CUI Huijin,LIU Ju,DU Ziqiang,et al.Hyperspectral Characteristics of the Sorghum Field and Their Relations with Soil Respiration Under the Conditions of Plastic Film Mulching and Biochar Application[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):15-22.
生物炭和地膜覆盖下高粱高光谱特征及其与土壤呼吸的关系
- Title:
- Hyperspectral Characteristics of the Sorghum Field and Their Relations with Soil Respiration Under the Conditions of Plastic Film Mulching and Biochar Application
- 文章编号:
- 1005-3409(2020)03-0015-08
- 分类号:
- S514
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 准确估算不同生态系统的土壤呼吸速率对全球碳循环研究具有重要意义。以高粱为研究对象,对生物炭添加和地膜覆盖处理下不同时期高粱的高光谱特征以及土壤呼吸速率进行了定期测定,基于高光谱和土壤呼吸数据建立了他们之间的定量关系,目的是为间接估算土壤呼吸提供方法。田间试验设对照(CK)、生物炭添加(B)、地膜覆盖(P)、生物炭添加+地膜覆盖(B+P)4个处理。结果表明:(1)与对照相比,地膜覆盖使土壤呼吸(Rs)显著增加(p<0.05),添加生物炭后Rs没有明显变化,生长季Rs的平均值大小依次为:9.43 μmol/(m2·s)(B+P)>8.88 μmol/(m2·s)(P)>7.35 μmol/(m2·s)(B)>6.68 μmol/(m2·s)(CK)。(2)不同生育期冠层近红外波段反射率表现为,拔节期B+P和P处理显著高于CK和B,但是抽穗期CK和B处理显著高于P和B+P,灌浆期和收获期4个处理之间没明显差异。(3)高粱冠层光谱反射率、一阶微分、光谱特征参数及已有的植被指数均与Rs呈显著相关,最大的相关系数可达0.80以上。(4)综合考虑模型的模拟精度和验证精度,估算高粱土壤呼吸的最佳模型为:Rs=1 666.3R'747+1.332[(R2=0.69,p<0.01,RMSE=2.56 μmol/(m2·s)],其验证模型的R2,RMSE,Slope分别为0.75,2.28 μmol/(m2·s),0.715 8。研究结果可为进一步开展区域农田土壤CO2排放通量的无损监测提供借鉴。
- Abstract:
- Accurate estimate of soil respiration(Rs)in different ecosystems has great significance for the global carbon cycle research. Taking sorghum field as the research sample, we carried out the periodical measurement of both soil respiration and canopy hyperspectral characteristics under the conditions of bio-charcoal addition and plastic film mulching, and established the relationship between the Rs and the canopy hyperspectral indices to provide an approach for indirectly estimate total soil emission based on those dataset. Four different field treatments in the experiment were control(CK), biochar(B), plastic film mulching(P), and biochar + plastic film mulching(B+P). The results are showed as follows.(1)Compared with CK treatment, the P treatment significantly promoted Rs (p<0.05), and there was no significant change in Rs for B treatment. The average value of the Rs in the growing season was 9.43 μmol/(m2·s), 8.88 μmol/(m2·s), 7.35 μmol/(m2·s)and 6.68 μmol/(m2·s)in B+P, P, B and CK treatments, respectively.(2)The reflectance of the near-infrared band of the canopy in different growth stages was different. The reflectance values in the B+P and P treatments were significantly higher than those in the CK and B treatments at jointing stage, but the values in CK and B treatments were significantly higher than those in the P and B+P treatments at heading stage, and no significant difference was found among the four treatments during grain filling and harvesting stages.(3)The spectral reflectance, first derivative spectrum, spectral characteristic parameters, and existing vegetation index of the sorghum canopy were significantly correlated with Rs and the highest correlation coefficient was more than 0.80.(4)Comprehensive consideration for the simulation accuracy and verification precision of the model, the best one for the Rs estimation in the sorghum field could be described as Rs =1666.3R'747+1.332 [R2=0.69, p<0.01, RMSE=2.56 μmol/(m2·s)], and with respect to the verification model, R2, RMSE and slope were 0.75, 2.28 μmol/(m2·s)and 0.715 8, respectively. The results of the study can provide the technical support for making non-destructive monitor for Rs emission from agricultural ecosystems at large scale.
参考文献/References:
[1] Schimel D S. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle[J]. Global Change Biology, 1995,1(1):77-91.
[2] Raich J W, Potter C S, Bhagawati D. Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980—1994[J]. Global Change Biology, 2002,8(8):800-812.
[3] Schlesinger W H, Anderws J A. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2000,48(1):7-20.
[4] 张东秋,石培礼,张宪洲.土壤呼吸主要影响因素的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(7):778-785.
[5] Kuzyakov Y, Larionova A. A. Root and rhizomicrobial respiration:a review of approaches to estimate respiration by autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms in soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2005,168(4):503-520.
[6] 张春兰,杨贵军,李贺丽,等.基于随机森林算法的冬小麦叶面积指数遥感反演研究[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(5):855-867.
