[1]张泽宇,李占斌,李鹏,等.汉江小流域土壤氮素空间分布特征及影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(04):46-52,58.
　ZHANG Zeyu,LI Zhanbin,LI Peng,et al.Spatial Variability of Soil Nitrogen and the Impact Factors of Land-Use Types in Yujiehe Watershed, Han River[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(04):46-52,58.
点击复制

汉江小流域土壤氮素空间分布特征及影响因素

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 24 期数: 2017年04期 页码: 46-52,58 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-08-28
Title:
Spatial Variability of Soil Nitrogen and the Impact Factors of Land-Use Types in Yujiehe Watershed, Han River
作者:
张泽宇1, 李占斌1,2, 李鹏1, 徐国策1, 张铁钢1
1. 西安理工大学 西北旱区生态水利工程国家重点实验室培育基地, 西安 710048;
2. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
ZHANG Zeyu1, LI Zhanbin1,2, LI Peng1, XU Guoce1, ZHANG Tiegang1
1. Base of Eco-hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
氮素; 土地利用; 氮素组成; 相关性; 汉江流域
Keywords:
soil nitrogen; land use; composition of nitrogen; correlation; Han River
分类号:
S151.9
摘要:
氮素是土壤中不可或缺的营养元素之一，对植物生长具有至关重要的作用。利用网格采样法（30 m×30 m）和典型样地取样法在汉江余姐河小流域进行土样采集，每个样点分为3层A1（0—20 cm），A2（20—40 cm），A3（40—60 cm），分别测定其土壤全氮、土壤铵态氮和土壤硝态氮含量。研究了土壤氮素的空间异质性、氮素的组成比例以及不同土地利用类型下土壤全氮、铵态氮和硝态氮与环境因子间的相关关系，并且分析了不同形态氮素间的相互关系。结果表明：土壤氮素的空间变异性为土壤硝态氮 > 土壤铵态氮 > 土壤全氮；土壤全氮与硝态氮在A1土层为强空间相关性，在A2，A3层为中等程度的空间相关性，土壤铵态氮在各土层均表现为中等空间相关性；农地、林地、草地对全氮储量的贡献依次增大；相较于林地草地，农地对铵态氮储量的贡献最大；而草地对硝态氮储量的贡献在三种土地利用中最大；不同土地利用类型中，农地的氮素空间分布主要与土壤粒径具有相关性，而与地形因子（坡度、坡向等）相关性较小；林地的氮素空间分布主要与地形因子相关性较高，草地介于两者之间；在流域内增加草地林地面积，在流域出口处布设林草地等措施可以减少流域土壤氮素的流失。
Abstract:
Nitrogen is an indispensable nutrient element in soil, and plays a vital role in the growth of plants. Grid sampling (30 m×30 m) and typical spot sampling were carried out in the study area, and soil samples were collected in three soil layers (0—20 cm， 20—40 cm， 40—60 cm). Total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (AN) and nitrate nitrogen content (NN) were determined. With classical analyses, geostatistical analyses, kriging interpolation, Pearson correlation analysis and Spearman correlation analysis, spatial variability of TN, AN, NN of land-use types and their correlations with environmental factors were studied. In addition, the relationships between different fractions of nitrogen were investigated. The results showed that soil nitrogen contents of the study area were at the low level; the TN, AN, NN contents decreased as soil depth increased; the spatial variability coefficient of NN was greater than AN, and both of them were larger than TN; the spatial dependence of TN and NN appeared to be high level in A1 layer and medium level in A2, A3 layers, and AN appeared moderate spatial dependence, which meant that the influence of human factors such as tillage on AN was greater than TN and NN, and it was the natural factor such as intrinsic properties of the soil and topography that controlled the distribution of TN and NN in A1 layer. The TN, AN, NN storage of the study watershed in 0-60 cm layer were 17.116 t, 183.082 kg, 62.528 kg, repectively; and the contribution ratio to TN decreased in the order: grassland > forestland > cropland; the contribution ratio of cropland to AN was larger than both grassland and forestland; grassland proved to have the biggest contribution ratio to NN among the three land-use types. The mean of AN/TN decreased as soil depth increased in cropland, but rose in grassland, and decreased in the sequence: A3 > A1 > A2; and the mean of NN/TN rose as soil depth increased in all the three land-use types. Pearson correlation analysis showed that AN/TN was highly significant positive correlated with NN/TN at a depth of 0—60 cm(r=0.440，p < 0.01); the correlations between different fractions of nitrogen were diverse in different layers and land-use types; Spearman correlation analysis indicated that nitrogen contents of cropland were mainly correlated with the soil particle size distribution, but was insignificantly correlated with topographic factors, nitrogen content of forestland had correlation with terrain factors. Therefore, increasing areas of forestland and grassland within the basin and the outlet can reduce the loss of soil nitrogen from catchment.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邢顺林,刘毅,李世清.青藏高原与黄土高原土壤氮素矿化过程对温度变化的响应[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2011,39(1):151-158.
