PEI Yile,LI Taixing,WANG Keqin,et al.Effects of Returned Straw Composted Under Different Stockpile Methods on Nitrogen Balance of Flue-Cured Tobacco Farmland Ecosystem in Central Yunnan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(03):65-73.
不同堆沤方式下秸秆还田对滇中烤烟农田生态系统氮素平衡的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Returned Straw Composted Under Different Stockpile Methods on Nitrogen Balance of Flue-Cured Tobacco Farmland Ecosystem in Central Yunnan Province
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)03-0065-09
- Keywords:
- straw returning; stockpile methods; nitrogen balance; farmland ecosystem; flue-cured tobacco
- 分类号:
- S157
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以滇中二龙潭小流域烤烟农田生态系统为研究对象,设置对照(CK)及8种不同玉米秸秆堆沤方式进行秸秆还田,各处理包括2种秸秆还田重量(0.75或1.5 kg/m2),2种秸秆粒度(1或5 cm),2种秸秆堆沤方式(水或水与尿素堆沤),研究烤烟农田生态系统中不同堆沤方式下秸秆还田对径流泥沙氮素流失、土壤氮素残留量、烤烟氮素吸收量以及农田烤烟生态系统氮素平衡的影响。结果表明:(1)径流和泥沙全氮流失量分别随着降雨量和降雨强度的增加而增加;(2)施用5cm粗秸秆较1cm细秸秆、1.5 kg/m2还田量较0.75 kg/m2还田量可分别减少径流氮素流失量0.32%～35.05%和54.52%～77.23%;(3)秸秆还田显著增加了土壤全氮、硝态氮含量,各处理分别较CK高出2.60%～20.33%和0.35%～90.57%;(4)烤烟各器官全氮含量分布特征为叶>茎>根,各处理下叶、茎、根全氮含量较CK分别增加了67.69%,25.33%和42.27%,水与尿素堆沤较水堆沤可显著提高烤烟氮素含量6.60%～38.03%;(5)在氮素平衡中径流和泥沙氮素流失量分别占氮素输入量的8.27%～23.85%和4.37%～12.72%,氮素流失主要以径流为主,泥沙为辅; 土壤残留量占氮素输入量的4.97%～36.79%; 烤烟吸收量占41.10%～71.64%,烤烟吸收的氮素占输入的主体部分。采用水与尿素堆沤,还田量1.5kg/m2,秸秆粒度5 cm的合理配置,可有效维系烤烟农田生态系统氮素平衡,增加烤烟产量,降低氮素流失量,并提高该流域农田生态系统经济和生态效益。
- Abstract:
- In this study, the farmland ecosystem of flue-cured tobacco in the Erlongtan small watershed in central Yunnan Province was used as the research object. The control(CK)and eight treatments(straw returning of corn)under different stockpile methods were set up. Different treatments included two kinds of straw returning amount(0.75 or 1.5kg/m2), two kinds of straw particle size(1 or 5 cm)and two kinds of stockpile methods(water or mix water with urea). The effects of returned straw composted under different stockpile methods on nitrogen loss from runoff and sediment, soil nitrogen residues, nitrogen absorption in flue-cured tobacco, and nitrogen balance in flue-cured tobacco farmland were studied. The results show that:(1)TN loss from runoff and sediment increased with amount of rainfall and rainfall intensity, respectively;(2)application of 5cm thick straw(compared with 1 cm thin straw), and 1.5kg/m2 returning amount(compared with 0.75 kg/m2)could effectively reduce the nitrogen loss from runoff by 0.32%～35.05% and 54.52%～77.23%, respectively;(3)straw returning significantly increased the contents of soil total nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen, and the contents of total nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen were 2.60%～20.33% and 0.35%～90.57% higher than CK, respectively;(4)the distribution characteristics of total nitrogen content in each organ of flue-cured tobacco were showed as the sequence: leaves>stems> roots, the total nitrogen content in the leaves, stems and roots increased by 67.69%, 25.33% and 42.27%, respectively, compared with CK; compared with water stockpile, mix water and urea significantly increased the nitrogen content of flue-cured tobacco by 6.60%～38.03%;(5)in the nitrogen balance, the nitrogen loss from runoff and sediment accounted for 14.36%～24.33% and 2.32%～14.32% of nitrogen input, respectively; the nitrogen loss was mainly caused by runoff nitrogen loss, followed by sediment loss; soil residues of nitrogen accounted for 4.97%～36.79% of nitrogen input; the absorption nitrogen amount of flue-cured tobacco accounted for 41.10%～71.64%, and the nitrogen absorbed by flue-cured tobacco accounted for the main part of nitrogen input. By using the reasonable configuration of mix water and urea, straw returning amount 1.5kg/m and straw particle size of 5cm can effectively maintain nitrogen balance in flue-cured tobacco farmland ecosystem, increase flue-cured tobacco yield, reduce nitrogen loss, and improve the economic and ecological benefits of the farmland ecosystem in this basin.
