[1]侯雨乐,赵景波.清末民国时期临汾地区旱灾变化研究[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):384-388.
　HOU Yule,ZHAO Jingbo.Analysis of Drought Disasters in Linfen Region During the Period from 1840 to 1949[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):384-388.
点击复制

清末民国时期临汾地区旱灾变化研究

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年04期 页码: 384-388 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-08-28
Title:
Analysis of Drought Disasters in Linfen Region During the Period from 1840 to 1949
作者:
侯雨乐1, 赵景波2,3
1. 阿坝师范学院, 四川 汶川 623002;
2. 陕西师范大学 旅游与环境学院, 西安 710062;
3. 陕西师范大学 西北历史环境与经济社会发展研究中心, 西安 710062
Author(s):
HOU Yule1, ZHAO Jingbo2,3
1. Aba Teachers College, Wenchuan, Sichuan 623002, China;
2. College of Tourism and Environment Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China;
3. Center for Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development in Northwest China, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710075, China
关键词:
旱灾; 清末民国; 临汾地区
Keywords:
drought disaster; the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China; Linfen region
分类号:
P426.616
摘要:
为研究临汾地区清末民国时期洪涝灾害变化规律及与气候变化关系等问题，恢复历史时期气候特征，通过对临汾地区历史资料的统计整理，利用数理方法对其旱灾频次、等级序列特点、时间变化以及成因进行了系统研究。结果表明：1840—1949年临汾地区的旱灾共计54次，平均每2年就发生一次。其中Ⅱ级以上旱灾比重高达66.7%，表明这110年间受灾程度严重。清末旱灾频率比民国时高出约19%，尤以Ⅲ级旱灾最为明显。这两个时期都属旱灾多发期，且Ⅳ级旱灾较多。全年或跨年大旱与特大旱灾指示当时年降水量多低于332.7 mm。气候冷干、暖干化以及厄尔尼诺等极端气候事件是影响旱灾频发的气候大背景；当年降水大幅减少是引发（特）大旱灾的主要原因。人地矛盾突出、毁林围湖开荒等对大自然无节制的开发也加剧了旱灾频发、灾情严重程度。
Abstract:
For the study of flood change rule and the relationship with climate change, restoring historical period climate characteristics in Linfen region, through the statistics of the historical data of Linfen City, using the method of mathematical statistics, we analyze frequency of drought disasters, grade sequence characteristics, seasonal and internal variations and the cause during the period from 1840 to 1949. The results show that it happened recorded a total of 54 times, about 2 years per one time, above class Ⅱ proportion was 66.7%, and the drought than half of the total number of drought, it shows that drought damage is serious in the 110 years. The drought frequency of late Qing Dynasty is about 19 % higher than the Republic of China, the level Ⅲ drought is especially significant. They belong to the more drought seasons, and the level Ⅳ drought is relative larger. Most drought season is the whole year drought, spring-to-summer continuous drought, summer drought. Heavy drought and major drought indicate annual precipitation is mostly less than 332.7 mm. The dry cold climate, warm dry climate, El Nino phenomenon and other extreme weather events are background of frequent drought climate. The drastically reduced precipitation is the main reason for the big drought. The prominent contradiction between human and land, land to carry at the forest on the nature of development also contributed to the frequent drought and severe floods.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张丽花,延军平,刘栎杉.山西气候变化特征与旱涝灾害趋势判断[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(5):120-125.
[2] 张春林,赵景波,牛俊杰.山西黄土高原近50年来气候暖干化研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(4):70-74.
[3] 李芬,张建新,郝智文,等.山西降水与ENSO的相关性研究[J],地理学报,2015,70(3):420-430.
[4] 张庆云.1880年以来华北降水及水资源的变化[J].高原气象,1999,18(4):486-495.
[5] 临汾市志编纂委员会.《临汾市志》[M].北京:中华书局,2014.
[6] 王巧霞,史海平,孙悦.临汾市近48年气候变化规律研究析[J].山西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2003,17(4):88-92.
[7] 张德二.中国三千年气象记录总集[M].南京:江苏教育出版社,2004.
[8] 闵祥鹏.中国灾害通史[M].郑州:郑州大学出版社出版,2009.
[9] 张杰.山西自然灾害史年表[M].太原:山西省地方志编撰委员会办公室,1988.
[10] 温克刚.中国气象灾害大典·山西卷[M].北京:气象出版社,2005.
[11] 山西省水利厅编撰.汾河志[M].太原:山西人民出版社,2006.
[12] 山西省史志研究院.山西通志[M].北京:中华书局,1998.
[13] 襄汾县志编纂委员会.襄陵县志[M].北京:方志出版社,1986.
[14] 汾西县地方志编纂委员会.汾西县志[M].北京:方志出版社,1997.
[15] 吕晓虎,赵景波.泾河流域明代干旱灾害与成因研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(12):87-92.
[16] 满志敏.光绪三年北方大旱的气候背景[J].复旦学报:社会科学版,2000(6):28-35.
[17] 董安祥,柳媛普,李晓苹,等.黄河流域1922-1932年特大旱灾的特点及其影响[J].干旱气象,2010,28(3):270-278.
[18] 安维雅,曹新宇,刘希付.临汾方志传记中的灾害体验1600-1900[J].清史研究,2009(1):1-9.
[19] 奚秀梅,赵景波.鄂尔多斯高原地区清代旱灾与气候特征[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(9):1180-1185.
[20] 张慧慧,赵景波,孟万忠.鄂尔多斯高原西南部清代旱灾研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(8):132-137.
[21] 孟万忠,王尚义. ENSO事件与山西气候的关系[J].中国沙漠,2011,33(1):258-264.
[22] 田庆春,周汶.临汾市近60年来气候变化特征分析[J].山西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2015,29(3):98-102.
[23] 刘毅,杨宇.历史时期中国重大自然灾害时空分异特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(3):291-299.
[24] 徐娟,魏明建.华北地区百年气候变化规律分析[J].首都师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006(27),4:79-85.
[25] 程延江.山西气象志[M].太原:山西省地方志编撰委员会办公室,1985.
[26] 侯春燕.山西人口数量变迁及思考[J].沧桑,1998(12):30-34.
[27] 王尚义,张慧芝.明清时期汾河流域生态环境演变与民间控制[J].民俗研究,2006(3):126-138.
[28] 马淑苗,赵景波.厄尔尼诺/拉尼娜事件对山西省南部地区气候的影响[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(4):106-111.
[29] 张慧芝.明清时期汾河流域经济发展与环境变迁研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2005.

