YANG Bingxun,LIU Qua,DONG Tingxu.Variation of Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community Diversity of Different Land Use Types in the Jialing River, Sichuan Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(05):14-20,26.
嘉陵江流域不同土地利用类型土壤微生物功能多样性特征
- Title:
- Variation of Soil Nutrients and Microbial Community Diversity of Different Land Use Types in the Jialing River, Sichuan Province
- 分类号:
- S154.3;X144
- 摘要:
- 基于2013—2015年对嘉陵江流域中游（四川段）不同土地利用类型（混交林、草甸、针叶林、阔叶林、灌丛和裸地）土壤生境的调查分析数据，利用Biolog微平板法和磷脂脂肪酸甲酯法（FAMEs）系统研究了土壤微生物多样性群落特征。不同土地利用类型土壤养分和有效养分基本表现为混交林 > 阔叶林 > 针叶林 > 灌丛 > 草甸 > 裸地。不同土地利用类型土壤微生物群落代谢平均颜色变化率（AWCD）随培养时间延长而逐渐增加，土壤微生物群落代谢活性依次是混交林 > 阔叶林 > 针叶林 > 灌丛 > 草甸 > 裸地。土壤微生物对不同种类碳源的利用强度存在较大差异，碳水化合物和羧酸类碳源是不同土地利用类型土壤微生物的主要碳源，其次为氨基酸类、酚酸类和聚合物类，胺类碳源的利用率最小。土壤微生物群落的物种丰富度指数（H）、均匀度指数（E）、优势度指数（Ds）和碳源利用丰富度指数（S）总体趋势为混交林最高，针叶林和阔叶林次之，裸地最低，优势度指数在不同土地利用类型差异并不显著（p > 0.05）。主成分分析结果表明，从31个因素中提取的与碳源利用相关的主成分1，主成分2分别能解释变量方差的65.154%和81.047%，在主成分分离中起主要贡献作用的是胺类和氨基酸类碳源；土壤微生物多样性指数与土壤养分之间呈正相关，与pH值呈负相关，而土壤全碳和全氮含量对土壤微生物多样性贡献较大，这是造成土壤微生物群落功能多样性差异的主要原因。H，E和S与土壤养分各指标的相关系数绝对值均高于Ds，说明了土壤养分对土壤微生物群落优势度指数的影响作用较小。
- Abstract:
- We present a comprehensive analysis of soil nutrients and soil microbial community diversity of different land use types in Jialing River from 2013 to 2015, based on the soil habitat, the structure and function of soil microbial community were studied by using Biolog plate and phospholipid fatty acid methyl ester (FAMEs), respectively. The results are as follows. The soil nutrients of different land use types decrease in the order: mingled forest > broad-leaved forest > coniferous forest > shrub > meadow > bare land. There were significant differences in functional diversity of microbial communities of different land use types. The average well color development (AWCD), which directly reflects microbial activity and functional diversity, increased and then decreased with the order: mingled forest > broad-leaved forest > coniferous forest > shrub > meadow > bare land. The carbon sources mostly used by soil microbes were carbohydrates and carboxylic acids, followed by amino acids, phenolic acids and polymers, the lowest was amines. The Simpson index, Shannon-Wiener index, richness index and McIntosh index of different land use types showed the sequence: mingled forest > broad-leaved forest > coniferous forest > shrub > meadow > bare land. Principal component analysis identified two factors in relation to carbon sources, they explained 65.154% and 81.047% of the variation, respectively. The carbon sources used by soil microbial communities were different among different land use types. Amino acids and amides were the two main carbon sources separating the two principal component factors. Correlation analysis showed that soil microbial diversity index was significantly or very significantly positively correlated with soil nutrients, and was negatively correlated with pH value, the soil nutrients had the more positive contribution to soil microbial diversity and soil pH value had the negative contribution, which were the reason for variation of soil microbial community diversity of different land use types in Jialing River.
参考文献/References:
[1] Westerdahl B. Biological Control of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes: Soil ecosystem management in sustainable agriculture, second edition[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2015,79(3):972.
[2] Soil ecology and ecosystem services[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[3] DeLuca T H, Gundale M J, MacKenzie M D, et al. Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations[J]. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology And Implementation, 2015,2:421-454.
[4] Prendergast-Miller M T, Duvall M, Sohi S P. Biochar-root interactions are mediated by biochar nutrient content and impacts on soil nutrient availability[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2014,65(1):173-185.
[5] Mukai M, Aiba S, Kitayama K. Soil-nutrient availability and the nutrient-use efficiencies of forests along an altitudinal gradient on Yakushima Island, Japan[J]. Ecological Research, 2016,31(5):719-730.
[6] Berthrong S T, Buckley D H, Drinkwater L E. Agricultural management and labile carbon additions affect soil microbial community structure and interact with carbon and nitrogen cycling[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2013,66(1):158-170.
[7] Fierer N, Leff J W, Adams B J, et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012,109(52):21390-21395.
[8] Lauber C L, Ramirez K S, Aanderud Z, et al. Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across land-use types[J]. The ISME Journal, 2013,7(8):1641-1650.
[9] Barberán A, Bates S T, Casamayor E O, et al. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities[J]. The ISME Journal, 2012,6(2):343-351.