参考文献/References:
[1] 霍丽丽,赵立欣,孟海波,等.中国农作物秸秆综合利用潜力研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(13):218-224.[2] 靳贞来,靳宇恒.国外秸秆利用经验借鉴与中国发展路径选择[J].世界农业,2015(5):129-132.[3] 韩瑞芸,陈哲,杨世琦.秸秆还田对土壤氮磷及水土的影响研究[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(9):148-154.[4] 李敬王.不同耕作方式下秸秆还田对砂姜黑土有机质等养分及物理性质的影响[D].重庆:西南大学,2019.[5] 王芳.秸秆腐解的微生物群落演替过程研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.[6] 刘玮斌,田文博,陈龙,等.不同秸秆还田方式对土壤酶活性和玉米产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019(5):25-29.[7] 李春阳.不同秸秆还田量对土壤性状及玉米产量的影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2017.[8] 王维钰.秸秆周年投入与施肥对小麦—玉米轮作温室气体排放效应及农田生产力的影响[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.[9] 徐蒋来,胡乃娟,朱利群.周年秸秆还田量对麦田土壤养分及产量的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2016,36(2):215-222.[10] 朱利群,夏小江,胡清宇,等.不同耕作方式与秸秆还田对稻田氮磷养分径流流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(6):6-10.[11] 王月宁,冯朋博,李荣,等.不同秸秆还田方式对宁夏扬黄灌区土壤性质及玉米生长的影响[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(11):2607-2614.[12] 陈喜靖,喻曼,王强,等.浙江省稻田系统秸秆还田问题及对策[J].浙江农业学报,2018,30(10):1765-1774.[13] 聂文翰,戚志萍,冯海玮,等.复合菌剂秸秆堆肥对土壤碳氮含量和酶活性的影响[J].环境科学,2017,38(2):783-791.[14] 徐坚,岳鹏,顾艳红.秸秆堆肥在水稻上的应用效果[J].浙江农业科学,2019,60(11):2015-2016,2019.[15] 匡石滋,田世尧,李春雨,等.香蕉间作模式和香蕉茎秆堆沤还田对土壤酶活性的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2010,18(3):617-621.[16] 邱学礼,李军营,李向阳,等.云南曲靖烤烟坡耕地不同农作处理的水土流失特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(6):98-103.[17] 韩雪丰,范茂攀,刘润梅,等.云南省种植马铃薯农户氮磷钾养分投入及其土壤养分平衡状况分析[J].云南农业大学学报,自然科学版,2019,34(3):538-543[18] 宋娅丽,王克勤.滇中坡耕地农田生态系统中氮素平衡特征[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):150-154.[19] 张亦涛,刘宏斌,王洪媛,等.农田施氮对水质和氮素流失的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(20):6664-6676.[20] 杨坤宇,王美慧,王毅,等.不同农艺管理措施下双季稻田氮磷径流流失特征及其主控因子研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(8):1723-1734.[21] 竹江良,刘晓琳,李少明,等.两种微生物菌剂对烟草废弃物高温堆肥腐熟进程的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(1):194-199.[22] 林庆明,丁文峰,张长伟,等.模拟降雨条件下红壤坡面侵蚀产沙水动力学特征[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):16-21.[23] 刘祁峰,毛应诚,晏斌.山丹县油菜秸秆腐熟剂筛选试验总结[J].农业科技与信息,2019(18):27-28.[24] 薛晓辉,赵常万,张嵩.黔西北不同土地利用类型下土壤全氮及硝态氮的分布与残留[J].草地学报,2016,24(4):819-824.[25] 李亚鑫,张娟霞,刘伟刚,等.玉米秸秆还田配施氮肥对冬小麦产量和土壤硝态氮的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2018,46(7):38-44.[26] 赵鹏,陈阜.秸秆还田配施氮肥对夏玉米氮利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2019,43(1):14-18.