CAI Xudong,ZHOU Yiwen,LIU Yaojun,et al.Evaluation on Comprehensive Ecological Benefit of Different Tillage Measures on Sloping Land in Red Soil Area of South China[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(05):281-287.
南方红壤区坡耕地不同耕作措施综合生态效益评价
- Title:
- Evaluation on Comprehensive Ecological Benefit of Different Tillage Measures on Sloping Land in Red Soil Area of South China
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)05-0281-07
- Keywords:
- sloping farmland; cultivation measures; ecological benefits; analytic hierarchy process; entropy weight method
- 分类号:
- S157
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 合理评价南方红壤区坡耕地不同耕作措施综合生态效益是进一步评价其经济效益和社会效益的必要条件,可为该地区耕作方式优化提供科学依据。针对已有研究对南方红壤坡耕地区耕作方式评价存在评价指标片面和评价系统粗略等问题,以裸露措施(CK)为对照,以顺坡耕作(DT)、顺坡+植物篱(DT+HR)、横坡耕作(CT)和稻草覆盖措施(SM)为研究对象进行了效益评价,评价指标体系通过层次分析法—熵权法确立了保持水土效益(B1)、控制农业面源污染效益(B2)和提高土地生产力(B3)3个效益指标类型以及具有代表性的8个评价指标。结果表明:以农民普通耕作(主要是顺坡耕作)为主的南方红壤区,稻草覆盖措施能明显地减少土壤侵蚀量、控制养分流失,各措施效益大小为顺坡耕作<顺坡+植物篱<横坡耕作<稻草覆盖; 不同耕作措施的综合生态效益和提高土地生产力效益均较顺坡耕作明显提升,其中稻草覆盖措施最高; 不同措施效益指标较顺坡耕作增幅也不同,其中保持水土效益、控制农业面源污染效益分别增加66.3%～87.7%,36.2%～45.4%。评价结果表明在南方红壤区坡耕地提倡稻草覆盖的耕作措施可以有效提高当地农用地的生态效益。
- Abstract:
- Rational evaluation of comprehensive ecological benefits of different tillage measures on slope-farmlands in southern red soil region is a necessary condition for further evaluation of economic and social benefits, which can provide scientific basis for the optimization of farming methods in this area. Aiming at the problems of one-sided evaluation index and rough evaluation system existed in the evaluation of tillage methods in slope-farmlands area of red soil in South China, we set bare land measure as control(CK), and evaluated the benefits of downslope tillage(DT), hedgerows with downslope tillage(DT+HR), contour ridge tillage(CT)and straw mulch(SM). The evaluation index system was established by analytic hierarchy process-entropy weight method, and three benefit indicators of soil and water conservation(B1), agricultural non-point source pollutant control(B2)and land productivity enhancement benefits(B3), and eight representative evaluation indicators. The results showed that: in southern China where the traditional tillage, ridge down and up, is adapted by local farmers, soil erosion decreases remarkably by SM and nutrients loss can be controlled; different type benefits increase in the order: DT<DT+HR<CT<SM; there is a significant increase in index for comprehensive ecological benefits and land productivity of different tillage measures compared to DT. Among the measures, SM benefit is the highest, the increase in different ecological benefits varies from that in DT, B1, B2 increase by 66.3%～87.7%, and 36.2%～45.4%, respectively. The evaluation results show that SM can effectively improve the ecological benefits of local agricultural land in the southern red soil slope-farmlands area.
参考文献/References:
[1]史志华,杨洁,李忠武,等.南方红壤低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):6-9.
[2]赵其国,黄国勤,马艳芹.中国南方红壤生态系统面临的问题及对策[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7615-7622.
[3]Ma W, Li Z, Ding K, et al. Effect of soil erosion on dissolved organic carbon redistribution in subtropical red soil under rainfall simulation[J]. Geomorphology, 2014,226:217-225.
[4]王昭艳,李亚光,李湛,等.水土流失防治措施在非点源污染控制中的作用[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(6):92-94.
[5]Parlak M, Parlak A Ö. Measurement of splash erosion in different cover crops[J]. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 2010,15(2):169-173.
[6]史晓梅,史东梅,文卓立.紫色土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤抗蚀性特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(4):63-66.
[7]戴金梅,查轩,黄少燕,等.不同植被覆盖度对紫色土坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(3):33-38.
[8]徐畅,谢德体,高明,等.三峡库区小流域旱坡地氮磷流失特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(1):1-5,10.
[9]水建国,叶元林,王建红,等.中国红壤丘陵区水土流失规律与土壤允许侵蚀量的研究[J].中国农业科学,2003,036(2):179-183.
[10]杨一松,王兆骞,陈欣,等.南方红壤坡地不同利用模式的水土保持及生态效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):84-87.
[11]孙昕,李德成,梁音.南方红壤区小流域水土保持综合效益定量评价方法探讨:以江西兴国县为例[J].土壤学报,2009,46(3):373-380.
[12]王效科,杨宁,吴凡,等.生态效益评价内容和评价指标筛选[J].生态学报,2019,39(15):5442-5449.
