土壤酶活性;  活性有机碳;  微生物呼吸;  微生物
Keywords:
soil enzyme activity;  labile organic carbon;  microbial respiration;  microorganism
分类号:
S718.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究经济作物对土壤根际土壤有机碳的影响,以喀斯特2种不同类型的楤木为对象研究了楤木对根际土壤碳、微生物碳和酶活性。结果表明:(1)楤木类型影响到根际土壤有机碳含量,与对照组相比小叶型楤木根际土壤有机碳含量最高,其次是大叶型楤木;(2)楤木类型影响到根际土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶和过氧化物酶活性。小叶型楤木根际土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶和过氧化物酶活性高于大叶型楤木根际土壤酶活性;(3)小叶型楤木根际土壤微生物呼吸最大,其次是大叶型楤木,对照组最低;(4)土壤微生物呼吸与土壤脲酶和细菌数量显著相关,相关系数分别为0.65,0.61; 土壤微生物呼吸随着土壤无机碳含量的增加呈负相关关系,相关系数为-0.67; 土壤有机碳含量与微生物呼吸呈现边缘显著(p=0.06)。由上可知,不同类型楤木影响到土壤根际碳含量。因此,今后在品种选育中可以把根际土壤碳增收作为参考指标,为低碳农业的发展提供科学依据。
Abstract:
In order to study the effects of cash crops on soil organic carbon in rhizosphere, two different types of alder were used to study their effects on soil carbon of rhizosphere. The results show that:(1)different types of Aralia affect the content of soil organic carbon in the rhizosphere; soil organic carbon in rhizosphere of Small-leaf type of alder was the highest, followed by big lea, it is the lowest the control group;(2)the type of alder affects the activities of urease, sucrase and peroxidase in the rhizosphere, activities of enzymes in the rhizosphere of the small leaf type of alder are higher than those in the large leaf type of alder;(3)the highest microbial respiration was found in soils of small-leaf alder, followed by large leaf alder, the microbial respiration of the control was the lowest;(4)soil microbial respiration is significantly related to soil urease and bacterial counts, and the correlation coefficients are 0.65 and 0.61, respectively; soil inorganic carbon content showed negative relation to soil microbial respiration, the correlation coefficient is -0.67; soil organic carbon content and microbial respiration presented marginal significance(p=0.06). These results indicate that the increase of soil carbon income in rhizosphere can be taken as a reference index in the future breeding, which can provide the scientific basis for the development of low-carbon agriculture.

参考文献/References:

[1] Nannipieri P, Trasar-cepeda C, Dick R P. Soil enzyme activity:a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis[J]. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2017,54(5):1-9.
[2] 陶宝先,张金池,愈元春,等.苏南丘陵地区森林土壤酶活性季节变化[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(10):2349-2354.
[3] GianfredaI L. Enzymes of importance to rhizosphere processes[J]. Journal of Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 2014,15:1-10.
[4] 刘捷豹,陈光水,郭剑芬,等.森林土壤酶对环境变化的响应研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,117(37):110-117.
[5] 张玉兰,刘桂芬,武志杰,等.土壤水解酶类催化动力学研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(12):2326-2332.
[6] 郭志明,张心昱,李丹丹,等.温带森林不同海拔土壤有机碳及相关胞外酶活性特征[J].应用生态学报,2007,28(9):2888-2896.
[7] 王国夫,孙小红,方逸,等.遮阴对抹茶茶园土壤微生物特性及土壤酶活性的影响[J].茶叶科学,2019,39(3):355-363.
[8] 于德良,雷泽勇,张岩松,等.沙地樟子松人工林土壤酶活性及其影响因子[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(3):621-629.
[9] 刘宇彤,霍璐阳,李志国,等.不同处理方式对土壤酶活性的影响[J].森林工程,2019,35(2):25-30.
[10] 李德辉,杨第芹,李应禄,等.不同耕地土壤微生物的呼吸及酶活性:以遵义市为例[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(4):186-189.
[11] 王世杰,李阳兵,李瑞玲.喀斯特石漠化的形成背景、演化与治理[J].第四纪研究,2003,23(6):657-666.
[12] 高雨秋,戴晓琴,王建雷,等.亚热带人工林下植被根际土壤酶化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2019,43(3):67-71.
[13] 杨万勤,王开运.森林土壤酶的研究进展[J].林业科学,2004,40(2):152-159.
[14] 林娜,刘勇,李国雷,等.森林土壤酶研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2010,23(4):21-25.
[15] 张志强.辽东葱木的国内外研究现状[J].黑龙江医学,2008,21(1):46-48.
[16] 谢佳艺,赵瑞华,栗现芳.延大兰惠园不同植物群落对土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].延安大学学报:自然科学版,2018,37(4):82-86.
[17] 周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987:184-186.
[18] 关松荫.土壤酶学及其研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1984:36-38.
[19] Lefroy R D B, Blair G J. Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and 13C natural isotope abundance[J]. Plant and Soil, 1993,155:399-402.
[20] Deng, Z S, Zhang B. Root-associated endophytic bacterial community composition of pennisetum sinese from four representative provinces in China[J]. Microorganisms, 2019,7(47):1-15.
[21] 李强,孙敬钊,皮本阳,等.不同品种烤烟根际微生物群落结构及多样性研究[J].安徽农业科学,2018,46(30):166-169.