[27] 普匡,高家合,田旺海,等.烤烟营养器官对氮肥的吸收利用效率[J].西南农业学报,2014,27(5):2035-2039.[28] 杨梅,王昌全,袁大刚,等.不同生长期烤烟各器官C, N, P生态化学计量学特征[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(6):686-693.[29] 王冬梅,杨惠敏.4种牧草不同生长期C, N生态化学计量特征[J].草业科学,2011,28(6):921-925.[30] 叶丽丽,王翠红,彭新华,等.秸秆还田对土壤质量影响研究进展[J].湖南农业科学,2010(19):52-55.[31] 方平,彭友,阳显斌,等.有机无机肥配施对烤烟氮吸收的影响[J].江西农业学报,2019,31(11):47-51.[32] 胡明芳,赵振勇,张科.周年秸秆还田量对南方双季稻生长及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(4):1-6.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨东,李新举,孔欣欣.不同秸秆还田方式对滨海盐渍土水盐运动的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):74.
YANG Dong,LI Xinju,KONG Xinxin.Effects of Different Straw Returning Modes on the Water and Salt Movement in the Coastal Saline Soil[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(03):74.
[2]李英臣,侯翠翠,李小宇,等.不同秸秆还田方式对黄土高原坡耕地土壤呼吸的影响[J].水土保持研究,2015,22(05):122.
LI Yingchen,HOU Cuicui,LI Xiaoyu,et al.Effects of Different Straw Returning Patterns on Soil Respiration in Sloping Cropland of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,22(03):122.
[3]王燕培,柴守玺,陈玉章,等.不同秸秆还田处理对旱地冬小麦土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(06):164.
WANG Yan-pei,CHAI Shou-xi,CHEN Yu-zhang,et al.Effect of Different Treatments with Straw Returning on Soil Water Content in Arid Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2014,21(03):164.
[4]张聪,慕平,尚建明.长期持续秸秆还田对土壤理化特性、酶活性和产量性状的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(01):92.
ZHANG Cong,MU Ping,SHANG Jianming.Effects of Continuous Returning Corn Straw on Soil Chemical Properties, Enzyme Activities and Yield Trait[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):92.
[5]陈静,张建国,赵英,等.秸秆和生物炭添加对关中地区玉米-小麦轮作农田温室气体排放的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):170.
CHEN Jing,ZHANG Jianguo,ZHAO Ying,et al.Effects of Straw and Biochar Amendment on Greenhouse Gases Emission in Wheat-Maize Rotation Cropland in Guanzhong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):170.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-06-15 修回日期:2020-07-31资助项目:云南省科技计划重点研发项目(2018BB018); 云南省高校优势特色重点学科(生态学)建设项目(050005113111); 云南省大学生创新训练项目(20191067706); 云南省科技厅“三区”人才支持计划第一作者:裴益乐(1997—),女,山西运城人,硕士研究生,主要从事生态恢复研究。E-mail:huanlehuanle@126.com通信作者:宋娅丽(1985—),女,山西长治人,博士,主要从事生态系统功能研究。E-mail:songyali19851205@sina.com