WEI Xindong,SONG Linhan,WANG Shaini,et al.Spatial and Temporal Changes and Its Variation of Cultivated Land Quality of Counties and Cities in Shaanxi on the West Bank of the Yellow River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2021,28(02):326-334.
黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地质量时空变化特征及其分异规律
- Title:
- Spatial and Temporal Changes and Its Variation of Cultivated Land Quality of Counties and Cities in Shaanxi on the West Bank of the Yellow River
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2021)02-0326-09
- Keywords:
- cultivated land quality; spatial and temporal change; distribution regulation; cultivated land protection; the west bank of the Yellow River; Shaanxi Province
- 分类号:
- F323.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为推动黄河流域高质量发展,以黄河流域为地理单元,从县域层面系统分析黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地数量和质量时空变化特征及其分异规律。基于陕西省2005—2018年耕地质量等别评价成果,采用动态度模型法、面积加权平均法、耕地质量区位指数法、重心迁移模型法研究黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地质量变化。结果表明:(1)时间上,2005—2018年黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地资源数量上表现下降趋势,质量上平均利用等别不高且变化不大。数量方面:年平均下降率为5.86%,在2005—2010年、2010—2015年、2015—2018年为先下降、后上升、再下降的变化态势,平均年变化率分别为17.46%,3.58%,1.60%,耕地数量变化更加平稳; 质量方面:2005年、2010年、2015年、2018年平均利用等别不高且变化不大,分别为12.46,12.60,12.50,12.50。相比全国平均耕地利用等9.96,黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地利用等处于较低水平,相比陕西省平均利用等11.34,耕地利用等约低于省内一个等。(2)空间上,2005—2018年黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地质量大致呈现自南向北逐渐降低的分异格局。区位指数角度:位于关中平原的潼关县和大荔县耕地利用等较高,为高等地的聚集区,但开展城市建设占用优质耕地,补充一般耕地,造成耕地质量有所下降。陕北地区耕地质量较差,中、低等地的区位指数较高,由于积极开展土地整治工程耕地利用等别均有提升。重心迁移角度:高等地重心在2005—2018年期间处于大荔县,中等地重心由合阳县向黄龙县迁移,低等地重心由佳县迁向米脂县,再迁回佳县。且中等地重心坐标迁移量>低等地重心坐标迁移量>高等地重心坐标迁移量。黄河西岸陕西各县市耕地数量、质量变化均愈加平稳,耕地质量大致呈现自南向北逐渐降低的格局,应保证潼关县和大荔县耕地质量不降低的同时保持黄河西岸陕北县市耕地质量增长趋势。本研究成果为黄河流域生态保护提供耕地管护支持,为基本农田划定、国土空间规划编制和耕地质量管理提供了基础支撑。
- Abstract:
- In order to promote the high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin, we took the Yellow River Basin as the geographical unit, and systematically analyzed the spatial and temporal variation characteristics of the quantity and quality of cultivated land in counties and cities of Shaanxi Province on the west bank of the Yellow River and its variation at the county scale. Based on the evaluation results of cultivated land quality from 2005 to 2018 in Shaanxi Province, we studied the change of cultivated land quality in counties and cities of Shaanxi province on the west bank of the Yellow River by using dynamic attitude model method, area-weighted averages method, cultivated land quality location index method and gravity center migration model. The results showed that: in terms of time, from 2005 to 2018, the quantity of cultivated land resources in counties and cities in Shaanxi on the west bank of the Yellow River presented the declining trend, while the average utilization of cultivated land resources in quality was not high and changed little; in terms of quantity, the annual average decline rate was 5.86%, from 2005 to 2010, from 2010 to 2015, and from 2015 to 2018, the average annual change rate was 17.46%, 3.58%, and 1.60%, respectively, the change of cultivated land was more stable; in terms of quality, the average utilization in 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2018 was not high and changed little, which were 12.46, 12.60, 12.50 and 12.50, respectively; compared with the national average utilization grade of cultivated land of 9.96, the utilization grade of cultivated land of all counties and cities in Shaanxi Province on the west bank of the Yellow River was at a lower level; compared with the average utilization grade of cultivated land of Shaanxi Province, which was 11.34, the average utilization grade of cultivated land was about one lower than that of Shaanxi Province; spatially, the cultivated land quality of each county or city in Shaanxi Province on the west bank of the Yellow River showed a pattern of gradual decrease from south to north from 2005 to 2018; from cultivated land location index point of view, Guanzhong plain, Tongguan county and Dali county had high grade cultivated land utilization, which were the gathering areas of higher grade cultivated lands; however, the quality of cultivated land had declined due to the occupation of high grade cultivated land for urban construction and the supplement of general cultivated land; the cultivated land in northern Shaanxi was poor quality, and the location index of middle and low grade cultivated lands was high; the cultivated land utilization had been improved due to the active development of land improvement projects; from the point of view of center of gravity transfer, from 2005 to 2018, the center of gravity of the high grade cultivated land was located in Dali, the center of gravity of the middle grade cultivated land was transferred from Heyang to Huanglong, the center of gravity of the low grade cultivated land was transferred from Jiaxian to Mizhi and then back to Jiaxian, with the characteristic of middle grade cultivated land center of gravity coordinate migration>low grade cultivated land center of gravity coordinate migration>high cultivated grade land center of gravity coordinate migration; on the west bank of the Yellow River, the quantity and quality of cultivated land in all counties and cities of Shaanxi became more and more stable; the cultivated land quality generally presented the pattern of gradual decline from south to north. So the cultivated land quality in Tongguan and Dali should not be reduced while the growing trend of cultivated land quality in north Shaanxi county on the west bank of the Yellow River should be maintained. These results of this study can provide farmland management and protection support for the ecological protection of the Yellow River Basin, and provide basic support for the delineation of basic farmland, the compilation of territorial space planning and the quality management of farmland.