相似文献/References:

[1]江丽,薛翠翠,安萍莉.基于作物生育期灾害敏感指数的旱灾粮食减产量研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(01):183.
　JIANG Li,XUE Cui-cui,AN Ping-li.Research on the Amount of Grain Loss by Droughts Based on the Sensitive Index of Crop Growth Period[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,18(04):183.
[2]侯雨乐,赵景波,成爱芳.明代文峪河流域旱灾探析[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(05):188.
　HOU Yule,ZHAO Jingbo,CHENG Aifang.Analysis of Drought Disasters in Wenyu River Basin in the Ming Dynasty[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):188.
[3]赵宗权,周亮广.江淮分水岭地区旱灾风险评估[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(01):370.
　ZHAO Zongquan,ZHOU Liangguang.Assessment on Drought Disaster Risk in Jianghuai Watershed Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):370.
[4]丛士翔,王融融,常文静,等.基于标准化降水指数(SPI)的宁夏中部干旱带旱灾危险性时空演变特征[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(04):223.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.045]
　Cong Shixiang,Wang Rongrong,Chang Wenjing,et al.Characteristics of Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Drought Hazard in the Middle Arid Zone of Ningxia Based on Standardized Precipitation Index(SPI)[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,31(04):223.[doi:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2024.04.045]

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-11-30;改回日期:2016-12-07。
基金项目:阿坝师范学院校级科研项目岷江上游旱涝灾害研究（ASB15-13）；四川省教育厅项目岷江上游旱涝灾害原因及治理探析（16ZB0386）；黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室项目（SKLLQG1428）
通讯作者:赵景波(1953-),男,山东滕州人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事区域环境研究。E-mail:zhaojb@snnu.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01