[10] Sradnick A, Murugan R, Oltmanns M, et al. Changes in functional diversity of the soil microbial community in a heterogeneous sandy soil after long-term fertilization with cattle manure and mineral fertilizer[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013,63:23-28.
[11] Lange M, Habekost M, Eisenhauer N, et al. Biotic and abiotic properties mediating plant diversity effects on soil microbial communities in an experimental grassland[J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(5):e96182.
[12] Paula F S, Rodrigues J L M, Zhou J, et al. Land use change alters functional gene diversity, composition and abundance in Amazon forest soil microbial communities[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2014,23(12):2988-2999.
[13] 齐师杰,张行南,夏达忠,等.嘉陵江流域土地利用/覆被变化特征及其驱动力分析[J].长江科学院院报,2013,30(1):1-7.
[14] 许炯心,孙季.嘉陵江流域年径流量的变化及其原因[J].山地学报,2007,25(2):153-159.
[15] 仙巍,邵怀勇,周万村.嘉陵江中下游地区土地利用格局变化的动态监测与预测[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(2):61-64.
[16] 刘瑞民,杨志峰,丁晓雯,等.土地利用/覆盖变化对长江上游非点源污染影响研究[J].环境科学,2006,27(12):2407-2414.
[17] 王国梁,刘国彬.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):1-5.
[18] Fierer N, Leff J W, Adams B J, et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012,109(52):21390-21395.
[19] Lauber C L, Ramirez K S, Aanderud Z, et al. Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across land-use types[J]. The ISME Journal, 2013,7(8):1641-1650.
[20] Zak D R, Holmes W E, White D C, et al. Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function:are there any links[J]. Ecology, 2003,84(8):2042-2050.
[21] Yao H, Jiao X, Wu F. Effects of continuous cucumber cropping and alternative rotations under protected cultivation on soil microbial community diversity[J]. Plant and Soil, 2006,284(1/2):195-203.
[22] Frey S D, Knorr M, Parrent J L, et al. Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004,196(1):159-171.
[23] Kennedy A C, Smith K L. Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils[J]. Plant and Soil, 1995,170(1):75-86.
相似文献/References:
[1]杨秉珣,刘泉,王彬.嘉陵江流域不同类型植被多样性与土壤养分和酶活性的关系[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(06):45.
YANG Bingxun,LIU Quan,WANG Bin.Relationships Between Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activity and Plant Diversity of Different Types of in Jialing River Basin, Sichuan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(05):45.
[2]刘荣,高敏华,谢峰.基于Logistic回归模型的土地利用格局模拟分析——以新疆吐鲁番市为例[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(06):74.
LIU Rong,GAO Min-hua,XIE Feng.Simulation and Analysis of Land Use Patterns Based on Logistic Regression Model—A Case Study of Turpan[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2009,16(05):74.
[3]田雨,庄莹,曹义,等.雾灵山低山区土地利用类型对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):41.
TIAN Yu,ZHUANG Ying,CAO Yi,et al.Effects of Land Uses on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Hilly Areas of Wuling Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):41.
[4]刘占仁,王立志.不同土地利用方式对土壤养分及肥力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):72.
LIU Zhan-ren,WANG Li-zhi.Effect of Different Land Use on Soil Nutrient and Soil Fertility[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):72.
[5]杨佳惠,雷国平.黑龙江省煤炭城市鸡西市的土地利用综合效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):176.
YANG Jia-hui,LEI Guo-ping.An Evaluation Study on Comprehensive Benefits of Land Use of Jixi Coal City in Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):176.
[6]汪明霞,朱志锋,刘凡,等.江汉平原不同土地利用方式下农田土壤有机碳组成特点[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):24.
WANG Ming-xia,ZHU Zhi-feng,LIU Fan,et al.Composition Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon under Land Use Change in Jianghan Plain, Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):24.
[7]张瑞,曹华,王云强,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土壤水分空间变异性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):52.
ZHANG Rui,CAO Hua,WANG Yun-qiang,et al.Spatial Variability of Soil Moisture and Its Influence Factors in Watershed of Gully Region on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):52.
[8]肖轶,尹珂.综合国土整治规划环境友好型土地利用影响评价——以重庆市璧山县大路镇为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):243.
XIAO Yi,YIN Ke.Assessment on Comprehensive Land Improvement Planning Environmental Friendly Land Use——A Case Study of Dalu Town, Bishan County of Chongqing Municipality[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):243.
[9]泮雪芹,刘占仁,孟晓云,等.云蒙湖流域不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):6.
PAN Xue-qin,LIU Zhan-ren,MENG Xiao-yun,et al.Analysis on Features of Soil Erosion with Different Land Uses in the Yunmeng Lake Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):6.
[10]胡媛,查轩,黄少燕.重要水源地东圳库区土地利用与水土流失 特征空间关系分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):53.
HU Yuan,ZHA Xuan,HUANG Shao-yan.Study on Spatial Relationship of Land Use and Water-Soil Loss in Dongzhen Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(05):53.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2016-10-01;改回日期:2016-10-18。
基金项目:四川省生态重点实验室开放项目“基于GIS的龙门山北段区域土地利用景观格局演变及其生态效应评价”
作者简介:杨秉珣(1975-),男,四川绵阳人,讲师,研究方向:文地理与土地利用。E-mail:13990198977@163.com
通讯作者:董廷旭(1968-),男,四川彭州人,博士,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:土壤学、土地利用与生态环境等。E-mail:Dong_zx@126.com