[1]方凯凯,张中恺,王志康,等.渭北果园不同管理措施的土壤水分灰色关联度[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(04):28-32.
　FANG Kaikai,ZHANG Zhongkai,WANG Zhikang,et al.Grey Relational Analysis of Soil Moisture Under Different Management Measures in Orchards of Weibei[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,23(04):28-32.
点击复制

渭北果园不同管理措施的土壤水分灰色关联度

《水土保持研究》[ISSN:1005-3409/CN:61-1272/P] 卷: 23 期数: 2016年04期 页码: 28-32 栏目: 出版日期: 2016-08-28
Title:
Grey Relational Analysis of Soil Moisture Under Different Management Measures in Orchards of Weibei
作者:
方凯凯1, 张中恺1, 王志康1, 李会科1,2
1. 西北农林科技大学 资源环境学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100;
2. 农业部西北植物与肥料及农业环境重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100
Author(s):
FANG Kaikai1, ZHANG Zhongkai1, WANG Zhikang1, LI Huike1,2
1. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
关键词:
苹果园; 土壤水分; 灰关联分析; 土地利用类型; 渭北
Keywords:
apple orchard; soil moisture content; grey relational analysis; land use type; weibei
分类号:
S152.7
摘要:
为了解果园土壤水分的剖面和季节变化特征，运用灰色关联分析法，分析了渭北黄土高原苹果园在3种不同土地利用类型下土壤水分的垂直变化和月动态。结果表明：不同土地利用类型的土壤水分垂直变化规律不尽相同，深层（120—160 cm）与底层（160—200 cm）土壤水分变化态势的相似程度均较高，即土壤水分的变化发展态势较一致，但相似程度清耕 > 草地 > 秸秆，表层（0—40 cm）、浅层（40—80 cm）与底层的灰色关联度最小，土壤水分变化态势差异最大。由各月土壤水分灰色关联度可知，清耕6—7月份与5月份的土壤水分灰色关联度处于中间水平，土壤水分变化态势的相似程度一般，8月份的差异明显；草地6—8月份的灰色关联度较大，土壤水分灰色关联度有波动，变化趋势为大—小—大—小—小—大；而秸秆地6—7月份与5月份的土壤水分灰色关联度相对较大，其他各月之间水分变化态势相似度较小。灰色关联分析法可以较好地反映不同土地利用类型土壤水分变化趋势的相异或相似性。
Abstract:
In order to investigate soil moisture profile and seasonal variation characteristics, based on the method of grey correlation analysis, we analyzed the vertical and monthly dynamic change of soil moisture content under 3 land use types of apple orchard in Weibei in the Loess Plateau. The results showed that the vertical change of soil moisture content under different land use types were quite different. In deep layer (120—160 cm) and bottom layer(160—200 cm), the variation of soil moisture was highly accordant, and the change of soil moisture development trend was consistent with an order of clear tillage > grassland > straw mulch land. Grey relational grade of the all land uses between top layer (0—40 cm) and shallow layer (40—80 cm) was less, which meant that soil moisture varied remarkably. In clear tillage, grey correlation degrees of soil moisture between June to July and May were at the middle level, however, remarkable difference was found in August. In grassland, grey correlation degree of soil moisture was high during the period from June to August, and the fluctuation of soil moisture in growth season was great with the change trend of high—low—high—low—low—high. Grey correlation degrees of soil moisture between June to July and May were at the high level in straw mulch land, however, the variation trend of soil moisture in other months was low. The method of grey correlation analysis can be used to ideally identify the dissimilarity or similarity of soil moisture content change under different land use types.

参考文献/References:

[1] 何其华,何永华,包维楷.干旱半干旱区山地土壤水分动态变化[J].山地学报,2003,21(2):149-156.
[2] 王浩,杨贵羽,贾仰文,等.土壤水资源的内涵及评价指标体系[J].水利学报,2006,37(4):389-394.
[3] 张北赢.黄土丘陵区小流域不同土地利用方式土壤水分动态规律研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2008.
[4] 赵忠,李剑,袁志发,等.黄土沟坡刺槐林地土壤水分垂直变化的数学模型[J].林业科学,2009,45(10):9-13.
[5] 张建军,李慧敏,徐佳佳.黄土高原水土保持林对土壤水分的影响[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):71-81.
[6] Wang Fei, Wang Xuan, Zhao Ying, et al. Correlation analysis of NDVI dynamics and hydro-meteorological variables in growth period for four land use types of a water scarce area[J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2014,7(3):187-196.
[7] Bu H, Meng W, Zhang Y, et al. Relationships between land use patterns and water quality in the Taizi River basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014,41:187-197.
[8] Wang G, Xu Z, Zhang S. The influence of land use patterns on water quality at multiple spatial scales in a river system[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2014,28(20):5259-5272.
[9] Ye Y, He X, Chen W, et al. Seasonal water quality upstream of Dahuofang Reservoir, China-the effects of land use type at various spatial scales[J]. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water, 2014,42(10):1423-1432.
[10] 王昕,贾志宽,韩清芳,等.半干旱区秸秆覆盖量对土壤水分保蓄及作物水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(4):196-202.
[11] 李会科,张广军,赵政阳,等.生草对黄土高原旱地苹果园土壤性状的影响[J].草业学报,2007,16(2):32-39.
[12] 梅立新,李会科.渭北旱地苹果园生草小气候效应研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(1):187-192.
[13] 张先来,李会科,张广军,等.种植不同牧草对渭北苹果园土壤水分影响的初步分析[J].西北林学院学报,2005,20(3):56-59.
[14] 关玉春,李忠元.灰色关联分析及其应用[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,1995,28(3):105-110.
[15] 敖长林,姚晓敏,郝庆升.灰色关联分析方法在农业总产值构成分析中的应用[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,1998,14(2):100-102.
[16] 马建军,李青丰,张树礼.灰色关联分析在黑岱沟露天煤矿土壤质量评价中的应用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(7):125-129.
[17] 夏军. Excel2000在灰色关联分析中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2004,21(2):117-121.
[18] 邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1987.
[19] James N K, Hu Yanxing. Application of feature-weighted Support Vector regression using grey correlation degree to stock price forecasting[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2013,22(1):143-152.
[20] 李超超.溃坝水流数值模拟与灰关联度分析[D].济南:山东大学,2013.
[21] 黄博.基于灰关联的BPM软件可信评估工具的研究与实现[D].西安:西北大学,2010.
[22] 张北赢,徐学选,刘文兆,等.黄土丘陵区不同土地利用的土壤水分灰色关联度[J].生态学报,2008,28(1):361-366.
[23] 胡广录,赵文智,武俊霞.绿洲罐区小麦水分生产率及其影响因素的灰关联分析[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(2):369-375.
[24] 陈林,王磊,张庆霞,等.风沙区不同土地利用类型的土壤水分灰色关联分析[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(6):840-845.