[13]郝洋,梁秀娟,孟凡傲,等.基于AHP-熵权法的地下水水质模糊综合评价:以白城市为例[J].节水灌溉,2016(6):51-54,55.
[14]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[15]蒲玉琳.植物篱—农作措施控制坡耕地氮磷流失效应及综合生态效益评价[D].重庆:西南大学,2013.
[16]朱晓宵,李炳军.基于熵权法的三维动态灰关联优化算法[J].数学的实践与认识,2019,49(17):203-212.
[17]Cuiting D, Yaojun L, Tianwei W, et al. Exploring optimal measures to reduce soil erosion and nutrient losses in southern China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018,210:41-48.
[18]郑海金,杨洁,黄鹏飞,等.覆盖和草篱对赵其花生生长和土壤特性的影响[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(4):119-126.
[19]彭春瑞,陈先茂,钱银飞.秸秆覆盖对红壤旱地作物生长及土壤质量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2011,32(S1):51-54.
[20]张青青,陈志强,陈志彪,等.南方典型红壤区不同水保措施下坡面产流产沙及稀土迁移特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):46-53,58.
[21]Ailincai C, Jitareanu G, Bucur D, et al. Influence of tillage practices and fertilization on crop yields and soil properties in long-term crop rotation(soybean-wheat-maize)experiments[J]. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 2011,9(1):285-289.
[22]胡雪琴,蒋平,彭旭东,等.紫色丘陵区不同土地利用类型径流泥沙及氮磷流失特征[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):35-39.
[23]林超文,罗春燕,庞良玉,等.不同耕作和覆盖方式对紫色丘陵区坡耕地水土及养分流失的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(22):6091-6101.
[24]蒲玉琳,谢德体,倪九派,等.紫色土区坡耕地植物篱模式综合生态效益评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2014,22(1):44-51.
[25]邱野,王瑄,李德利,等.不同耕作模式下坡耕地次降雨径流量及径流泥沙颗粒机械组成规律[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(2):62-65.
相似文献/References:
[1]朱红春,张友顺.陕北黄土高原坡耕地生态退耕经济效益评价与分析[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(02):41.
ZHU Hongchun,ZHANG Youshun.Economic Benefit Value and Analysis of Biologic Rescue in the North Shanxi Sloping Plantation of the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2003,10(05):41.
[2]郑粉莉,唐克丽,陈文亮.细沟侵蚀过程的研究方法[J].水土保持研究,1993,(01):107.
Zheng Fenli,Tang Keli,Chen Wenliany.Research Methods of Rill Erosion Process[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1993,(05):107.
[3]农淦,路培,王林华,等.黄土高原坡耕地小麦根系分布特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(05):92.
NONG Gan,LU Pei,WANG Lin-hua,et al.Study on Root Distribution of Winter Wheat on Slope Farmland on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,20(05):92.
[4]吴素业.皖西南山区坡耕地水土流失防治措施[J].水土保持研究,1996,3(04):38.
Wu Suye.The Control Practice of Water and Soil Loss in Hillside Fields of Southwestern Mountain Area of Anhui Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1996,3(05):38.
[5]林永知.丘陵地区坡耕地水土流失动态监测分析[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(01):120.
Lin Yongzhi.Analysis on the Dynamic Monitoring of Soil and Water Loss of Slope Farmland in Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):120.
[6]高岚,王振颖.辽宁省坡耕地资源普查及成果分析[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):44.
Gao Lan,Wang Zhenying.General Survey of Hillyland Resources and Result Analysis in Liaoning Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):44.
[7]杨玉阁,黄毅,曹忠杰.辽宁坡耕地的生产能力与开发治理前景[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):50.
Yang Yuge,Huang Yi,Cao Zhongjie.Soil Productivity and Its Exploitate Prospect for Hillside Fields in Liaoning Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):50.
[8]张本家.辽宁省坡耕地低产原因与治理措施[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):53.
Zhang Benjia.Low Output Problems of Hilly Field and Its Harnessing Measures in Liaoning Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):53.
[9]张宝林,刘跃光,寿祝邦.辽宁坡耕地建设水平梯田的必要性与可能性[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):60.
Zhang Baolin,Liu Yaoguang,Shou Zhubang.The Necessary and Possibility of Level Terrace Construction in Hilly Fields of Liaoning Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):60.
[10]孙景华,杨玉阁,张本家,等.辽北低山丘陵区坡耕地水土流失规律研究[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(04):65.
Sun Jinghua,Yang Yuge,Zhang Benjia,et al.Hilly Field Erosion Regulation in Low Mountain Region of Northern Liaoning[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1997,4(05):65.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-11-18修回日期:2019-12-04
资助项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0505401); 公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503106)
第一作者:蔡旭东(1996—),男,贵州铜仁人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与环境生态研究。E-mail:840459149@qq.com
通信作者:李朝霞(1976—),女,湖北丹江口人,博士,教授,主要从事土壤侵蚀机理等方面研究。E-mail:zxli@mail.hzau.edu.cn