[7] 房贤一,朱西存,王凌,等.基于高光谱的苹果盛果期冠层叶绿素含量监测研究[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(16):3504-3513.
[8] 张卓,龙慧灵,王崇倡,等.冬小麦叶片光合特征高光谱遥感估算模型的比较研究[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(4):43-55.
[9] Liang Y, Cai Y, Yan J, et al. Estimation of soil respiration by its driving factors based on multi-source data in a sub-alpine meadow in North China[J]. Sustainability, 2019,11(12):1-17.
[10] Cicuendez V, Rodríguez-Rastrero M, Huesca M, et al. Assessment of soil respiration patterns in an irrigated corn field based on spectral information acquired by field spectroscopy[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015,212:158-167.
[11] Huang N, Niu Z, Zhan Y, et al. Relationships between soil respiration and photosynthesis-related spectral vegetation indices in two cropland ecosystems[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012,160:80-89.
[12] Gamon J A, Field C B. Relationships between NDVI, canopy structure, and photosynthesis in three Californian vegetation types[J]. Ecological Applications, 1995,5(1):28-41.
[13] Gitelson A A, Gritz Y, Merzlyak M N. Relationships Between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2003,160(3):271-282.
[14] Richardson A J, Wiegand C L. Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1977,43(12):1541-1552.
[15] Hellawell A. The crystal chemistry and physics of metals and alloys[J]. International Metallurgical Reviews, 1973,18(1):39-39.
[16] Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002,83(1):195-213.
[17] Vogelmann J E, Rock B N, Moss D M. Red edge spectral measurements from sugar maple leaves[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993,14(8):1563-1575.
[18] Gamon J A, Penuelas J, Field C B. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992,41(1):35-44.
[19] Atkinson C J, Fitzgerald J D, Hipps N A. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils:a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010,337(1/2):1-18.
[20] Biederman L A, Harpole W S. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling:a meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2013,5(2):202-214.
[21] Han G, Lan J, Chen Q, et al. Response of soil microbial community to application of biochar in cotton soils with different continuous cropping years[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017,7(1):10184.
[22] 吴伟祥,孙雪,董达,等.生物质炭土壤环境效应[M].北京:科学出版社,2015.
[23] Stewart C E, Zhang J Y, Botte J, et al. Co-generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates green-house gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils[J]. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2013,5(2):153-164.
[24] Liu Y, Liu S, Wan S, et al. Differential responses of soil respiration to soil warming and experimental throughfall reduction in a transitional oak forest in central China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016,226:186-198.
[25] Al-Wabel M I, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar A H, et al. Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,131:374-379.
[26] Sagrilo E, Jeffery S, Hoffland E, et al. Emission of CO2 from biochar-amended soils and implications for soil organic carbon[J]. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2015,7(6):1294-1304.
[27] 王颖,娄运生,石一凡,等.夜间增温对稻田甲烷排放的影响及其高光谱估算[J].生态学报,2018,38(14):5099-5108.
[28] Wu C, Gaumont-Guay D, Black T A, et al. Soil respiration mapped by exclusively use of MODIS data for forest landscapes of Saskatchewan, Canada[J]. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014,94:80-90.
[29] Huang N, He J S, Niu Z. Estimating the spatial pattern of soil respiration in Tibetan alpine grasslands using Landsat TM images and MODIS data[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013,26:117-125.
相似文献/References:
[1]陈静,张建国,赵英,等.秸秆和生物炭添加对关中地区玉米-小麦轮作农田温室气体排放的影响[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(05):170.
CHEN Jing,ZHANG Jianguo,ZHAO Ying,et al.Effects of Straw and Biochar Amendment on Greenhouse Gases Emission in Wheat-Maize Rotation Cropland in Guanzhong Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(03):170.
[2]王 乐,何平如,张红玲,等.秸秆深埋和覆膜对土壤水盐及番茄产量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(03):372.
WANG Le,HE Pingru,ZHANG Hongling,et al.Effects of Straw Burying and Film Mulching on Soil Water-Salt and Yield of Tomato[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2020,27(03):372.
[3]刘 青,马建涛,韩凡香,等.不同覆盖材料对旱地马铃薯土壤水分和耗水的影响[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(06):197.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.021]
Liu Qing,Ma Jiantao,Han Fanxiang,et al.Effects of Different Mulching Materials on Soil Moisture and Water Consumption of Potato in Dryland[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2023,30(03):197.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2023.06.021]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2019-08-07 修回日期:2018-08-28资助项目:高等学校服务产业创新学科建设计划“土壤污染生态修复学科群”; 国家现代农业高粱产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-06-02-03)第一作者:崔慧瑾(1995—),女,山西晋中人,硕士研究生,研究方向为:生态系统碳循环。E-mail:chj205093@163.com通信作者:严俊霞(1976—),女,山西太原人,副教授,研究方向为:生态系统碳循环。E-mail:yjx422@sxu.edu.cn