参考文献/References:
[1] Zhou D, Xu J C, Lin Z L. Conflict or coordination·Assessing land use multi-functionalization using production-living-ecology analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,577:136-147.
[2] 徐辉,师诺,武玲玲,等.黄河流域高质量发展水平测度及其时空演变[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):115-126.
[3] 毛汉英.“黄河流域高质量发展路径与资源生态保障”专辑序言[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):1-2.
[4] 陶荣,孔雪松,陈翠芳,等.“二调”以来湖北省耕地变化的时空特征及其驱动因子识别[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(6):290-295.
[5] 贾绍凤,梁媛.新形势下黄河流域水资源配置战略调整研究[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):29-36.
[6] 赵阳,胡春宏,张晓明,等.近70年黄河流域水沙情势及其成因分析[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(21):112-119.
[7] Lv M X, Ma Z G, Lv M Z. Effects of climate/land surface changes on streamflow with consideration of precipitation intensity and catchment characteristics in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres, 2018,123(4):1942-1958.
[8] 郑景云,文彦君,方修琦.过去2000年黄河中下游气候与土地覆被变化的若干特征[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):3-19.
[9] 马柱国,符淙斌,周天军,等.黄河流域气候与水文变化的现状及思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2020,35(1):52-60.
[10] 李永乐,佘小光.南水北调西线工程对黄河流域生态环境的影响分析[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(4):160-163,172.
[11] 金凤君,马丽,许堞.黄河流域产业发展对生态环境的胁迫诊断与优化路径识别[J].资源科学,2020,42(1):127-136.
[12] 陈强,陈云浩,王萌杰,等.2001—2010年黄河流域生态系统植被净第一性生产力变化及气候因素驱动分析[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(10):2811-2818.
[13] 姚子艳,张丽娟,唐世浩,等.20世纪80年代以来全球耕地变化的基本特征及空间格局(英文)[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017,27(7):771-785.
[14] 谈明洪,李圆圆.1992-2015全球耕地时空变化(英文)[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019,10(3):235-245.
[15] 郧文聚,吴克宁,张小丹.中国耕地健康问题及防治对策[J].中国发展,2019,19(4):34-37.
[16] 孔祥斌,张蚌蚌,温良友,等.基于要素—过程—功能的耕地质量理论认识及其研究趋势[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(9):14-20.
[17] 卫新东,王筛妮,员学锋,等.陕西省耕地质量时空变化特征及其分异规律[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(3):240-248.
[18] 张志雷,孔祥斌,张青璞.京津冀鲁地区耕地等别空间分布特征研究[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(S1):230-237.
[19] 钱凤魁,张靖野,王秋兵.东港市耕地质量空间相关性分析及驱动机制研究[J].土壤通报,2018,49(5):1048-1053.
[20] 魏洪斌,吴克宁,赵华甫,等.中国中部粮食主产区耕地等别空间分布特征[J].资源科学,2015,37(8):1552-1560.
[21] 周忠惠.气候变化对黄河流域陕西段的农业影响研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012.
[22] 王玥.黄河流域陕西段古村落文化的保护与发展[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
[23] 刘光华,楼劲.黄河文化丛书·黄河人[M].兰州:甘肃人民出版社,2001:29.