[2] 蔡贵信,朱兆良.水稻生长对土壤氮素矿化的影响[J].土壤学报,1983,20(3):272-278.
[3] 李世清,李生秀,邵明安,等.半干旱农田生态系统长期施肥对土壤有机氮组分和微生物体氮的影响[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(6):859-864.
[4] 杨小林,李义玲,朱波,等.紫色土小流域不同土地利用类型的土壤氮素时空分异特征[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(10):2807-2813.
[5] 张伟,刘淑娟,叶莹莹,等.典型喀斯特林地土壤养分空间变异的影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(1):93-101.
[6] 刘志鹏.黄土高原地区土壤养分的空间分布及其影响因素[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2013.
[7] 徐国策,李占斌,李鹏,等.丹江中游典型小流域土壤总氮的空间分布[J].地理学报,2013,67(11):1547-1555.
[8] 佘冬立,邵明安,俞双恩.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带小流域土壤矿质氮空间变异性[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(6):89-96.
[9] Leip A, Britz W, Weiss F, et al. Farm, land, and soil nitrogen budgets for agriculture in Europe calculated with CAPRI[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2011,159(11):3243-3253.
[10] Qi Y C, Dong Y S, Jin Z, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and respiration in the desertified grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Pedosphere, 2010,20(5):655-665.
[11] Cao C, Jiang S, Ying Z, et al. Spatial variability of soil nutrients and microbiological properties after the establishment of leguminous shrub Caragana microphylla Lam. plantation on sand dune in the Horqin Sandy Land of Northeast China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011,37(10):1467-1475.
[12] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].南京:河海大学出版社,2000.
[13] Xu W, Chen X, Luo G, et al. Soil organic carbon storage and its spatial distribution characteristic in the Sangong river watershed of arid region[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2009,24(10):1740-1747.
[14] Nielsen D R, Bouma J. Soil spatial variability[C]//Proceedings of a Workshop of the ISSS and the SSSA, Las Vegas(USA),30 Nov-1 Dec 1984. Pudoc., 1985.
[15] 徐少君,曾波,苏晓磊,等.基于RS/GIS的重庆缙云山自然保护区植被及碳储量密度空间分布研究[J].生态学报,2012,32(7):2174-2184.
[16] 杨艳丽,史学正,于东升,等.区域尺度土壤养分空间变异及其影响因素研究[J].地理科学,2008,28(6):788-792.
[17] Gao X J, Hu X F, Wang S P, et al. Nitrogen losses from flooded rice field[J]. Pedosphere, 2002,12(2):151-156.
[18] Zhao J, Liu H, Sui Y, et al. Analysis for spatial heterogeneity of organic matter content and available nutrients in blacksoil crop area with different scales[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,20(1):41-44.
[19] 丘华昌,陈家宙.旱地土壤的供氮潜力[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1995,1(2):33-39.