[22] 汪娅婷,付丽娜,姬广海,等.基于高通量测序技术研究云南玉米根际微生物群落多样性[J].江西农业大学学报,2019,41(3):7-11.
[23] 陈海生,秦昌鲜,彭崇,等.甘蔗间作花生对根际土壤微生物种群及酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2019,47(3):231-234.
[24] 李惠民.影响根际土壤微生物多样性的因素研究[J].科技与生活,2011(5):98-99.
[25] 吴林坤,林向民,林文雄.根系分泌物介导下植物—土壤—微生物互作关系研究进展与展望[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(3):298-310.
[26] 葛晓改,肖文发,曾立雄,等.不同林龄马尾松凋落物基质质量与土壤养分的关系[J].生态学报,2012,32(3):852-862.
[27] Zhang B, Zhou X, Zhou L, et al. A global synthesis of below-ground carbon responses to biotic disturbance:a meta-analysis[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2015,24(2):126-138.
[28] Zhou L, Zhou X, Zhang B, et al. Different responses of soil respiration and its components to nitrogen addition among biomes:a meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2014,20(7):2332-2343.
[29] 张宝成,白艳芬,李宪碧,等.汉中盆地秸秆还田撂荒和林地对土壤碳的影响[J].广西植物,2018,38(8):1081-1087.
[30] 戴国华,朱珊珊,刘宗广,等.青藏高原高寒草地土壤中脂肪酸的分布特征[J].中国科学:地球科学,2016,46(6):756-766.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨秉珣,刘泉,王彬.嘉陵江流域不同类型植被多样性与土壤养分和酶活性的关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):45.
　YANG Bingxun,LIU Quan,WANG Bin.Relationships Between Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activity and Plant Diversity of Different Types of in Jialing River Basin, Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(03):45.
[2]何学敏,吕光辉,秦璐,等.艾比湖地区典型乔灌群落水盐胁迫下土壤重金属对酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):94.
　HE Xue-min,LV Guang-hui,QIN Lu,et al.Effects of Heavy Metals on Soil Enzyme Activities in Typical Arbor-shrub Communities under the Different Water and Salt Conditions in Ebinur Lake Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):94.
[3]李凤霞,王学琴,郭永忠,等.不同改良措施对银川平原盐碱地土壤性质及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):13.
　LI Feng-xia,WANG Xue-qin,GUO Yong-zhong,et al.Effect of Soil Properties and Soil Enzyme Activity in Different Improvement Measures of Saline-alkali Soil in Yinchuan Plain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(03):13.
[4]曹正梅,时东倩,万利军,等.播期及覆膜处理对不同玉米杂交种养分吸收及土壤养分供应影响的研究[J].水土保持研究,2001,8(03):40.
　CAO Zheng-mei,SHI Dong-qian,Wan Li-jun,et al.Study on the Influence of Sowing Dates and Plastic Sheeting on Maize Hybrids Nutrient Uptake and Soil Nutrient Supply[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2001,8(03):40.
[5]徐福利,梁银丽,张成娥,等.日光温室土壤生物学特性与施肥的关系[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(01):20.
　XU Fu-li,LIANG Yin-li,ZHANG Cheng-e,et al.Relationship Between Soil Microbial Biomass and Soil Enzyme Activities and Fertilization in Sunlight Greenhouse[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,11(03):20.
[6]安韶山,黄懿梅,刘梦云,等.宁南宽谷丘陵区植被恢复中土壤酶活性的响应及其评价[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(03):31.
　AN Shao-shan,HUANG Yi-mei,LIU Meng-yun,et al.The Responses and Evaluation of Soil Enzymatic Activities to Plant Rehabilitation in Ningxia Loess Hilly-gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2005,12(03):31.
[7]左智天,田昆,向仕敏,等.澜沧江上游不同土地利用类型土壤氮含量与土壤酶活性研究[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(04):280.
　ZUO Zhi-tian,TIAN Kun,XIANG Shi-min,et al.Soil Nitrogen Content and Enzyme Activity in Different Utilization Types of Land in the Upper Reaches of Lancang River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):280.
[8]余娜,刘济明,张超,等.不同沙生植被土壤酶活性分异特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(01):77.
　YU Na,LIU Ji-ming,ZHANG Chao,et al.Study on the Differentiation Characteristics of Different Sandy Vegetation Soil Enzyme Activities[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):77.
[9]解媛媛,谷洁,高华,等.微生物菌剂酶制剂化肥不同配比对秸秆还田后土壤酶活性的影响[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(02):233.
　XIE Yuan-yuan,GU Jie,GAO Hua,et al.Dynamic Changes of Soil Enzyme Activities in Microorganism Inoculants, Enzymes and Chemical Fertilizers in Different Proportions after Straw Returning Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):233.
[10]郑子成,王永东,李廷轩,等.退耕地表层土壤理化性质及酶活性变化特征[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(03):208.
　ZHENG Zi-cheng,WANG Yong-dong,LI Ting-xuan,et al.Research on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity of Abandoned Cropland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):208.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-01-04 修回日期:2020-07-08
资助项目:国家自然科学基金(31660106); 遵义师范学院博士启动基金(遵师BS[2014]06,BS[2014]07号); 贵州省科技厅合作项目[黔科合LH字(2017)7063]; 贵州省科技厅项目(黔科合支撑[2018]2364)
第一作者:张宝成(1978—),男,陕西南郑人,博士,副教授,主要从事生态功能及资源生态方面的研究。E-mail:bczhang@fudan.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-20