ZHENG Zi-cheng,WANG Yong-dong,LI Ting-xuan,et al.Research on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity of Abandoned Cropland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,17(03):208-211,284.
退耕地表层土壤理化性质及酶活性变化特征
- Title:
- Research on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Enzyme Activity of Abandoned Cropland
- Keywords:
- soil particle size distribution; soil chemical properties; soil enzyme activity; abandoned cropland
- 分类号:
- S153;S154.2
- 摘要:
- 采用野外调查及室内试验相结合的方法，就退耕地土壤理化性质及酶活性特征进行了研究。结果表明：（1）土壤各粒级含量均表现为粉黏粒＞物理性黏粒＞黏粒，其中枇杷园三种粒级含量均高于其它退耕地。（2）土壤有机质的含量表现为杉树人工林＞桉树人工林＞枇杷园＞茶园＞撂荒地；土壤阳离子交换量表现为桉树人工林＞枇杷园＞茶园＞撂荒地＞杉树人工林，且不同退耕地间差异不显著；全氮含量表现为撂荒地＞枇杷园＞茶园≥桉树人工林＞杉树人工林；全磷含量表现为杉树人工林＞茶园＞撂荒地＞枇杷园＞桉树人工林；土壤全钾含量表现为枇杷园＞桉树人工林＞茶园＞撂荒地＞杉木人工林。（3）过氧化氢酶活性表现为杉树人工林＞撂荒地＞枇杷园＞茶园＞桉树人工林；撂荒地和枇杷园脲酶的活性较高，撂荒地和枇杷园的差异达极显著水平；撂荒地碱性磷酸酶的活性最高，茶园碱性磷酸酶的活性最低；酸性磷酸酶的活性表现为杉树人工林＞桉树人工林＞枇杷园＞撂荒地＞茶园。（4）土壤质量综合指数的变化趋势表现为杉木人工林＞桉树人工林＞茶园＞枇杷园＞撂荒地。
- Abstract:
- By the method of field investigation and laboratory analysis, the characteristics of soil physical-chemical properties and enzyme activity were studied to the abandoned cropland. The results showed that: (1) The content of soil grain grade ranking from small amount to much was powder viscous grain>physical viscous grain>viscous grain, and the amount of the three kinds of grain in the loquat garden were all more than those under the other conditions. (2) The content of soil organic matter rank was fir plantation>eucalyptus plantation>loquat garden>tea garden>abandoned land. The cation exchange capacity was eucalyptus plantation>loquat garden>tea garden>abandoned land>fir plantation, but there were no significant differences between different land uses. The total nitrogen content ranking from small amount to much was abandoned land>loquat garden>tea garden≥fir plantation>eucalyptus plantation, the total phosphorus content rank was fir plantation>tea garden>abandoned land>loquat garden>eucalyptus plantation, the total potassium content rank was loquat garden>eucalyptus plantation>tea garden>abandoned land>fir plantation. (3) The activity of catalase ranking from strong to the weak was fir plantation>abandoned land>loquat garden>tea garden>eucalyptus plantation. The activity of urease in abandoned land and loquat garden was stronger, and the differences between the two were very obvious. The activity of alkaline phosphatase in abandoned land was the strongest while the tea garden’s was the weakest, and the activity of the acidic phosphatase rank was fir plantation>eucalyptus plantation>loquat garden>abandoned land>tea garden. (4) The change trend of soil quality comprehensive index was fir plantation>eucalyptus plantation>tea garden>loquat garden>abandoned land.
参考文献/References:
[1] 曹慧, 杨洁, 孙波, 等.太湖流域丘陵地区土壤养分的空间变异[J].土壤, 2002, 34 (4):201-205.
[2] 贺明蔡, 冷寿慈.桃粮间作对土壤养分状况及土壤生物活性的影响[J].土壤通报, 1994, 25 (4):188-189.
[3] 白文娟, 焦菊英.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地主要自然恢复植物群落的多样性分析[J].水土保持研究, 2006, 13 (3):140-145.
[4] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化研究[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2000:142-168.
[5] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1986:67-80.
[6] 郑立臣, 宇万太, 马强, 等.农田土壤肥力综合评价研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2004, 23 (5):156-161.
[7] 黄昌勇, 李保国, 徐建明, 等.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 1999.
[8] 陈尚洪, 刘定辉, 朱钟麟, 等.四川盆地秸秆还田免耕对土壤养分及碳库的影响[J].中国水土保持科学, 2008 (6):54-56.
[9] 邱莉萍, 张兴昌.子午岭不同土地利用方式对土壤性质的影响[J].自然资源学报, 2006, 11 (6):965-972.
[10] 薛立, 邝立刚, 陈红跃, 等.不同林分土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究[J].土壤学报, 2003, 40 (2):280-285.
[11] 杨鹏, 薛立, 陈红, 等.不同混交林地土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J].湖南林业科技, 2004, 31 (4):43-45.
相似文献/References:
[1]付兴涛,叶碎高,赵聚国,等.人工河岸水土保持生物措施土壤持肥和固土效应分析[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(01):237.
FU Xing-tao,YE Sui-gao,ZHAO Ju-guo,et al.The Effects Analysis on Soil Fertility Conservation and Reinforcement on Artificial Riverside with Vegetable Measures[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(03):237.
[2]李春艳,张晓丽,安树杰,等.松材线虫入侵后马尾松根际土壤性质相关分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(03):89.
LI Chun-yan,ZHANG Xiao-li,AN Shu-jie,et al.Relevant Analysis of Soil Characters in Forest Land Invaded by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2007,14(03):89.
[3]朱瑜,张卓栋,刘畅,等.激光粒度仪与吸管法测定土壤机械组成的比较研究——以不同退化程度栗钙土为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(03):62.
ZHU Yu,ZHANG Zhuodong,LIU Chang,et al.Comparison of Laser Diffraction Method and Pipette Method on Soil Particle Size Distribution Determination—A Case Study of Variously Degraded Kastanozem[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):62.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2009-12-14。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（40901138）；四川省教育厅重点项目（07ZA059）；四川省科技厅应用基础项目（2008JY0022）；地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目（2008-KF-05）；中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室开放研究基金
作者简介:郑子成（1976- ），博士，副教授，从事土壤生态与水土保持研究。E-mail：zichengzheng@yahoo.com.cn
通讯作者:李廷轩（1966- ），教授，博士生导师，