[24] 郭丽英, Di L P, Tian Q.2000—2015年京津走廊耕地和建设用地变化监测研究(英文)[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(5):702-718.
[25] 张青璞,孔祥斌,郧文聚,等.重庆市国家级农用地分等汇总前后等别分布规律[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(10):297-303.
[26] 朱传民,郝晋珉,陈丽,等.基于耕地综合质量的高标准基本农田建设[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):233-242.
[27] 刘彦随,王介勇,郭丽英.中国粮食生产与耕地变化的时空动态[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(12):4269-4274.
[28] 胡存智.中国耕地质量等级调查与评定(全国卷)[M].北京:中国大地出版社,2010.
相似文献/References:
[1]兰泽凡,耿 韧,赵广举,等.窟野河流域水沙变化及其驱动因素[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):95.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.031]
Lan Zefan,Geng Ren,Zhao Guangju,et al.Runoff and Sediment Load Variation and Driving Factors in the Kuye River Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):95.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.031]
[2]翟博超,朱 燕,申小娟,等.黄土丘陵区两个典型成熟森林群落土壤水分时空变化特征及对降雨事件的响应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):170.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.042]
Zhai Bochao,Zhu Yan,Shen Xiaojuan,et al.Spatiotemporal Variation of Soil Moisture and the Responses to Rainfall Events in Two Typical Mature Forest Stands in the Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):170.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.042]
[3]皇 彦,宋海清,胡 琦,等.2000—2020年内蒙古NDVI时空动态及其对水热条件的响应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):197.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.006]
Huang Yan,Song Haiqing,Hu Qi,et al.Spatial-temporal Dynamics of NDVI and Its Response to Hydrothermal Conditions in Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2020[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):197.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.006]
[4]孙 珑,江 曦,韩剑桥,等.近30年来黄土高原山洪灾害风险时空变化及成因[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):241.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.022]
Sun Long,Jiang Xi,Han Jianqiao,et al.Changes and Causes of Mountain Torrent Disaster Risk on the Loess Plateau in the Past 30 Years[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):241.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.022]
[5]姚宏斌,温仲明,张添佑,等.基于CMIP6的中国北方草地生态系统年总初级生产力时空格局[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):266.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.017]
Yao Hongbin,Wen Zhongming,Zhang Tianyou,et al.Spatiotemporal Pattern of GPP of Grassland Ecosystem in Northern China Based on CMIP6[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):266.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.017]
[6]廖瑞恩,齐 实,赖金林,等.西南高山峡谷区水力侵蚀时空变化及其驱动力[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(05):139.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.002]
Liao Ruien,Qi Shi,Lai Jinlin,et al.Spatial-temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Water Erosion in Southwest Alpine-Canyon Area of China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(02):139.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.05.002]
[7]韩宗伟,卢德彬,杨建,等.贵州省耕地质量时空格局及变化趋势分析[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(06):154.
HAN Zongwei,LU Debin,YANG Jian,et al.Analysis on the Distribution and Variation Trend of Cultivated Land Quality in Guizhou Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(02):154.
[8]周明,王占岐.基于耕地质量和空间聚类的县域基本农田划定——以湖北省团风县为例[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):316.
ZHOU Ming,WANG Zhanqi.Spatial Distribution of Primary Farmland Based on Cultivated Land Quality and Spatial Clustering at County Scale —A Case of Tuanfeng County, Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(02):316.
[9]张家政,李崇贵,王 涛.黄土高原植被覆盖时空变化及原因[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(01):224.
ZHANG Jiazheng,LI Chonggui,WANG Tao.Dynamic Changes of Vegetation Coverage on the Loess Plateau and Its Factors[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):224.
[10]付含培,王让虎,王晓军.1999—2018年黄河流域NDVI时空变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(02):145.
FU Hanpei,WANG Ranghu,WANG Xiaojun.Analysis of Spatiotemporal Variations and Driving Forces of NDVI in the Yellow River Basin During 1999—2018[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2022,29(02):145.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2020-05-15 修回日期:2020-06-02
资助项目:自然资源部退化及未利用整治工程重点实验室开放基金课题:耕地生态质量等别评价体系研究(211927180139); 国家重点研发计划:传统村落保护利用价值的分级分类体系与评价导则(2019YFD1100901); 国家留学基金委资助
第一作者:卫新东(1978—),男,陕西咸阳人,博士,副教授,研究方向为土地资源利用与管理。E-mail:xindongw@chd.edu.cn
通信作者:宋林韩(1995—),女,河南安阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土地资源利用与管理。E-mail:2316400397@qq.com