相似文献/References:

[1]苏嫄,焦菊英,马祥华.黄土丘陵沟壑区主要群落地上生物量季节变化及其与土壤水分的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(06):7.
　SU Yuan,JIAO Ju-ying,MA Xiang-hua.Seasonal Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Main Plant Communities and Its Relationship with Soil Moisture in the Hill-gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):7.
[2]王巧利,贾燕锋,王宁,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区自然恢复坡面植物根系的分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):16.
　WANG Qiao-li,JIA Yan-feng,WANG Ning,et al.Distribution of Root on Vegetation Recovery Slope in the Hilly and Gully Loess Plateau[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):16.
[3]姚志宏,杨勤科,王粉萍,等.黄土丘陵区影响土壤水分的非气候因子之定量标征[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):23.
　YAO Zhi-hong,YANG Qing-ke,WANG Feng-ping,et al.Quantitative Marking of Non-climatic Factors Influencing Soil Moisture in Loess Hilly Area[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):23.
[4]许浩,蒋齐,潘占兵,等.黄土丘陵区降雨、土壤水分和苗木成活率的关系[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(05):202.
　XU Hao,JIANG Qi,PAN Zhan-bing,et al.Relationship of Rainfall, Soil Moisture and Seedling Survival Rate in Loess Hilly Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):202.
[5]奚同行,左长清,尹忠东,等.红壤坡地土壤水分亏缺特性分析[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(04):30.
　XI Tong-hang,ZUO Chang-qing,YIN Zhong-dong,et al.Analysis on Characteristic of Soil Water Deficit on Red Soil Slope Land[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):30.
[6]邝高明,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区微地形对土壤水分及生物量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(03):74.
　KUANG Gao-ming,ZHU Qing-ke,LIU Zhong-qi,et al.Effect of Microrelief on the Soil Water and Vegetation Arrangement in Loess Hilly and Gully Region[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):74.
[7]鲁瑞洁,唐清亮,桑艳礼,等.青海湖克土沙区不同类型沙丘土壤水分的动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):111.
　LU Rui-jie,TANG Qing-liang,SANG Yan-li,et al.Dynamic Changes of Soil Moisture in Different Dunes of Ketu Sand Land in Qinghai Lake Basin[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):111.
[8]宋淑亚,刘文兆,王俊,等.覆盖方式对玉米农田土壤水分、作物产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(02):210.
　SONG Shu-ya,LIU Wen-zhao,WANG Jun,et al.Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Grain Yield and Water Use Efficiency in a Corn Field[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):210.
[9]展秀丽,严平,王宁,等.青海湖防沙工程措施区土壤水分及入渗特征初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(01):33.
　ZHAN Xiu-li,YAN Ping,WANG Ning,et al.Preliminary Study on Soil Water and Permeability Characteristics of Desertification Combating Areas Exerted by Engineering Measures around Qinghai Lake[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2012,19(04):33.
[10]邵明安,陈志雄.SPAC中的水分运动[J].水土保持研究,1991,(01):3.
　Shao Mingan,Chen Zhixiong.WATER MOVEMENT IN SPAC[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,(04):3.

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2015-09-10;改回日期:2015-09-17。
基金项目:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划（2014BAD16B06）；国家现代农业产业技术体系项目（CARS-28）；国家自然科学基金（3157062）
作者简介:方凯凯(1991-),男,浙江衢州人,硕士,研究方向为农业生态环境。E-mail:fangkaikai@nwsuaf.edu.cn
通讯作者:李会科(1965-),男,陕西武功人,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事农果复合型生态农业方面的研究。E-mail:lihuike@nwsuaf.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01