[20] 巨晓棠,刘学军,张福锁.不同氮肥施用后土壤各氮库的动态研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2004,12(1):92-94.
[21] 鞠敏睿.小兴安岭森林土壤氮形态研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2010.
[22] 张玉树.农业管理方式对亚热带土壤氮转化过程的影响[D].南京:南京师范大学,2015.
[23] 赵彤,蒋跃利,闫浩,等.土壤氨化过程中微生物作用研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报,2014,20(2):315-321.
[24] 李兆富,杨桂山,李恒鹏.西苕溪流域土地利用对氮素输出影响研究[J].环境科学,2006,27(3):498-502.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪明霞,朱志锋,刘凡,等.江汉平原不同土地利用方式下农田土壤有机碳组成特点[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):24.
　WANG Ming-xia,ZHU Zhi-feng,LIU Fan,et al.Composition Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon under Land Use Change in Jianghan Plain, Hubei Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):24.
[2]田雨,庄莹,曹义,等.雾灵山低山区土地利用类型对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):41.
　TIAN Yu,ZHUANG Ying,CAO Yi,et al.Effects of Land Uses on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Hilly Areas of Wuling Mountain[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):41.
[3]刘占仁,王立志.不同土地利用方式对土壤养分及肥力的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):72.
　LIU Zhan-ren,WANG Li-zhi.Effect of Different Land Use on Soil Nutrient and Soil Fertility[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):72.
[4]杨佳惠,雷国平.黑龙江省煤炭城市鸡西市的土地利用综合效益评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):176.
　YANG Jia-hui,LEI Guo-ping.An Evaluation Study on Comprehensive Benefits of Land Use of Jixi Coal City in Heilongjiang Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):176.
[5]张瑞,曹华,王云强,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土壤水分空间变异性及其影响因素[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):52.
　ZHANG Rui,CAO Hua,WANG Yun-qiang,et al.Spatial Variability of Soil Moisture and Its Influence Factors in Watershed of Gully Region on the Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):52.
[6]肖轶,尹珂.综合国土整治规划环境友好型土地利用影响评价——以重庆市璧山县大路镇为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):243.
　XIAO Yi,YIN Ke.Assessment on Comprehensive Land Improvement Planning Environmental Friendly Land Use——A Case Study of Dalu Town, Bishan County of Chongqing Municipality[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):243.
[7]泮雪芹,刘占仁,孟晓云,等.云蒙湖流域不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):6.
　PAN Xue-qin,LIU Zhan-ren,MENG Xiao-yun,et al.Analysis on Features of Soil Erosion with Different Land Uses in the Yunmeng Lake Watershed[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):6.
[8]蔡广鹏,韩会庆,张凤太,等.喀斯特地区贵州省绥阳县土地利用/覆被变化对陆地植被碳储量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):122.
　CAI Guang-peng,HAN Hui-qing,ZHANG Feng-tai,et al.Impacts of Land Use Change on the Vegetation Carbon Storage in Suiyang, Guizhou Province in the Karst area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):122.
[9]陈鹏,许燕红.厦门市集美区土地利用变化的时空特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):94.
　CHEN Peng,XU Yan-hong.Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of the Land Use Change of Jimei District in Xiamen City[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):94.
[10]李鹏杰,何政伟,李璇琼.基于RS和GIS的土地利用/覆被动态变化监测——以九龙县为例[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):38.
　LI Peng-jie,HE Zheng-wei,LI Xuan-qiong.Dynamic Monitoring on Land Utilization/Land Coverage in Kowloon County Based on RS and GIS[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):38.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2016-12-19;改回日期:2017-01-12。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金（41401316）；陕西省教育厅重点实验室科研计划项目（15JS065）；丹汉江水源区清洁小流域建设关键技术（2015slkj-06）
通讯作者:李占斌(1962-),男,河南镇平人,博士,博士生导师,主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持方面的研究。E-mail:zhanbinli@126.com

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01